Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky makes the case for why every company should be in 'founder mode' in the age of AI
On an episode of The Verge's "Decoder" podcast that aired on Monday, Chesky said that embracing "founder mode," a term that he helped popularize, is key to acting like a nimble startup.
"In the age of AI, my argument is you need to be founder oriented/founder mode, because you're going to need to be able to move like a startup to be able to adapt," he said. "I think these big, professionally managed companies aren't organized to be able to do that, so they don't bode well for this new world."
AI is likely the third big technological wave, Chesky said, after the personal computer and the internet. Embracing founder mode is key to hopping on the wave and remaining open to change, he said.
"All of us have to be moving as fast as we can," he said. "That has to do with culture. That's why, to me, so many roads lead back to the conversation we have with org charts and founder mode, because you don't want to miss the next wave."
Chesky talked about founder mode on the same podcast last year, saying people misunderstand the term. It's not about "swagger," he said, but instead about being focused on the details. The whole ethos is "that great leadership is presence, not absence," Chesky said last year.
The details — and larger vision — of Airbnb have changed recently, and Chesky said in the interview that it's partly to adapt to the new AI world. The company launched Airbnb Services, where people can book things like private chefs, photographers, and personal trainers.
As AI digitizes the world, Chesky said the launch is partly an attempt to fill the "void" that's being left, and that AI won't replace "jobs that are people-to-people oriented."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
11 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
One of California coast's most spectacular destinations could see vacation rental ban
A proposed ban on vacation rentals in Big Sur and a limit on the rentals in other parts of Monterey County moved closer to passage this week. On Wednesday, the California Coastal Commission approved Monterey County's plan to remove unhosted vacation rentals – when the guest rents out the entire home without a host present – from Big Sur and the Carmel Highlands, and to limit such rentals along other parts of the coast to 4% of the number of single family homes in the area. The plan includes an exception for homeowners that rent out their houses no more than three times a year, and it does not apply to hosted stays, such as when someone rents out a room or guest house. The plan will next go to the Monterey County Board of Supervisors, which approved an earlier version of the proposal last year. There are currently 37 unhosted vacation rentals in Big Sur. None would able to operate under the regulations. In the Del Monte Forest area of the coast, which includes Pebble Beach, 26 of the current 83 unhosted vacation rentals would have to be phased out, and in Carmel, 100 out of the current 218 unhosted vacation rentals would no longer be allowed, according to a staff report by the Coastal Commission. The proposed ban and limit on vacation rentals comes at a time when Big Sur businesses have been struggling due to multiple closures of Highway 1 following massive landslides. But it also is part of a larger effort to curtail overcrowding on the mostly undeveloped, and spectacular, stretch of California's coast. Last year the conservation group Keep Big Sur Wild last year even called for a halt on all types of new lodging in the area. Monterey County does not currently have regulations for vacation rentals along its coast, and the new rules primarily focus on unhosted rentals because those have the biggest impact on housing and are the most controversial among residents, said Craig Spencer, director of housing and community development for the county. 'Many of the complaints we receive as the local government have to do with these types of vacation rentals,' Spencer said at the meeting, such as about noise, trash and parking. Spencer said planning for the new rules has been going on for at least 15 years, ever since the rise of Airbnb and other vacation rental services, and the county has hosted multiple community meetings over the years. 'Our constituents have been mixed, there's no doubt about it,' he said, as many residents say they rely on vacation rentals for income. The new rules are a proposed amendment to Monterey County's local coastal program, which California requires all municipalities on the coast to have to regulate development. Frank Angel, an attorney representing the Monterey County Vacation Rental Alliance, said at the Coastal Commission meeting that the limits would go against the the commission's mandate to maximise public access to the coast. (In November, the Alliance sued the county and board of supervisors over the proposed limits.) Angel said limiting availability to hosted vacation rentals won't work for many guests. 'Families and larger groups are less likely to stay at hosted (short term rentals),' Angel said. 'The conclusion is clear. The housed requirement is a de facto ban.'
Gizmodo
11 hours ago
- Gizmodo
As People Ridicule GPT-5, Sam Altman Says OpenAI Will Need ‘Trillions' in Infrastructure
People have ridiculed GPT-5, the newest large language model release from OpenAI, since the second it launched, with many users complaining that it's dumb, boring, and not as good as the last LLM that the company released. Sam Altman, the company's CEO, has some comforting words for those who may be concerned about the direction his company is headed: AI is a bubble, and oh, also btw, my company is about to spend the GDP of France to build out our AI infrastructure. That seems to be the gist of what Altman said during a dinner held in San Francisco on Thursday with a group of journalists and other OpenAI execs, according to The Verge. During that casual conversation, Altman admitted that his company's latest software release had been bungled, but promised that the future was bright for his company, as well as his industry. 'I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,' he said. 'On the other hand, our API traffic doubled in 48 hours and is growing. We're out of GPUs. ChatGPT has been hitting a new high of users every day. A lot of users really do love the model switcher. I think we've learned a lesson about what it means to upgrade a product for hundreds of millions of people in one day.' At the same time, Altman appears to agree with critics of his industry who have called it a 'bubble' akin to the early internet. 'Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI?' Altman said. 'My opinion is yes.' For quite some time, critics and commentators alike have wondered whether the excitement around the AI industry is due for a precipitous collapse. Some recent industry moves—like a very unfortunate stock day for datacenter and AI infrastructure startup Coreweave—have added to such concerns. Many onlookers have noted that, so far, AI is a money pit, with companies hurling vast sums of cash at the industry while dreaming of one day, somehow, turning a profit. During his conversation with journalists, Altman added: 'When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth,' Altman said. 'If you look at most of the bubbles in history, like the tech bubble, there was a real thing. Tech was really important. The internet was a really big deal. People got overexcited.' Whether AI is a bubble or not, Altman still wants to spend a certifiably insane amount of money building out his company's AI infrastructure. 'You should expect OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on data center construction in the not very distant future,' Altman told reporters. It's this truly absurd scale of investment in AI that spurs the casual onlooker to wonder what it's really all for. Indeed, the one question that never seems to get raised during conversations with Altman is whether a society-wide cost-benefit analysis has ever been run on his industry. In other words, is AI really worth it? This single question could easily be pared down into a variety of more specific questions. For instance, one good question might be: Is it really worth spending trillions of dollars just to create a line of mildly amusing chatbots that only give you accurate information a certain percentage of the time? Or: Wouldn't trillions of dollars be better spent, like, helping the poor or improving our educational system? Also: Are chatbots a societal necessity, or do they just seem sorta nice to have around? How much more useful is AI than, say, a search engine? Can't we just stick to search engines? Do the negative externalities associated with AI use (a massive energy footprint, alleged reduced mental capacities in users, and a plague of cheating in higher education) outweigh the positive ones (access to a slightly more convenient way to find information online)?
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Business travel surges as companies prioritize face-to-face meetings
Companies are bringing their employees back into the office — and sending them back on the road. The Navan Business Travel Index (BTI) shows business travel jumped 15% year-over-year. Additionally, the BTI showed a 54% increase in travel intensity since Q1 2023, the index's baseline year. Navan CFO Amy Butte conceived the idea for the BTI shortly after joining the company. When comparing data from Airbnb and major airlines to Navan's numbers, Butte saw that they weren't lining up. She realized that most companies do not differentiate between business and leisure travel, and there was no dedicated business travel data index — thus, Navan's BTI was born. "The launch of the Navan Business Travel Index provides a clear, detailed view of business travel activity on our platform, separated from the noise of consumer travel," Butte wrote in a letter included in the BTI. Fall Is Now A Peak Travel Season, Expert Says The Navan BTI is built on five core principles, which focus on robust data sources, a dynamic weighting system, a verified methodology, an accurate post-pandemic baseline, and Nasdaq validation. The data points, drawn from millions of business transactions across more than 10,000 companies, track international and domestic airline bookings, hotel reservations and business expenses. Navan uses these data points and, through its dynamic weighting system, automatically adjusts for market volatility. Additionally, the methodology behind the index is "closely aligned with the Conference Board's composite index approach," according to the report. Read On The Fox Business App Nasdaq Chief Economist Phil Mackintosh says the Navan BTI offers "a unique, data-driven look at how companies are investing in growth, relationships, and in-person collaboration." "This isn't just travel data; it's a window into corporate strategy and where the business travel industry is heading next," Mackintosh said in the report. Navan's data revealed an inverse relationship between business and leisure travel. As holiday and seasonal travel goes up, business travel dips. Additionally, TSA data showed a 1% dip in overall travel, underscoring the emphasis companies are putting on face-to-face interactions. The BTI notes that a comparison between Navan and TSA data reveals insights not only into how much people are traveling, but also why they are traveling at certain times. As the report states, business travel spikes correlated with corporate planning cycles and industry conferences. "What I think is most fascinating about that rate isn't the number alone, it's the growth rate relative to all other travel," Butte told FOX Business. The business travel and expense management platform observed that companies are taking more opportunities to have their employees connect face-to-face with clients, colleagues and peers. Navan found that despite economic uncertainty, there was an uptick in individual trip indicators, such as car rentals and personal meals over team events. Spirit Airlines Warns It May Not Survive Another Year While there is overall growth in business travel, there are still differences among several industries. Butte told FOX Business that Navan saw growth in travel for the financial services (+31%) and media and entertainment (+25%) industries. In contrast, the report showed nonprofit organizations (-5.1%), the hospitality and travel sector (-8.4%), and healthcare and life sciences companies (-15.2%) all reduced their travel spending. Government travel saw a modest 4.4% increase. Navan states in its BTI that it aimed to prevent COVID from skewing the data presented in the report — a point Butte also emphasized to FOX Business. This awareness of how COVID travel restrictions could impact the data influenced where Navan chose to set its baseline for comparison. "When we think about post-COVID, we look at 2023. As a CFO, as well as a public company board member, I actually think a post-Covid world almost demands more travel," Butte said. "In some ways, our data is kind of reflecting the importance of, even if you work remotely, you still need to connect, and that can be with clients or colleagues." As Navan noted an overall growth in business travel, Butte pointed out that international travel grew more than domestic. In the BTI, Navan found that domestic hotel spending grew by 12%, while international grew by 17%, and Butte has a theory on why that is the case — and it has to do with U.S. policies. "Our hypothesis is that companies may not be traveling as much to China, but maybe they're traveling more as a way to find sourcing for manufacturing in other geographies. So, we're not seeing the end to international travel. In contrast, we're seeing companies kind of lean in to finding newer relationships," Butte told FOX Business. Butte doesn't see the trend slowing down any time soon. Though she admits she is "bullish by nature," Butte predicts that travel growth will continue, not just among large companies, but also among small and medium-sized article source: Business travel surges as companies prioritize face-to-face meetings Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
