
Judge OKs Iowa limits on K-6 gender identity, sexual orientation teaching but not elective programs
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa can continue to restrict instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation in schools up through the sixth grade, a federal judge said, but has to allow nonmandatory programs related to the topics.
U.S. District Judge Stephen Locher offered a split decision late Thursday, siding in part with a LGBTQ advocacy organization, teachers and students who sued the state.
In a separate ruling in March, Locher again temporarily blocked another disputed component of the law, which would prohibit school libraries from carrying books that depict sex acts. Iowa has asked the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn that decision.
Republican majorities in the Iowa House and Senate passed the law in 2023, intending to reinforce what they consider to be age-appropriate education in kindergarten through 12th grades. It's been a back-and-forth battle in the courts in the two years since. The provisions of the law that are being challenged were temporarily blocked by Locher in December 2023, just before they became enforceable. That decision was overturned in August by the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, meaning the law has been enforceable for most of the current school year.
The appellate court told the lower court that it failed to apply the correct analysis in determining whether to temporarily block the law.
An attorney for the LGBTQ students, teachers and advocacy organization told Locher in February that the law is overly broad because it prohibits 'any program, curriculum, test, survey, questionnaire, promotion, or instruction relating to gender identity or sexual orientation' in kindergarten through sixth grade. Opponents argued the law is vague enough to limit any information accessed or activity engaged in within the school.
Locher agreed in his decision that any 'program' or 'promotion' is broad enough to violate students' First Amendment rights and those provisions are therefore on hold. But restrictions on curriculum, tests, surveys, questionnaires or instruction can be interpreted in the way the state argues, as applying only to the mandatory school functions.
Locher laid out specifically what that means: 'Students in grades six and below must be allowed to join Gender Sexuality Alliances ('GSAs') and other student groups relating to gender identity and/or sexual orientation.' And the district, teachers and students 'must be permitted to advertise' those groups.
On the other hand, teachers are not allowed to provide mandatory instruction that include 'detailed explanations or normative views' on the issues, Locher said. "It does not matter whether the lessons or instruction revolve around cisgender or transgender identities or straight or gay sexual orientations. All are forbidden."
The state education agency's rules on the law say they will not take a neutral statement on gender identity and sexual orientation to be a violation of the law.
During a February hearing, Locher posed questions to the state's attorney asking, for example, how a teacher should decide whether a book featuring a same-sex couple is a neutral portrayal allowed under the law, or whether it is a positive or affirming portrayal.
The state often said the answers depend on context. Opponents of the law said that means the measure is too vague.
Locher's decision dictated that neutral references where sexual orientation or gender identity aren't the focus is allowed. That means books with characters of varying gender identities or sexual orientations are permitted, so long as those 'are not the focus of the book or lesson.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Japan's Princess Kako receives medal in Brazil as she starts 11-day trip
SAO PAULO (AP) — Japan's Princess Kako of Akishino, a niece of Emperor Naruhito, received the highest order of Brazil's powerhouse state of Sao Paulo on Friday as she kicks off an 11-day trip to the South American nation. Her trip also marks the 130th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries. The younger daughter of Crown Prince Fumihito and Crown Princess Kiko arrived on Thursday in Sao Paulo. She held appointments with members of the Japanese community on Friday and finished her schedule at a dinner with Governor Tarcisio de Freitas at the state government palace. She was awarded the Order of the Ipiranga at a closed ceremony. Princess Kako will visit another seven cities, including Rio de Janeiro and capital Brasilia, where she is expected to meet President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Speaking to de Freitas, she made reference to the first Japanese immigrants arriving in the city of Santos in 1908 after a gruesome trip through the seas. On the first day of her trip, she visited the memorial to pioneer Japanese immigrants at Sao Paulo's Ibirapuera Park. 'I felt that the immigrants made an enormous effort to adapt to Brazil, and still today are very active in different areas. The fact that Brazil sheltered the Japanese community made the connections between the two countries to become deeper,' the princess said. Today, Brazil has the largest population of people of Japanese descent in the world, estimated at about 2.7 million. About half of those live in Sao Paulo state, official figures show. Emperor Naruhito has no male children, which makes his brother Akishino, Princess Kako's father, the first successor in line. Japan's tradition does not allow women to take the throne. Princess Mako, who is Princess Kako's older sister, was the last member of Japan's imperial family to visit Brazil . She traveled to 13 cities of the South American nation in 2018. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eyes on Senate Republicans as Trump and Musk feud over tax and spend bill
As the simmering tensions between Donald Trump and his once top adviser, the billionaire Elon Musk, erupted into public view on Thursday, eyes turned to the Republican lawmakers still weighing whether to pass the president's so-called 'big, beautiful bill'. It was approved by just a single vote in the House of Representatives with no Democratic support last month, and nonpartisan analysts have found the sweeping legislation could add a whopping $2.4tn-$5tn to the $36.2tn US national debt and make deep cuts to Medicaid and food-assistance programs. Seen as an outline of Trump's 'America first' agenda, the bill would also extend tax cuts, fund beefed-up immigration enforcement and impose new work requirements for enrollees of federal safety net programs. In a barrage of tweets over its cost, which Musk warned would undo Doge's efforts to save the government money by cancelling programs and pushing federal workers out of their jobs, the billionaire called on conservatives to withdraw their support for the bill. Along with personal barbs aimed at Trump – including trumpeting support for his impeachment and signaling the president's ties to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – Musk spent Thursday afternoon re-posting years-old quotes from the House speaker Mike Johnson and the Senate leader John Thune, when the Republican lawmakers spoke critically of federal debt. Musk's intense withdrawal of support for the administration has magnified a rift in the Republican party that was already threatening the bill's passage in the Senate. While the Senate's Republican leaders have shown no indication that they share Musk's concerns, they are eyeing changes to some aspects of the measure that were the result of hard-fought negotiations in the House, and could throw its prospects into jeopardy. One issue that has reappeared is the deductibility of state and local tax (Salt) payments, which the tax bill passed under Trump in 2017 limited to $10,000 per household. House Republicans representing districts in Democratic-run states that have higher tax burdens managed to get a provision increasing the deduction to $40,000 into the One, Big Beautiful Bill act. But there are almost no Republican senators representing blue states. After meeting with Trump on Wednesday, Thune indicated his lawmakers were not inclined to keep that provision as they negotiate the bill. 'We also start from a position that there really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the Salt issue,' he said. 'It's just not an issue that plays.' Related: Trump's tax bill helps the rich, hurts the poor and adds trillions to the deficit | Katrina vanden Heuvel That could upset the balance of power in the House, where Republicans can lose no more than three votes on any bill that passes along party lines. Johnson spent weeks negotiating with his fractious Republican majority to get the bill passed narrowly through his chamber, and on Wednesday said he had been trying to speak with Musk about his concerns. In an interview with Bloomberg TV on Thursday, he called the Tesla CEO 'a good friend' and said the two had exchanged text messages ahead of a call he expected to take place that morning. 'I just want to make sure that he understands what I think everybody on Capitol Hill understands. This is not a spending bill, my friends, this is a budget reconciliation bill. And what we're doing here is delivering the 'America first' agenda,' Johnson said. 'He seems pretty dug in right now, and I can't quite understand the motivation behind it,' the speaker added. Later in the day, Johnson told reporters at the Capitol that the call did not take place, but that the disagreement 'isn't personal'. On X, Musk publicly questioned Johnson's resolve to cut government spending, prompting the speaker to reply that he 'has always been a lifelong fiscal hawk'. While the Tesla CEO has focused his complaints on the price tag of the bill, Trump accused him of turning against it because of provisions revoking incentives for consumers to purchase electric vehicles. The president began by saying he was 'very disappointed' by the former adviser's opposition to his top legislative priority, but the online insults escalated after Musk fired back that Trump would not have won election without his financial support. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said, adding that 'he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left.' 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more,' the president said. The falling-out came days after Musk had stepped down as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) and then pivoted to attacking the One Big, Beautiful Bill. Musk responded almost immediately on X, saying that the president's comment was 'false', and 'this bill was never shown to me even once'. He then pivoted to personal attacks on Trump, after praising him just days earlier in an Oval Office appearance to mark the end of his time leading Doge. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' he said, responding to a video of Trump's remarks. 'Such ingratitude.' Gabrielle Canon contributed reporting
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Impeachment, Epstein and bitter acrimony: Trump and Musk joust in astonishing social media duel
Elon Musk called for Donald Trump's impeachment and mocked his connections to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as the US president threatened to cancel federal contracts and tax subsidies for Musk's companies, in an extraordinary social media feud that erupted between the former allies on Thursday. The deterioration of their once close relationship into bitter acrimony came over the course of several remarkable hours during which the president and the world's richest person hurled deeply personal insults over matters significant and insignificant. The direct shots at Trump were the latest twist in the public showdown over a Republican spending bill that Musk had criticized. Trump and Musk had been careful not to hit each other directly, but on Thursday the pair discarded restraint as the feud escalated on their respective social media platforms. In the most churlish moment of the astonishing saga, Musk said on X the reason the Trump administration had not released the files into Epstein was because they implicated the president. He later quote-tweeted a post calling for Trump to be removed and said Trump's tariffs would cause a recession. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk wrote, after Trump threatened to cut subsidies for Musk's companies as it would save 'billions'. Related: Trump says he is 'very disappointed' in Elon Musk after attacks on tax bill It was a bizarre drama that served to underscore the degree to which Trump and Musk's relationship has been one of mutual convenience, despite the White House claiming for months that they were simply ideologically aligned. It also caused the rightwing writer Ashley St Clair, who gave birth to Musk's 14th known child and sued Musk for child support, to weigh in. 'Let me know if u need any breakup advice,' she posted on X, tagging Trump. Shares in Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company, fell almost 15% on Thursday afternoon with the decline timed to when Trump's remarks began. Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, is not publicly traded, but competitors to SpaceX rose on the news. For weeks, Musk has complained about the budget bill, and used the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimating the bill would add $2.4tn to the deficit over the next decade as an opening to condemn the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination'. On Thursday, Trump appeared to finally have had enough of Musk's complaints. Speaking in the Oval Office as the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, looked on in bemusement, Trump mocked Musk's recent black eye and questioned why he didn't cover it up. 'You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval desk. Even with a black eye. I said, do you want a little makeup? He said, no, I don't think so. Which is interesting,' Trump said. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Trump then ratcheted up his barbs against Musk, accusing him of turning against the bill solely out of self-interest, as the bill did not benefit Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle company. Trump also pulled the nomination of Musk's preferred candidate to lead Nasa. 'I'm very disappointed with Elon,' Trump said. 'He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate.' Musk then went on the warpath. Within minutes of Trump's comments appearing in a clip on X, where Musk was responding in real time, Musk accused the president of lying about the bill, and accused Trump of being ungrateful for the millions he spent to get him elected. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on X. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk taking credit for Trump's election win initially threatened to be the touchpoint for their relationship, given Trump had made a point to say that Musk's contributions had no effect on him winning the battleground state of Pennsylvania. But then Trump posted on Truth Social that he had fired Musk from his role as a special adviser because he was 'wearing thin' at the White House, and Musk responded: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Related: Elon Musk calls Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill a 'disgusting abomination' It was less than a half an hour later that Musk fired off his Epstein tweet, in effect accusing him of being part of an alleged child sexual abuse ring linked to Epstein, using a dog whistle for the Maga movement to try to set them against the president. In doing so, Musk ignored his own connections to Epstein. In 2014, like Trump, Musk was photographed at a party with Ghislaine Maxwell, a former Epstein girlfriend who was convicted in 2021 on charges that she helped the financier's sex-trafficking activities. The public feud comes after a remarkable partnership that lasted longer than many Democrats on Capitol Hill and in Trump's orbit predicted. Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars on Trump's re-election campaign through his specially created America Pac, which shouldered a large portion of Trump's door-knocking campaign, although the actual impact of that ground-game effort is unclear.