Alabama bill requiring age verification for app downloads sparks debate
Rep. Chris Sells, R-Greenville, sits in a House Child and Senior Advocacy Committee meeting on Feb. 26, 2025. The committee heard support and opposition on his bill, HB 317, that would require app store age verification. (Anna Barrett/Alabama Reflector)
An Alabama bill requiring app stores to verify users' ages drew debate during a committee hearing last week.
HB 317, sponsored by Chris Sells, R-Greenville, would prohibit a minor from downloading a new app or updating an existing app without parental consent. In order for app stores to know whether someone is a minor, the platforms would have to implement age verification under the legislation.
Supporters of the bill said Wednesday that parents support this regulation. Those who oppose the legislation said it would create a false sense of security, and the law would likely be challenged in court for violating users' privacy.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Other age verification methods of the social media sites have all been solved in court,' Justin Hill from NetChoice told the House Child and Senior Advocacy Committee. 'One like this hasn't made it out of the legislature yet, so maybe Alabama can be the first to defend that in court.'
NetChoice advocates for limited internet government control, free speech and enterprise across the country. The group has fought many internet laws nationwide. Hill mentioned laws in Florida and Virginia that created online literacy courses for minors. He said an education-based law, rather than a mandate, would be constitutional.
'And we really need to remember that an unconstitutional law helps no children,' he said.
Nicole Lopez, safety policy director for youth at Meta, said the bill provides parental control. She said a small study conducted on behalf of Meta showed that 80% of parents want app store age verification.
'Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their child's age before they can download apps,' Lopez said. 'HB 317 is the mechanism to achieve just that, with an immediate impact on Alabama families supporting their teens online.'
NetChoice opposed a similar bill that would require age verification for social media accounts on Feb. 19. Meta implemented Instagram Teen Accounts in September that have built-in protections, limiting who can contact them and the content they see, while also providing new ways to safely explore their interests.
Melea Stephens, a family therapist, said she supported the bill because of how she has seen the internet affect her clients.
'As a family therapist, I witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of unregulated apps and what they can have on our youth,' she said. 'I've treated several cases of child sextortion and sexual abuse that have arisen through platforms marketed to children where predators exploit the very apps designed to foster connection and entertainment.'
Knox Argo, an attorney based in Montgomery, said he opposed the bill because it is being pushed by Meta.
'We certainly don't want to be the first in the nation to stick our neck out on some new bill that is pushed by a multimillion-dollar corporation,' he said.
Meta is worth $1.7 trillion.
The committee did not vote on the bill. Rep. Ginny Shaver, R-Leesburg, the chair of the committee, said she'd put it on the agenda in a couple weeks.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' could wreck Utah's groundbreaking AI laws
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget package could derail the state's groundbreaking artificial intelligence laws unless it is changed. The 1,000-page bill that passed the House last month includes a 10-year prohibition on AI regulations. An updated Senate version removed the all-out ban but conditioned $500 million in AI infrastructure grants on states pausing enforcement of AI laws. Behind these provisions is a desire by some lawmakers to prevent a nationwide patchwork of AI regulations that hampers innovation amid competition with China. But Cox, and Utah's top tech policymakers, said the approach taken by Trump's bill interferes with the state's right to react to rapidly evolving technologies. 'Our hope is that the last version of this bill that passes, whatever that looks like, will allow for the smart type of regulation that we're doing in Utah, and prevent the bad kind of regulation that would stop AI from reaching its fullest potential,' Cox said Tuesday during a monthly PBS broadcast. Utah has been recognized around the world for having the 'first and smartest of the AI regulations that have been proposed,' according to Cox. These policies include bills that create a state-run AI policy lab, clarify consumer protection liability for AI and require AI disclosures in industries like finance and mental health. The governor said that multiple members of the U.S. House have told his team that they were not aware of the AI moratorium when they voted on the bill. Members of the White House and Senate have also said that they don't want the 'BBB bill' to eliminate Utah's law, Cox said. 'AI companies actually support what we're doing because they recognize that this is the right way to do AI regulation as opposed to just piecemeal,' Cox said. Cox agreed that 'a hodgepodge' of AI laws around the country would cause the U.S. to 'fall behind and we would lose this global race that is happening right now.' But he said a moratorium on AI policy shouldn't come at the expense of Utah's novel approach which doesn't actually tell AI companies how they can develop their models. Utah Rep. Doug Fiefia, R-Herriman, said the problem goes beyond counterproductive policy. It targets the foundation of states rights that has allowed Utah to lead out on so many issues, according to Fiefia, a freshman lawmaker who previously worked at Google. 'States are laboratories for innovation when it comes to policy, and I believe that the federal government should not overreach on this process and allow it to work,' Fiefia said. 'We will not give over our control because the federal government believes that it's the right thing to do to win this race.' On Tuesday, Utah House legislative leadership, and 62 state senators and representatives, sent a letter authored by Fiefia to Utah's congressional delegation arguing that the moratorium hindered 'Utah's nationally recognized efforts to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' Not only would the moratorium harm state efforts to legislate guardrails, it would also hurt businesses that are using AI responsibly by allowing their competitors to engage in unethical behavior, according to Fiefia. States have shown they are more nimble than the federal government when they need to adapt to change, Fiefia said. And this is the approach Fiefia believes Utah has demonstrated in opening up legal pathways for innovation while updating the law for the threats posed by AI. 'Just because we want to move fast in this global arms race of AI doesn't mean we can't do so with a seat belt,' Fiefia said. 'I believe that we can both win this AI race, but also doing it in a thoughtful and meaningful way.' The AI moratorium faces procedural hurdles in addition to ideological pushback. Utah Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, pointed out that reconciliation bills are meant only to amend the annual budget and not make substantive policy shifts. Some senators have alleged that the AI moratorium does not comply with the 'Byrd Rule,' a procedural requirement that prohibits 'nonbudgetary' additions during the budget 'reconciliation' process. Cullimore, who was the sponsor behind most of Utah's AI legislation, was in Washington, D.C., last week, speaking with members of the House Commerce Committee, which oversaw the inclusion of the AI moratorium provisions. The intentions behind the moratorium, Cullimore said, were to prevent states from implementing what are called 'foundational regulations' that restrict the kind of technology AI companies can develop. Utah's laws do not do this, according to Cullimore, who also signed Fiefia's letter, but they would still be sidelined by the 'big beautiful bill' even if the moratorium is replaced by the conditioned federal funding. 'I think the drafting of the moratorium was so broad that it potentially encompassed all of that stuff,' he said. 'So I hope that that we can refine the text a little bit, and then if they want to put those conditions in on foundational regulation, I think that'd be appropriate.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DHS Official Picks Fight With Kim Kardashian After She Speaks Out Against ICE
One Department of Homeland Security official seems to think she can throw down with a woman raised by Kris Jenner. On Wednesday, Tricia McLaughlin, the DHS assistant secretary for public affairs, decided to pick a fight with Kim Kardashian after the reality TV star simply exercised her freedom of speech. Amid the ongoing anti-deportation protests in Los Angelesthat were sparked by a rash of terrifying U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, Kardashian made it clear on her Instagram story Tuesday that her values align with the demonstrators. 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals — great,' Kardashian began her statement. 'When we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right.' She continued, 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family.' 'No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants,' she wrote. The beauty mogul concluded, 'We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely. There HAS to be a BETTER way.' When Kardashian's statement made its way to X, formerly Twitter, Wednesday, it seemed to really get McLaughlin's Skims in a twist. '.@KimKardashian, which one of these convicted child molesters, murderers, drug traffickers and rapists would you like to stay in the county? These are just a few of the convicted illegal criminals who have been picked up in the last 72 hours,' McLaughlin wrote on X, alongside images of a few men who have been detained by ICE in Los Angeles, per some very colorfully wordedDHS press releases that include quotes from McLaughlin. Although McLaughlin didn't like Kardashian's statement, plenty of social media users did. Kardashian, who graduated from law school in May, has an interesting history with the Trump family. In 2018, she met with President Donald Trump during his first term to advocate for prison reform, and later claimed she helped soften his stance on crime (which, apparently, did not work). In 2023, the president's eldest daughter, Ivanka Trump, was pictured at Kardashian's birthday party, upsetting many of Kardashian's fans. The 'American Horror Story' alum also seemed celebratory on Trump's inauguration day in January, posting a caption-less photo of first lady Melania Trump's outfit to her Instagram story that same day.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida beefs up laws against deepfake porn, luring children, sex trafficking. What to know
Florida has taken some big steps in the fight against sexually explicit deepfakes. On June 10, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed five bills designed to protect children against sexual crimes. The bills expand Florida laws against luring or enticing children, add more registration and reporting requirements for sexual predators and offenders and mandate minimum terms for subsequent offenses, add harsher penalties — including the death penalty — for anyone convicted of human trafficking for sexual exploitation of children under 12 or individuals who are mentally incapacitated, and provide an enforceable framework to remove deepfake material from online platforms. The bill against deepfakes is called "Brooke's Law" after Brooke Curry, the daughter of former Jacksonville mayor Lenny Curry, who was 16 when a teenage boy she didn't know used a picture from her Instagram account to create an image she later described as 'embarrassing, vulgar, rude and against everything I stand for.' Curry, now 18, testified at a Florida House of Representatives committee hearing for passage of House Bill 1161 and was on hand when DeSantis signed the bill. 'Florida has zero tolerance for criminals who exploit children,' DeSantis said. 'Throughout my time in office, we've worked with the legislature to strengthen penalties for child abuse, hold predators accountable, and ensure that Florida remains a safe place to raise a family.' Here's what to know. "Deepfakes" are fake images or video created through graphics software or AI generators of real people. Faces taken from social media posts or other pictures available online are photoshopped onto adult movie actresses or models or used to generate explicit AI-generated content without consent, which is then shared around school, sent to family members or employers, or uploaded to websites for millions to see. Software to create convincing deepfake nudes has become increasingly accessible and the content it produces is often indistinguishable from real images and video. It's used as a tool of abuse, humiliation and harassment that disproportionately targets teenage girls and women. Celebrities such as Taylor Swift, Jenna Ortega and Megan Thee Stallion have seen false sexual imagery of themselves spread across the web, and women politicians are frequent targets. One in eight teens age 13 to 17 personally know someone who has been victimized by deepfake nudes, according to a report from Thorn, a nonprofit company focused on childhood safety online. One in 17 said they were a direct victim. Deepfake penalties: Students used AI to create nude photos of their classmates. For some, arrests came next. Law enforcement was slow to address the problem as they worked out how to address the everchanging murky world of cybercrime, and many websites refused to remove images or video after they were reported. If they were removed, offenders would share them somewhere else, further traumatizing the victim. In May, President Donald Trump signed the bipartisan Take It Down Act to federally criminalize publication of non-consensual intimate imagery, also known as NCII. The law requires social media platforms and similar websites to remove nonconsensual intimate imagery — defined as including realistic, computer-generated pornographic images and videos that depict identifiable, real people — within 48 hours of notice from a victim. Florida's HB 1161, Removal of Altered Sexual Depictions Posted without Consent, provides victims with a legal mechanism to fight deepfakes by requiring specified websites and online services to establish a process for victims to request removals, with a clear and conspicuous notice of the process in easy-to-understand language. Once a victim makes a written request for removal, the platform must remove the content and any copies within 48 hours. Failure to reasonably comply will be considered an unfair or a deceptive act or practice under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, subject to cease and desist orders and civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation, plus actual damages and attorney's fees and costs. The bill provides liability protections for platforms that act in good faith. The platforms are required to establish a clear and prominent process for reporting such content. Email providers, information services and websites whose content is not user-generated are not included. The bill is effectively immediately. HB 777 expands the laws on luring and enticing children: Expands the age of the victim involved to be any child under 14 (previously it was a child under 12) Prohibits a person 18 years of age or older from intentionally luring or enticing, or attempting to lure or entice, a child under the age of 14 into or out of a structure, dwelling, or conveyance for other than a lawful purpose 1st violation: Bumped up from a first-degree misdemeanor to a third-degree felony 2nd or subsequent violation: Bumped up from a third-degree felony to a second-degree felony If committed by an offender with a previous violation of certain offenses: Bumped up from a third-degree felony to a second-degree felony Expands the scope of the offense by including "or out of" buildings and vehicles, not just into one Prohibits ignorance of the victim's age, misrepresentative of the victim's age by another person, or what the defendant sincerely believed the victim's age as a legal defense This bill takes effect Oct. 1, 2025. HB 1351 adds sexual predator and offender reporting requirements to block some reporting loopholes, including: Requires registrants to report their occupation, business name, employment address, and employment phone number Requires sexual offenders and predators to report in-state travel residences within 48 hours either online through the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE)'s online system or in person with the sheriff's office, removes a requirement to report it to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Requires local law enforcement agencies to conduct address verifications of sexual offenders at least one time per calendar year and sexual predators four times per calendar year to ensure the accuracy of the information Clarifies that 'permanent residence,' as far as sexual predator and sexual offender registration and reporting requirements go, means the person's home or other place where the person primarily lives This bill takes effect Oct. 1, 2025. HB 1455 provides mandatory minimum sentences for certain sexual offenses when committed by registered offenders or predators: Requires a court to impose a mandatory minimum sentence if a person who has previously been convicted of a specified sexual offense is convicted of committing a subsequent specified sexual offense, even if the mandatory minimum exceeds the maximum authorized sentence 10 years for: Lewd or lascivious molestation of a victim under 16 years of age Lewd or lascivious molestation of an elderly or disabled person Online solicitation of a minor, traveling to meet a minor, or prohibited computer usage Possession or transmitting of child pornography 15 years for possession of child pornography with the intent to promote 20 years for: Use of a child in a sexual performance Promoting a sexual performance by a child Buying or selling minors Specifies that except in the case of a pardon or conditional medical release, a person sentenced must serve the full minimum sentence This bill takes effect Oct. 1, 2025. SB 1804 establishes a new felony offense, "Capital Human Trafficking of Vulnerable Persons for Sexual Exploitation," and makes it a capital offense punishable by life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or death. Under the law, Capital Human Trafficking of Vulnerable Persons for Sexual Exploitation is committed by a person 18 years or older who knowingly initiates, organizes, plans, finances, directs, manages, or supervises a venture that has subjected a child less than 12 years of age, or a person who is mentally defective or mentally incapacitated. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that death sentences are limited to murder cases with at least one aggravating factor. "No one has been executed for a non-murder offense in this country since 1964," an analysis of the bill states, and life imprisonment without the possibility of parole is the current maximum sentence for capital sexual battery due to a string of court cases in both the U.S. and Florida Supreme Courts. According to six other states — Georgia, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas — and the U.S. military allow for death sentences for various specifications of underage rape. There have been no executions under those laws so far, and two people sentenced in Louisiana had their sentences overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. This bill takes effect Oct. 1, 2025. Steve Patterson, Florida Times-Union, contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Florida strengthens laws against deepfake nudes, sex trafficking
