HS market forecast to reach $7.8bn across 7MM by 2034
Currently, only three biologics are approved for HS: AbbVie's Humira (adalimumab), Novartis' Cosentyx (secukinumab), and UCB's Bimzelx (bimekizumab). While Humira, the first approved biologic, remains the market leader, it is widely viewed by KOLs as having limited efficacy, with response rates near 25%–30% and high rates of treatment fatigue. In contrast, the newer IL-17 inhibitors have demonstrated more robust outcomes. In pivotal trials (BE HEARD I/II), Bimzelx achieved hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) rates of up to 64%, with a faster onset and more durable effect than Cosentyx, despite being a second-line biologic. However, candidiasis risk and high cost may temper uptake.
The landscape is now shifting further with a maturing pipeline with varying mechanisms of action. MoonLake Immunotherapeutics' sonelokimab, a tri-specific nanobody targeting IL-17A/F and albumin, is anticipated to be a best-in-class agent based on its deeper tissue penetration and strong Phase II performance. Similarly, Incyte's JAK1 inhibitor povorcitinib is advancing through late-stage development, showing promise particularly in pain reduction and quality-of-life improvement metrics. GlobalData forecasts that by 2034, pipeline products, including sonelokimab and povorcitinib will represent 47.3% of the total HS market.
A defining challenge in HS care remains the heterogeneity of disease severity and the high unmet need in both early- and late-stage disease. Diagnostic delays, averaging 7–10 years, often result in irreversible structural damage by the time patients reach speciality care. Furthermore, current treatments target only moderate-to-severe HS, leaving early-stage (Hurley stage I) patients without effective interventions. As highlighted by GlobalData's analysis, products that can safely intervene earlier in disease progression represent a significant commercial opportunity.
KOLs also emphasised that clinical endpoints such as HiSCR50 do not fully capture the burden of disease, particularly in tunnel-dominant or refractory cases. As a result, next-generation trials are adopting stricter endpoints such as HiSCR75, and increasingly incorporating patient-reported outcomes such as dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and numerical rating scale-30 (NRS-30). This evolution in trial design aligns with payer and physician expectations for more meaningful, real-world benefits.
Market growth will be led by the US, which accounted for over 70% of HS sales in 2024 due to a larger diagnosed population, broader biologic access, and premium pricing. While biosimilar entry may moderate TNF-alpha sales, the expansion of high-cost IL-17 and JAK pathway inhibitors is expected to intensify market competition and drive overall market prices upward due to the premium pricing of these agents.
Barriers to market growth include safety monitoring requirements for JAK inhibitors, competition among newer biologics, and access challenges in countries with tighter reimbursement frameworks. However, if emerging therapies show consistent improvements in flare reduction, pain control, and psychosocial burden, as seen with Bimzelx and sonelokimab, they could reshape the treatment algorithm and expand biologic usage to earlier disease stages.
With nearly 33 agents in active clinical development and multiple first-in-class mechanisms poised to enter the market, HS is undergoing a therapeutic transformation. GlobalData expects this evolution to redefine the standard of care for a historically underserved patient population.
"HS market forecast to reach $7.8bn across 7MM by 2034" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
CDC issues travel warning amid Chikungunya outbreak in China
Fox News State Department correspondent Gillian Turner reports on the outbreak of Chikungunya in China, the response from the Chinese as well as the U.S. on 'Special Report.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eating fries over boiled potatoes increases type 2 diabetes risk
People who eat three portions of French fries a week have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes, a new study suggests. Those who consume similar amounts of boiled, baked or mash potatoes do not have an increased risk, researchers found. An international team of researchers, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, wanted to investigate any links between potato consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Academics analysed data on studies tracking the health of more than 205,000 health workers in the US. Repeated surveys about people's diets were performed over almost four decades. And during the study follow-up periods, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented. Overall the research team found that consumption of baked, boiled or mashed potatoes were not linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). But people who had a higher consumption of French fries – at least three weekly servings – had a 20% increased risk. And those who eat fries five times a week appeared to have a 27% increased risk. 'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the authors wrote in The BMJ. 'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries. 'Higher intake of French fries, but not combined baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes, was associated with a higher risk of T2D.' The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8%. 'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' they wrote. But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found. The research team also performed a review of all of the other studies on the topic which had similar findings. In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the US and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.' They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.' Commenting on the study, Dr Faye Riley, research communications lead at Diabetes UK, said: 'This research shows that the link between potatoes and type 2 diabetes isn't as clear-cut as it might seem. 'Type 2 diabetes is a complex condition, with many factors influencing its development, including genetics, age and ethnicity. 'Diet is just one part of the picture, but this study suggests that how food is prepared can make a difference and reinforces the advice to prioritise whole grains and cut back on fried or heavily processed foods as a way to support a balanced diet and reduce your risk.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. In a now-viral X video, RFK Jr. tried to explain the funding cuts saying, "HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." Twitter: @SecKennedy According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." Related: In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." Related: While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." Related: And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." Related: "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: