Oil explorers may get legal shield if assets stripped off
"If any measure or series of measures taken by the government or the state government substantially or permanently deprives the contractor of the ownership of any assets being utilised for mineral oil operations, or of its rights under the lease or this contract, the contractor shall be entitled to compensation," the draft contract states.
The compensation will be equivalent to "all costs and expenditures incurred in respect of mineral oil operations, up to that point relating to such asset or rights deprived," per the draft.
However, compensation will not be paid if the company hasn't submitted a field development plan for the specific field, or if the government action was prompted by the need to protect its own rights or legitimate public interests.
Energy giant
ExxonMobil
has for years demanded that exploration contracts provide a
legal shield
against government moves to expropriate assets. Without using the term 'expropriation', the draft contract attempts to address concerns like those raised by Exxon by including a provision for compensation, an official said.
An Exxon India executive previously told ET that its demand for protection against expropriation was "rooted in experience," citing how it faced expropriation after a change in government in Venezuela in the past.
The government is reworking the Model Revenue Sharing Contract (MSRC) to attract large
foreign oil companies
, which have largely stayed away from India's exploration licensing rounds under the Open Acreage Licensing Policy introduced eight years ago. Scarce exploration success and maturing fields have led to falling output and rising dependence on oil and gas imports.
Globally, capital allocation for exploration has been shrinking and is being increasingly directed toward regions offering the best returns and stronger investment protection. Lower oil prices are also making it harder for multinationals to commit capital to countries like India, which are not known for abundant petroleum resources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
15 hours ago
- NDTV
So, Does Pakistan Really Have Those Oil 'Riches'?
The whole thing is like a very badly written play, with the finale still questionable. Trump sets sail for Pakistani waters for 'unimaginable' oil riches, and signs a trade deal too, which seems far more generous than almost anyone else, including India. In some ways, it's all very predictable. Pakistan's generals always court US presidents, and usually with considerable success; perhaps it's something to do with the uniform. But this time, the whole affair is unprecedented in its apparent intimacy. But hang on. As always with Pakistan, nothing is as it seems. The Trade-Offs First, the trade deal. Reliable reports say that Islamabad has got itself a 19% reciprocal tariff deal on a wide range of its products, far lower than the 29% initially threatened under an Executive Order signed by the President. Other countries, like Bangladesh, face a 20% tariff. The US is Pakistan's largest export destination for textiles, where it competes with India, Cambodia and China, among others, and potentially, a higher tariff on these countries should profit Pakistan. But the reality is that it doesn't. Poor industry practices, smaller volumes and high base costs mean that Pakistan only has a slight advantage in at least levelling the playing field. Besides, China, the largest competitor, seems to still be in the game. Pakistan's total exports to the US are at about USD 5.552 billion, compared to India's USD 86 billion, but it matters to a far smaller economy. Which is probably why the tariff rates are comparable to those levied on Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea. On the whole, it is a relief to an embattled economy, but no great reward. All The Wonderful Oil The deal was negotiated over 90 days, and a day prior to this was another far more surprising announcement. Trump, in his typical hyperbolic fashion, announced on his Truth Social channel that the countries had signed a deal to exploit Pakistan's 'massive oil reserves'. Pakistan's official sources seemed to have been struck dumb by the announcement, with officials only praising the trade deal (without revealing the exact numbers involved). Prominent media largely followed suit, as industry experts scanned maps to find the ' massive' oil fields. True, for some years now, Pakistan has been talking about such finds, with most notably Imran Khan announcing this in early 2019. But eventually, drilling in Kekra-1, some 280 km in deep waters off the Karachi coast, was suspended when nothing was found. This was an effort together with the US giant Exxon Mobil and an Italian firm. In 2024, the 'massive oil reserves' story was back, this time with apparent assistance from an unknown 'allied nation', at the time assumed to be Saudi Arabia's Aramco. This time, officials were cautious, warning that it could cost some $5 bn for just exploration, and years to actually exploit the resource if it's actually found. Given that no major oil companies came rushing to Pakistan after this announcement, in fact, and that Shell and Total, among others, left Pakistan due to security issues and the sheer difficulty of doing business, it seemed that this was also an issue of mere wishful thinking. No doubt, the Indus River basin that flows into the sea - where India's Bombay High is also located - potentially can have oil reserves. But the difficulty lies in finding exploitable resources. Also note, India's firms took years to find the right spots for drilling. The question is, will foreign firms care to put in the money and the time for this, not to mention the additional infrastructural facilities involved? Days ago, a major oil find was reported in Sindh, which had interested Chinese firms in 2024. Certainly, several Chinese giants, like the CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company, are operating in Pakistan. But there is no indication of any firm going in for ocean drilling. US government agencies, including the Energy Information Administration (EIA), make no mention of any massive oil find and only note declining shale gas reserves. The Actual Agreement The actual aspect of all this talk of oil is the fact that Pakistan has, in fact, signed off on a deal to buy its first-ever shipment of crude from a Texas-based arm of Vitol, a company that has operations worldwide. This was signed a day after the reduction of tariffs. Pakistan's buy would presumably be at the cost of its usual West Asian imports; the actual details in terms of pricing are unclear, but it would hardly compete with Saudi Arabia's 'Special Oil Facility', which recently deferred payment of about $1.2 bn again this year. Pakistan's imports of oil account for some $11.3 bn a year, and about a third of its total import bill. So, any deal that uses one country's money to pay for another is likely to annoy everyone concerned. The Real Deal The other 'deal' is, of course, in foreign policy, where a read-out of the meeting between Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio appreciated Pakistan's 'continued willingness to play a constructive role in mediating conversations with Iran', and, in return, offering counter-terrorism cooperation in Afghanistan. Pakistan seems to be delivering on the first. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian was in Pakistan on Saturday and Sunday on his first-ever visit, together with a high-level delegation. The visit was described by Iranian news as a 'strategic milestone'. Expect some heavy-handed action against Taliban-based terror groups in return. But that will mean US drones and operators, together with military contracts and some troops in Pakistan to deal with its worst nightmare, the Tehrik-e-Taliban, as well as other Afghanistan-based groups. That is what Islamabad has been playing for all along. For the US, this is a foreign policy 'deal' that Trump will trumpet, even while it sends a signal to India of Washington's ability to play the field. The trade deal hardly matters for Trump, since Pakistan is his country's 168th trading partner. But this is also a pushback against China. When People Comes Knocking Even as all these 'deals' were announced, the Field Marshal, Asim Munir, cut a massive cake together with the Chinese ambassador to commemorate the 78th anniversary of the People's Liberation army. This is power balancing of a very high order, even for the ambidextrous army chief. But so far, so good: an apparently non-existent oil deal and a paltry trade deal, in exchange for buying US oil, and a heavy hand on Iran and Afghanistan. Not bad for the very short term. In the coming days, however, someone's going to come looking for that oil. Something is due to blow, and it's not going to be an oil well.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Exxon tops Q2 profit estimates, eyes value-driven acquisitions ahead
Exxon Mobil beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter profit on Friday as higher oil and gas output and low production costs offset the impact of lower crude prices. The biggest US oil producer made clear that it is ready to take advantage of lower oil prices and make acquisitions, but only if it is confident that it can create additional value. The energy sector has struggled with price volatility as the OPEC+ group increased its production, pushing global benchmark Brent crude prices down 11 per cent in the quarter. Global tariffs levied by US President Donald Trump added to price weakness because they raised the prospect of a weakening global economy with knock-on effects for oil demand. Exxon's oil and gas production was the highest for any second quarter since the merger of Exxon and Mobil formed the company more than 25 years ago, Exxon Mobil said. "The second quarter, once again, proved the value of our strategy and competitive advantages, which continue to deliver for our shareholders no matter the market conditions or geopolitical developments," Exxon CEO Darren Woods said in a statement. Adjusted earnings during the second quarter were $7.1 billion, or $1.64 per share, surpassing consensus analyst estimates of $1.56 per share, data compiled by LSEG showed. Shares of Exxon declined 1.8 per cent in morning trading. Exxon paid $4.3 billion in dividends and repurchased $5 billion worth of shares during the quarter. The buyback figure puts the company on track to meet its annual share repurchase goal of $20 billion. The company's main production areas include the Permian basin, the largest US oilfield, as well as the prolific Stabroek Block off the coast of Guyana. The low cost of production in those fields allows them to stay profitable even during times of weaker oil prices, Exxon has said previously. Global production totaled 4.6 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd) during the quarter, up from 4.5 million boepd in the previous three months. The start-up of Yellowtail, a fourth floating production, storage and offloading facility in Guyana, is anticipated next week, the company said. ON THE HUNT In a press briefing, Woods said he was keeping a high bar for potential acquisitions, searching for targets that have a similar culture to Exxon and where leaders from both companies can learn from one another. "We're not interested in buying volume," he said. "We're very focused on creating value." The Permian basin is one area of potential, given Exxon's technological work to increase oil recovery in that field, Woods said during a conference call with analysts. Exxon secured the lead in the Permian with $60 billion purchase of shale rival Pioneer in 2023. Last month, Exxon lost a legal challenge against Hess, one of its partners in Guyana, which cleared the way for rival Chevron to complete its acquisition of Hess. Exxon argued it had a contractual pre-emptive right to purchase Hess' 30 per cent stake in the Stabroek Block. Woods said Exxon sought out legal opinions from neutral, third parties about the joint operating agreement that governed the partnership between Exxon, Hess and China's CNOOC in Guyana. "In every case, and I mean in literally every case, we were told that our rights were clear," Woods said. The arbitrators said that Exxon had a commercially reasonable argument but that it relied on a narrow textual interpretation, Woods said, adding that the company would take steps to strengthen future contracts as needed. Earnings from oil and gas production were $5.4 billion, down from $6.7 billion in the first quarter. Exxon said it expects lower scheduled maintenance in its refining business during the third quarter.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Oil earnings slip: Exxon and Chevron Q2 profit hits 4-year low; revenue dips as crude prices stay weak despite output rise
Exxon Mobil and Chevron on Friday reported their lowest second-quarter profits in four years, as lower global energy prices and a surge in oil supply from OPEC+ weighed on revenues. However, both US oil giants still managed to beat Wall Street's earnings expectations, driven by higher production volumes. Texas-based Exxon Mobil posted a net profit of $7.08 billion, or $1.64 per share, for the quarter ended June 30, down from $9.24 billion, or $2.14 per share, in the same period last year. Revenue dropped to $81.51 billion from $93.06 billion, missing analyst projections of $82.82 billion, according to Zacks Investment Research, AP reporyted. Exxon does not adjust its earnings for one-time items, such as asset sales. Still, its reported profit exceeded analysts' average forecast of $1.49 per share. 'We achieved our highest second-quarter Upstream production since the merger of Exxon and Mobil more than 25 years ago,' said Darren Woods, Chairman and CEO of Exxon Mobil. The company reported second-quarter net production of 4.6 million oil-equivalent barrels per day, up by 79,000 barrels compared to the first quarter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Chevron Corp, meanwhile, posted a net income of $2.49 billion, or $1.45 per share. Excluding special items, adjusted earnings came in at $1.77 per share, beating analysts' estimates of $1.70. Revenue for the quarter stood at $44.82 billion, lower than expectations. The earnings decline marks a significant reversal from the boom period of 2022, when oil and gas companies posted record profits due to high energy prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Since then, prices have eased. U.S. benchmark crude has largely traded below $70 per barrel this year and briefly dropped under $60 in May. Chevron said production in the Permian Basin reached 1 million barrels of oil equivalent per day during the quarter. Total US net oil-equivalent production rose by 123,000 barrels per day from the year-ago period. Chevron is also in the process of acquiring Hess Corporation for $53 billion, after securing a crucial legal clearance from a Paris court in July. The global oil market faces fresh uncertainties after eight OPEC+ members announced they would increase output by 548,000 barrels per day in August. The group cited improving global economic conditions and depleted inventories for the decision, which is expected to further pressure crude prices. While oil briefly surged in June during a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, it quickly dropped after the US brokered a truce and launched targeted strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. The combination of geopolitical volatility and OPEC+ actions suggests energy markets could remain under pressure in the near term, despite stronger output by US producers. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
