logo
Paris court concludes hearing on Sulu award dispute, decision expected Dec 9

Paris court concludes hearing on Sulu award dispute, decision expected Dec 9

KUALA LUMPUR: The Paris Court of Appeal has reserved its decision until Dec 9 on Malaysia's bid to annul the US$14.9 billion (RM70 billion) final award in the arbitration case filed by individuals claiming to be heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate.
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, in a statement, said the court concluded its hearing on the merits for the annulment of the final award in the case.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whistleblowers must report to agencies first, not media
Whistleblowers must report to agencies first, not media

The Sun

time16 hours ago

  • The Sun

Whistleblowers must report to agencies first, not media

KUALA LUMPUR: Whistleblowers seeking protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) must first report to legitimate enforcement agencies instead of going directly to the media, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. She explained that this procedure ensures the authenticity of the information and prevents the risk of exposing state secrets. 'Many people ask why whistleblowers who go to the media can also be seen as among those being accused, but in reality, the procedure does not allow you to go directly to the media,' she said during a Dewan Rakyat session. Azalina stressed that whistleblowers must approach the relevant agency first to verify the information, particularly concerning national security. 'We want to determine that the state secrets are not at the level mentioned by the whistleblowers,' she added. She also warned against 'trial by media,' where premature judgments could undermine legal fairness. 'If a person goes to the media, the public may already decide on the offence, which is unfair to our legal process,' she said. The government is currently amending Act 711, with the first phase involving the formation of a Whistleblower Protection Committee to oversee disclosures and complaints. The second phase will strengthen protections, including confidentiality safeguards under Section 6. Azalina assured that whistleblowers' identities remain protected under Section 8, and an independent ombudsman system will be introduced to handle cases involving law enforcement agencies. She also noted that whistleblowers involved in misconduct may still receive protection under the Witness Protection Programme. When asked about the Sabah mining scandal case, Azalina declined to comment in detail due to ongoing legal proceedings but reiterated that whistleblowers must follow proper legal channels for protection. – Bernama

Azalina: Whistleblowers only get legal protection if they go to authorities, not the media
Azalina: Whistleblowers only get legal protection if they go to authorities, not the media

Malay Mail

time17 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Azalina: Whistleblowers only get legal protection if they go to authorities, not the media

KUALA LUMPUR, July 21 — Whistleblowers seeking protection under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) cannot make direct disclosures to the media; instead, they must first refer to legitimate enforcement agencies. According to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, the move was important to ensure the information provided is authentic and to avoid the risk of disclosing state secrets. 'Many people ask why whistleblowers who go to the media can also be seen as among those being accused, but in reality, the procedure does not allow you to go directly to the media. 'Whistleblowers must go to the responsible agency because the agency wants to assess the validity of the information... we want to determine that the state secrets are not at the level mentioned by the whistleblowers, especially on national security issues,' she said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat today. She was answering a supplementary question from Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong (BN-Ayer Hitam) regarding the government's decision to amend the definition of eligible whistleblowers in Act 711 so as not to exclude whistleblowers from protection under the Act. Azalina emphasised that fair legal procedures (due process) must be respected and the media should not be used as a place to pass premature judgement on any party. 'If a person, for example, goes to the media, there will be a premise of trial by media, meaning the media has already made a decision, the public has already made a decision about the offence, and this is also unfair to the legal process system in our country,' she said. Responding to Wee's original question about the current status of the Act's amendment, she said the government is currently in the first phase of the amendment, which involves the establishment of a Whistleblower Protection Committee responsible for overseeing, collecting statistics, and data related to disclosures and complaints made under Act 711. She said the amendments to be made for the second reading tomorrow will also involve proposals to improve Section 6 to ensure protection remains valid even if the disclosure touches on confidentiality aspects under other laws. Addressing concerns about the safety of whistleblowers in high-profile cases, Azalina said that in terms of information confidentiality, Section 8 of Act 711 will continue to apply automatically to all individuals recognised as whistleblowers. The identity and information related to the whistleblower are protected and cannot be disclosed without permission. The government also established an independent system like an ombudsman... because sometimes the problem with whistleblowers is when they provide information against law enforcement agencies. 'That is why when we look at the second phase, we really need an independent system called an ombudsman so that the guarantee is established and maintained,' she said. Azalina said that in certain cases, whistleblowers who are also involved in misconduct can still be given protection under the Witness Protection Programme, based on the assessment of law enforcement agencies. Responding to a supplementary question from Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN-Kota Bharu) regarding the whistleblower case in the Sabah mining scandal, Azalina said she would answer in general, as the case is ongoing and she could not comment in detail as it can be seen as sub judice. However, she added that all whistleblowers must go through legal channels to be protected by law and hoped that the amendments to be presented would further strengthen the existing protection system. — Bernama

Azalina: Whistleblowers should follow procedure, not go straight to the media
Azalina: Whistleblowers should follow procedure, not go straight to the media

New Straits Times

time17 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Azalina: Whistleblowers should follow procedure, not go straight to the media

KUALA LUMPUR: Whistleblowers should report through official channels, not the media, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said warned, saying bypassing procedures risks national security and prosecution. "I want to address something here, many people ask why whistleblowers are prosecuted when they go to the media. "There are procedures in place where whistleblowers should not go directly to the media. The information must first be brought to the responsible agency so that its authenticity can be verified. "One of the reasons for this is to prevent abuse of the system. Secondly, we want to ensure that state secrets are not disclosed by whistleblowers, especially in matters of national security. "It is also to ensure that due legal process is followed. If information is disclosed to the media, it creates a premise of 'trial by media', where the public forms judgments on guilt or wrongdoing and this is unfair to the country's legal system," she said in reply to Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong (BN-Ayer Hitam) during the oral question-and-answer session in Dewan Rakyat. Wee had asked about the government's decision to amend the definition of eligible whistleblowers under the law, so that restrictive conditions or criteria cannot be used as grounds to exclude them from protection under the Act. Azalina said the government aims to encourage whistleblowers to come forward to the appropriate agencies for assessment. "Wrongdoing is wrongdoing, but there are times when whistleblowers must be given protection. The second premise is to place them under the witness protection programme. "That is the framework we are working towards in handling whistleblower cases in this country," she said. She added that it is the government's responsibility to ensure whistleblower safety is protected under the law. "To uphold this initiative, in terms of confidentiality, Section 8 of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711) will continue to apply automatically to all individuals recognised as whistleblowers under the Act. "The identity and information relating to whistleblowers are protected and cannot be disclosed without consent, except for investigation or legal proceedings, as clearly stated in the Act," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store