The Universe's Most Powerful Cosmic Rays May Finally Be Explained
Somewhere in our galaxy are engines capable of driving atomic fragments to velocities that come within a whisker of lightspeed.
The explosive deaths of stars seems like a natural place to search for sources of these highly energetic cosmic bullets, yet when it comes to the most powerful particles, researchers have had their doubts.
Numerical simulations by a small international team of physicists may yet save the supernova theory of cosmic ray emissions at the highest of energies, suggesting there is a brief period where a collapsing star could still become the Universe's most extreme accelerator.
For more than a century, scientists have scanned the skies for phenomena that may be responsible for the relatively constant showers of atomic nuclei and occasional electrons that pepper our planet.
Simply following their trajectory would be like picking up a bottle on the beach and looking to the horizon for its home. The charges of most cosmic rays put them at the mercy of a turbulent ocean of magnetic fields across the galaxy and beyond, leaving researchers to search for other clues.
A mere few thousand light years away in our galactic backyard, the historic supernova known as Tycho's star has been studied for signs of physics capable of accelerating charged particles.
In 1572, astronomers marveled at the star's sudden brightening, now understood to be the final hoorah of a white dwarf ending its life in a thermonuclear catastrophe. As its core collapsed under its own weight, the burst of heat and radiation slammed into the shell of surrounding gases, generating immense magnetic fields.
In 2023 researchers published their analysis on those fields, finding their ability to generate cosmic rays was "significantly smaller" than those expected of existing models.
While this doesn't rule out collapsing stars as potential particle accelerators, it does raise questions on just how much power they can provide.
Every now and then, Earth is struck by some true monsters – particles that are up to a thousand times more powerful than anything our own technology has been capable of generating. These peta-electronvolt (PeV) energies are the work of hypothetical cosmic engines dubbed PeVatrons.
According to astrophysicists Robert Brose from the University of Potsdam in Germany, Iurii Sushch from the Spanish Centre for Energy, Environmental and Technological Research, and Jonathan Mackey from the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, dying stars just might be the mysterious PeVatrons scientists have been searching for.
For it to work, the dying star first needs to cough up enough material to form a dense shell around itself. Then, at the moment of supernova the rapidly expanding shock wave smashes into this dense environment, generating the necessary magnetic turbulence to whip nuclei and electrons towards PeV-levels of acceleration.
The critical element, they claim, is timing – only within its first decade or two is the surrounding shell dense enough to provide the amount of turbulence required for particles to reach the highest of energies.
"It is possible that only very young supernova remnants evolving in dense environments may satisfy the necessary conditions to accelerate particles to PeV energies," the team writes.
Had Tycho's star held its breath for just another few centuries, astrophysicists may have recorded a shower of cosmic rays at the highest of magnitudes.
Perhaps in the near future, the violent end of another nearby star just might give us the opportunity they need to solve the perplexing mystery of PeVatrons once and for all.
This research has been accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics.
China's Tianwen-2 Launches to Grab First 'Living Fossil' Asteroid Samples
Scientists Have Clear Evidence of Martian Atmosphere 'Sputtering'
Chance X-Ray Discovery Reveals Mystery Object 15,000 Light Years Away
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can adults grow new brain cells?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The developing human brain gains billions of neurons while in the womb, and tacks on some more during childhood. For most of the 20th century, the conventional wisdom was that the brain cells grown before adulthood would be the only ones we would have for the rest of our lives. But over the past few decades, more and more research is challenging that belief. So is it actually possible for adults to grow neurons? While some experts believe there's strong evidence that we can gain brain cells after childhood, others are still skeptical of this notion. The process of creating new brain cells is called neurogenesis. Researchers first observed neurogenesis after birth in lab animals of various ages, including mice, rats and songbirds. In adult mice, they found new neurons growing in parts of the brain collectively called the subventricular zone, an area closely linked with sense of smell, as well as in the hippocampus, a structure that's central to memory. Researchers think that neurogenesis in these brain regions is important for plasticity, or the brain's ability to adapt and change over time. Plasticity underlies the ability to learn and form memories, for instance. In mice, it's clear that lifestyle factors such as living in a stimulating environment and exercising can promote the growth of new neurons. Conversely, in mouse models of diseases like Alzheimer's, neurogenesis is hampered. What's still up for debate is whether these findings extend beyond mice and other lab animals. "Most of our knowledge about adult neurogenesis came from studies in animal models," Hongjun Song, a professor of neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, told Live Science in an email. "Whether such knowledge can be directly translated to human studies is a challenge." That's because many of the studies that have established the existence of adult neurogenesis in animals used methods that aren't possible in human studies, such as injecting radioactive tracer molecules into the brain. These methods enable scientists to visualize if and where new neurons are growing, but the tracers themselves can be toxic. These methods also require dissecting the brain after the animal has been euthanized. "Unfortunately, there is no way to measure neurogenesis in the living person yet," Gerd Kempermann, a professor of genomics of regeneration at the Center for Regenerative Therapies in Dresden, Germany, told Live Science in an email. Related: Is there really a difference between male and female brains? Emerging science is revealing the answer. There are, however, some rare cases in which scientists have been able to apply similar methods to track neurogenesis in humans. For example, the radioactive tracer molecules used in animal neurogenesis studies are also sometimes used by doctors to track tumor growth in patients with brain cancer. While these radioactive tracer molecules are too toxic to give to healthy people, their benefits outweigh their risks in patients who already have cancer. Scientists behind a 1998 study published in the journal Nature Medicine used this approach and analyzed the brains of cancer patients after their deaths. They reported that, in addition to flagging cancer cells, the tracer molecules had marked new neurons in the hippocampus. This finding suggested that humans could grow new neurons well into adulthood, given the patients were 57 to 72 years old. Later, a 2013 study in the journal Cell used a form of radiocarbon dating to look for new neurons in humans. Radiocarbon dating usually determines the age of a sample by comparing the relative proportion of two different forms of carbon, or carbon isotopes, called carbon-14 and carbon-12. But to study neurogenesis in humans, scientists instead looked at carbon-14 concentrations inside the DNA of cells. Their approach took advantage of the fact that there was a spike in carbon-14 levels in the atmosphere caused by nuclear bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s. People's bodies absorbed this carbon-14 via their diets, and it became incorporated into their DNA. The amount of carbon-14 in a given cell corresponds to the isotope's concentrations in the atmosphere at the time the cell formed, making it possible to roughly pinpoint the "birthday" of that cell — and determine whether it formed after its owner's birth. By analyzing postmortem brain tissue from people ages 19 to 92, this radiocarbon study identified newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus. But while compelling, the study's methods were so complex that the results have never been replicated. That said, there are also more indirect markers of neurogenesis, such as certain proteins that are only present in growing neurons. Using these methods, both Kempermann and other research groups have uncovered additional evidence of newborn neurons in the adult human brain. "There are many different markers that are more or less specific for adult neurogenesis," Kempermann said. "In tissue sections, one can study these markers under the microscope and look for patterns that are consistent with neuronal development." But some researchers aren't convinced by this evidence. Arturo Alvarez-Buylla, a professor of neurological surgery at the University of California, San Francisco, has spent his career studying the growth of new neurons. While he's observed new neurons being formed in children and adolescents, he's found little evidence to support the notion of neurogenesis in adults. Alvarez-Buylla believes there are a number of issues that may lead other researchers to find signs of neurogenesis in adult humans. For example, the chemical markers that some labs use to track new neurons may also show up in other cell types, such as glia, which are cells in the brain that support neurons' function in various ways. This may make it appear that new neurons are growing when they're actually not. He's also skeptical of the use of carbon-14 dating for this purpose, calling it "creative" but arguing that researchers can't confirm that the new cells are neurons, or if there could be other potential reasons for varying carbon-14 levels in cells. But Alvarez-Buylla isn't ruling out the possibility of human adult neurogenesis; he's only saying that — so far — the evidence hasn't convinced him. "I would say that is a rare phenomenon," said Alvarez-Buylla. "If it happens, it's very, very few cells." Kempermann, on the other hand, is a firm believer that people can grow new neurons well into adulthood. "The positive reports outnumber the critical papers by far, their take is much wider, and their quality is overall higher." The researchers said that understanding whether adult neurogenesis exists will continue to be a key question for the field of neuroscience. RELATED STORIES —Could we ever retrieve memories from a dead person's brain? —What happens in your brain while you sleep? —How much of your brain do you need to survive? "The question about whether adults can grow new neurons has tremendous implications for the plasticity of the adult brain," Song said. If new neurons can be grown and integrated into the brain, he explained, those mechanisms could form the basis for new therapies for a variety of conditions, including brain injuries and neurodegenerative disorders. Alvarez-Buylla said that even if he doesn't believe neurogenesis happens frequently in adults, it may nonetheless be possible to harness the mechanisms used by animals to grow new neurons for human therapies. "The whole idea that it can happen opens a huge door for repair," he said. "I hope that we can keep our plasticity open to things going either way."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northern lights may be visible in these 23 US States tonight
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Northern lights could put on an impressive show tonight (June 1) as ongoing geomagnetic storm conditions may push auroras farther south than usual, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Earth is currently reverberating from a speedy coronal mass ejection (CME) impact that struck in the early hours of June 1, wreaking havoc on our planet's magnetic field — great news for anyone hoping to see the northern lights. Space weather forecasters from the U.K. Met Office predict frequent G1 to G2 level storming and occasional G3 and even G4 level storm intervals possible June 1-2. Read more: Aurora alert: Ongoing powerful geomagnetic storm could spark more northern lights across the US tonight The NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center predicts that the Kp index will peak at 7.67 over the next 24 hours. For an up-to-date breakdown of timings, check out NOAA's 3-day forecast. (Kp is a measurement of geomagnetic activity, with an index that ranges from 0 to 9; higher Kp indicates stronger auroral activity.) Aurora chasers, get those cameras charged, fingers crossed and your eyes firmly fixed on the skies! You can also keep up with the latest forecasts and geomagnetic storm warnings with our aurora forecast live blog. Alaska has the highest chance of seeing the northern lights tonight. If G3 or even G4 storm levels are reached, auroras could be visible at high-latitude states, including Michigan and Maine, according to NOAA. Below, we have listed all 23 states that appear either fully or in part above the possible view line for auroras tonight according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center. They are ordered most likely to least likely based on their proximity to the auroral oval's center and how much of each state is within or near the view line. But remember, auroras are fickle — sometimes they appear much farther south than predicted, and other times they barely show up at all. Many conditions have to align for the perfect display. Alaska Montana North Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin Michigan South Dakota Vermont New Hampshire Maine Idaho Washington Oregon New York Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island Nebraska Iowa Wyoming Illinois Indianna Pennsylvania If you find yourself in one of the 23 states forecasted to have a chance of seeing the northern lights tonight, head to a north-facing vantage point as far away from light pollution as possible. But as we approach the summer solstice on June 20/21, the window of darkness for observing northern lights is shrinking; the early morning hours around 1 and 2 a.m. might be the best time to try and see the northern lights. Interested in tracking space weather and knowing when and where to spot auroras? Download a space weather app that provides forecasts based on your location. One option I use is "My Aurora Forecast & Alerts," available for both iOS and Android. However, any similar app should work well. I also use the "Space Weather Live" app, which is available on iOS and Android, to get a deeper understanding of whether the current space weather conditions are favorable for aurora sightings. Editor's note: If you snap a great picture of the northern or southern lights and would like to share it with readers, send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Haunting Image Shows The Moon Deimos From The Surface of Mars
There's not much hustle and bustle on Mars. The red planet is inhabited by no-one that we know of, except the robotic rovers toiling away to excavate its secrets. The only sound you'd hear is the whispering of the wind. There are no crowds, not much in the way of turmoil (unless you happen to get caught in one of Mars's wild, global sandstorms). Nevertheless, a new image taken by Perseverance from its lonely vantage point in the Jezero Crater seems to convey the serenity possible on Mars like no other. It was taken in the liminal pre-dawn darkness, at 4:27 am local time on 1 March 2025. The rover aimed its left Navcam above the horizon, and for a total exposure time of 52 seconds, stared at the sky – specifically, Deimos, the smaller and more distant of the two Martian moons. At just 16 kilometers (10 miles) across, and orbiting at an average distance of around 20,000 kilometers from the Martian surface, Deimos is quite small when viewed from Perseverance's perspective. It looks like a bright star in the sky. Mars has two moons; the other is Phobos. They were named for the sons of god of war Ares, the Greek counterpart for the Roman god Mars; their names mean fear (Phobos) and dread (Deimos). There are lots of mysteries about these little potato-moons. Scientists want to know where they came from, and where they are going. Simulations suggest that Phobos, which orbits Mars closer than any other moon in the Solar System, and whose orbit is shrinking, will one day be torn asunder by the gravity of Mars and become a faint ring around its equator. Deimos, at a much safer distance, is likely to escape this carnage; its fate, however, is not clear. Observations such as this haunting image captured by a lonely robot on the Martian surface are the tiny puzzle pieces scientists use to conduct their painstaking investigations thereon. Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail The Universe's Most Powerful Cosmic Rays May Finally Be Explained China's Tianwen-2 Launches to Grab First 'Living Fossil' Asteroid Samples