
What is 8647? Did former FBI director James Comey threaten to kill Donald Trump?
A political firestorm has engulfed Washington after former
FBI Director
James Comey
shared an Instagram post featuring a seemingly innocuous image of seashells — arranged to spell out the numbers '8647.' What appeared at first glance to be a whimsical beachside memento has instead sparked furious allegations of an assassination threat against President
Donald Trump
, prompted investigations by federal authorities, and reopened the festering wound of Trump vs.
Comey — a bitter feud that has defined the darker undercurrents of American politics for nearly a decade.
The '8647' Enigma
At the centre of the uproar is the interpretation of the numbers '86 47.' In American slang, '86' can mean to cancel, get rid of, or even 'eliminate' someone. Meanwhile, '47' refers to Donald Trump's current position as the 47th President of the United States. Combined, conservative critics allege, the numbers amount to a coded call for Trump's assassination — an accusation that has escalated into a full-blown national security issue.
The post was quickly deleted after backlash erupted online. Donald Trump Jr. led the charge, posting: 'Just James Comey casually calling for my dad to be murdered. This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!!!!' Right-wing commentators and lawmakers echoed the sentiment, framing the post as a veiled threat from a man who once headed the nation's top law enforcement agency.
Comey, for his part, denied any sinister intent.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
35 & Earning? Protect Your Family with ₹1 Cr Life Cover
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
In a follow-up Instagram statement, he said: 'I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn't realise some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.'
But in today's hyper-polarised climate, the clarification did little to stem the outrage.
Federal Agencies Respond
Kash Patel announces Operation Restore Justice under which over 200 child sex predators have been arrested.
The fallout from the post has extended well beyond social media. Homeland Security Secretary
Kristi Noem
declared on X (formerly Twitter) that the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service were treating the matter as a potential threat against the President.
'Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of @POTUSTrump,' she wrote. 'DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.'
The Secret Service, tasked with protecting the President, confirmed the initiation of an investigation. A spokesperson told CNN: 'The Secret Service vigorously investigates anything that can be taken as a potential threat against our protectees.
We take this responsibility very seriously.'
FBI Director
Kash Patel
confirmed coordination with the Secret Service, stating on X: 'We are in communication with the Secret Service and Director (Sean) Curran. Primary jurisdiction is with SS on these matters and we, the FBI, will provide all necessary support.'
Adding fuel to the fire, Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard
went on Fox News and declared that Comey should be imprisoned.
'I'm very concerned for [Trump's] life,' she said. 'And James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this.'
While Gabbard has no legal authority to press charges — and many legal experts remain sceptical of whether the post rises to the level of a criminal threat — the controversy has nonetheless become a dominant political issue.
A Violent Backdrop
FILE - Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump is surrounded by U.S. Secret Service agents at a campaign rally, July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pa. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
The controversy is especially sensitive given its proximity to a near-fatal assassination attempt on Trump.
On July 13, 2024, Trump was shot in the right ear while delivering a campaign speech in Butler, Pennsylvania. The shooter, reportedly a 19-year-old lone actor, was killed on site by a Secret Service sniper. One bystander died, and two others were injured.
The attempt on Trump's life galvanised his supporters and shifted the tone of the 2024 presidential race. Then-President Joe Biden condemned the attack and called for unity, but the political temperature never truly cooled.
In that context, any perceived threat to Trump — even in symbolic or numerical form — is viewed through an especially volatile lens.
Trump vs. Comey: The Long War
The '8647' episode cannot be fully understood without unpacking the long and bitter feud between Trump and James Comey. Once seen as a buttoned-up, by-the-book bureaucrat, Comey was appointed FBI Director in 2013 by President
Barack Obama
. His tenure, however, placed him at the centre of two of the most politically charged investigations in modern US history.
First came the Clinton email probe. In July 2016, Comey held an extraordinary press conference announcing that the FBI would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while Secretary of State. While clearing her legally, he publicly criticised her actions as 'extremely careless,' drawing bipartisan condemnation — Democrats accused him of damaging Clinton's campaign; Republicans said he was letting her off easy.
Then came the Russia investigation. After Trump won the presidency in November 2016, the FBI began investigating potential links between Trump's campaign and Russian efforts to interfere in the election. In May 2017, just months into his presidency, Trump abruptly fired Comey — an act that would later prompt the appointment of Special Counsel
Robert Mueller
.
Trump justified the firing by calling Comey a 'grandstander' and a 'showboat,' and later admitted in an interview that the Russia investigation was a factor.
That admission fueled allegations of obstruction of justice and sparked years of legal and political drama.
Comey, now unshackled from government service, went on a media blitz. His memoir,
A Higher Loyalty,
was a bestseller. He became a fixture on MSNBC, Twitter, and college campuses — positioning himself as a defender of the rule of law against Trump's alleged abuses of power.
To Trump and his base, Comey became a symbol of the so-called 'deep state' — an entrenched bureaucracy that, they argued, tried to delegitimise the Trump presidency through leaks, investigations, and partisan sabotage.
To Comey's defenders, he was a principled public servant caught in a political firestorm not of his own making.
The Political Fallout
As of now, no charges have been filed, and the investigation into Comey's '8647' post remains ongoing. Legal analysts have cautioned that while the post may have been ill-advised or in poor taste, proving criminal intent — particularly incitement or threat — would require a high bar of evidence.
But the political damage may already be done. The incident has reignited debates over free speech, the power of symbolism, and the weaponisation of national security apparatus for partisan ends. For Trump's supporters, it confirms suspicions that former officials still harbour ill will — and potentially worse. For Comey's defenders, the backlash is seen as another overreach by a government veering toward authoritarian tendencies.
Whether '8647' was a cryptic message, a misunderstood reference, or simply an unfortunate coincidence, one thing is certain: the Trump-Comey saga is far from over. In today's America, even seashells can start a storm.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Forget texts, calls or emails: Woman catches cheating husband using electric toothbrush. Here's how
In a world where cheating is often uncovered through texts, calls, or shady messages, one UK woman cracked her husband's lies using something far more mundane—an electric toothbrush. Yes, you read that right. It wasn't WhatsApp or a lipstick-stained shirt that gave him away. It was a synced toothbrush app that recorded his every brushstroke. Private investigator Paul Jones, who recounted the bizarre case to Mirror UK , called it one of the strangest infidelity busts he's seen in his career. But in a digital age where even our toothbrushes are smart, perhaps the betrayal wasn't so surprising after all. Brushing Off the Truth—Until It Brushed Back The woman had connected the toothbrush app to her phone to monitor her children's dental hygiene. But soon she noticed irregularities in the brushing logs—not from her kids, but her husband. Logs showed he was brushing at home during school hours and regular workdays, especially on Fridays. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Container Houses Vietnam (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo At first, the data seemed trivial. But week after week, brushing sessions popped up at suspiciously similar times—late mornings on Fridays when he was supposedly at work. The digital trail didn't lie. It told a precise, timestamped story: someone was at home brushing their teeth while pretending to be at the office. The Dirty Truth Curious and increasingly suspicious, the woman hired Jones to investigate further. What he found confirmed her worst fears. Her husband hadn't worked on a Friday in over three months. Instead, he was inviting his mistress—one of his coworkers—over to the family home while the rest of the household was out. You Might Also Like: ChatGPT caught lying to developers: New AI model tries to save itself from being replaced and shut down All the while, his alibi was spotless—or so he thought. But his toothbrush had kept a perfect record of his infidelity, logging every session and outing him with brutal digital honesty. Data Doesn't Lie, People Do Jones emphasized the importance of noticing seemingly insignificant digital cues. 'It's timestamped, often location-based, and emotionless,' he said. 'When a device says someone brushed their teeth at 10:48 am on a workday, that's very hard to explain away.' He urged those suspicious of infidelity not to limit their attention to text messages or phone records. Instead, he advised looking into smart devices—be it a toothbrush, voice assistant, or even supermarket loyalty apps—that quietly collect data in the background. The New Digital Detectives Jones isn't the only private eye warning about hidden digital trails. Another UK investigator, Aaron Bond, said supermarket loyalty cards like Tesco's Clubcard are another untapped resource for uncovering deception. These apps log dates and locations of purchases—meaning a simple trip to a different store can contradict an alibi. You Might Also Like: After girlfriend cheated on him, techie pulls off a shocking scam to get paid leave from office 'If your partner says they were working late, but the app shows they were shopping across town, that's a red flag,' Bond explained. From toothbrushes to shopping apps, our everyday devices are evolving into unintentional truth-tellers. While lies can be rehearsed and stories spun, data remains precise and unfeeling. It doesn't care about guilt, shame, or excuses—it just logs what happened and when. So next time something feels off in your relationship, you might not need to dig through messages or check the call history. Just open the toothbrush app—you might find more than just plaque.


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Judge blocks Trump's move to stop international Harvard students from entering US — Will other universities follow suit?
Judge halts Trump's order barring international Harvard students — what this means for US student visas Judge halts Trump's order on Harvard's international students — what does this mean for the future of student visas? A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's proclamation aimed at preventing international students from entering the US to study at Harvard University. The ruling comes amid an escalating legal battle between the Trump administration and the prestigious institution. US District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order, stopping the government from enforcing the proclamation, citing concerns that the policy could cause "immediate and irreparable injury," as reported by the ABC News. Judge blocks Trump's proclamation citing potential harm The proclamation, signed by President Trump, invoked the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard for at least six months. It also directed the secretary of state to consider revoking visas of current international students enrolled at Harvard. In her order, Judge Burroughs prohibited the government from "implementing, instituting, maintaining, enforcing, or giving force or effect" to the proclamation. This legal move followed a lawsuit refiled by Harvard challenging the proclamation on grounds that it violates the First Amendment and misuses federal law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Harvard's lawyers argued the president's actions were not taken to protect US interests but instead represented "a government vendetta against Harvard," as reported by the ABC News. They claimed the moves were retaliatory, targeting Harvard for exercising its constitutional rights to reject government control over its governance, curriculum, and faculty ideologies. A continuing feud between Harvard and the Trump administration This ruling builds on a previous decision by the same judge that blocked the Trump administration's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students through the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Although the Department of Homeland Security initially tried to revoke the program, the court issued a temporary order blocking that move. President Trump justified his proclamation by claiming Harvard refused to provide information about international students, was "extensively entangled with foreign countries," and engaged in discriminatory admissions practices. The proclamation also pointed to rising crime rates and called for investigations into potential misconduct by foreign students. "I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," the proclamation stated, as reported by the ABC News. What does this mean for the future of student visas? The judge's decision protects Harvard's international students for now but raises broader questions about the future of student visa policies in the US. The administration's confrontational stance toward Harvard may signal possible restrictions for other institutions, raising concern across campuses nationwide. Legal experts believe this ruling could set a precedent safeguarding universities from similar government actions. However, the Trump administration has yet to clarify if it will appeal or pursue other measures. With the ongoing legal battles, international students and universities are closely watching the outcome. The decision could have far-reaching implications for immigration policy, academic freedom, and the US's role as a global education leader. As quoted by the ABC News, "This fight is about more than visas. It's about the protection of free speech and institutional autonomy." The case continues to unfold, shaping a critical conversation about immigration and education in the US. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump and Musk break up, and Washington holds its breath
Maybe it was always going to end this way, with two billionaires angrily posting about each other on social media, fingers flying across pocket-sized screens as their incandescent feud burned hotter by the minute. But even if the finale was predictable, that didn't make it any less shocking. After long months when Donald Trump and Elon Musk appeared united in their chaotic mission to remake Washington , their relationship imploded this week like a star going supernova. It began with Musk complaining about the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which the president at first took in stride. Eventually Trump let slip that he was disappointed in his former adviser, prompting Musk to unleash a flood of insults and taunts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bhagawatipara Apartment Prices May Be Lower Than You Think (Take a Look) Apartments for rent | Search Ads Learn More Undo Also Read: Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX': Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status He accused Trump of betraying promises to cut federal spending, shared a suggestion that the president should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about his association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most viciously, Musk insisted that Trump wouldn't have won last year's election without his help. Live Events Trump, not one to slouch from a fight, could hold back no longer. He posted that Musk had been "wearing thin," that he had "asked him to leave" his administration, that the tech titan had "gone CRAZY." Maybe, Trump threatened, he should save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. Bad blood with high stakes On and on it went, as liberals savored the spectacle of their most despised political opponents clawing at each other's digital throats and conservatives reeled at the prospect of having to pick sides. Laura Loomer, a right-wing provocateur and conspiracy theorist, saw an opportunity to position herself as the voice of reason. "This fight should be taken offline," she said - on social media, of course. The question now is whether Trump and Musk find some way to step back from a battle that is tearing apart one of the most consequential relationships in modern American politics. If they don't, there's little telling how far the fallout could spread from a collision between the world's most powerful man and its wealthiest. At stake are the future of Musk's companies, including electric automaker Tesla and rocket manufacturer SpaceX; government programs that rely on the billionaire entrepreneur's technology; legislation for advancing tax cuts and Trump's other priorities in Congress; Republican chances in next year's midterm elections; and an entire political ecosystem that has orbited around Trump and Musk's deteriorating partnership. "It's like India and Pakistan," said Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana, referring to two nuclear-armed nations that recently skirmished along their border. "It just escalates and neither one of them seem to back down and understand the strength of each other." Opposites attracted (for a time) Trump and Musk were always an odd pairing, with contrasting world views and deep generational and stylistic differences. Trump, 78, comes from old-school New York real estate and never appears in public without a suit and tie unless he's on the golf course. Before running for president, he became a household name as a reality television star. Musk, 53, is an immigrant from South Africa who struck it rich in Silicon Valley. In addition to running Tesla and SpaceX , Musk owns the social media company X. He's fashioned himself as a black-clad internet edgelord, and his wealth vastly outstrips Trump's. Also Read: Elon Musk to start new political party amid feud with Trump? Tech mogul drops big hint on X But Trump and Musk are kindred spirits in other ways. They're experts at generating attention who enjoy stirring the pot by riling up their opponents. Each has sought more power to accomplish existential quests. Trump assails the federal "deep state" that resisted him during his first term, while Musk warns about the country going bankrupt from excessive spending and promotes an interplanetary future powered by his rocket technology. Musk endorsed Trump after the Republican candidate was nearly assassinated in Butler, Pennsylvania, and he began spending millions to support him. His social media megaphone was a powerful addition to Trump's comeback campaign, magnifying his efforts to court tech leaders and young, very online men. Trump rarely tolerates sharing the spotlight, but he seemed enamored with his powerful backer, mentioning him in stump speeches and welcoming him onstage at rallies. After the election, Musk was a fixture around Mar-a-Lago, posing for photos with Trump's family, joining them for dinner, sitting in on meetings. Instead of growing tired of his "first buddy," Trump made plans to bring Musk along to Washington, appointing him to lead a cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency. Cracks emerge Musk tried to establish himself as the president's omniscient and omnipresent adviser. He held court in Cabinet meetings, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and helped himself to caramel ice cream from the White House kitchen. The federal bureaucracy practically trembled before Musk, who oversaw layoffs and downsizing with his team of acolytes and engineers embedded in various agencies. Musk appeared thrilled at his opportunity to tinker with the government and exulted in his bromance with Trump, posting on Feb. 7 that he loved the president "as much as a straight man can love another man." Trump returned the favor on March 11, allowing Musk to line up Tesla vehicles on the White House driveway as his company was struggling with declining sales. Trump made a show of choosing a cherry red electric car for himself. But cracks were emerging, especially as Trump pursued tariffs that could raise costs for Musk's businesses. Musk said Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, was "truly a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks" on April 8. The billionaire entrepreneur, who had never before worked in public service, seemed to be souring on government. He suggested there wasn't enough political will, either in Congress or in the White House, to adequately reduce spending. Trump started signaling that it was time for him to leave even though Musk said he would be willing to stay. Shortly before announcing his departure, Musk said he was "disappointed" by legislation that Trump called the "big beautiful bill" because it would increase the deficit. The measure includes tax cuts, more money for border security and changes to Medicaid that would leave fewer people with health insurance. "I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful," Musk said. "But I don't know if it could be both." The criticism didn't prevent Trump from giving Musk a send-off in the Oval Office, where he presented his outgoing adviser with a ceremonial key. "Elon is really not leaving," Trump said. "He's going to be back and forth." Musk said, "I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president." The implosion comes hard and fast It's hard to imagine that now. Musk escalated his attacks on the legislation Tuesday, calling it a "disgusting abomination," and Trump tried to fend off the criticism. "He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next," the president said Thursday in the Oval Office during a meeting with the German chancellor. It was. Musk quickly took to X to vent his anger at Trump, saying his tariffs "will cause a recession in the second half of this year" and accusing him of lying. He also said it was "very unfair" that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. Trump fired back in real time as he tried to maintain momentum for his legislation, which faces a difficult debate in the Senate. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago," the president posted. "This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress." Meanwhile, some of Trump's allies plotted revenge. Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser who hosts an influential conservative podcast, said the president should direct the U.S. government to seize SpaceX. He also encouraged Trump to investigate allegations that Musk uses drugs and "go through everything about his immigration status" in preparation for potential deportation. "We'll see how good Elon Musk takes a little of that pressure," Bannon said, "because I happen to think a little of that pressure might be coming."