
Who are the Druze and why does Israel say it is hitting Syria for their sake?
Straddling Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, the Druze occupy a special niche in the region's complex politics.
.
Who are the Druze?
The Druze are Arabs who follow a religion derived from a branch of Islam. They maintain a degree of secrecy about the practice of their faith that emerged in the 11th century and incorporates elements from Islam and other philosophies, emphasising monotheism, reincarnation and the pursuit of truth.
Some hardline Sunni Muslims deem them heretics. Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, an Islamist who once belonged to al Qaeda, called them part of the Syrian fabric and vowed to protect their rights in a speech today.
Where do they live?
Syria's Druze are concentrated in the southwest in the Sweida region bordering Jordan and in areas of Quneitra province, near the occupied Golan. They also reside in the Damascus suburb of Jaramana. In Israel, Druze reside primarily in the north and the occupied Golan.
In Lebanon, they are concentrated in mountain regions, including Chouf and Aley, and others such as Hasbaya in south Lebanon.
How do they fit into regional politics?
Though a small minority, the Druze have often played an outsized role in the politics of countries where they live.
In Israel, the Druze number 150,000. Unlike Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel, many Druze Arabs serve in the Israeli military and police, including during the war in Gaza, and some have reached a high rank, meaning their voices cannot be easily ignored by Israel's political leadership.
While most Druze in Israel identify as Israeli citizens, more than 20,000 living in the occupied Golan still identify as Syrians and have close ties to family on the other side of the border.
Facing calls from Israeli Druze to help Syrian Druze, Israeli leaders have cited protecting them as a reason for attacking Syria repeatedly this year.
Syria's Druze population is estimated to number around one million people. They held some protests against Bashar al-Assad after the eruption of the war in 2011 but there was little conflict between them and Damascus as it focused on trying to crush the uprising in Sunni-majority areas.
Since Mr Assad was toppled in December, friction with the Islamist-led authorities has ignited fighting several times.
While some Druze leaders have urged accommodation with Damascus, others have come out strongly against Mr Sharaa, notably Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari, who urged resistance to government forces and appealed to world leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during this week's violence.
Some Druze figures have criticised this approach.
Lebanon's Walid Jumblatt, one of the region's most prominent Druze politicians, has rejected the notion that Israel is protecting Syria's Druze. He has warned against calls for international protection and called for Syrian national unity.
What is driving Israel's intervention?
Israel bombed Syria frequently when Mr Assad was in power, seeking to roll back the influence established by Iran and Iran-backed groups that deployed there to help him fight rebels.
Israel has painted the new Syrian government as a jihadist threat, saying it won't allow it to deploy forces into southern Syria. Israel has said it wants to avoid any hostile build-up at its border, whilst also vowing to protect the Druze minority.
Israeli troops have also seized Syrian territory adjoining the occupied Golan Heights since December.
Speaking today, Mr Sharaa said Israel was promoting division among Syrians, accusing it of seeking to "dismantle the unity of our people", saying it had "consistently targeted our stability and created discord among us since the fall of the former regime".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
6 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Israeli military chief opposes plan for Gaza war expansion
During a tense, three-hour meeting on Tuesday, Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, the military chief of staff, warned the prime minister that taking the rest of Gaza could trap the military in the territory, which it withdrew from two decades ago, and could lead to harm to the hostages being held there, the sources briefed on the meeting said. The Israeli military has said it already controls 75pc of Gaza after nearly two years of war, which began when militant group Hamas attacked southern Israeli communities in October 2023. It has repeatedly opposed imposing military rule, annexing the territory, and rebuilding Jewish settlements there – policies advocated by some government members. Mr Netanyahu is under intense international pressure to reach a ceasefire in the coastal enclave, which has been reduced to rubble in the fighting. Most of the population of about two million has been displaced multiple times and aid groups say residents are on the verge of famine. The UN has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza 'deeply alarming' if true. The military, which accuses Hamas of operating among civilians, has at times avoided areas where intelligence suggested hostages were held and former captives have said their captors threatened to kill them if Israeli forces approached. Mr Netanyahu told Lt Gen Zamir that the military had failed to bring about the release of the hostages, the Israeli officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. Most of those freed so far came about as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Defence minister Israel Katz wrote on X yesterday that the military chief has both the right and the duty to voice his opinion, but said the military would carry out the government's decisions until all war objectives are achieved. The prime minister's office confirmed the meeting with Lt Gen Zamir on Tuesday but declined to comment further and the military did not respond to a request for comment. ADVERTISEMENT The prime minister is scheduled to discuss military plans for Gaza with other ministers today. A fourth source said Mr Netanyahu wants to expand military operations in Gaza to put pressure on Hamas. Mr Netanyahu, who in May said that Israel would control all of Gaza, leads the most right-wing coalition government in Israel's history and some of his key partners have in the past threatened to quit if the government ended the war. Following a 40-minute meeting with the prime minister yesterday, opposition leader Yair Lapid told reporters he had advised Mr Netanyahu that the public was not interested in continuing the war and that a full military takeover would be a very bad idea. A public poll last month by Israel's Channel 12 also showed support for a diplomatic deal that would end the war and secure the release of the hostages. There are 50 hostages still being held in Gaza, of whom at least 20 are believed to be alive. Videos released by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, another militant group in Gaza, last week of two extremely emaciated captives triggered international condemnation. Close to 200 Palestinians have died of starvation in Gaza since the war began, about half of them children, according to Gaza's health ministry. More than 20 died yesterday when a truck believed to be carrying food overturned as it was swarmed by a desperate crowd, according to local health authorities. The Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites. This week, a group of UN special rapporteurs and independent human rights experts called for the GHF to be disbanded, saying it is 'an utterly disturbing example of how humanitarian relief can be exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas in serious breach of international law'. The experts work with the UN but do not represent the world body. The UN human rights office said last week that about 1,400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid since May, mostly near GHF sites but also along UN convoy routes where trucks have been overwhelmed by crowds. It said nearly all were killed by Israeli fire. The latest ceasefire talks in Qatar broke down last month. Hamas insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war, while Israel accuses the group of lacking sincerity about giving up power afterwards and must be defeated. An expansion of the military offensive in heavily populated areas would likely be devastating. 'Where will we go?' Tamer Al-Burai, a displaced Palestinian living at the edge of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, told Reuters by phone. 'Should people jump into the sea if the tanks rolled in, or wait to die under the rubble of their houses? We want an end to this war, it is enough, enough.' The war in Gaza has also overextended Israel's military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilise reservists. It is not clear if more reservists would be needed to expand operations and take more territory. The military continued to carry out airstrikes across Gaza yesterday, killing at least 135 people in the last 24 hours, the Gaza health ministry said, adding that the death toll since the beginning of the conflict was now at more than 61,000, mostly civilians. About 1,200 people were killed, including more than 700 civilians, and 251 hostages taken to Gaza after the Hamas attack on Israel, according to Israeli tallies.


Irish Independent
6 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: Youth can be no excuse for those responsible for acts of violence on our streets
I am being asked by my friends in India about how safe Ireland is. Some of them were earlier asking if their children could come and study in Ireland, as it was considered safe. They were prepared to spend thousands of euro to send them for third-level education. Now I am in a dilemma. What can I say to them? My country, Ireland, is carrying a bad name. It is time to determine who is responsible for creating this environment of fear. The teens who are usually involved in such incidents get away because they are young. This does not excuse them, as they cause life-altering damage to a person's life. This affects at least five more lives who are dependent on them. How can the law be oblivious of the damage done to families on the excuse of the perpetrator being young? If there is any politics in it, the individuals need to be singled out and made to pay a price. In the US, the parents of such criminals are being punished for the damage their children do. Can that not be followed in Ireland? And how about treating such criminals as adults in Irish courts? Pradeep K Chadha, Castleknock, Dublin 15 Would ending Triple Lock mean Ireland was free to intervene in Palestine? Assuming the Triple Lock on our neutrality is eventually lifted, can we expect the Irish Government to send troops on humanitarian duties to ensure food gets into Gaza and people are protected? I mean, we would be free of the UN mandate and seeking its approval. Or would we require US-, UK- and EU-supporting Israel's approval to do the above? John Cuffe, Co Meath Who will pay to rebuild Gaza after the conflict is finally brought to an end? A recent commentator rightly underlines that 'recognition alone cannot substitute for immediate, concrete action that includes a ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access and accountability for atrocities'. ADVERTISEMENT This is the very minimum series of actions necessary to go towards the rebalancing of the appalling man-made humanitarian tragedy imposed on the Palestinian people by the state of Israel. But so much more needs to be done, inter alia – the imposition of sanctions on Israeli ministers, military personnel and officials responsible for war crimes; employment of all international mechanisms to bring the culprits to justice; and the ending of all preferential trade and service arrangements for Israel under the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Finally, and crucially, to date I have heard no mention of war reparations for the deaths, destruction and dispossession suffered by the Palestinians. Who will have the courage to demand these compensations from Israel? Or will it be the EU, in the wake of its pathetic political inaction throughout the last two years, that will transfer vast sums of money for the rebuilding of Gaza, in an effort to salve its conscience and regain whatever little moral authority remains? Tom McGrath, Ashford, Co Wicklow Pope Leo has a chance to send a powerful message by visiting Middle East The Catholic Church has an opportunity to make a positive impact on the dire situation in Gaza. Shortly after his election, the late Pope Francis visited the island of Lampedusa and highlighted the indifference to migrants and asylum- seekers . A visit to Gaza by Pope Leo would have an equal impact on the dire situation of the Palestinian people as they die from bullets and starvation. Even if he got as far as the Rafah crossing, it would send out a powerful message to the people of Gaza that religion has no borders. Brendan Butler, Drumcondra, Dublin Pharma tariffs are a risk to Ireland, but it's consumers in US who will suffer most US president Donald Trump has announced that pharmaceutical tariffs could eventually reach up to 250pc. He referenced Ireland's strength in the pharmaceuticals sector in an interview on Tuesday. It seems Trump doesn't give a hoot about the ordinary American person as he considers such an extortionate tariff. Medical care in America is already outrageously expensive, and when you throw a possible 250pc on pharmaceuticals, the collateral damage of such a punitive tax will be felt by everyone. This latest threat certainly raises big questions for Ireland. It's reported that a deal between the EU and the US is getting closer. One is curious as to what the terms of such a deal will be. The pharmaceuticals and medtech sectors collectively employ over 70,000 people within the Industrial Development Agency (IDA) network. This includes both direct employment in manufacturing and indirect roles associated with the industry. The sector is a significant contributor to Ireland's economy, with pharmaceutical exports representing 39pc of the total. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Thanks to my teacher for always encouraging his students to 'speak proper' On Pat Kenny's radio show last Monday, there was an item on the widespread misuse of grammar these days. For example: 'He was sat there.' I was lucky that in primary school we had a teacher who constantly reminded us of the importance of (as Gay Byrne used to preach) speaking proper. Mind you, as youngsters sat there, it would be years later when I would appreciate that teacher's dedication. A very belated thank you, sir. Tom Gilsenan, Beaumont, Dublin 9 All-Ireland final shows how Jim Gavin's changes have revitalised the game It was a pleasure to watch the recent All-Ireland football final contested by players displaying all the skills of the game. Thanks to Jim Gavin and all concerned for getting rid of the 'puke football' introduced way back in 2003 by Tyrone, and progressed to a more dreary and boring game by Donegal in 2012. Long may the game continue to progress with its skills of high fielding and long-range points from play.


Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change
Earlier this week, the renowned Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem released Our Genocide, an analysis of Israeli policy towards Palestinians since October 7, 2023. The report finds that, since October 2023, the Israeli regime has been responsible for carrying out genocide against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. The finding of genocide is based on two prior conclusions, supported by evidence gathered by the organisation: Mass crimes by Israel are being 'perpetrated systematically, as part of a coordinated attack aimed at annihilating all facets of life in the Gaza Strip'; The intent of Israel's political and military leadership is to 'irreversibly destroy Palestinian life'. The international community, B'Tselem argues, has not only failed to halt this genocide, but enabled it 'through statements affirming Israel's right to self-defense" or active support — including the shipment of weapons and ammunition' to Israel. The foundations for the genocide, the report states, have been laid through Israel's settler-colonial project, notably three of its fundamental elements: Apartheid, imposing separation, and ethnic cleansing; systematic and institutionalised violence against Palestinians, perpetrated with impunity; and the institutionalised dehumanisation of Palestinians, including through the framing of them as an existential threat. B'Tselem points to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023 — which it finds 'included many war crimes and likely also crimes against humanity' — as 'the catalyst for the ruling system to carry out genocide". The B'Tselem report is based on 20 months of research and documentation of human rights violations committed by Israel against Palestinians. It was released on the same day as an equally damning and clear report by a second Israeli organisation, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, which has concluded the following: 'The destruction of life-sustaining systems, the cumulative patterns of destruction, the bodily and mental trauma inflicted, and the direct killing of civilians, when understood in light of the implemented policy and the public rhetoric, make clear that Israel's campaign in Gaza constitutes genocide under international law.' In publishing their reports, the Israeli organisations join a host of other internationally recognised human rights organisations — first and foremost Palestinian — in describing the slaughter being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza as genocide. On October 13, 2023, in light of the Israeli onslaught and statements by high-ranking Israeli politicians that followed the Hamas attacks of October 7 that year, Al-Haq, Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights issued a statement calling on the international community to urgently intervene to protect the Palestinian people from a genocide by Israel. The Palestinian organisations warned that other states not only had an obligation under international law to intervene to prevent the potential genocide, but that they may be held responsible if they failed to take all measures within their power to do so. Since then, all three Palestinian organisations have continued to document the mass crimes being perpetrated by Israel. They have denounced its actions as amounting to genocide, and have called on all states do all within their power to bring it to an end. Their work, and that of other Palestinian human rights defenders, has reverberated around the world It has been reinforced by international human rights organisations and UN mechanisms. However, it has been cruelly, callously ignored and disregarded by many states which continue to defend Israel's actions, provide weapons and other equipment for its army, and allow the crimes to continue. The result: A famine engineered by Israel with international support; more than 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israel with international support, including more than 1,000 Palestinians killed trying to access humanitarian aid; cities completely destroyed, and millions displaced with international support; hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches bombed one by one by Israel with international support; more than 100,000 Palestinians injured by Israel with international support; and companies profiting from these crimes with international support. The atrocities go on. All the while Israeli cabinet ministers proclaim that Gaza will be entirely destroyed and cleared of all Palestinians in what B'Tselem calls 'the exact definition of genocide'. UN special rapporteur Mary Lawlor: 'International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7.' And what is the response by States? Crumbs dropped from the sky by former colonial powers and Middle Eastern states; an internal conclusion by the EU that there are 'indications' Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations, but no concrete measures to pressure it to abide by them; and the British government arguing in court that there is no evidence of genocide in Gaza. Where is the action? It is with the people in the streets, communities, associations, and organisations all around the world who are organising and protesting to demand an end to Israel's crimes, apartheid, and occupation — doing so despite being beaten by police, designated as terrorists, and smeared as antisemites. Action is with the Palestinian people among them and in Gaza and the West Bank, supporting one another despite the bombardments, massacres, displacement, and starvation. It is with Palestinian human rights defenders and their allies in Israel, such as B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, documenting these crimes and demanding justice. Recent days have shown what an increase in international pressure can do as aid trucks were finally permitted into Gaza by Israel, albeit on an extremely limited basis and while the killing continues. This is far too little, far too late for far too many, but it does demonstrate that if states can be shamed into action, Israel's behaviour will be forced to change International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7. In order to rescue the remnants of this system and resuscitate that which remains, the atrocities must stop, Israel must be held accountable, and the Palestinians must be guaranteed their full rights — including their right to self-determination. Mary Lawlor is the UN special rapporteur on human rights defenders