logo
Thames Water nationalisation ‘not the answer' says minister after private equity rescue fails

Thames Water nationalisation ‘not the answer' says minister after private equity rescue fails

Yahoo2 days ago

Nationalisation of struggling Thames Water is 'not the answer', environment secretary Steve Reed has warned after a private equity giant pulled out of a £4bn rescue deal, throwing the company's future into doubt.
A bailout of the debt-laden utility would take money away from the NHS and other public services, he said.
Thames Water is about £19bn in debt, and MPs were told last month that at one point this year it had about five weeks' worth of cash left before going bust.
Britain's biggest water supplier, which has 16 million customers, chose KKR at the end of March to be its preferred bidder under plans to invest around £4bn of new equity. But the firm said on Tuesday that KKR was no longer 'in a position to proceed' and that its status as preferred bidder had lapsed.
At the despatch box, Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins accused ministers of having 'talked themselves out of' a rescue plan.
Mr Reed told MPs: 'The government stands ready for any eventuality and will take action as required. We are not looking at nationalisation because it would cost over £100bn of public money that would have had to be taken away from other public services like the National Health Service to be given to the owners of the water companies.
'It will take years to unpick the current model of ownership, during which time pollution would get worse and we know that nationalisation is not the answer – you only have to look at the situation in Scotland to see that.'
Mr Reed said he would 'make no apology' for tackling the behaviour of water companies under the previous government. 'I mean, we even had stories that have been confirmed by water companies of previous Conservative secretaries of state shouting and screaming at water company bosses, but not actually changing the law to do anything about the bonuses that they were able to pay themselves.'
Liberal Democrat environment spokesperson Tim Farron said Thames Water should go into special administration and emerge 'as a public interest company'.
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice proposed a plan to 'buy it for a pound – it's a good deal for the taxpayer – then it won't have to pay huge, egregious rates of interest, and the taxpayer and the customers will be the beneficiaries'.
The move by KKR comes as an interim report by the Independent Water Commission found the water sector in England and Wales needs a 'fundamental reset' and called for a 'strengthening and rebalancing' of Ofwat's regulatory role.
It is understood that Thames Water is now working on alternative plans with senior creditors. These creditors are the bondholders who effectively own Thames Water after the High Court earlier this year approved a financial restructuring through a loan of up to £3bn to ensure it can keep running until the summer of 2026.
Sir Adrian Montague, chair of Thames Water, said: 'We continue to believe that a sustainable recapitalisation of the company is in the best interests of all stakeholders and continue to work with our creditors and stakeholders to achieve that goal.'
KKR declined to comment.
An Ofwat spokesperson said: 'We are liaising with the company on its next steps in light of its recent announcement to ensure its equity raise process continues to secure improved financial resilience and operational performance.'
The firm was put under further pressure last week when it was fined a record £122.7m by Ofwat after it was found to have broken rules over sewage treatment and paying out dividends.
Water companies have faced public and political outrage over the extent of pollution, rising bills, high dividends, and executive pay and bonuses.
Thames hiked consumer water bills for customers by an average of 31 per cent in April and incurred further wrath over plans to pay senior bosses large bonuses linked to the water company securing a £3bn emergency loan, which were later dropped.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban

Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries to try and get around a bonus ban. Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban

Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries to try and get around a bonus ban. Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.

New VanEck ETF Offers Exposure to Private Market Leaders
New VanEck ETF Offers Exposure to Private Market Leaders

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New VanEck ETF Offers Exposure to Private Market Leaders

Investors looking to benefit from the growth of private market giants like Blackstone, Brookfield, KKR and Apollo may be interested in VanEck's latest exchange-traded fund: the VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ). Launched on Thursday, the fund provides targeted exposure to alternative asset managers, including leaders in private equity, venture capital, private credit, private infrastructure and private real estate, according to the firm's press release. GPZ is designed to track the performance of the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index. The index includes equity securities of publicly traded U.S., Canadian and developed European alternative asset management companies that are 'ultra-pure play,' meaning at least 75% of their revenues come from private market activities. The aforementioned Blackstone, Brookfield, KKR and Apollo are currently the top holdings in the fund. Company weightings are capped at 12%. 'This is really pure growth exposure to the asset class,' Brandon Rakszawski, director of product management with VanEck, told He added that while there are legacy offerings that provide exposures to the market, what sets this fund apart is 'dedicated exposure to the managers as opposed to strategies that may have launched a decade ago.' For instance, instead of offering exposure to the private credit market, GBZ offers exposure to the managers of those assets: 'It's more of an investment for investors who are looking for exposure to growth of the segment.' Private assets are one of the fastest-growing markets due to their potential for significant returns, high yields and diversification. Traditionally, only available to institutional investors and the wealthy, more asset managers are looking for ways to offer retail investors exposure to these opaque investments. Industry estimates project private markets growing from $13 trillion in 2025 to more than $20 trillion by 2030, according to a recent report from BlackRock. Rakszawski said GPZ came about as a result of immense client | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store