logo
‘Budget Bjelke-Petersen': Organiser lashes lord mayor as court blocks Story Bridge protest

‘Budget Bjelke-Petersen': Organiser lashes lord mayor as court blocks Story Bridge protest

The Age29-05-2025
A protest organiser has labelled Brisbane's lord mayor 'budget Bjelke-Petersen' after a protest that would have shut down all six traffic lanes on the Story Bridge during peak hour was blocked by a court ruling.
Protesters had lodged a notice of intention of the protest on May 20, making it an authorised action under the Peaceful Assembly Act, for a one-hour walk across the bridge on Friday from 8am to draw attention to their calls for Brisbane City Council to allocate one car lane to pedestrian, cyclist and scooter traffic while the footpaths were repaired.
The Story Bridge footpaths – used by about 4000 walkers, bike and scooter riders daily – were closed on March 5, with reports later revealing parts of the bridge were an 'extreme risk' to the public, while council has called for cash from the state and federal governments to restore it.
Mediation efforts last week failed, and police took the matter to Brisbane Magistrates Court, with the support of the council.
Prosecutor Acting Senior Sergeant Donna Kay said closing the bridge during peak hour would cause 'mass disruption'.
In making his ruling, magistrate Ross Mack pointed to disruptions for thousands of commuters if the protest went ahead.
Kathryn Good, who lodged notice of the protest and was self-represented, told the court she understood the protest would cause disruption, but pointed to numerous other times the Story Bridge was shut, including for seven hours this Sunday for the Brisbane Marathon.
Mack asked a Brisbane City Council solicitor when the footpaths would be reopened, and he replied: 'I don't have those instructions'.
A business case for the full bridge restoration is not due until 2027, but the council plans to work on a temporary footpath replacement first.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day
WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

WA election a cautionary tale of the cost of pinching pennies on polling day

Less than 0.04 per cent of the WA government's budget could have been the difference between the well-run elections voters expect, and the array of problems experienced in March. That's the shocking conclusion of a wide-ranging inquiry called to try and understand what went so wrong at the state poll. Some voters were left queuing for hours, or confused about how to cast their ballots, or in some cases completely unable to vote. Former governor Malcolm McCusker concluded many issues could be traced back to a lack of staff. On the surface, that was a result of Election Operations Director, Shani Wood, requesting 30 per cent fewer staff than had originally been forecast. "It was the budget. It was always the budget. Everything was getting cut," she told the inquiry. Everything was being cut because of a decision of the government's powerful Expenditure Review Committee (ERC), chaired by Treasurer Rita Saffioti, which signs off on government spending. The WA Electoral Commission had gone to the ERC, warning if it did not get an extra $16 million there would be problems. It got only $4 million. The WAEC was told, however, that "if these increased costs simply can't be absorbed … then … come back to the ERC for supplementary funding after the election". But that message did not seem to make it to Wood, who stuck to the budget she was given. "The premier, the treasurer and those other senior ministers had considered their request and had refused to support them in the way that they had asked," Opposition Electoral Affairs spokesperson Shane Love said, suggesting the Commission may have been reluctant to ask again. Those issues were exacerbated, McCusker found, by Wood not telling Commissioner Robert Kennedy about the shortfall. "Had she told him that, the Commissioner deposed … that he probably would have gone back to Treasury 'to convince ERC to give us the money'," the report reads. "In his evidence he said 'I distinctly recall saying to her (i.e. Shani Wood) cut numbers elsewhere. Don't cut into the polling staff.'" In her evidence, Wood accepted she had never passed that information along to the commissioner. "She believed that [three other staff], all with more election experience than her, accepted that the reduced numbers of [temporary election workers] would be sufficient for election day," the report found. "Although she does not say that she told them how much of a reduction in numbers she was making." The hole the commission was digging for itself was made even deeper by the original estimations for both staff and ballot paper allocations being based on 2021 data — an election held during COVID — which assumed half of all in-person votes would be cast early. In November — four months before the election — a senior WAEC official questioned the accuracy of that number. They said even if it was true, election day staff would likely still be overwhelmed and suggested adding more staff. "For the sake of a vest and a badge it may alleviate risk around fatigue management, media scrutiny regarding queues and show [returning officers] we are listening to their concerns," they wrote. In the end, only 31 per cent of in-person votes were cast early — meaning demand on election day was much higher than expected. That appeared to be one of many disagreements between the commission's upper-most staff and those closer to the ground, which resulted in a "soured relationship". "I think there was a couple of, shall we say, dominant personalities there … both of them felt that they were in the right and they should be running things," Commissioner Kennedy reflected. That meant head office wasn't fully aware of issues experienced on the day, including ballot paper shortages. And, unsurprisingly, staff shortages meant those working booths struggled to respond to that increased demand. "[Presiding Officers] and experienced election staff had to respond to other front line issues, such as having to arrange for an ambulance if someone fainted in long queues," the report concluded. That recruitment had been outsourced — apparently in a bid to save the WAEC's reputation after the previous election — was not to blame for every issue, but did add a complicating factor, the report concluded. It noted staff were not vetted, and that a phone number given to polling place officials to replace staff who did not show up was the same one given to more than 7,000 staff across the sate and often rang out. "If people don't turn up for the election, or the wrong people turn up, it is a fundamental impact on the … democratic architecture either of the state or federally," former Australian Electoral commissioner Tom Rogers told the inquiry. "So you have to be responsible for your own workforce … and you need to minimise somebody else doing that for you, because they just don't have the same level of accountability and responsibility that we do." Indeed, even Commissioner Kennedy — who gave the final sign off to outsource — agreed "in hindsight" it would have been better for the WAEC to recruit its own staff. The government has pledged in-principle support to 23 of the report's 24 recommendations, including establishing an oversight committee and overhauling recruitment. But the one marked as "noted" is potentially the most significant. It's leaving it up to the WAEC and Treasury to work out a future funding model and report back. Given the whole array of issues at the election almost all stem back to funding, the pressure to get that arrangement right is a big one. And it's not just about dollars and cents. Electoral Affairs Minister David Michael said he was "surprised that the funding message from Treasury did not filter through the organisation". Understanding what role government, and the WAEC, played in that miscommunication will be key to avoiding a repeat of these issues. Issues which seemingly could have been avoided for the low, low price of $12 million.

Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police
Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police

Sydney Morning Herald

time6 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police

The Story Bridge could be shut for a march mirroring the protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge last weekend – but Premier David Crisafulli has criticised the plan. Organisers Justice for Palestine Magan-djin has sought permission to rally between Raymond Park in Kangaroo Point and Centenary Park in Fortitude Valley from 1pm on Sunday, August 24, as part of a 'nationwide march for Palestine'. They said in a statement on Friday that the protest was being organised to reflect the 'urgency of the situation in Gaza'. 'This is the same bridge our lord mayor refused to light in the colours of the Palestinian flag, denying solidarity to a grieving community.' The new events being planned follow Sunday's march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by what police estimate was 90,000, and organisers put at 200,000 to 300,000 people. Asked whether his government would seek to intervene, as the former Labor government did to halt a pandemic-era protest over the treatment of refugees, Premier David Crisafulli said: 'Police will assess the application independently based on community safety but shutting down a city is no way to endear Queenslanders to your cause.' Queensland Police, which recently blocked an unrelated attempt to stage a peak-hour bridge protest over the closure of its pedestrian access, are now assessing the request. 'The QPS recognises that every person has the right to peacefully assemble under Human Rights Act and Peaceful Assembly Act,' a spokesperson said.

Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police
Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police

The Age

time6 days ago

  • The Age

Premier criticises plans for Story Bridge Palestine march, but leaves call to police

The Story Bridge could be shut for a march mirroring the protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge last weekend – but Premier David Crisafulli has criticised the plan. Organisers Justice for Palestine Magan-djin has sought permission to rally between Raymond Park in Kangaroo Point and Centenary Park in Fortitude Valley from 1pm on Sunday, August 24, as part of a 'nationwide march for Palestine'. They said in a statement on Friday that the protest was being organised to reflect the 'urgency of the situation in Gaza'. 'This is the same bridge our lord mayor refused to light in the colours of the Palestinian flag, denying solidarity to a grieving community.' The new events being planned follow Sunday's march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by what police estimate was 90,000, and organisers put at 200,000 to 300,000 people. Asked whether his government would seek to intervene, as the former Labor government did to halt a pandemic-era protest over the treatment of refugees, Premier David Crisafulli said: 'Police will assess the application independently based on community safety but shutting down a city is no way to endear Queenslanders to your cause.' Queensland Police, which recently blocked an unrelated attempt to stage a peak-hour bridge protest over the closure of its pedestrian access, are now assessing the request. 'The QPS recognises that every person has the right to peacefully assemble under Human Rights Act and Peaceful Assembly Act,' a spokesperson said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store