What's NATO without America?
The 32 members of the NATO alliance are in the Netherlands for a summit that has been overshadowed by efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East.
World leaders are being encouraged to set a goal to spend 5% of their GDP on defence by 2035. US President Donald Trump has pushed for that target, but does he have a plan on what's next for NATO?
On today's episode, Niall Paterson is joined by security and defence editor Deborah Haynes, who is at The Hague with a front row seat to the meeting.
This episode contains bad language.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Judge denies DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury docs
Donald Trump was handed another blow on Wednesday when a federal judge denied his administration's attempts to release grand jury testimony from the Jeffrey Epstein case. U.S. District Judge Richard Berman deemed Trump's Justice Department did not provide adequate reasoning to unseal the highly-protected materials. He also said that the grand jury motion was likely a 'diversion' coming from the Trump administration. '[T]he court denies the government's motion to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts and exhibits,' the Clinton-appointed judge wrote in his Wednesday decision. It comes after Attorney General Pam Bondi moved at the direct of the president this summer to request the documents be unsealed in attempts to satisfy Americans who were enraged over the lackluster review of the Epstein files. The request came only after weeks of bemoaning from the MAGA base claiming there was a 'cover-up' and that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel were not being as 'transparent' as Trump promised they would be. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account last month amid the backlash. On July 18, Bondi filed motions in the Southern Districts of New York and Florida to have judges grant release of grand jury testimony from the [sexual] trafficker's cases in the respective states. Florida swiftly denied the request, while SDNY requested the government send their reasoning for requesting the years-old documents be drudged up. Trump's government argued in its reasoning that 'the passage of time has not dulled the public's interest in these cases.' It also revealed that there were only two witnesses in the case – an FBI agent and New York Police Department officer, both of whom are still alive. But Judge Berman claimed that the reasoning was not sufficient for him to grant the request to unseal the grand jury testimony. 'The Government is a logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,' Berman wrote in the Wednesday decision. 'By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breath and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession.' He also said that Trump's administration did not exhibit there were any 'special circumstances' that would justify unsealing the documents. Berman has come under fire from Trump and his supporters in the past for being a partisan judge. Bill Clinton appointed Berman to the bench in the Southern District of New York in 1998, where he has worked ever since as a judge and then a senior judge starting in September 2011. It's widely known that Clinton and Epstein had personal, professional and philanthropic connections. Epstein donated $1,000 to Clinton's presidential campaign in 1991 and two years later contributed $10,000 to the White House Historical Association for a redecoration project. This got him and longtime girlfriend and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell a ticket to a White House donors' reception hosted by Bill and Hillary Clinton. Maxwell is still serving out a 20-year sentence in relation to the child [sexual] trafficking crimes. She even spoke for nine hours over the course of two days with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in Florida last month to answer questions about Epstein's crimes. She was transferred to a prison in Texas days after the interviews and appears to be angling for pardon from Trump. Flight logs for Epstein's private plane the Lolita Express show that Clinton took at least 17 flights between 2002 and 2003, often with staff, Secret Service agents and Clinton Foundation supporters. Trump also has links to the disgraced financier and appears on his flight logs. Epstein attended Trump's wedding to his second wife Marla Maples in 1993. The deep connections to those most influential in political and business circles is what Americans think is stopping the release of files related to his crimes and his sketchy death. Conspiracies still float online claiming that Epstein was killed in prison in August 2019 and that it was made to look like he took his own life – even though Trump's DOJ concluded that Epstein did [kill himself].
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Russia says excluding Moscow on Ukraine talks is a ‘road to nowhere'
Russia 's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, issued a warning to Western nations regarding the exclusion of Moscow from security discussions concerning Ukraine. Speaking on Wednesday, Lavrov's comments followed a meeting hosted by Donald Trump at the White House with Volodymyr Zelensky and other Western leaders. Lavrov stated that alienating the Kremlin from collective security matters is a 'road to nowhere' and 'will not work'. He emphasised that Russia would continue to express its 'legitimate interests fairly and harshly', asserting that the US must understand the futility of excluding Moscow. Watch the video in full above.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump claimed peace was closer than ever. Then Lavrov threw a hand grenade
Donald Trump would like to have you believe that he has never been closer to settling the war in Ukraine. A high-stakes meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska was said to have ushered in a series of concessions from Moscow, which meant a peace deal was at his fingertips. An apparent compromise on security guarantees for Kyiv was leapt on by the European leaders who accompanied Volodymyr Zelensky to the White House as a real success. But with Mr Trump scrambling to bring the two warring leaders together, Russia appears to be rowing back against any suggestion that it was prepared to drop its maximalist position to deliver peace. On Wednesday, as European military leaders met to discuss how to secure a ceasefire, Russia's veteran foreign minister hurled a metaphorical hand grenade into the mix. Sergey Lavrov suggested Russia would only agree to security guarantees in which it and China have a veto over. He said a document drawn up during initial peace talks in the spring of 2022 would serve as a 'very good example' for a potential blueprint. Under the draft discussed at the time, a mechanism allowed for countries to come to Ukraine's aid militarily if it was attacked again. This was deliberately designed by Kyiv's team of negotiators to closely mimic Nato's Article 5, the alliance's mutual defence clause, so much so that it was also designated as article 5. It was envisaged that Kyiv's allies would send weapons and help police a no-fly zone above the country. Britain, France, Italy, Poland, Israel, Germany, Turkey, Canada and the United States were all listed as possible guarantors. The catch? Russia and China would also be included on the list of countries, which would have to unanimously agree there had been an attack on Ukraine. This handed Moscow, the most likely party to re-invade Ukraine, a veto over any future support for the country in case of a military attack. Fast-forward to the latest peace negotiations, brokered by Mr Trump, and there is no suggestion that Putin has deviated from his original position. 'We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Mr Lavrov told a news conference on Tuesday. 'I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere.' Using the 2022 draft agreement as the basis for the current talks would suggest that Mr Trump and his peace envoy, Steve Witkoff, had fallen for Russian spin in their discussions with Putin. But had they? After all, Mr Witkoff has previously described the draft as a 'guidepost' for future negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow. Could his claim that Putin was ready to accept 'Article 5-style' guarantees have been misunderstood by the Americans as those promised in the 2022 draft? It would now seem concessions celebrated by the US president were simply a promise to repeat the guarantees offered in the original peace treaty, which was later described as a Ukrainian capitulation. In the days since meeting Putin, Mr Trump has ruled out Ukrainian membership of Nato, calling the idea 'insulting' and 'impossible', clearly using Kremlin talking points. The demand from Moscow goes back to the original document, which forced Ukraine to become a 'permanently neutral state' and forgo joining 'any military alliances' as the price for peace. If Russia was to get its own way in the latest round of talks, using the 2022 draft as the basis, Kyiv would have to significantly cut down the size of its army. The draft agreement stipulated that Ukraine's armed forces would be shrunk to less than 85,000 personnel – half its pre-war size. Any long-range missiles would also have to be forfeited. Rehashing this demand would make it impossible for Kyiv's European allies to support a peace settlement. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer and his European counterparts said 'no limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or its co-operation with third countries'. This might be why, secretly, European officials are less than hopeful about the prospect of peace, despite warm words from their political masters. Enthusiasm for Mr Trump's peace plan is, however, seen as a deliberate tactic, with both the Europeans and Putin tussling for his support. In his news conference, Mr Lavrov was clear in positioning Kyiv's most ardent allies as the problem, accusing them of trying to undemocratically sway the White House's opinion. 'We have only seen aggressive escalation of the situation and rather clumsy attempts to change the position of the US president,' he said in reference to Monday's meeting in Washington. He also attempted to stymie European attempts to convince Mr Trump to organise a meeting between Putin and Mr Zelensky as soon as possible. The minister said any summit between the leaders 'must be prepared in the most meticulous way' so the meeting does not lead to a 'deterioration' of the situation around the conflict.
