logo
What to expect, and what not to, at the UN meeting on an Israel-Palestinian two-state solution

What to expect, and what not to, at the UN meeting on an Israel-Palestinian two-state solution

Indian Express28-07-2025
The UN General Assembly is bringing high-level officials together this week to promote a two-state solution to the decades-old Israel-Palestinian conflict that would place their peoples side by side, living in peace in independent nations. Israel and its close ally the United States are boycotting the two-day meeting, which starts Monday and will be co-chaired by the foreign ministers of France and Saudi Arabia. Israel's right-wing government opposes a two-state solution, and the United States has called the meeting 'counterproductive' to its efforts to end the war in Gaza.
France and Saudi Arabia want the meeting to put a spotlight on the two-state solution, which they view as the only viable road map to peace, and to start addressing the steps to get there. The meeting was postponed from late June and downgraded from a four-day meeting of world leaders amid surging tensions in the Middle East, including Israel's 12-day war against Iran and the war in Gaza.
'It was absolutely necessary to restart a political process, the two-state solution process, that is today threatened, more threatened than it has ever been,' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said Sunday on CBS News' Face the Nation.
The idea of dividing the Holy Land goes back decades. When the British mandate over Palestine ended, the UN partition plan in 1947 envisioned dividing the territory into Jewish and Arab states. Israel accepted the plan, but upon Israel's declaration of independence the following year, its Arab neighbours declared war and the plan was never implemented.
Under a 1949 armistice, Jordan held control over the West Bank and East Jerusalem and Egypt over Gaza. Israel captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza in the 1967 Middle East war. The Palestinians seek those lands for a future independent state alongside Israel, and this idea of a two-state solution based on Israel's pre-1967 boundaries has been the basis of peace talks dating back to the 1990s.
The two-state solution has wide international support. The logic behind it is that the population of Israel — along with East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza — is divided equally between Jews and Palestinians. The establishment of an independent Palestine would leave Israel as a democratic country with a solid Jewish majority and grant the Palestinians their dream of self-determination.
France and Saudi Arabia have said they want to put a spotlight on the two-state solution as the only viable path to peace in the Middle East — and they want to see a road map with specific steps, first ending the war in Gaza.
The co-chairs said in a document sent to UN members in May that the primary goal of the meeting is to identify actions by 'all relevant actors' to implement the two-state solution — and 'to urgently mobilise the necessary efforts and resources to achieve this aim, through concrete and time-bound commitments'.
Saudi diplomat Manal Radwan, who led the country's delegation to the preparatory conference, said the meeting must 'chart a course for action, not reflection'. It must be 'anchored in a credible and irreversible political plan that addresses the root cause of the conflict and offers a real path to peace, dignity and mutual security', she said.
French President Emmanuel Macron has pushed for a broader movement towards a two-state solution in parallel with a recognition of Israel's right to defend itself. He announced late Thursday that France will recognise the state of Palestine officially at the annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly in late September.
About 145 countries have recognised the state of Palestine. But Macron's announcement, ahead of Monday's meeting and amid increasing global anger over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, makes France the most important Western power to do so.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. Netanyahu's religious and nationalist base views the West Bank as the biblical and historical homeland of the Jewish people, while Israeli Jews overwhelmingly consider Jerusalem their eternal capital. The city's eastern side is home to Judaism's holiest site, along with major Christian and Muslim holy places.
Hard-line Israelis like Netanyahu believe the Palestinians don't want peace, citing the second Palestinian uprising of the early 2000s, and more recently the Hamas takeover of Gaza two years after Israel withdrew from the territory in 2005. The Hamas takeover led to five wars, including the current and ongoing 21-month conflict.
At the same time, Israel also opposes a one-state solution in which Jews could lose their majority. Netanyahu's preference seems to be the status quo, where Israel maintains overall control and Israelis have fuller rights than Palestinians, Israel deepens its control by expanding settlements, and the Palestinian Authority has limited autonomy in pockets of the West Bank.
Netanyahu condemned Macron's announcement of Palestinian recognition, saying it 'rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became'.
The Palestinians, who label the current arrangement 'apartheid', accuse Israel of undermining repeated peace initiatives by deepening settlement construction in the West Bank and threatening annexation. That would harm the prospect of a contiguous Palestinian state and their prospects for independence.
Ahmed Majdalani, a member of the PLO Executive Committee and close associate of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, said the meeting will serve as preparation for a presidential summit expected in September. It will take place either in France or at the UN on the sidelines of the high-level meeting, UN diplomats said.
Majdalani said the Palestinians have several goals, first a 'serious international political process leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state'. The Palestinians also want additional international recognition of their state by major countries including Britain. But expect that to happen in September, not at Monday's meeting, Majdalani said.
And he said they want economic and financial support for the Palestinian Authority and international support for the reconstruction and recovery of the Gaza Strip.
All 193 UN member nations have been invited to attend the meeting and a French diplomat said about 40 ministers are expected. The United States and Israel are the only countries boycotting.
The co-chairs have circulated an outcome document which could be adopted, and there could be some announcements of intentions to recognise a Palestinian state. But with Israel and the United States boycotting, there is no prospect of a breakthrough and the resumption of long-stalled negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians on an end to their conflict.
Secretary-General António Guterres urged participants after the meeting was announced 'to keep the two-state solution alive'. And he said the international community must not only support a solution where independent states of Palestine and Israel live side-by-side in peace but 'materialise the conditions to make it happen'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas Agrees For Aid To Hostages In Gaza If Israel Halts Strikes, Opens Humanitarian Corridors
Hamas Agrees For Aid To Hostages In Gaza If Israel Halts Strikes, Opens Humanitarian Corridors

News18

time21 minutes ago

  • News18

Hamas Agrees For Aid To Hostages In Gaza If Israel Halts Strikes, Opens Humanitarian Corridors

Last Updated: Hamas offers to work with the Red Cross to aid hostages in Gaza if Israel opens humanitarian corridors and stops airstrikes,following outrage over a video of hostage Evyatar David. Palestinian militant group Hamas on Sunday said it is willing to coordinate with the Red Cross to deliver aid to Israeli hostages it holds in Gaza only if Israel permanently opens humanitarian corridors and halts airstrikes during aid delivery, according to news agency Reuters. Hamas' offer follows intense global criticism sparked after it released a disturbing video showing Israeli hostage Evyatar David in an emaciated state. In the footage, David, visibly skeletal, was seen digging what he described as his own grave. The image of the person filming—whose arm appears healthy—has further fueled outrage. Western nations including the US, UK, France, and Germany condemned the video, and Israel confirmed the United Nations Security Council will hold a special session on Tuesday to address the issue of hostages in Gaza. The Reuters report, citing Israeli authorities, mentioned that 50 hostages are still in Gaza, with only 20 believed to be alive. Hamas has so far denied humanitarian organizations any access to them, leaving families desperate for information. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday said he urged the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to provide humanitarian aid to the hostages during a call with the ICRC's local head in Israel. A statement from The Hostages Families Forum, which represents relatives of those being held in Gaza, said Hamas' comments about the hostages cannot hide that it 'has been holding innocent people in impossible conditions for over 660 days," and demanded their immediate release, Reuters reported. Meanwhile, Gaza's humanitarian crisis continues to deepen. Six more people reportedly died from starvation or malnutrition in the last 24 hours, bringing the total death toll from hunger-related causes to 175, including 93 children, according to the local health ministry. Israel said it allowed a new fuel delivery into Gaza on Sunday. The ongoing conflict, which began after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel that killed over 1,200 people, has resulted in more than 60,000 Palestinian deaths, according to Gaza health officials. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Trump will not let the world move on from tariffs
Trump will not let the world move on from tariffs

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump will not let the world move on from tariffs

When President Donald Trump stood outside the White House on April 2nd and revealed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, all hell broke loose. The 'reciprocal' levies threatened to break financial markets, as well as scrambling international commerce. Thankfully, Mr Trump quickly backed down, cutting tariffs to 10% for most countries on April 9th and doing the same for China a month later. Markets recovered; uncertainty receded. The world economy tried to move on. Everyone began to lose interest. Everyone, that is, except Mr Trump . In recent days he has signed orders removing a tariff loophole (the de minimis exemption) for parcels worth less than $800 (he had already closed it for China). He raised a 'fentanyl' tariff on Canada, which supposedly punishes the country for failing to stop the illegal drug flowing across the border. The increase from 25% to 35% was, he said, a response to Canada's own retaliation and support for Palestinian statehood. He also imposed a tariff of 50% on more than half of America's imports from Brazil, complaining the country was persecuting Jair Bolsonaro, its former president, much as Mr Trump himself felt persecuted after he was ousted from office in 2021. Chart And to the dismay of dozens of countries, from India (population: 1.4bn) to Iceland (population: 0.0004bn), he also returned to the madness of Liberation Day. He imposed new rates on many of America's trading partners, designed to punish them for selling more to America than they bought from it. These levies will take effect from August 7th, and push America's average tariff, weighted by last year's imports, up to about 18%, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. Some countries have used the weeks since April 9th to negotiate a deal with America, promising to remove trade irritants, buy more of its stuff or cough up investment. Owing to the deal agreed between Mr Trump and the European Union on July 27th, the bloc will pay a tariff of 15%. That is higher than the 10% rate applied since April 9th, let alone the 1.4% average levy it faced last year. But it is better than the 20% announced on April 2nd and the 50% threatened by Mr Trump in May. Other countries that have struck similar deals include Japan and South Korea. Another group is still in the middle of talks. The July 31st order threatens India with a tariff of 25%. America's president has been posting tetchy comments about the country and its 'obnoxious' trade barriers on his social-media network. But Indian officials will cling to the hope that they can knock a few percentage points off the higher rate through negotiations in the coming week. India, which America is supposedly courting as a geopolitical partner, will not fail to notice that its neighbour and antagonist Pakistan has a tariff of only 19%, down from the 29% rate touted on April 2nd. A third group of countries has yet to negotiate at all. Some are too small to recapture the president's attention. They were given their own tailored tariffs on April 2nd, based on a crude calculation of their trade imbalances with America. But they were shown some benign neglect in the July 31st order. Thus tiny Lesotho, a landlocked country in the south of Africa, will pay 15%, like many other African countries, not the 50% horror that was announced on April 2nd. The remainder of this group is in more of a pickle. They once again face something similar to the Liberation Day scenario, or are even worse off. Turkey, for example, has seen its rate rise from 10% to 15%. All these tariff rates will be added to Mr Trump's other levies—on cars, car parts and metals—as well as many he inherited when he returned to office. Some goods, including electronics and energy products, are excluded. If the various tariffs are weighted by last year's imports, the average rate faced by America's biggest trading partners ranges from less than 3% for Ireland to over 40% for China. Shortly after Mr Trump's latest hikes, the Bureau of Labour Statistics reported that American firms added just 73,000 jobs in July—well below expectations. Some of the slowdown may reflect trade uncertainty. When levies go up, firms shift their investments in response. When they go up, down and up again, firms simply delay their investments in response. The tariff threat has, at the very least, made it harder for the Federal Reserve to buoy America's economy by cutting interest rates. This week Jerome Powell, the Fed's chairman, defied both the president and two members of the central bank's own board to keep rates unchanged. The consequences of tariffs for inflation 'may be less than people estimate or more than people estimate,' he said, but 'they're not going to be zero'. Even when consumers buy American, tariffs can appear in the supply chain of the goods they purchase. According to our estimates, personal computers, tablets and peripherals have endured the biggest impact from tariffs: the burden amounts to 17% of consumer spending. Other items that have been affected include big household appliances and smaller personal-care devices, such as electric razors. As tariffs rise even higher, they will shave even more off the spending power of America's citizens. The world's financial markets seem willing to 'look through' Mr Trump's antics. America's currency, shares and bonds all plunged after the Liberation Day shock, but they have taken his encore in their stride. Investors are beguiled by the technological revolution on the horizon and blind to the commercial havoc under their noses. When American consumers start paying even more for the goods and services they enjoy, they may not be so far-sighted. Trump-will-not-let-the-world-move-on-from-tariffs Trump-will-not-let-the-world-move-on-from-tariffs Trump-will-not-let-the-world-move-on-from-tariffs Trump-will-not-let-the-world-move-on-from-tariffs

Making a Palestinian State Less Likely
Making a Palestinian State Less Likely

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Making a Palestinian State Less Likely

The Gaza aid crunch is starting to abate, as local prices fall. Why are Gazans paying for aid at all? Well, the United Nations says 87% of the aid trucks that it and its partners have tried to deliver since May 19 have been 'intercepted' by mobs or 'armed actors.' Much of the food ends up sold at market, with Hamas taking a cut. The U.N. rejects Israeli security escorts. The U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which gives free aid to Gazans at large distribution sites, has been shunned by the established aid groups. This has hindered GHF efforts to scale up—the best way to shrink the crowds at each site. For now, large masses must trek past Israel Defense Forces lines to reach these sites, while Hamas instigates stampedes. Much hunger in Gaza has been concentrated in the north, where there are no GHF sites. 'The fastest way to end the humanitarian crises in Gaza is for Hamas to SURRENDER AND RELEASE THE HOSTAGES,' President Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social. He's right, but why should Hamas give up when Israel is under massive international pressure? Reveling in French, U.K. and Canadian plans to recognize a state of Palestine, Hamas has hardened its position and rejected new cease-fire talks. But even if recognizing a Palestinian state weren't a gift to Hamas now, it would still be a policy error. The Soviet bloc and its allies recognized Palestine in 1988, but the West has long insisted that recognition follow the creation of a Palestinian state, not precede it. And to create such a state, the Palestinians would have to agree to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Otherwise, a state would merely be a base from which to expand the fighting. No one should want the West Bank to become another Gaza, devoted to sacrificing its people in perpetual war against Israel. In 2000, 2001 and 2008, the Palestinian Authority (PA) rejected Israeli offers of statehood because it was unwilling to give up on the dream of a mass migration to rule all of the land 'from the river to the sea.' Instead, the PA has turned to an international pressure campaign. France, the U.K., Canada and a few others now vindicate the strategy. The U.K. makes no demands on the PA, whose state it looks to recognize. France and Canada satisfy themselves with PA 'commitments' of reform they know it has no ability or intent to keep. Real actions aren't forthcoming, so much of the world has stopped asking. Germany says sensibly that 'recognition of a Palestinian state is expected to be the end' of a peace process. But there will be no process so long as other states pressure only Israel and tell Palestinians they needn't compromise. Canada asks that the PA commit to holding elections but exclude Hamas, the largest party, from a vote. It took 20 months for PA President-for-life Mahmoud Abbas to outright condemn the Hamas massacre of Oct. 7, 2023, and the last time he held an election, in 2006, Hamas won and violently purged the PA from Gaza. The good news is that the decisions that matter aren't made in Paris, London or Ottawa. No Palestinian state is coming because the PA is weak, corrupt and intransigent, and Hamas wants to kill every Jew. International recognition can serve as a launchpad for legal warfare against Israel. But by showing Hamas that war works when fought cynically enough, and by showing the PA that it need never compromise, it pushes Palestinian statehood further away.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store