AustralianSuper criticised for buying up shares in Whitehaven Coal while claiming to be committed to net zero
Shareholder advocacy groups said AustralianSuper was moving against the trend of its peers with recent share purchases in the company, which they said were 'flying in the face of environmental, social and governance (ESG) commitments'.
Clean energy finance organisation Market Forces said the super fund was 'on the precipice' of becoming Whitehaven Coal's largest investor, with shares worth about $395m.
Recent disclosures by Whitehaven, first reported by the Australian Financial Review, reveal AustralianSuper now owns 70.9m shares in the company, or 8.47% of shares on issue, after the recent purchases.
AustralianSuper is the second-largest shareholder in the coal company and, according to Market Forces, holds nearly triple the combined shares of all of the other top 30 super funds in their default investment options, based on the latest disclosures effective as at December 2024.
Market Forces said 'after fully and publicly divesting from the company in 2020', AustralianSuper now held its biggest interest in Whitehaven in 10 years.
Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter
'How on earth can AustralianSuper call itself a responsible investor after buying millions of shares in Whitehaven Coal?' Market Forces' senior analyst, Brett Morgan, said.
'AustralianSuper is backing Whitehaven's expansion plans, which would result in nearly 5bn tonnes of carbon pollution from burning coal, equivalent to running all of Australia's coal-fired power stations until 2062.'
Morgan said the organisation had been contacted by dozens of AustralianSuper members concerned 'that their fund is greenwashing and endangering a safe future for their retirement'.
An AustralianSuper spokesperson said the fund remained committed to its long-term goal of net zero by 2050.
'Whitehaven's acquisition of BHP's metallurgical coal assets changed the company's revenue profile and made it a more attractive investment given their importance in steel making,' the spokesperson said. Metallurgical coal is used primarily to make steel while thermal coal is primarily used for electricity generation.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
'The energy transition is not linear, which means thermal coal will be an important stabilising source of electricity for the grid for some time to come, both domestically and overseas.'
But Naomi Hogan, from the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said climate-aware investors across the superannuation sector had been making an effort on ESG and emissions reductions and 'this AustralianSuper move is going against the trend of its peers'.
'Metallurgical coal investing cannot be used to shield against scrutiny of coal,' Hogan said.
'Last year ACCR published research based on a global survey of 500 investors in the steel value chain, which found that 80% of investor respondents believe metallurgical coal's risk profile will increase in the next decade.'
Hogan said AustralianSuper, having previously 'talked up' the importance of its companies aligning with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, now has a 'huge amount of work ahead to bring [Whitehaven's] emissions into line'.
'ACCR will be looking closely at AustralianSuper's disclosures outlining its ESG risk assessment of this investment,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labor asks Deloitte to design universal childcare system as PM eyes political legacy
Labor has commissioned consulting giant Deloitte to help design a universal childcare system in Australia, launching a two-year study of demand and costs, as Anthony Albanese chases a political legacy to rival Medicare. The government could redirect billions in existing spending on the childcare subsidy and introduce a daily flat fee for families. It will spend $10.4m on the research, with Deloitte required to assess service demands and collect data across the early childhood education system, with a report due before the next federal election. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Findings by Deloitte would help the government 'make further decisions about the pathway' toward universal childcare, a long-held goal of the prime minister and something he has described as a potential legacy. The analysis would examine childcare wages and property costs, as well as the experience of operators, lobby groups and families, according to federal education department guidance. Launched in early June, the Early Education Service Delivery Prices Project requires a data-based report to be handed to the government by early 2027, more than a year before the expected date of the next election in mid-2028. It could lead to the introduction of a $10 flat fee for childcare services, similar to rules put in place in Canada in 2010. Work by the Productivity Commission suggests such a move would increase the total hours of work by single parents and secondary earners with young children by nearly 3% – the equivalent of about 17,000 additional full-time workers. Higher tax rates have long acted as a disincentive for women to return to work. In February, parliament passed changes to eligibility rules for the childcare subsidy that mean parents will be guaranteed a minimum of three days of subsidised childcare regardless of how much they work or study. The three-day guarantee begins from January 2026 for families earning up to about $530,000. Early childhood education places have increased by 50% since 2013. Nearly half of all one-year-olds and about 90% of four-year-olds are enrolled in care. Before next week's economic reform roundtable, the Productivity Commission will on Wednesday release its latest interim report on delivering quality care more efficiently. It is expected to consider the role of childcare in the economy. The childcare subsidy will cost the federal budget about $16.2bn this financial year, and that's slated to rise to $18.4bn by 2028-29. With growth of about 5.5%, it is one of the major budget measures growing faster than nominal GDP. 'The big vision is certainly there,' Albanese said of universal childcare earlier this year. 'That everyone would pay no more than a limited amount that was affordable – but we need to get there in stages.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In 2024, the Productivity Commission said removing the childcare subsidy and introducing a flat-fee model of $10 a day would cost $8.3bn annually. Instead, it recommended one-child families earning less than $80,000 a year – and those with multiple children earning up to $140,000 a year – should receive three days a week of free childcare for 48 weeks of the year. That plan would cost $4.7bn annually if the existing subsidy was also limited to families with a combined income of less than $580,000. Parliamentary Budget Office costings for 50 hours of universal care a week, with funding provided directly to providers, forecast a bill of $36bn over the forward estimates period – or about $126bn over a decade. The federal treasurer, Jim Chalmers, said last week the total cost of a universal care system would depend on 'how you went about it'. 'It doesn't come cheap. You've got to make sure that any changes are affordable. If you look at the pressures on the budget, early childhood education is now one of the big half a dozen,' he said. 'We've indicated a willingness and an appetite to do more. We've got to work out how to make that affordable.' A report from the thinktank the Centre for Policy Development, released on Monday, called on Labor to commit to a 10-year plan for a universal system. It said children who accessed quality early education were more likely to succeed at school, have better health outcomes, and participate in the workforce as adults. About 95% of new operators joining the childcare system each year across Australia are private, suggesting the system would be largely for-profit without reform.
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Experts convinced RBA will cut interest rates despite bank shrugging off similar peer pressure in July
Australians are spending more but buying less than in 2022, underlining the intense cost-of-living pressures on households ahead of Tuesday's Reserve Bank of Australia interest rate decision. Economists and financial markets are once again convinced that the RBA board will drop the official cash rate from 3.85% to 3.6%, after the central bank stared down a similarly strong consensus and held rates at its previous meeting six weeks ago. Not all members of the rate-setting board were convinced of that decision at the time. Three of the nine voted in favour of a cut. The majority, however, did not see the need to rush rate cuts and wanted to see confirmation that inflation was tracking as expected through the three months to June. That confirmation duly came, with the latest quarterly consumer price report showing inflation sinking to as low as 2.1% – at the bottom of the bank's 2% to 3% target range – while the RBA officials' preferred underlying measure of price growth also fell, to 2.7%. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Andrew Hauser, the deputy governor, has since described the inflation figures as 'very welcome'. Given these developments, the chief economist of Deutsche Bank, Phil O'Donaghoe, said he expected the monetary policy board's decision on Tuesday would be a unanimous vote in favour of a cut. If the RBA does cut rates for the third time this year, then homeowners with a variable mortgage should not be paying interest of more than 5.5%, said Sally Tindall, the data insights director at Canstar, an online comparison site. 'In fact, if the majority of banks pass the cut on in full, which they should absolutely do, then there should be over 30 lenders offering at least one variable rate under 5.25%, while CBA and Westpac's lowest rates could hit 5.34%,' Tindall said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Total household consumption is 22% higher than three years earlier, based on Australian Bureau of Statistics figures. But prices have climbed by roughly the same amount over that period, even as the population has swelled, and both have added to the total dollars being spent in the economy. After adjusting for inflation and putting it in per person terms, Australians on average are actually buying 5% less now than they were in early 2022, according to Challenger's chief economist, Jonathan Kearns. 'No wonder the government is thinking about how to boost economic growth with its productivity summit in a couple of weeks,' Kearns said. There are worries that the scars of the pandemic have left many households more keen to save than spend, although data for the month of June showed shoppers were happy to take advantage of end-of-financial-year bargains.
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Before the Australian election, both parties wanted to cut international student numbers. So why are they going up?
Last year, amid partisan debate over international student numbers, Universities Australia accused both sides of parliament of using the tertiary sector as a 'political plaything'. Fast forward to 2025, and the federal government has back flipped on its plan to cap foreign student entries, announcing last week that it would increase places by 25,000 next year. The opposition has also said it will adopt a more 'sensitive approach'. So was the election campaign rhetoric just hot air? And will the cap ever be revived? From next year, the international education sector will be allowed to grow by 25,000 additional places compared with 2025 and all providers will receive at least their current allocation of students. After the commonwealth's proposed international student cap – which would have limited new enrolments in 2025 to 270,000 – failed to receive Coalition backing, the National Planning Level for 2026 was set at 295,000 international places. The education department said that was 8% below the post-Covid peak in 2023, and that international student levels for 2025 were 'broadly on track' for the current planning level of 270,000s. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Public universities will be able to lobby for higher individual allocations by demonstrating 'increased engagement' with Southeast Asia, in line with the government's priority to 'deepen engagement in our region', or by providing additional student accommodation (the initial purpose of the proposed cap was to free-up housing). 'Strategically important' cohorts including Pacific and Timor-Leste students and scholarship holders will continue to receive high-priority visa processing, and some students, including those moving from Tafe institutes to public universities, will be exempt from the planning level. The minister for home affairs, Tony Burke, said the changes would ensure student visa processing supported 'genuine education outcomes' and strategic priorities. 'This is about backing providers who do the right things and giving them the certainty they need to grow sustainably,' he said. The federal government replaced its failed international student cap by slowing visa processing, a move the former deputy immigration secretary described as 'political point scoring'. The new Ministerial Direction 111 (MD111), rolled out in late 2024 introduced two categories of student visa processing: 'high priority' and 'standard priority', instead of capping numbers. All international providers received high priority processing up to 80% of their indicative cap, with slower processing after this. Prior to that, Ministerial Direction 107 (MD107) was employed as an arbitrary cap that gave visa processing priority to 'low risk' sandstone universities and students from 'low risk' nations, disproportionately affecting applicants from south Asia and regional universities. The education department said MD111 would be replaced with an updated ministerial direction later in 2025 to 'manage student visa prioritisation in line with the 2026 allocations'. It will continue the principles of MD111. The international education sector will be continue to be heavily regulated by the government. From 2027, the new Australian Tertiary Education Commission will manage higher education growth, subject to legislation passing, indicating there will not be a shift back to a market-led approach. For the international Vet sector from 2027, the federal government will continue to use visa processing and integrity reforms to direct the proportion of international students. The education minister, Jason Clare, said the sector was an 'incredibly important export industry' that had to be expanded sustainably. 'The new planning level gives the sector certainty to continue delivering a high-quality educational experience to international students, while addressing national priorities.' The next step is for the government to meet its 2026 target. Andrew Norton, a higher education policy professor at Monash University, said that despite the modest reforms, other migration policies in place to block or deter international students could mean the actual number falls short of 295,000. Norton noted in the Conversation that the successive migration policies had particularly decimated offshore demand for vocational education, which dropped by 75% in the first six months of 2025 compared with 2023. After consistently calling for growth in the international student market, Universities Australia's chief executive officer, Luke Sheehy, said the government's approach was 'sensible' and would provide 'stability and certainty'. 'We'll continue to work constructively with the government to strengthen the integrity of the sector, including the design of a new ministerial direction,' Sheehy said. International students have welcomed the changes, but warned the government needs to go further to lure students back. International officer at the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA), Weihong Liang, said international education needed a 'reset' towards student welfare and support, 'instead of the constant rhetoric around the revenue they bring in'. He pointed out international student visa fees almost tripled since 2023, from $710 to $2,000 – and not were not directed towards university services or funding for accommodation. 'Experiences of perceived unfair treatment have lasting impacts, potentially affecting Australia's international relationships, educational partnerships and economic opportunities far into the future,' Liang said. Deputy Greens leader and higher education spokesperson, Senator Mehreen Faruqi, said during the election campaign that international students had been used as a 'political football'. 'Blaming international students for the housing crisis was pure racist dog-whistling and a far cry from reality,' she said. 'Australia's reputation was trashed by Labor's politically motivated international student caps and high visa fees, with students turning away and university rankings declining. 'Now Labor is trying to crawl back on their reckless international student caps but still without a rationale or a long-term plan to address [this] crisis.' The Coalition has also toned down its messaging. The opposition's education spokesperson, Jonathon Duniam, walked away from his party's call for Australia to slash 80,000 international student places, promising a more 'sensitive' approach this term. He said tertiary providers needed clarity on how the target was chosen, 'while ensuring that there are no losers'. 'Regional universities and high-quality specialist providers should not be swept up in a one-size-fits-all approach,' he said. 'We will work with tertiary sector to get this right.'
