Russian-controlled Crimea brings in information blackout designed to counter Ukrainian drone attacks
Sergei Aksyonov, the head of Crimea - which Russia annexed from Ukraine in 2014 - said he had signed a decree banning media outlets and social media users from publishing any photos, video or other content that revealed the location of Russian forces or details of Ukrainian attacks on the Black Sea peninsula.
"The relevant decree was adopted to safeguard public security and military and other important facilities in the republic," Aksyonov said in a statement on Telegram.
Ukraine, which has said it wants Crimea back - something Moscow says it will not allow to happen - has repeatedly launched major attacks on Russian military assets in Crimea and targeted Russia's Black Sea Fleet, which is formally based on the peninsula.
Aksyonov specifically mentioned the need to classify the location of Russian air defence systems, weapons, military equipment, and military personnel and not to share any GPS coordinates.
He also said that the ban covered the sharing of any information detailing the location, nature or aftermath of any Ukrainian attacks on Crimea, including missile and drone or sea drone strikes and sabotage.
Russian bloggers, media, and social media users frequently post images and details of Ukrainian strikes on Russian-held territory, often triggering criticism from both local and federal authorities.
(Reporting by ReutersWriting by Maxim RodionovEditing by Andrew Osborn)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
20 minutes ago
- The Star
South Korea delays decision on Google's request for map data exports
SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korea delayed a decision on Friday on a request from Google for permission to export map data, following U.S. pressure to address what Washington regards as a non-tariff barrier during recent trade talks, its transport ministry said. South Korea and the United States are preparing for a summit of their leaders, possibly this month, after reaching a trade deal in late July, but it was not clear whether the map issue will be discussed at the meeting. South Korea previously rejected requests from Google, whose parent is Alphabet, for permission to use map data on servers outside the country, in 2016 and 2007, citing security concerns. South Korea's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport said in a statement its National Geographic Information Institute had decided to postpone the decision for 60 days to give Google time to come up with measures that address its security concerns. Google has said there were no security concerns about its mapping data on South Korea, saying the data are publicly available and used by a number of companies, after going through a security review by a government agency. The company said, however, it is closely discussing with the South Korean government about taking any other security measures requested by the authorities, while considering plans to purchase blurred images from local partners which have been approved by the government. South Korea, whose 1950-53 war with North Korea ended without a peace treaty, argues that if it allowed such data to leave the country, the locations of military facilities and other sensitive sites could be revealed. But the U.S. said restrictions on cross-border data flows have long served as barriers to operating navigation services through Google Maps and Apple Maps, resulting in U.S. companies losing out in the South Korean market. South Korea had not made concessions on the map issue and also on further opening up agriculture, despite early and intense bilateral talks, presidential adviser Kim Yong-beom had said. Google said the lack of data restricts its Google Maps services in Korea, causing major inconveniences to foreign tourists. Late last month, Transport Minister Kim Yoon-duk said South Korea needed to be "very cautious" about granting map access, saying defence and public safety were prioritised over trade. (Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin and Joyce Lee; Editing by Alex Richardson and David Holmes)
The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Putin-Trump summit details on Ukraine peace talks
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin are preparing for a summit aimed at ending the Ukraine war, which began with Russia's 2022 invasion. Trump has prioritised peace efforts since taking office, though previous diplomatic attempts have failed to produce results. Both sides confirm summit preparations are underway, with a potential meeting next week. Trump stated a face-to-face discussion with Putin could happen 'very soon.' He added, 'They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing,' referring to both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Putin noted mutual interest in a US-Russia meeting, while Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov indicated next week as a target. Zelensky insists a three-way summit is necessary for progress, but Putin has dismissed immediate talks with his Ukrainian counterpart. Putin said, 'I have nothing against it in general, but certain conditions must be created for this.' Russian negotiators previously stated a Putin-Zelensky meeting could only occur at the final stage of peace talks. Trump clarified that Putin does not need to meet Zelensky as a prerequisite for their summit. No venue has been confirmed, though the UAE, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia are potential hosts. Putin described the UAE as 'one of the quite suitable places.' China has also been speculated as a possible location, with reports suggesting a September meeting hosted by Xi Jinping. NATO member countries are unlikely hosts due to the ICC arrest warrant for Putin. Negotiating positions remain far apart, with Russia demanding Ukrainian withdrawal from annexed regions and neutrality. Ukraine insists on an immediate ceasefire and refuses to recognise Russian territorial claims. Kyiv seeks Western security guarantees, including foreign peacekeeping forces to enforce any ceasefire -AFP
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Analysis-Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround
(Reuters) -Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan is already facing an uphill battle in turning around the ailing chipmaker. Now, U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that Tan resign over his ties to Chinese firms will only distract him from that task, two investors and a former senior employee said. Trump said on Thursday that Tan was "highly conflicted" due to his Chinese connections. Reuters reported exclusively in April that Tan had invested in hundreds of Chinese firms, some of which were linked to the Chinese military. Tan may now have to mount an effort to reassure Trump that he remains the right person to revive the storied American chipmaker, pulling his focus away from the cost cuts he's trying to implement. "It is distracting," said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, which, according to LSEG data, owns more than 200,000 shares in Intel. "I think Trump will make goals for Intel to spend more, and I don't think Intel has the capabilities to spend more, like what Apple and Nvidia are doing." AI chip market leader Nvidia and iPhone-maker Apple have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to expand domestic manufacturing, which, according to Trump, will bring jobs back home. Until recently, Intel had emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 2022 CHIPS Act, as former CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out plans to build advanced chipmaking factories. Tan, however, has significantly pared back such ambitions, as the company's goal of rivaling Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC's contract manufacturing chops have fallen short. Tan said last month that he would slow construction work on new factories in Ohio and planned to build factories only when he saw demand for Intel's chips, a move that is likely to further strain relations with Trump. The company, its board and Tan were making significant investments aligned with Trump's America First agenda, Intel said in a statement on Thursday, without any mention of Trump's demand. The statement was "bland", said David Wagner, a portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, which owns Intel stock through index funds. "Either defend your leader, which will be the beginning of a difficult road ahead, or consider making a change," Wagner said. Having this play out over a few months is not something that Intel can afford, he said. Tan himself released a statement late on Thursday. "The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company," he said, adding that the board was "fully supportive of the work we are doing to transform our company." "BUILT ON TRUST" Tan, a chip industry veteran, took the helm at Intel about six months ago, after the board ousted previous boss Pat Gelsinger over years of missteps and burgeoning losses. The company's shares are largely flat this year after losing nearly two-thirds of their value last year. Tan was the CEO of chip-design software maker Cadence Design from 2008 through December 2021. Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, Reuters reported. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership. Reuters reported on Wednesday that U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and the criminal case involving Cadence. "There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles," Tan said in his statement on Thursday. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards. My reputation has been built on trust," he said. It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on that list. But Trump's remarks have now forced the limelight on an issue that could erodeinvestorconfidence. "If you add in another layer of government scrutiny, and everybody looking into how the company is doing whatever it's doing ... that just makes it harder," said a former senior executive at Intel, who was familiar with the company's strategy under Gelsinger. The source, who declined to be named, was let go as part of Gelsinger's workforce reduction drive last year. Tan's strategy is to "get rid of all of the non-productive parts of the company and really focus on a key few products," the person said. "If (Tan) leaves, it's going to just prolong whatever Intel has to do and needs to do really quickly." (Reporting by Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru; Editing by Sayantani Ghosh and Anil D'Silva)
