[Editorial] Back to square one
Semiconductor bill in crisis; Opposition leader changes stance
A bill to strengthen the competitiveness of the nation's semiconductor industry is in crisis over a clause that exempts R&D workers in the industry from the 52-hour workweek.
Lawmakers of the ruling and opposition parties discussed the clause in a subcommittee meeting of the National Assembly's Trade, Industry, Energy, SMEs and Startups Committee on Monday, but failed to agree on it.
The ruling People Power Party is clinging to the position that it should stay, while the main opposition Democratic Party of Korea is arguing the issue should be covered by the Labor Standards Act. But this would mean the Environment and Labor Committee is supposed to handle it. Democratic Party members of the committee oppose making an exception for the semiconductor industry.
The Democratic Party wants to proceed with the bill without the clause. Rep. Kim Won-i of the party said that it was a minor part of the bill.
But for the ruling party, that clause is the key point. The bill covers government subsidies, research and development support, related infrastructure construction and other support to raise the competitiveness of South Korea's semiconductor industry.
Among others, allowing companies to ask R&D scientists and engineers to work longer hours than the legal maximum of 52 hours a week is what business lobby groups want the most.
Semiconductor companies can make investments with their own funds even without government subsidies, but they can make employees work more R&D hours flexibly only if an exception to Korea's universal 52-hour workweek is approved.
Business lobby groups say it will be difficult for Korean companies that are forced to turn off the lights of their labs after 52 hours to beat competitor TSMC in Taiwan, where R&D professionals work longer shifts.
The Democratic Party is said to be concerned that once an exception is allowed for the semiconductor industry, other strategic industries will likely make the same demand, eventually negating the universality of the 52-hour workweek.
But for the ruling party, this is an excessive worry. It is desirable to deal with work hours issues through labor and management agreements reflecting the different conditions of individual companies. The working life of highly paid scientists and engineers differs from that for production workers.
For the conservative party, the breakdown of negotiations over the bill is attributable to Democratic Party Chair Rep. Lee Jae-myung's change of position.
He said in a debate on the bill on Feb. 3 that he sympathized with an opinion that it is reasonable to give flexibility in work hours to R&D professionals only. He said that he was at a loss for words, in response to a question about whether there was a problem in letting them work intensively as an exception, provided they agree to do so. Two days later, however, he backpedaled, saying that he doubts it is necessary to make an exception for the semiconductor industry.
In a National Assembly speech on Feb. 10, Lee said that it was wrong to argue that international competitiveness in the high-tech field can be raised through lengthening work hours and labor exploitation.
Lee backtracked to reflect the strong backlash from umbrella union Korea Confederation of Trade Unions, lawmakers and party supporters. He had once said that he prioritized business-driven growth, apparently to extend his base, but he eventually came back to his original prolabor position.
Regarding the issue of revising the Inheritance Tax Act, Lee recently argued for tax deductions to be expanded for those who inherit a home. But he looked away when it came to a key issue: cutting the highest inheritance tax rate to lessen the burden on those who inherit a business. South Korea has the second highest inheritance tax rate among OECD member countries. But Lee has said it will only benefit the superrich.
When the ruling party commented that he was ideologically moving from left to right, Lee argued that his party was originally focused on the economy and that fools do not change.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Controversy grows over Jim Rogers' ‘endorsement' of Lee Jae-myung
Investor tells The Korea Herald he does not support or endorse anyone Rival parties on Monday bickered over the authenticity of the Democratic Party of Korea's claims of veteran US investor Jim Rogers' letter of "endorsement" of its presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung. The controversy snowballed Monday after Rogers denied his endorsement of Lee in several interviews with local media from late Sunday. In an email inquiry from The Korea Herald, Rogers replied, "I do not support or endorse or anything any candidate there," when asked whether he supports or has endorsed Lee. The Democratic Party refuted the investor's remarks in a joint statement released to the press by Kim Jin-hyang, the former head of the Kaesong Industrial Complex, and Song Kyung-ho, a professor at Pyongyang University of Science and Technology, who is based in London. The two were closely involved in the process of receiving the letter from Rogers and announcing it to the public. Song explained in the statement that Rogers did express his 'support' for Lee, which was interpreted as his endorsement of the candidate, which he said he regretted. Kim said Rogers' 'support of candidate Lee Jae-myung' was real, while admitting that there were 'some mistakes' made in the communication between Song and the US investor. The two also included screen captures of the conversation between Rogers and Song regarding Rogers' 'support' of Lee on the messenger app WeChat from May 26 to May 29. The screen-captured images showed that Rogers replied 'Thanks! This is fine' to a document titled 'A Message from Jim Rogers: Peace and Opportunity on the Korean Peninsula' drafted by Song. Song has asked for confirmation on whether he could release the document under Rogers' name, according to the images. However, the version shared on WeChat showed a toned-down version of the document later released to the public by the Democratic Party. The version drafted by Song and confirmed by Rogers said "That is why I recognize the pragmatic approach of Lee Jae-myung, a leader who is focused not on ideology or political distractions." The version of the document released by the Democratic Party shows Rogers saying, "That is why I strongly support Lee Jae Myung," instead of "I recognize the pragmatic approach." Rogers then says "Let us invest in peace. Let us invest in the future. Let us invest in Korea. So now. ... The choice is Lee Jae-myung." He calls Lee "a leader with the courage and vision to end the era of confrontation and open a new chapter of peace, growth, and global leadership for Korea." The People Power Party denounced the Democratic Party's claims as 'an international fraud' and called for Lee to drop out of the presidential race. People Power Party Interim Chair Kim Yong-tae said during the party's election committee meeting held Monday morning that the Democratic Party's claims are 'incorrect stories spread by a person who met (Rogers) briefly a few years ago.' On Thursday, several members of the Democratic Party's central election committee announced in a press conference that Rogers decided to 'endorse' Lee. The 8-minute press conference was entirely dedicated to Rogers. mkjung@


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul shares nearly flat amid renewed tariff woes
South Korean stocks finished slightly higher Monday, as investors took a wait-and-see posture ahead of the crucial presidential election amid signs of renewed trade tensions between the United States and China. The local currency rose against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index added 1.3 points, or 0.05 percent, to close at 2,698.97. Trade volume was moderate at 320.32 million shares worth 7.99 trillion won ($5.82 billion), with losers beating winners 523 to 369. Foreign and retail investors bought a net 127.34 billion won and 98.7 billion won worth of stocks, respectively, while institutions sold 240.17 billion won worth of shares. The index opened lower but soon turned higher, rising nearly 1 percent. But it had moved in and out of negative territory before ending slightly higher. Investor sentiment was dampened as US President Donald Trump said last week that he planned to double tariffs on foreign imports of steel to 50 percent. He also upped trade tensions by accusing China of violating a trade agreement with the US ahead of a scheduled call with Chinese President Xi Jinping to address trade issues. On the domestic front, South Korean voters were set to cast their ballots to choose a president Tuesday after former President Yoon Suk Yeol was ousted following the short-lived imposition of martial law. Front-runner Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party was vying against Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party. Top-cap shares finished mixed. Market bellwether Samsung Electronics surged 1.07 percent to 56,800 won, and its rival SK hynix jumped 1.47 percent to 207,500 won. But major battery maker LG Energy Solution fell 0.52 percent to 284,500 won, and leading biotech firm Samsung Biologics edged down 0.1 percent to 1.03 million won. Steelmakers lost ground. No. 1 steelmaker POSCO Holdings sank 2.4 percent to 244,000 won, and Hyundai Steel tumbled 2.66 percent to 27,450 won. Carmakers also fell. Top carmaker Hyundai Motor dipped 0.7 percent to 184,000 won, and its sister Kia Motors went down 1.12 percent to 88,400 won. Defense giant Hanwha Aerospace advanced 2.96 percent to 835,000 won, while leading financial firm KB Financial retreated 4.12 percent to 100,000 won. The local currency was quoted at 1,373.1 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., up 7 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Far-right group's ties to South Korea's after-school program sparks outrage
Instructors allegedly rewarded for online attacks on liberals, praise for conservatives A far-right educational group's involvement in South Korea's government-led after-school program for elementary students has triggered controversy, with parents voicing alarm over the infiltration of ideological bias into classrooms. The controversy started with a local investigative news outlet reporting that a far-right organization called Rhee Park School — known for glorifying former authoritarian presidents Syngman Rhee and Park Chung-hee — has not only conducted online manipulation campaigns under a team named "Jasongun" but also dispatched instructors to Neulbom schools, a state-run extended-day elementary education program. Jasongun is the abbreviation of a Korean phrase meaning "freedom finger army to save the nation' (direct translation). The report alleged that Rhee Park School trained and dispatched instructors to Neulbom schools in Seoul using an internally issued instructor certificate. These instructors were said to be selected in return for participating in online smear campaigns targeting liberal politicians, including presidential candidates Lee Jae-myung and Lee Jun-seok, while promoting right-wing figures such as Kim Moon-soo of the ruling People Power Party. Outrage has mounted among parents, especially after it was revealed that the institution had secured a partnership with the Korea Association for Neulbom Education and Seoul National University of Education. According to the Education Ministry, the agreement allowed the group to supply instructors for science and art-based Neulbom programs at 10 elementary schools in the capital. The Education Ministry announced a full investigation into any links between the far-right institution and the national Neulbom system. 'Given the public reaction and severity of the issue, we have instructed the immediate suspension of related programs and the cancellation of the agreement with the organization,' said the SNUE Neulbom Education Support Center. Rhee Park School was founded in 2017 by Son Hyo-sook, a retired civil servant with no prior educational credentials. Son's recent appointment as an education policy adviser to the Education Minister has drawn further scrutiny, with critics questioning how she gained a high-level policy advisory role without a professional background in education. The controversy has renewed criticism of the Neulbom system, a key education policy initiative of the Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Initially branded as an 'all-day elementary school,' the program aims to merge after-school classes and care services under state responsibility. The Education Ministry said Monday it has launched a full-scale investigation into the matter and dismissed the head of the far-right group from her role as a policy adviser the day prior. 'Given the sensitivity of the allegations, she was dismissed immediately,' ministry spokesperson Koo Yeon-hee stated during a press briefing. 'Son did not play a prominent role on the committee and only attended a recent workshop.' Koo explained that the committee consists of 124 advisers from various ideological backgrounds and functions in a consultative capacity. 'Since it is a purely advisory body, we did not screen appointees for political neutrality at the time of selection,' she said. Although Son's term was originally set to end on June 12, Koo added that the ministry would consider reviewing the status of other advisers. 'We will ask the relevant departments to look into whether there are any issues with other committee members and whether further investigation is possible,' she said. While the Education Ministry stated that private certifications like the one issued by Rhee Park School do not guarantee employment in schools, and that hiring decisions are made independently by each institution, it acknowledged the need for a system-wide review. The ministry pledged to audit all currently operating Neulbom programs to assess any connection to the institution.