Make healthy food more appealing, government tells supermarkets
Make healthy food more appealing, government tells supermarkets
Image source, Getty Images
Author, Nick Triggle Role, Health correspondent
8 hours ago
Food businesses must make it easier for customers to buy healthy food, under new government plans announced on Sunday.
Supermarkets and food manufacturers in England will partner with the government to tackle obesity rates by encouraging people to make their weekly shop healthier.
Ministers say it will be up to food retailers to decide how they do that, but it could involve offering promotions on healthy food, tweaking loyalty points to incentivise healthy options, or changing shop layouts.
It may also involve changing products to make them healthier.
It is hoped the plans will help to make healthy eating more accessible to customers and relieve pressure on the NHS.
The policy will see major food retailers report on healthy food sales in a bid to increase accountability - and targets will be agreed in partnership with industry..
The plan is part of a raft of measures aimed at improving the health of the nation that will be included in the 10-year plan for the NHS in England, which is expected to be published next week.
"Unless we curb the rising tide of cost and demand, the NHS risks becoming unsustainable," Health Secretary Wes Streeting said.
"This government's ambition for kids today is for them to be part of the healthiest generation of children ever. That is within our grasp."
The upcoming report will show that more than one in five children are living with obesity by the time they leave primary school, rising to almost one in three in the most deprived areas.
A recent report found a basket of healthy food costs more than double that of less healthy options.
The Food Foundation reported that 1,000 calories of healthy food such as fruit and veg costs £8.80, compared to £4.30 for the equivalent amount of less healthy food, such as ready meals and processed meats.
Andrew Opie of the British Retail Consortium said the news is "really positive" but said "all food businesses" must work together to drive down obesity.
"Engaging all food businesses makes a difference," Opie told the BBC.
"It can't just be about supermarkets- we consume about a quarter of our calories outside the home, so unless we get all supermarkets, food retailers, and restaurants on board, we won't move the dial on obesity."
Opie said that he agreed with the government's flexible approach on the standards, as businesses have "a lot of insights and data" into how we shop for food and what would be best for their customers.
Katharine Jenner, director of the Obesity Health Alliance said: "The government has rightly identified the root cause of obesity-related ill health: a food system that makes healthy eating difficult."
She said it was encouraging to see the government putting the spotlight on businesses "rather than placing the burden on individuals who are already struggling to get by."
Alongside the new partnership, the government said it will also:
Offer shopping vouchers to customers in return for being active and eating healthily, via a new app
Double the number of spaces on the NHS Digital Weight Management Programme, which supports obese individuals with either diabetes or high blood pressure
Introduce stricter rules on advertising alcohol to in line with current regulation on promoting junk food
It is hoped the new guidance will reduce people's sugar and calorie intake overall.
The government cited research showing that cutting just 50 calories a day would lift 340,000 children and two million adults out of obesity.
If everyone who is overweight reduced their calorie intake by just 216 calories a day, which is equivalent to a single bottle of fizzy drink, obesity would be halved, researchers said.
This is not the first time the government has sought voluntary partnerships with industry. Over the last 20 years there has been numerous food reformulation programmes aimed at reducing salt, sugar and calories in certain foods.
Success has been mixed with a push to reduce sugar in certain foods by 20% between 2015 and 2020 falling well short.
Sarah Woolnough, from The King's Fund think tank, said while welcome, the impact of the scheme may be limited.
'A lot of less healthy food and drink is purchased from local convenience shops and takeaways.
'The stark fact remains that unhealthy food is far cheaper and more readily available and so unless this change is part of a wider, comprehensive strategy it will not be enough.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK pharma group Hikma ploughs $1bn into US manufacturing as tariff threat lingers
Medicines firm Hikma Pharmaceuticals plans to invest $1billion into US manufacturing and research and development over the next five years. The London-headquartered firm told investors on Monday the investment would expand its domestic capabilities 'to develop, produce and deliver a broad range of medicines needed by the US healthcare system to treat patients nationwide'. Hikma specialises in generic medicines - medications created to be the same as a brand-name drug, but usually sold at a lower cost. It comes as the UK-US trade deal comes into effect today, leaving UK carmakers with reduced tariffs of 10 per cent and removing levies on the aerospace sector entirely. However, Britain's pharmaceutical sector still faces the potential for further tariffs down the line, as well as recent suggestions the White House could move to clamp-down on the price of medicines in the US. UK pharma sold £6.6billion worth of products to the US last year, meaning the sector is Britain's second-biggest export to the country. President Donald Trump's threat to end exemptions on pharma tariffs, which are driven by a 1995 World Trade Organisation deal, has sparked fears that disruption to the sector's highly complex supply chain could have implications for UK pharmacies and patients. Hikma said on Monday it has provided access 'to a wide range of generic medicines at a lower cost than branded products' since operating in the US since 1991. The group's 'America Leans on Hikma' strategy plans to increase the volume of 'essential medicines' developed and produced across its R&D and manufacturing sites in Columbus and Cleveland, Ohio and New Jersey. Hikma said: 'This next phase of expansion will help to strengthen Hikma's portfolio of more than 800 medicines and increase the company's US-based capacity to produce large volumes of high-quality and affordable medicines for American hospitals, providers and patients.' President of Hikma's generics business Dr. Hafrun Fridriksdottir added: 'We are proud to continue our ongoing investments in US manufacturing and R&D to better serve the needs of American patients. 'Hikma and our 2,300 dedicated US people are committed to supporting healthier communities nationwide by providing Americans with a steady and reliable supply of domestically produced quality medicines.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major supermarket urgently recalls lunch favourite that's contaminated with 'pieces of plastic'
A batch of pre-cooked chicken pieces has been urgently recalled due to the presence of plastic in some of the packets—causing a huge choking risk. BM Foods Ltd has issued an urgent recall on their Chicken Cooked Meat Trimmings, which are sold at budget supermarket Aldi. The recall affects the 400g products with the use by date July 4, 2025 and the batch code 50328453. Customers who have a packet of the contaminated meat have been told to not eat it, and to return the product to their Aldi store where they will receive a full refund. In a statement Aldi said: 'As a precautionary measure, our supplier is recalling selected packs of Chicken Cooked Meat Trimmings because they may contain plastic. 'We apologise that this product did not meet our normal high standards and thank you for your co-operation.' The Food Standards Agency (FSA), the UK's regulatory body for food and drink, issues recalls when problems are spotted with food that could be potentially harmful to consumers. In the urgent recall, the FSA said: 'The possible pieces of plastic in the products presents a choking hazard and makes them unsafe to eat.' It came just days after the budget supermarket issued an urgent recall on Inspired Cuisine Baby Potatoes with Herbs and Butter with the pack size 385g. This was because it contained milk not mentioned on the label—which poses a possible risk to anyone with an allergy or intolerance to milk. The food safety watchdog told the supermarket to contact the relevant allergy organisations to inform their members. Customers were similarly asked to return the product to their nearest Aldi store to receive a full refund. They warned those who have bought the product and have an allergy or intolerance to milk or milk constituents, not to eat it. It included Inspired Cuisine Baby Potatoes with Herbs and Butter products with date codes up to and including July 1, 2025. The supermarket also issued a 'point-of-sale notice its customers', which explains the recall and instructs shoppers on what to do next. 'These notices explain to customers why the product is being recalled and tell them what to do if they have bought the product,' said the regulator. While cow's milk allergy is less common in older children and adults, it affects about one in 50 infants in the UK, according to the NHS.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Carers like me connect patients and doctors – so why are we so often made to feel invisible?
It's autumn 2024 and I'm talking to an A&E doctor. We're on the refreshment break at a conference about care. He tells me that he and his colleagues keep their NHS lanyards visible when they take loved ones to medical appointments. It means the doctors listen to them. It's understandable; they're peers with shared training and expertise. But it's also infuriating because I know Mary's story and many more like it. Mary is 58, and lives in Wales with her husband and their adult son. As a result of epilepsy in infancy, her son has global developmental delay. Practically, this means that he is non-mobile, non-verbal and takes food through a tube to his stomach. I worked with Mary and 15 other unpaid carers last year, supporting them to keep weekly diaries and interviewing them, resulting in a research report. Mary's son requires medication to prevent excess drooling. He can't stop himself choking, so it's essential to minimise his saliva production. But in her diary, she explained that the medication was changed and the new type was less effective – he was having dangerous coughing fits. Mary reported this to his medical team but, in her words: 'It was a feeling of, if it wasn't witnessed by a health professional it didn't happen.' A few weeks later, she had a meeting in her home with some of his care team. 'I was just lucky that he performed,' she told me with a wry, tired smile, by which she meant he had a coughing fit in front of the professionals. His medication was swiftly reverted. I wish Mary's story was unique. But it's not. Ada is 80 and also cares for her son. He's in his 40s, and has autism and several other conditions. She had been warning medical professionals about his escalating panic attacks for months, but nothing had been done. In one incident, he became so panicked that he ran away from his daycare centre and had to be located by police. At other times, when it's just Ada and him at home, things can turn violent. Still, Ada told me that her concerns were dismissed. She was only believed when, by chance, a psychiatrist happened to witness one of these panic attacks. 'He said it was one of the gravest attacks he had seen.' To be an unpaid carer is to be deemed not credible, according to Mary, Ada and several other carers in this study. Mary feels this is especially apparent higher up the professional ladder. The community-based staff listen to her, perhaps because they see what she does for her son on a daily basis. But of consultants and doctors, she said: 'I'm lucky if they'll even look at me.' Yet it is Mary who has been at every medical appointment for her son during his 26 years. It is Mary who spends 15 hours in every 24-hour period providing care for him (alongside her part-time job and the paid care he receives). It is Mary who spots side effects, monitors symptoms and administers medications. It's not just about feeling respected; for carers such as Mary and Ada, being heard is a matter of life, death and safety. Of that meeting at which her son 'performed', she wrote that there had been too few chairs to seat all the attenders, so she perched on the periphery. 'The irony that there was no room for me at the table was not lost.' Family members provide far more than hands-on care at home in the absence of paid workers – their unpaid labour is woven through the entire health and care system and at all times. At the most basic level, they perform a high volume of administrative tasks, made harder by disjointed and complex systems. In fact, the carers in the study spent up to 220 hours over 12 weeks on these sorts of tasks for the people they are caring for. The diaries read like broken records – endless arranging and rearranging of appointments, prescriptions and finances, automated phone services that lead to dead ends, digitised forms that aren't fit for purpose. 'I wish that we did not move in circles,' wrote Philippa, 86, and caring for her 60-year-old son, after a long week trying to sort out his future care. In a cast of changing medical and care professionals, family members also act as essential living repositories of their loved ones' medical histories. Jared's wife had an industrial accident in 2011, after which she was in a coma. Jared told me that her medical notes were about 900 pages long. Medical professionals have rarely, if ever, had time to read all of the notes. In this context, Jared becomes indispensable as 'the only one who can say, well, this happened in this order'. Beyond project management and medical histories, carers also reported enabling what professionals call 'person-centred care', ensuring that the personality and preferences of their family members are understood. Lisa's mum is 75, and has diabetes, multiple sclerosis and cognitive decline. She is supported by a live-in paid worker. Lisa settles in the paid workers when they rotate. She does this practically – showing them where things are in the house – but she also communicates 'the nuances of Mum … I want to get across to them that they are going to see the worst side of her, but she's not that.' She tells them about the dinner parties her mother used to throw, her flirtatious and bubbly nature. 'She's such a different person now that you want her care workers to understand who she was.' Throughout the interviews and diaries, carers such as Lisa explain repeatedly how they lubricate the system, enabling it to function when care-receiving loved ones cannot. They are the unseen but essential lifeblood of the health and care system: it's not about them, but it does not function without them. Since being a carer myself, and subsequently writing a book about carers' experiences, I have developed a keen sense for when a policymaker, politician or simply a member of the public has failed to understand the contribution of carers. The Labour party manifesto last year was a case in point. It managed to set out a plan on care yet omit carers, that is, the people who perform the vast majority of care in the UK. Subsequent governmental announcements fall into the same trap, paying carers cursory attention. While we wait for politicians to catch up with reality, perhaps carers need to pirate those NHS identity cards. I'm not serious, of course. But I think, too, of Mary, Ada and all the other carers I've met, walking a tightrope of their loved ones' safety on a daily basis, steeped in loving and practical knowledge. It shouldn't take a piece of laminated card for them to win legitimacy. Emily Kenway is a social-policy doctoral researcher at the University of Edinburgh and author of Who Cares: the Hidden Crisis of Caregiving and How We Solve It
