I almost died on the way to my son's wedding after using fat jabs to look good – think long and hard before taking them
Ali Eastburn began using GLP-1 drugs in April this year and collapsed in July while travelling by plane to the nuptials - after her appendix burst.
15
15
15
The mum was hoping to shift 20lbs so she could feel confident in photos as her 29-year-old son Chase Holland got married.
Before starting taking the jabs, the 58-year-old weighed 13 stone and had struggled to slim down naturally after going through the menopause.
So when a "trusted" doctor suggested she try Ozempic, she began taking a low dose of the prescribed drug.
The family of drugs known as GLP-1 RAs were originally developed to treat diabetes, but have been rolled out for weight loss as they were found to suppress patients' appetite.
It is worth noting that Ozempic is licensed as a diabetes drug, whereas Wegovy - which uses the same active ingredient semaglutide - is prescribed for weight loss.
Ali, from Nashville, Tennessee, US, said: "I was trying to get thin for my son's wedding and I knew I had to do something drastic.
"I was desperate to look better. I didn't want to hate the wedding photos for the rest of my life."
At first the mum-of-three claims the medication was a "miracle".
She began to lose weight every week and only experienced heartburn as a side effect.
But when her weight loss plateaued in July, the realtor upped her dosage to hit her target weight for the wedding on July 19.
I went on fat jabs but the hair loss was unbelievable so I quit - I'd rather be chubby with hair than skinny and bald
It was then that 5ft 4in Ali began to experience heartburn, nausea and "violent" diarrhoea and was rushed to the ER twice.
On the flight to Chase's wedding in Orange County, California, on July 15, Ali's appendix ruptured and she was rushed in for emergency surgery when she landed.
A shocking image shows the mum collapsed on the floor clutching an ice pack to her stomach.
After emergency surgery, Ali was able to attend her son's wedding, but claims she was in pain the whole day.
Now recovered, Ali is urging people to "think long and hard" before resorting to skinny jabs as a quick-fix weight loss solution.
15
Ali said: "I would say think long and hard before taking a GLP-1 because it could have killed me.
"If you care about your family or people that you love, think about them having to live life without you and think about all you might miss out on.
"Being thin is not worth losing your life or your health.
"I'd been struggling with my weight for years. I was post-menopause and my whole metabolism just changed and I had tried everything to lose weight.
"When I went to see my health care provider, she said I'd benefit from a GLP-1 and I trusted her.
"At first, it seemed like a miracle as the weight was just falling off.
"[By July 1], I had lost 15lbs and I felt better and I finally felt there was hope.
"But when my weight loss plateaued, my health care provider upped my dose so I could get to my goal of losing 20lbs.
When my son saw me sitting in the front row, he came over and hugged me for the longest time and we both had a good cry. While I was in the hospital that week, we didn't know I was going to be at the wedding, much less live to tell anyone about it
Ali Eastburn
"The first week I upped my dose to the highest level I'd been on, the nausea was uncontrollable and I had no desire to eat or drink anything.
"The heartburn was at an all-new level and it became painful around the clock.
"Eleven days before the wedding I finally went wedding dress shopping and I felt nauseous and sick the entire day.
"I was dry heaving and I was fighting the urge to throw up all day. I then had violent diarrhoea for four days.
"[On July 15], when we landed at the airport, an ambulance took me straight to the hospital and I was diagnosed with a ruptured appendix.
"It was terrifying. Within 15 minutes of leaving the airport I was in a hospital room.
What are the other side effects of weight loss jabs?
Like any medication, weight loss jabs can have side effects.
Common side effects of GLP-1 injections include:
Nausea: This is the most commonly reported side effect, especially when first starting the medication. It often decreases over time as your body adjusts.
Vomiting: Can occur, often in conjunction with nausea.
Diarrhea: Some people experience gastrointestinal upset.
Constipation: Some individuals may also experience constipation.
Stomach pain or discomfort: Some people may experience abdominal pain or discomfort.
Reduced appetite: This is often a desired effect for people using Ozempic for weight loss.
Indigestion: Can cause a feeling of bloating or discomfort after eating.
Serious side effects can also include:
Pancreatitis: In rare cases, Ozempic may increase the risk of inflammation of the pancreas, known as pancreatitis, which can cause severe stomach pain, nausea, and vomiting.
Kidney problems: There have been reports of kidney issues, including kidney failure, though this is uncommon.
Thyroid tumors: There's a potential increased risk of thyroid cancer, although this risk is based on animal studies. It is not confirmed in humans, but people with a history of thyroid cancer should avoid Ozempic.
Vision problems: Rapid changes in blood sugar levels may affect vision, and some people have reported blurry vision when taking Ozempic.
Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar): Especially if used with other medications like sulfonylureas or insulin.
"After a quick CT scan, the doctor said my appendix had ruptured and they needed to remove it."
A burst appendix can be life-threatening. It can happen if appendicitis - swelling and infection of the appendix - is not treated quickly.
While there have been reports of people experiencing appendicitis after using weight loss jabs, it is considered to be a rare side effect.
Some patients do experience heartburn while taking the drugs, particularly during the initial stages of treatment or after a dosage increase.
Nausea tends to be a common side effect of GLP-1s.
After having her appendix removed, Ali spent four days in hospital, which saw her miss Chase's rehearsal dinner.
When she was discharged, she says she spent the wedding in pain and unable to walk properly.
15
15
15
'Too close of a call'
Following the celebrations Ali was hospitalised again due to internal bleeding, which delayed their flight home until July 29.
Ali said: "I was really upset and when I couldn't go to the dress rehearsal I just cried because I felt it was all my fault and I did this to myself.
"I missed all the pre-wedding festivities because I wanted to be thin and it broke my heart.
"On the wedding day we went at the very last minute because I was in so much pain. Sitting on a chair was painful and it was hard to walk.
"When my son saw me sitting in the front row, he came over and hugged me for the longest time and we both had a good cry.
"While I was in the hospital that week, we didn't know I was going to be at the wedding, much less live to tell anyone about it."
Novo Nordisk's response
Ozempic's manufacturer, Novo Nordisk, told Sun Health: "Patient safety is of the utmost importance to Novo Nordisk.
"We continuously collect safety data on our marketed GLP-1 RA medicines and work closely with the authorities to ensure patient safety.
"As part of this work we continue to monitor reports of adverse drug reactions through routine pharmacovigilance.
"We recommend patients take these medications for their approved indications and under the supervision of a healthcare professional.
"Treatment decisions should be made together with a healthcare provider who can evaluate the appropriateness of using a GLP-1 based on assessment of a patient's individual medical profile.
"We recommend that any patient experiencing side effects while taking GLP receptor agonists including Wegovy, Ozempic or Rybelsus report them to their healthcare provider and via the MHRA Yellow Card scheme: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/."
Before losing weight Ali was a US size 12 and by the wedding had dropped down to a US size 10 and weighed 11 stone 7lbs.
Now recovered, Ali says she'll never touch weight loss drugs again and is going to lose weight naturally by controlling her portion sizes and exercising regularly.
Ali said: "My weight was the last thing on my mind at the wedding.
"It was the most beautiful wedding I have ever seen and to see my son marry the woman of his dreams was such a gift.
"I didn't care about my size anymore as I was just so proud to be there.
"It was hard to stand and do the mother-son dance, but we got through it and I was so grateful.
"I will never jeopardise or endanger myself again with any drugs to lose weight as that was too close of a call."
15
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardized, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus," the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost," Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. "It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day." John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard," she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, CDC report says
Most Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, those super-tasty, energy-dense foods typically full of sugar, salt and unhealthy fats, according to a new federal report. Nutrition research has shown for years that ultraprocessed foods make up a big chunk of the U.S. diet, especially for kids and teens. For the first time, however, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed those high levels of consumption, using dietary data collected from August 2021 to August 2023. The report comes amid growing scrutiny of such foods by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who blames them for causing chronic disease. 'We are poisoning ourselves and it's coming principally from these ultraprocessed foods,' Kennedy told Fox News earlier this year. Overall, about 55% of total calories consumed by Americans age 1 and older came from ultraprocessed foods during that period, according to the report. For adults, ultraprocessed foods made up about 53% of total calories consumed, but for kids through age 18, it was nearly 62%. The top sources included burgers and sandwiches, sweet baked goods, savory snacks, pizza and sweetened drinks. Young children consumed fewer calories from ultraprocessed foods than older kids, the report found. Adults 60 and older consumed fewer calories from those sources than younger adults. Low-income adults consumed more ultraprocessed foods than those with higher incomes. The results were not surprising, said co-author Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert. What was surprising was that consumption of ultraprocessed foods appeared to dip slightly over the past decade. Among adults, total calories from those sources fell from about 56% in 2013-2014 and from nearly 66% for kids in 2017-2018. Williams said she couldn't speculate about the reason for the decline or whether consumption of less processed foods increased. But Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was not involved in the research, suggested that there may be greater awareness of the potential harms of ultraprocessed foods. ' People are trying, at least in some populations, to decrease their intakes of these foods,' she said. Concern over ultraprocessed foods' health effects has been growing for years, but finding solutions has been difficult. Many studies have linked them to obesity, diabetes and heart disease, but they haven't been able to prove that the foods directly cause those chronic health problems. One small but influential study found that even when diets were matched for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients, people consumed more calories and gained more weight when they ate ultraprocessed foods than when they ate minimally processed foods. Research published this week in the journal Nature found that participants in a clinical trial lost twice as much weight when they ate minimally processed foods — such as pasta, chicken, fruits and vegetables — than ultraprocessed foods, even those matched for nutrition components and considered healthy, such as ready-to-heat frozen meals, protein bars and shakes. Part of the problem is simply defining ultraprocessed foods. The new CDC report used the most common definition based on the four-tier Nova system developed by Brazilian researchers that classifies foods according to the amount of processing they undergo. Such foods tend to be 'hyperpalatable, energy-dense, low in dietary fiber and contain little or no whole foods, while having high amounts of salt, sweeteners and unhealthy fats,' the CDC report said. U.S. health officials recently said there are concerns over whether current definitions 'accurately capture' the range of foods that may affect health. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Agriculture Department recently issued a request for information to develop a new, uniform definition of ultraprocessed foods for products in the U.S. food supply. In the meantime, Americans should try to reduce ultraprocessed foods in their daily diets, Deierlein said. For instance, instead of instant oatmeal that may contain added sugar, sodium, artificial colors and preservatives, use plain oats sweetened with honey or maple syrup. Read food packages and nutrition information, she suggested. 'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Hold the fries! How your favorite salty side can increase your risk of type 2 diabetes
A new study has found eating a certain amount of French fries a week can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Nothing beats salt-coated fries straight out of the fryer, but next time you order a burger, you may want to tell the restaurant, 'Hold the fries!' A study published in The BMJ journal Wednesday found eating three servings of fries a week could increase your risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 20 percent. Those who eat fries five times a week have a 27 percent increased risk of the chronic disease, according to the study. But potato lovers should not fear, as researchers found those who eat similar amounts of boiled, baked, or mashed potatoes do not face an elevated risk of the disease. An international team, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, analyzed health data from more than 205,000 U.S. health workers, with repeated surveys about their diets, tracking their well-being over nearly four decades. During this extensive follow-up period, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the researchers wrote. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8 percent. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' researchers wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the U.S. and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.'
