AI model being trained with NHS data from 57m people ‘could predict disease'
The world-first study, led by researchers at University College London (UCL) and King's College London (KCL), could help 'unlock a healthcare revolution', officials said.
The model, know as Foresight, uses similar technology to ChatGPT but rather than predicting the next sentence it predicts future health conditions based on a patient's medical history.
Foresight is really exciting step towards being able to predict disease and complications before they happen, giving us a window to intervene and enabling shift towards more preventative healthcare at scale Dr Chris Tomlinson, UCL
As part of the pilot, it will be trained using eight routinely collected datasets from across England, including hospital admissions, A&E attendances and Covid-19 vaccination rates, which have been stripped of personal information.
Dr Chris Tomlinson, of UCL, said: 'Foresight is a really exciting step towards being able to predict disease and complications before they happen, giving us a window to intervene and enabling shift towards more preventative healthcare at scale.
'And to give a practical example of what that actually looks like, we could use Foresight to look across the whole population and predict the risk of, for example, unscheduled hospitalisation.
'This is a really significant event that often heralds deterioration in the patient's health but can occur from a variety of different causes, and also has a major resource implication on the health service.
'We can then use Foresight to understand the drivers for that deterioration, and potentially suggest personalising opportunities for intervention so that might include, for example, optimising medications to improve blood pressure control and reduce the risk of, say, stroke.'
Foresight is currently restricted to Covid-19-related research.
Dr Tomlinson added: 'We're looking at predicting Covid-19 outcomes – which may help us inform the next pandemic – but we're also testing the model's ability to generalise to other important healthcare outcomes, such as predicting the risk of hospitalisation or death in the next year, as well as the onset of over 1,000 different conditions.
'Ultimately, we'd like to increase the depth and capability of Foresight by including richer sources of data – information like physicians' notes and the results of investigations such as blood tests or scans.'
The pilot study will operate within NHS England's Secure Data Environment, which will provide access to de-personalised records with patient data remaining under strict NHS control.
An unrelenting focus on privacy and security, means people can rest assured that their data is in safe hands Science and technology secretary Peter Kyle
Dr Vin Diwakar, national director of transformation at NHS England, said: 'The NHS Secure Data Environment has been fundamental to this pioneering research, shaping a future where earlier treatments and interventions are targeted to those who will benefit, preventing future ill health.
'This will boost our ability to move quickly towards personalised, preventative care.'
Science and technology secretary Peter Kyle added: 'This ambitious research shows how AI, paired with the NHS's wealth of secure and anonymised data, is set to unlock a healthcare revolution.
'This technology is transforming what's possible in tackling a host of debilitating diseases, from diagnosis, to treatment, to prevention.
'This is work that that will be instrumental to this Government's missions to overhaul healthcare and grow the economy, which sit at the heart of our Plan for Change.
'And an unrelenting focus on privacy and security means people can rest assured that their data is in safe hands.'
The new pilot comes after a study, published in the Lancet Digital Health in March 2024, found Foresight was able to predict the type of health conditions a patient is likely to develop in the future.
Professor Richard Dobson, deputy director of the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre and another lead researcher at KCL and UCL, added: 'This pilot is building on previous research that demonstrated Foresight's ability to predict health trajectories from data from two NHS trusts.
'To be able to use it in a national setting is very exciting as it will potentially demonstrate more powerful predictions that can inform services nationally and locally.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I still wake up in the night panicking I haven't given Derek his meds – stress of caring for him left me needing surgery
Kate tells us why it's vital Rachel Reeves puts carers at the heart of her plans, invests in their health, and gives them real support KATE GARRAWAY I still wake up in the night panicking I haven't given Derek his meds – stress of caring for him left me needing surgery CARING for someone you love is a tough, relentless and, very often, such a lonely task. But it is also a privilege that all carers embrace. 7 TV host turned carer Kate Garraway with husband Derek at their home in 2023 Credit: PA 7 Derek died in January 2024 aged 56 four years after contracting Covid Credit: ITV 7 Kate, above with her husband in 2008, says looking after him was one of the greatest honours of her life Credit: PA Looking after my husband Derek — who died in January 2024 aged 56, four years after being left seriously ill from Covid — was one of the greatest honours of my life and I wish I was still doing it today. The children and I were so grateful he had survived despite the terrible damage the virus had done to him, and that with the help of doctors, nurses and professional carers we had the chance to give him the best life possible. Being a carer, its joys and its responsibilities, stays with you even after you have lost the person. I still wake up in the middle of the night panicking that I haven't given him his medicine, or that I have forgotten to move him every hour to prevent the painful contractions in his limbs. The next second I realise he no longer needs that care. There is a moment of relief — that I did not let him down — before a tsunami of sadness hits. Caring takes over your whole life. You don't begrudge it, but you suffer because of it. A report by non-profit organisation Carers UK this week reveals that 58 per cent of carers struggle to look after their own health. Four in ten have cancelled medical appointments to prioritise the person they look after and 1.2million live in poverty, including 400,000 in deep poverty. Almost half of adults who have looked after a loved one have physical or mental problems as a result, with seven in ten living with long-term conditions afterwards. That works out as 10.7million people whose lives have been turned upside down and left with serious health problems. Emotional Kate Garraway opens up on spending first wedding anniversary without Derek Draper I was one of the lucky ones, with hugely caring family and friends and supportive employers, but the harsh reality is that my own health still suffered. One day in November 2022, I was heading to Good Morning Britain when I woke up with searing chest pain. I could barely move, but I forced myself into the car. On the way in, I threw up. By the time I arrived at the studio, something was clearly wrong. Dr Hilary told the producers to call an ambulance. Instead of going on air, I was in hospital, wired to machines, with doctors fearing a heart attack. Thankfully, it was not. It was what they described as a 'heart event'. The stress of fighting for Derek to get the support he needed along with the physical demands of being a primary carer 24 hours a day was such a strain that my body was feeling the effect. And there were other signs too. Missed appointments. No time to rest. My autoimmune thyroid condition — neglected during Derek's illness — has now worsened significantly. Surgery now looks likely. It could have been avoided. During a three-week gap in care, while the system tried to work out which agency should give Derek the life-saving care he needed, I had no choice but to try to get through looking after Derek 24/7 completely alone. How could the only answer be to abandon someone who couldn't move, couldn't safely be left alone — but was fully aware and trusted me — to God knows what, just to have a cry for help answered? By the end I was so sleep-deprived I was scared it was no longer safe — for me, for the children, let alone for Derek. In desperation I called health services again and this time refused to get off the phone until some answer was given. In the end, the person on the other end of the phone, who was also clearly exhausted, told me, 'There is nothing I can do but — and this isn't official — you are not alone and what I always say to people is take him to A&E and leave him there, then they legally have to do something.' I knew she meant well but how could we have come to this? How could the only answer be to abandon someone who couldn't move, couldn't safely be left alone — but was fully aware and trusted me — to God knows what, just to have a cry for help answered? 7 Kate sends a plea to Chancellor Rachel Reeves to not forget carers ahead of the spending review Credit: Rex 7 Carers are the backbone of this country — but are being broken under the weight, says Kate Credit: Shutterstock Editorial PLEASE HELP HELPERS By Grace Macaskill MILLIONS of people throughout the country are struggling under the weight of looking after loved ones. According to a new survey, almost half of carers have seen a decline in their own mental and physical health. Research by Carers UK also found that four in ten current or former carers – equivalent to 10.7million people – put the health of disabled, older or sick relatives before their own. This leads them to skip medical appointments, tests, scans or therapy because they are unable to get someone to look after the person they are caring for. Carers are also more likely to suffer health problems, with 70 per cent dealing with issues compared to 59 per cent of the general population, according to last year's GP Patient survey in England. Helen Walker, chief executive of Carers UK, said: 'Sadly, caring for someone often comes at a personal cost and carers still face significant inequalities. If you are caring for someone it's likely that you will experience poorer health, financial strain, challenges accessing employment and education opportunities and be at greater risk of loneliness and isolation. 'It can be a negative cycle for many carers who experience worsening physical or mental health and are unable to take a break to look after themselves. 'The impact of this can be long- lasting, but we know that change is possible – from the Government investing more in support for unpaid carers and the NHS having clear measures of help for carers, to rights at work and support within education.' I didn't take him, I just couldn't, physically or morally. Final straw I got through another day somehow until a family member took time off their work to come — and we got through. But others are not so lucky. And they are simply breaking and fearing even worse is to come. I have more friends than ever taking on caring roles. And my own mum is now caring full-time for my dad following a stroke, and they are both in their eighties. There are millions out there in far worse situations than I found myself in. Carers UK has raised serious concerns about the Government's proposed welfare changes, particularly reforms to Personal Independence Payment. If eligibility becomes stricter, many carers could lose vital financial support and their Carer's Allowance. These changes could affect up to 150,000 carers, with losses of more than £8,000 a year per household. For many, barely surviving, that would be the final straw. Carers are the backbone of this country — but are being broken under the weight. They are doing the work of a second NHS. Silently. Without pay. Without recognition. Every day, 12,000 more people become unpaid carers. And every day, 600 workers leave their jobs to care full-time. Britain depends on an army of unpaid carers who save the country £184billion a year — more than the entire NHS budget. But who is caring for them? This week is Carers Week and, just as the Chancellor prepares to give her spending review today, investment in the sector is at an all-time low. So my message to Rachel Reeves is: Please do not forget the carers. My message to Rachel Reeves is: Please do not forget the carers Put them at the heart of your plans. Invest in their health, give them real support and recognise the vital role they play. When you support carers, you take pressure off the NHS, you keep people out of hospital and you help get them home — where they want to be, where they belong. Carers are not asking for praise. They love what they do. They are just asking not to be forgotten. Not now, not again, and not when they are holding up the very fabric of our country with their bare hands. 7 Kate's autoimmune thyroid condition has now worsened significantly after being neglected during Derek's illness Credit: Refer to Caption 7 Kate and Derek pictured with their family Credit: Instagram
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Loss of data relating to inquiry at NHS trust most likely deliberate, say police
A missing data file containing the details of hundreds of maternity cases was most likely deleted 'intentionally or maliciously', a police investigation has concluded. Nottinghamshire police began an investigation in February into the temporary loss of the computer file at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS trust. The trust is at the centre of the largest maternity inquiry in the history of the NHS, examining deaths and harm spanning more than a decade at the Queen's Medical Centre and Nottingham city hospital. The police force's cyber team said the deletion was 'most likely to be the action of an individual' but the loss 'was not caused or contributed to by any systemic corruption within NUH'. A letter to families involved in the inquiry, seen by the BBC, from assistant chief constable Rob Griffin said the deletion was 'most likely to have been done intentionally/maliciously rather than accidentally'. Police said the identity of the culprit could not be determined. The trust previously said the computer file went missing in July 2024 for a few days. It was recovered after its deletion was spotted by the trust and led to about 300 more cases being added to the maternity inquiry. Nearly 2,500 cases are being examined by the senior midwife, Donna Ockenden, and a national team of leading doctors and midwives, whose review is due to conclude in summer 2026. A statement from the Nottingham Affected Families Group said: 'Nottingham families would like to thank the police for their determined investigation. We are distressed that they were unable to find who did this. 'We are appalled to hear this news, though sadly we are not surprised … To know that there is most likely an individual who is capable of such behaviour is devastating for the already harmed and for the future of NUH safety. 'We call for openness at this worrying time and for the individual, their colleagues or anyone who knows anything about this to come forwards as a matter of urgency. This is a patient safety emergency.' Anthony May, chief executive of NUH, said: 'I would like to thank Nottinghamshire police for their support in investigating this matter and we accept their findings. Upon discovering the issue, the trust informed Nottinghamshire police and engaged fully in the investigation. 'We have put appropriate measures in place to secure digital files so that this cannot happen again.' Last week, Nottinghamshire police said they were investigating possible corporate manslaughter at the trust over the deaths and severe harm of more than 2,000 babies and women. Det Supt Matthew Croome said at the time that the alleged offences related to 'circumstances where an organisation has been grossly negligent in the management of its activities, which has then led to a person's death'.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
New NHS guidelines mean younger women could have fewer cervical screenings
Women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will be invited to cervical screening every five years instead of every three, under new NHS guidelines. The change, set to take effect next month in England, follows recommendations from the UK National Screening Committee. According to analysis from King's College London, extending the screening interval to five years for HPV-negative women is just as safe as the current three-year interval, with a similar rate of cancer detection. HPV is a sexually transmitted group of viruses, with around 13 high-risk types known to cause almost all cases of cervical cancer. Most people with HPV don't experience any symptoms. Women who test positive for HPV, or have a history of the virus, will continue to be invited for more frequent screenings to monitor the virus and check for any changes to cells in the cervix. In a written statement to Parliament, health minister Ashley Dalton said the new change 'increases the opportunities to test and recall women and people with a cervix who have HPV, while extending the cervical screening intervals from three to five years in England for individuals who have a negative HPV test. 'This will bring England's cervical screening intervals in line with those of Wales and Scotland.' She said the NHS screening programme in England provides all women between the ages of 25 and 64 'with the opportunity to be screened routinely to detect HPV infection or cervical abnormalities at an early, more treatable stage'. She added: 'The aim of the programme is to reduce the number of women who develop invasive cervical cancer and reduce the number who die from it.' Ms Dalton said testing negative for HPV means the chances of developing cancer within five years are very small, as it can take around 10 years or more from the time HPV is detected to developing cervical cancer. She added: 'Those who test positive for HPV are already being followed up with yearly testing. 'This is important to ensure that individuals are monitored for any early signs of cervical abnormalities and provided the necessary treatment.' Experts have been concerned about falling numbers of women under 50 attending cervical screening, with around a third in England not taking up their invitations. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal, said: 'We want every eligible person to feel empowered to attend a vaccination and cervical screening appointment when they are invited so we can achieve the brilliant ambition of eliminating cervical cancer.'
