The 10 councils left with no overall control after local elections
Reform won the most seats of any party — 677 out of some 1,650 — cinching majority control in ten councils, but gaining representation across all 23 councils.
Labour and Conservatives lost two-thirds of the seats they had in 2021 while the Liberal Democrats nearly doubled their seats up to 370 overall, and winning majority control of three councils.
Since the election counts, 10 local councils left with no overall control have since confirmed their leadership and executive arrangements after holding annual meetings.
This is the political makeup of each authority, and which parties will lead them.
Devon County Council
Both the Lib Dems and Reform gained 18 seats at the election, ensuring the former became the biggest party with 27 councillors.
The Conservatives lost 32 seats and control of the council, with seven councillors remaining.
The Greens were the only other party to make gains as their seats increased from two to six.
Lib Dem Julian Brazil was elected leader unchallenged on Thursday.
A major challenge for the new leadership will be children's services, with the county's support rated inadequate by Ofsted for the second time in five years earlier this month.
Commenting on the issue on Thursday, Mr Brazil said: 'No stone will be unturned or sinew unstrained in order to improve the service that we deliver to some of the most vulnerable children in our communities.'
At the same meeting, Reform councillor Michael Fife Cook complained that 'half the council is being ignored' after the Lib Dem cabinet was confirmed.
Gloucestershire County Council
The Conservatives had led Gloucestershire County Council since 2001 but lost 20 seats at the election, reducing the Tory group to just six.
The Lib Dems gained 11 seats but fell one short of the 28 needed for a majority.
The party's group leader Lisa Spivey was elected council leader unchallenged on May 21, becoming the first woman to take on the role.
Her nomination was backed by the Greens, which secured the third highest number of seats at the election with nine – a gain of five.
Reform became the second largest group with 11 councillors while Labour's seats were reduced from five to one.
Speaking at the annual meeting, Ms Spivey said the electorate had delivered 'a clear call for something better – a loud and resounding vote for change'.
Addressing new Reform councillors, she acknowledged there would be sharp differences of opinion between the two groups, but added: 'I look forward to working with you to deliver for your communities.'
Hertfordshire County Council
Hertfordshire County Council slipped into no overall control for the first time this century, with a collapse in support for the Conservatives indicative of the party's wider electoral woes.
Such was its dominance in this part of the South East, the Tories had been the only party to hold a majority in Hertfordshire since the council was established in 1974.
With 40 seats needed for a majority, the Lib Dems came closest with 31 due to a gain of eight.
The Tories lost more than half of their 46 seats to end the night with 22 councillors, while Reform made the biggest gain by securing 14 seats.
Both Labour and the Greens ended up with five seats.
Lib Dem Steve Jarvis was elected leader on May 20, with no sign of a formal coalition agreement with other parties.
He said his first two priorities were to fix roads and host a summit on plans to improve support for those with special educational needs and disabilities.
Leicestershire County Council
A surge in support for Reform in Leicestershire resulted in the party gaining 25 seats – just three short of an overall majority.
The Conservatives, who led the council as a majority since 2001, lost 27 seats.
This left the party as the second largest group with 15 councillors, followed by the Lib Dems with 11 (+2), Labour with two (-2), the Greens with one (+1) and independents with one (+1).
Former Conservative councillor Dan Harrison was elected leader on May 14, having defected to Reform in February.
The Conservatives had ruled out forming a coalition with Reform, preferring to provide a 'strong opposition', the BBC reported.
Warwickshire County Council
Warwickshire County Council, which has alternated between a Conservative majority and no overall control since it was established in 1974, is now under the leadership of Reform.
However, despite securing 23 seats the party fell short of the 29 needed for a majority.
The Lib Dems gained nine seats to take its total to 19, while the Conservative vote collapsed to deliver just nine councillors – a loss of 32.
The Greens won seven seats with a gain of four. Labour lost three to end with three.
Reform's Rob Howard was elected as leader of the county council on May 16 and his cabinet will be announced 'in the coming weeks', the council said.
Alternative leadership nominations were made for Liberal Democrat councillor Jerry Roodhouse and Green councillor Jonathan Chilvers.
Mr Howard won the support of 28 councillors, while Mr Roodhouse won 15 votes and Mr Chilvers 10, with one abstention.
Reform councillor Edward Harris was chosen as the new chairman of the authority and Conservative councillor Dale Keeling elected as vice-chairman.
Worcestershire County Council
Reform were just two seats shy of securing the 29 needed for an overall majority after voters turned their backs on the Conservatives en masse, with the party losing 33 councillors – leaving them with 12.
The Tories had been in charge of the county since 2001.
Reform's Jo Monk was elected the new leader of the council unchallenged on Thursday.
The Greens benefited from a five-seat boost to become the third biggest group, ahead of the Lib Dems on six (+2) and Labour on two (-1).
The Conservatives fell one seat short of retaining overall control of Buckinghamshire council, a unitary authority performing both county and district-level functions created in 2020.
The Tories lost 29 seats to leave them with 48 after boundary changes, while the Lib Dems gained 19 to secure 27 and second place.
Conservative Steven Broadbent was elected council leader on Thursday after former Tory leader Martin Tett stepped down.
Independents are the third largest group with 13 councillors, an increase of six, followed by Labour on four.
Reform failed to make the inroads it achieved elsewhere, with the party winning three seats.
Cornwall Council
Reform emerged from the election as the biggest party but fell well short of the 44 seats needed to gain overall control.
Reform's 28 new councillors put the party ahead of the Lib Dems in second on 26, after a gain of 13.
However, the support of independents proved pivotal in the vote for council leader on May 20 as Lib Dem councillor Leigh Frost was elected with 53 votes. There were 25 abstentions.
Reform UK had withdrawn from the race after other parties said they would not support them, the BBC reported.
Independents maintained their 16 seats and became the third biggest block, while the Conservatives suffered a huge loss of 40 seats, reducing their representation to seven councillors.
Labour now have four seats on the council – a reduction of one.
Northumberland County Council
The Conservatives narrowly retained its status as the largest group on Northumberland County Council, finishing three seats ahead of Reform, which gained its first 23 councillors.
But the Tories failed to win the 36 seats needed for overall control and faced a challenge from Reform for the leadership of the unitary authority.
Support from independents, Greens and Liberal Democrats led to Tory leader Glen Sanderson being re-elected as leader ahead of Reform nominee Mark Peart. Labour councillors abstained.
The election saw Labour slip from 21 seats to eight while independents, the Lib Dems and the Greens maintained low levels of representation.
Speaking at the annual meeting on May 21, Mr Sanderson is reported as saying: 'We will build together to make this continue to be successful. We all share one thing in common, which is to have our residents put a cross in our box to say we put our trust in you to represent us.'
Wiltshire Council
During a dramatic annual meeting on May 20, the Liberal Democrats took control of Wiltshire Council – a Conservative stronghold since it became a unitary council in 2009.
The Lib Dems gained 16 seats in the election but fell seven short of an overall majority, while the Tories lost 24 to come in second on 37.
This set up a head-to-head between Lib Dem Ian Thorn and former council leader Richard Clewer for the leadership.
Boosted by support from independents, it was Mr Thorn who prevailed by a margin of five votes.
Mr Thorn said there is now an opportunity to encourage parties to work together more, while Mr Clewer said he was 'frustrated' and 'sad' not to continue in the role.
Reform is now the third biggest party on the unitary council after winning 10 seats, followed by independents on seven and Labour on one (-2).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
New Statesman
27 minutes ago
- New Statesman
What the Bell Hotel closure reveals about the asylum housing stalemate
Photo byThe Bell Hotel must oust its asylum seekers within 28 days. A High Court judge has ruled in favour of Epping Forest District Council's request to stop asylum seekers being housed at the local hotel – a site of numerous recent protests, one of which turned violent, since a resident was charged with sexual assault. The Home Office's last-minute attempt to have the case dismissed failed. It had warned that the decision would 'substantially impact' its ability to accommodate asylum seekers in hotels. Whether this is a victory for mob rule and the far right or planning regulation and nimbys, it reveals the true extent of government impotence. The Home Office has a duty to avoid destitution – it cannot empty the hotels until there are enough houses available to shelter asylum seekers. This dispersal strategy is currently underway with the likes of Serco contracted by the government to offer dreamy deals to landlords to convert their properties into houses of multiple occupancy to house asylum seekers. But these, too, will bring the same tense dynamics of the hotels. They already draw local complaint and unease – and pressure on councils to regulate against them. While Labour ministers have made repeated promises to close the asylum hotels, and are vocally opposed to the policy – introduced by the Conservatives when the pandemic hit in 2020 – cases such as the Bell Hotel reveal how the Home Office has to fight to keep them open. 'Do you think anyone wanted to house asylum seekers in hotels?' as one despairing minister put it. The government is stuck in asylum hotel California. It can check out of the policy any time it likes, but it can never leave. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers
The Government does not have a plan to accommodate asylum seekers and did not listen to concerns that they should not be housed at the Bell Hotel, the leader of Epping Forest District Council has said. Chris Whitbread, who also leads the Conservative group at the Essex authority, said that failures to improve the system for processing asylum applications were also causing distress 'up and down the country'. His comments came after the council was granted a temporary injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been at the centre of a series of protests and counter-protests in recent weeks. The interim injunction granted by Mr Justice Eyre means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12, but the company could seek to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the judgment, Mr Whitbread said the injunction marked an 'opportunity for my community to start to return to normal'. A hearing on Friday was told by barristers representing Somani Hotels that the venue previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. Asylum seekers were then placed in the Bell Hotel again from April 2025. When asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Mr Whitbread said: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns. 'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns. 'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.' When asked what message he believed this sent from the Government, he said: 'If I am honest with you, I don't think they have actually got a plan. I think that is my real concern. 'We talk about one in, one out, well, that is a gimmick. If you talk about smashing the gangs, that was a gimmick. 'What we really need to see is a government with a serious plan to deal with this problem, and that obviously comes down to processing, where they stay while they are being processed, and actually speeding up the system. 'We are not seeing that at the moment, and that is causing a lot of distress to people up and down the country.' The hotel became the focal point of a series of protests after an asylum seeker housed at the site was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl. Mr Whitbread said that while later protests had been 'more peaceful, more bearable but still disruptive' to the community, he had 'never seen anything like what we have seen in recent times'. He said: 'I think what we have done as a council and what my brilliant team of council officers have done is actually take forward what the desire of residents is, to see the Bell closed, but do it in a sensible and proper way, and that is what we're doing.' Mr Whitbread also said that there had been 'no conversations' about the next steps for removing those currently housed at the hotel. Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open. 'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'
