BPSC 71st recruitment: Bihar Commission increases vacancies ahead of Preliminary exam, releases revised list
: The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has revised the total number of vacancies for the 71st Integrated Combined Competitive Examination (CCE) 2025, increasing the count from 1,250 to 1,264.
The expansion follows the addition of 14 newly sanctioned posts for the highly sought-after position of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), according to an official update issued on June 16.
The updated vacancy list was announced after the Home Department (Police Branch), Bihar, Patna, sent an official requisition to the Commission for the inclusion of DSP posts. This development marks the first time DSP roles have been opened for recruitment under the current BPSC 71st CCE notification, which previously did not feature either DSP or Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) roles.
— BPSCOffice (@BPSCOffice)
BPSC 71st recruitment 2025: Revised vacancies
The revised total of 1,264 posts includes key administrative and departmental roles across various sectors. The distribution of vacancies is as follows:
Post names
Number of vacancies
Senior Deputy Collector
100
Financial Administrative Officer
79
Labour Superintendent
10
Sub Registrar / Joint Sub Registrar
3
Sugarcane Officer
17
Block Cooperative Officer
502
Block Panchayati Raj Officer
22
Block SC/ST Welfare Officer
13
Revenue Officer
45
Block Minority Welfare Officer
459
Deputy Superintendent of Police
(Newly Added)
14
Total
1,264
Application window open until June 30
The online application process for the BPSC 71st CCE 2025 commenced on June 2 and will remain open until June 30, 2025. Interested candidates must submit their applications through the official BPSC portal at bpsc.bihar.gov.in. No offline applications will be accepted.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
The Commission has also clarified that any further departmental requisitions received before the application deadline will be incorporated into the ongoing recruitment cycle. Aspirants are strongly advised to stay updated through the official website for any modifications in vacancy details, eligibility criteria, and examination guidelines.
With the inclusion of DSP posts, the 71st CCE recruitment drive now offers a broader spectrum of opportunities for civil service aspirants in Bihar, making it one of the most competitive state-level examinations this year.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 hours ago
- The Hindu
SBI directed to compensate customer for ‘deficiency in service'
A district consumer commission directed the State Bank of India's to pay compensation to a customer for failing to notify him about the creation of an overdraft account linked to a disputed debit card transaction. The customer had claimed that this had impacted his CIBIL score. The Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karimnagar, was dealing with a a complaint filed one Gaddam Shivaramakrishna, 27, who claimed that the bank had created a ₹1,200 overdraft account in his name without his consent. Later a technical error related to a merchant transaction in 2019 took place which led to the escalation of the issue. Despite clearing dues, his CIBIL report reflected that he had an active loan. This, he said, affected him negatively. For their part, the SBI admitted to a merchant transaction of ₹1,200 in April 2019 that was reversed. This led to the bank opening an overdraft account for the purpose of adjustment. They contended that the complainant was informed orally and through text message. Later, the account was closed after full repayment. The bank also submitted a CIBIL report that indicated the status of the loan was updated. The Commission found that the creation of the overdraft account was not wrong. They cited RBI guidelines that permit such a move in cases of failed ATM transactions. However, it held the bank had not placed on record concrete evidence of the customer being informed about the account's creation. This, the Commission concluded , amounted deficiency in service.
Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation 's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google 's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising , and has closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'.'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'.The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'.'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order.'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
Economic Times
18 hours ago
- Economic Times
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising, and closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement markets. In an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'. 'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'. The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its conclusion. It also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'. 'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order. 'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
