logo
Valero Energy to close California refinery, inflicting ‘a major hit on the city' and raising supply concerns

Valero Energy to close California refinery, inflicting ‘a major hit on the city' and raising supply concerns

Yahoo07-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Located roughly 36 miles away from San Francisco is the city of Benicia, California. With a population of about 26,400 people, it's known for its small-town charm.
The city also relies heavily on one major business — San Antonio, Texas-based Valero has operated a 170,000-barrel-per-day refinery in Benicia for 25 years. The facility employs over 400 workers.
Don't miss
But now, those jobs, and the city's general economy, are threatened as Valero has decided to close that location next year because of high operating costs and the strict environmental regulations California is known for. It also raises concerns for the fuel supply in the state.
Mario Guiliani, city manager for the city of Benicia, called the news "surprising and distressing" and said the refinery generates millions of dollars in revenue for Benicia.
"It would be a major hit on the city," he told ABC7 News. "It is the newest refinery on the West Coast. It produces a significant amount of gasoline for the California market. I cannot foresee a possibility where that refinery just ceases operation altogether."
Last year, another energy company, Phillips 66, announced it will close its Los Angeles oil refinery in late 2025 due to questions about its long-term sustainability. As a result of refinery closures, there's a supply crunch anticipated at the end of this summer in California, reported Argus Media.
Governor Gavin Newsom has asked the California Energy Commission to 'redouble the state's efforts to work closely with refiners' and by July 1 recommend changes to the state's approach to ensure it has adequate fuel supply.
'I am directing you … to reinforce the State's openness to a collaborative relationship and our firm belief that Californians can be protected from price spikes and refiners can profitably operate in California — a market where demand for gasoline will still exist for years to come,' wrote Newsom in a letter April 21.
Rich Walsh, executive vice president at Valero, said the company is having meetings with the CEC to 'minimize the impacts that would result from the loss of the refinery.'
Why a major refinery seeks to close its doors
The decision for Valero to close its refinery did not come out of the blue. Rather, it "follows years of regulatory pressure, significant fines for air quality violations, and a recent lawsuit settlement related to environmental concerns," the company said in a statement quoted by ABC7.
And it's not just the Benicia refinery that's at risk. The company said it's also reviewing its broader operations in California.
During Valero's most recent earnings call, CEO Lane Riggs said, "California has been pursuing policies to move away from fossil fuels for really for the past 20 years. And the consequence of that is the regulatory and enforcement environment is the most stringent and difficult of anywhere else in North America."
Riggs also said, "Benicia operates in the more difficult part of California with respect to the regulatory and enforcement side of this. And then on top of that, Benicia costs considerably more to maintain."
In October, Valero was charged almost $82 million in fines for a history of toxic chemical releases and other violations at its Benicia refinery dating back to 2003, reported ABC7. That was the largest-ever penalty to be issued by the Bay Area Air District.
A 2019 inspection found that Valero did not properly report toxic emissions from the facility's hydrogen system — emissions that have been linked to health effects.
Read more: Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
A potentially devastating economic blow
The closure of the Valero refinery could cost several hundred Benicia workers their jobs — but the ripple effect goes beyond that.
Benicia Mayor Steve Young told ABC7 that news of the Valero closure is "deeply impactful for our entire community."
Brittany Hodgkinson, the manager of Elviarita's Cantina and Catering in downtown Benicia, told the news network that her business relies on Valero employees for sales.
But beyond that, the refinery plays a big role in the community by sponsoring youth sports and school events.
"Just hoping that someone comes in and buys the refinery and keeps us going … That's just my biggest hope" she said.
Unfortunately, such are the consequences of having a small city or town rely on one major employer for revenue.
For instance, in 2019, the city of Luke, Maryland suffered a major blow when its 131-year-old paper mill shut down, taking 675 jobs away with it, per The Washington Post.
The closure was said to have an impact on 2,000 others employed by other nearby businesses. Taxes from the mill had funded the bulk of the town's budget.
As of now, Valero intends to close its Benicia refinery by April of 2026. Walsh did acknowledge during the company's last earnings call that "there's a genuine interest in California to avoid the closure." But he also said it's a complex issue.
"We are having discussions with the state, but our intent right now is to close the refinery," Walsh said.
Young, meanwhile, told KQED that he wished the company had provided more of a heads-up on its closure plans.
'We need to get moving on this quickly because 12 months is not a long time given the severity of the economic impact,' said Young, who noted that nearly 20% of Benicia's $60 million budget comes from the refinery. 'I think that's part of my frustration, is how little time we have to try to plan for some kind of an alternative.'
What to read next
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ARK Invest Loaded Up $373M Worth of Circle Shares on First Day of Trading
ARK Invest Loaded Up $373M Worth of Circle Shares on First Day of Trading

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ARK Invest Loaded Up $373M Worth of Circle Shares on First Day of Trading

Cathie Wood's ARK Invest bought nearly 4.5 million Circle (CRCL) shares on the stablecoin issuer's first day of trading, a holding worth $373 million at the stock's closing price. The St Petersburg, California-based investment manager was quick to add the USDC issuer to its portfolio companies that provide exposure to the crypto industry along with the likes of Coinbase (COIN), Robinhood (HOOD) and Block (XYZ). Circle shares surged on the company's New York Stock Exchange debut, climbing as high as $103.75, around 50% higher than its opening price of $69. CRCL closed at $83.23 on Thursday. The IPO price was $31. ARK also offloaded a chunk of shares in other crypto companies, selling $39 million of COIN, $18.5 million of HOOD and $10.4 million of in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Buildup to a Meltdown: How the Trump-Musk Alliance Collapsed
Buildup to a Meltdown: How the Trump-Musk Alliance Collapsed

New York Times

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Buildup to a Meltdown: How the Trump-Musk Alliance Collapsed

President Trump was peeved. Just minutes before he walked into the Oval Office for a televised send-off for Elon Musk, an aide had handed him a file. The papers in that file showed that Mr. Trump's nominee to run NASA — a close associate of Mr. Musk's — had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Mr. Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through the public farewell, with both men praising each other and saying their relationship would continue. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Mr. Musk. Mr. Trump started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head and pointing out several of the most recent ones in the file. This was not good, the president said — an early signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later. Mr. Musk, who was sporting a black eye, which he blamed on a tussle with his young son, tried to explain. He said his friend Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next NASA administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Maybe it's a good thing, Mr. Musk told the president — it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box
Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unshackled Wells Fargo Fights to Regain Momentum Lost in Penalty Box

Wells Fargo shares rose over 2% early Wednesday, hitting a three-month high, after the Federal Reserve lifted an asset cap imposed following regulators' determination that the bank had exploited its own customers. The stock, a little hot out of the gate, spent the rest of the day ticking downward and, by the time the closing bell rang, had fallen 0.3% for the day. While a banking juggernaut may have been unshackled to pursue a determined growth strategy, some Wall Street observers think its ambitions are already priced in. READ ALSO: Tariffs Deliver Record Drop in US Trade Deficit and Circle Spirals Upward in $1 Billion IPO There was a period in the late 2010s when Wells Fargo tallied up more scandals than the National Enquirer, the most notorious being when its employees juiced sales numbers by setting up millions of fake deposit and credit card accounts in customers' names without their consent. US regulators got so fed up that they imposed a $1.95 trillion asset cap in 2018, ordering the lender to keep its balance sheet frozen at 2017 levels. Obviously, that left the lender — which Bloomberg estimates lost out on $39 billion in profits under the cap — hamstrung for seven years in the face of fierce competition. From the end of 2017 to March of this year, JPMorgan Chase's assets grew from $2.5 trillion to $4.3 trillion, while Bank of America's rose from $2.3 trillion to $3.3 trillion. Now, Wells Fargo is free to pursue growth, which post-scandal CEO Charlie Scharf has been plotting for years: Once home to the largest US mortgage operation, Wells Fargo has retreated from the multi-trillion-dollar sector under Scharf, who has sold the bank's asset management business, corporate trust division, student loan portfolio, rail equipment leasing unit, and most recently, the bulk of its commercial mortgage-servicing unit. What he's positioned for expansion are trading and investment banking, which were handcuffed by the cap. Wells Fargo has added over four dozen senior bankers since 2020 and scored a major coup last year when Scharf convinced the departing head of JPMorgan's North American investment banking, Fernando Rivas, to run the San Francisco-based lender's corporate and investment bank. Early results are promising: Investment banking fees grew 62%, investment advisory fees 13%, and trading revenues 10% in 2024 — though Wells' operations are a fraction of the size of JPMorgan's. Taking Stock: Apart from the muted performance on Wednesday, Wells Fargo shares have climbed 7.3% in 2025, outperforming the 4.3% gain by the S&P 500 Banks Index. But that explains why some investors are cautious. HSBC analysts noted in a report that 'markets have been increasingly pricing in the asset cap removal, possibly limiting near-term upside.' Shares are already up 28% in the past year. JPMorgan analysts, for example, kept their $73.50 price target after the news of the cap removal. But others on Wall Street are betting Wells Fargo will muscle its way higher as it beefs up investment banking operations: Bank of America hiked its target to $90 a share from $83 after the asset cap's removal, and Morgan Stanley raised its target to $87 from $77. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store