logo
Trump's peace-deal demands leave Zelensky with only bad options

Trump's peace-deal demands leave Zelensky with only bad options

Straits Times9 hours ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Since his Aug 15 meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, US President Donald Trump has been pushing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to 'make a deal'.
WASHINGTON – Mr Volodymyr Zelensky finds himself in an impossible bind: risk Mr Donald Trump's wrath or accept a quick deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine by paying the disastrous price of ceding territory for vague security guarantees that could see Moscow come back stronger in a few years' time.
This is the existential dilemma confronting the Ukrainian leader as he travels to Washington for talks with the US president on Aug 18. Fresh off a summit in Alaska with Mr Vladimir Putin that bypassed a ceasefire, Mr Trump has left Mr Zelensky little room to manoeuvre.
The situation is made even more tenuous by the memory of his last visit to the White House in February that
erupted into a bitter exchange between Mr Zelensky and Mr Trump and briefly led to a halt in military support. This time,
a coterie of European leaders will accompany him, but they have questionable leverage and have not always been on the same page.
The entourage will seek clarity from Mr Trump on exactly what security guarantees the US is willing to provide as it attempts to orchestrate a meeting with the Ukrainian president and Mr Putin.
Among the group accompanying Mr Zelensky are people Mr Trump has struck a strong personal rapport with, including Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte and Finnish President Alexander Stubb.
Aside from avoiding another dispute and maintaining Mr Trump's interest in brokering a deal, Mr Zelensky's objectives in the talks include: learning more about Mr Putin's demands, pinning down the timing for a trilateral meeting, and prodding the US toward tougher sanctions against Russia, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations.
Whether he can achieve any of these goals will depend on how much, in the view of European officials, Mr Putin has gotten into Mr Trump's head.
After the Aug 15 summit, Mr Trump appeared to align again with the Russian president by
dropping demands for an immediate ceasefire as a condition for opening negotiations. Instead, he said he will urge Mr Zelensky to act fast on a peace plan.
'Putin has many demands,' Mr Zelensky said on Aug 17 at a joint press conference with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels, a stopover to prepare for the Washington visit.
'It will take time to go through them all. It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,' he said, adding that a ceasefire would be needed to 'work quickly on a final deal'.
Making a deal
Raising the stakes for Kyiv, the US president sounded open to Mr Putin's demands that Ukraine give up large areas of land in the east of Ukraine, which the Russian army and its proxies have been trying to seize since 2014.
Despite the harsh demands on Ukraine, there are signs that the US is now prepared to back a deal.
Following his meeting with Mr Putin, Mr Trump told European leaders that the US could contribute to any security guarantees, and that Mr Putin was prepared to accept that.
But it remains unclear what kind of security guarantees are being discussed with Mr Putin, and what the Kremlin leader is willing to accept.
'We got to an agreement that the US and other nations could effectively offer
Article 5-like language to Ukraine,' Mr Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, said in an interview with CNN, referring to the Nato provision that says if one ally is attacked, it is considered an attack on all members.
Mr Trump is also under pressure. He promised that after taking office in January he would quickly end Russia's full-scale invasion, which is in its fourth year.
His efforts were mainly targeted at Kyiv, but he ultimately had to acknowledge it was the Kremlin that did not want to stop the war.
Instead of yielding to Mr Trump, Russia has intensified attacks. Civilian deaths have mounted, with June and July the deadliest months in more than three years, according to the United Nations.
Pliant Trump
Ahead of the Alaska summit, Mr Trump said refusal to accept a ceasefire would trigger tough new punitive measures on Moscow and countries buying Russian oil.
After the meeting, which included a red-carpet reception for Mr Putin and a shared ride in the US leader's armored limo, Mr Trump called off the threats.
Rather than punish the aggressor, he declared he is seeking a full peace deal that includes 'lands' swop' and urged Mr Zelensky to accept it. On Aug 17, the Ukrainian leader reaffirmed his stance that he will not give up territory or trade land.
'Since the territorial issue is so important, it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia' at a meeting accompanied by the US, Mr Zelensky said. 'So far, Russia gives no sign the trilateral will happen.'
Mr Zelensky's
refusal to accept territorial losses is a position shared by the majority of Ukrainians. But the level of support has softened as counter-offensives sputter and casualties mount.
Still, fears are that a further retreat could invite later attacks.
Talks in Washington will also be pivotal for Mr Zelensky domestically. In late July, he faced his first political crisis since Russia invaded.
Thousands took to the streets over his move to undermine anti-corruption institutions. Mr Zelensky relented and re-installed independence to agencies that investigate top officials.
His position in the talks is complicated by divisions among the US, Ukraine and other allies.
Mr Trump believes Russia can take the whole of Ukraine, although the Kremlin has managed only to seize less than a fifth of Ukraine's territory despite more than a million war casualties.
Europeans, meanwhile, are wary that favourable conditions could encourage Mr Putin to widen his aggression.
'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine,' Mr Zelensky said on Aug 17. 'But there are no details how it'll work and what America's role will be, what Europe's role will be, what the EU can do. And this is our main task.' BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congo and M23 rebels miss deadline to reach Doha peace deal
Congo and M23 rebels miss deadline to reach Doha peace deal

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Congo and M23 rebels miss deadline to reach Doha peace deal

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: An M23 rebel walks on the outskirts of Matanda which is controlled by M23 rebels, in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, March 22, 2025. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra/File Photo KINSHASA - The Congolese government and M23 rebels have missed Monday's deadline to reach a peace agreement in Doha, raising fears that tensions between the two parties might derail talks and reverse progress made to end the conflict. Fighting in eastern Congo has intensified this year, with the M23 group launching an offensive that allowed it to capture the two largest cities in the region. Under a mediation effort hosted by Qatar, Congo and the rebels signed a declaration of principles on July 19 in which they vowed to start negotiating a deal no later than August 8 with the goal of reaching it by August 18. The AFC-M23 Movement said in a statement on Sunday that only the full implementation of the declaration of principles, which includes the release of prisoners, would enable the next round of talks to proceed. A senior AFC source said on Monday that while rebels didn't expect significant progress from the talks, they would send a small delegation in the coming days due to Qatar's pressure as negotiators. "Our delegation will simply reinforce the need to implement these measures before we can engage in negotiations," the source said. A governmental source said authorities had received a draft agreement from the mediation team, and both parties are working on their comments before delegates return to Doha later this week. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jobs, infrastructure and homes at the core of Singapore's resilience: Economists Business New online tools by SkillsFuture Singapore help companies plan and curate staff training Life Chinese EV brand Nio to be launched in Singapore in first quarter of 2026 Asia 2 firefighters die in building fire at Osaka's Dotonbori tourist district Singapore Driver hurt after car turns turtle in Upper Thomson accident Sport National tennis player Shaheed Alam serves up charity event to benefit migrant workers Life New Blackpink album scheduled for November, YG Entertainment confirms Singapore Jail for driver of 11-tonne garbage truck that ran over cyclist in Woodlands It added that the release of prisoners is a complicated prerequisite because it can be a subject of negotiations rather than a condition to continue talks. A Qatari official told Reuters on Sunday that while the timeline outlined in the declaration of principles had not been met, both parties expressed a willingness to continue negotiations. REUTERS

Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time
Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Iran warns war with Israel could resume at any time

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Israel and the United States repeatedly threatened to attack Iran again should Tehran relaunch its nuclear sites and resume its nuclear enrichment programme. TEHRAN - A senior Iranian official warned on Aug 18 that war with Israel could erupt at any moment, describing the current lull after June's 12-day conflict as only a temporary halt. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation; right now, we are not even in a ceasefire (agreement); we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice-President Mohammad Reza Aref. The fighting in June saw Israel bombard Iranian nuclear and military sites, as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes that killed dozens in Israel. The United States announced a halt in fighting on June 24, two days after it joined the war by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But there was no agreement formalising the ceasefire, only an undeclared pause in hostilities. On Aug 17, Mr Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Iranian media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jobs, infrastructure and homes at the core of Singapore's resilience: Economists Business New online tools by SkillsFuture Singapore help companies plan and curate staff training Life Chinese EV brand Nio to be launched in Singapore in first quarter of 2026 Asia 2 firefighters die in building fire at Osaka's Dotonbori tourist district Singapore Driver hurt after car turns turtle in Upper Thomson accident Sport National tennis player Shaheed Alam serves up charity event to benefit migrant workers Life New Blackpink album scheduled for November, YG Entertainment confirms Singapore Jail for driver of 11-tonne garbage truck that ran over cyclist in Woodlands 'We are not in a ceasefire now, we are in a war phase, it could break down at any time, there is no protocol, no regulations, no agreement between us and the Israelis, between us and the Americans,' he said in remarks carried by the Shargh daily. 'A ceasefire means ceasing attacks; that could change at any time,' he added. Since then, Iranian officials have insisted the country is not seeking war but is ready for another confrontation. Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons through its atomic programme, a charge Tehran strongly denies. Following the war, Israel and the United States repeatedly threatened to attack Iran again should Tehran relaunch its nuclear sites and resume its nuclear enrichment programme. The United Nations nuclear watchdog has warned that Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country that enriches uranium to 60 per cent – far beyond the 3.67 per cent cap set by a landmark international accord reached in 2015. The level is a short step from the 90 per cent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Last week, Britain, France and Germany, all signatories to the 2015 deal, threatened to reimpose sanctions lifted under the agreement. Iran has warned of serious consequences, with some officials in the country hinting at withdrawal of Tehran from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. AFP

What does Ukraine's constitution say about territorial changes?
What does Ukraine's constitution say about territorial changes?

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

What does Ukraine's constitution say about territorial changes?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A drone view shows the ruins of residential buildings in the abandoned town of Marinka (Maryinka), which was destroyed in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in the Donetsk region, a Russian-controlled area of Ukraine, August 7, 2025. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko/File Photo KYIV - Territorial questions are certain to be a key area of focus when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders meet U.S. President Donald Trump for talks on Monday to map out a possible peace deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine. Russia occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and the U.S. president has said "land-swapping" and changes to territory will be crucial for any settlement. Two sources briefed on Russian thinking said on Saturday that Putin and Trump have discussed a proposal requiring Ukraine to fully withdraw troops from the Ukrainian-controlled parts of the eastern Donetsk region. UKRAINE'S CONSTITUTION ON THE ISSUE OF TERRITORY Any changes to Ukraine's territory would have to be settled in Ukraine by a referendum, according to the country's constitution. "Issues of altering the territory of Ukraine are resolved exclusively by an All-Ukrainian referendum," Article 73 says. The question can be put to a referendum by popular initiative if the signatures of three million eligible Ukrainian voters are gathered from at least two thirds of the country's regions, it says. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jobs, infrastructure and homes at the core of Singapore's resilience: Economists Business New online tools by SkillsFuture Singapore help companies plan and curate staff training Life Chinese EV brand Nio to be launched in Singapore in first quarter of 2026 Asia 2 firefighters die in building fire at Osaka's Dotonbori tourist district Singapore Driver hurt after car turns turtle in Upper Thomson accident Sport National tennis player Shaheed Alam serves up charity event to benefit migrant workers Life New Blackpink album scheduled for November, YG Entertainment confirms Singapore Jail for driver of 11-tonne garbage truck that ran over cyclist in Woodlands UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT STANCE Ukraine, like its European allies, strongly opposes the idea of legally recognising any Ukrainian territory as Russian. But it has tacitly acknowledged it will almost certainly have to accept some de facto territorial losses. Zelenskiy has said talks to end the war should take the current front line as their starting point and cannot begin by Kyiv having to withdraw its troops from parts of its own sovereign territory that Russia does not control. He has said he does not have a mandate to give away any of the country's territory, and that tracts of state land cannot be traded around as if they were his private property. Zelenskiy has also said that if Kyiv withdrew troops from the heavily fortified eastern Donetsk region, it would open up Ukraine to the threat of Russian advances deeper into less well-defended Ukrainian territory. TRUMP'S STANCE The U.S. president has publicly criticized Zelenskiy for saying he could not violate the constitution by agreeing to give away territory. "I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelenskiy was saying: 'Well, I have to get constitutional approval'. I mean, he has got approval to go into war, kill everybody but he needs approval to do a land swap. Because there will be some land swapping going on", he told the press on August 11. UKRAINIANS' VIEW A clear majority of Ukrainians want a negotiated settlement, according to opinion polls, but they also oppose recognising Ukrainian land as Russian. The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology says that an opinion poll it conducted in June showed that 68% of those questioned oppose the idea of officially recognising "some parts" of occupied land as Russian, while 24% are open to this. The same survey showed that 78% are against the idea of giving up on land that Kyiv's troops still control. The pollster did not survey opinions in areas occupied by Russia. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store