Book Review: 'Lincoln's Peace' offers lessons for these times from the Civil War
Had the Union maintained a larger and stronger post-Civil War occupying army, could it have banished all the residual slavery practices and prevented the formation of the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups that crawled out from the Confederacy ruins?
And how different might the outcomes have been in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan had we thought harder about what we were going to do to resolve the issues that triggered armed conflict?
As Michael Vorenberg notes in 'Lincoln's Peace,' the end of a war does not necessarily signal the outbreak of peace.
But we Americans are an impatient people; we like to smash our way to victory and go home as quickly as possible, buoyed by the belief that we have vanquished evil, installed goodness and inspired World War Il liberation-of-France-level jubilation.
Never mind that scenario hasn't happened since; we haven't paused enough to learn. And the Civil War is the conflict that keeps on teaching.
In January, for example, Knopf published Richard Carwardine's 'Righteous Strife: How Religious Nationalists Forged Lincoln's Union,' which explores the roles of faith-based nationalism during the Civil War and traces Christian nationalism to present-day issues such as abortion and gender identity.
The most potent lesson in Vorenberg's 'Lincoln's Peace' is to carefully consider all the issues at stake in planning what to do after the fighting stops.
Abraham Lincoln wanted to 'let them (the defeated Southern states) up easy' but as Vorenberg shows in great detail, enough unrepentant Southerners merely switched to other tactics to keep Blacks powerless, in poverty and subjugated in every way to the white majority.
Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, fervently wanted to declare victory and move on and he prevailed in that strategy, reducing the occupying Union Army force until it was ineffectual.
If the book has a fault, it's the meticulous detail and profusion of names, even of minor characters who could be named by title alone. In an interview, Vorenberg said he wanted a timeline and list of characters, but publisher Knopf demurred. (Note to Knopf: Take his advice next time.)
Without dwelling on it, "Lincoln's Peace" mentions multiple times another failure during the Civil War that reverberates today: Newspapers during the Civil War often presented starkly different accounts of the war, depending on whether they published in Southern or Northern cities.
Now 160 years after the Civil War, many of our fellow citizens accuse our legacy news media of also contouring their reporting to mesh with their own institutional viewpoints and those of their perceived audiences.
Vorenberg and Carwardine's books remind us of the cost in lives in failing to resolve — peacefully and diplomatically — arguments with deep social and moral implications.
A clear conclusion is that it will take Lincoln's ideals and general decency to get us out of the strife we Americans have created for ourselves today.
___
AP book reviews: https://apnews.com/hub/book-reviews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
a few seconds ago
- Washington Post
White House creates account on TikTok, the app Trump once tried to ban
The White House launched an account on the popular video app TikTok on Tuesday, sharing a number of videos, including one in which President Donald Trump declares: 'I am your voice.' The U.S. has had a rocky relationship with the Chinese-owned video app across multiple administrations. Federal employees are banned from downloading it on work devices — with limited exceptions — because of concerns that China could collect Americans' user data.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump slams mail-in ballots as corrupt, but may not have the power to derail them
President Trump told Brian Glenn of the conservative Real America's Voice that he didn't want to answer his question because it was "off-topic" as he stood there with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. Then he proceeded to answer it at great length. The idea, it turns out, began with Vladimir Putin, who has a bit of experience at keeping himself in power, which isn't all that hard if you're a dictator. My source? Donald Trump. He said Putin told him that "it's impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections," in an interview with Fox's Sean Hannity. He said Putin told him he won the 2020 election "by so much," as Trump has long claimed, "and you lost it because of mail-in voting. It was a rigged election." Music to the president's ears. So Trump was ready when a friendly reporter asked the question. "Mail-in ballots are corrupt," he declared. "Mail-in ballots, you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots, and we as a Republican Party are going to do everything possible that we get rid of mail-in ballots. We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt." He was just warming up. And, you know, that we're the only country in the world, I believe I may be wrong, but just about the only country in the world that uses [mail-in ballots] because of what's happened, massive fraud all over the place. The other thing we want, change of the machines. For all of the money they spend, it's approximately 10 times more expensive than paper ballots. And paper ballots are very sophisticated with the watermark paper and everything else, we would get secure elections. We get much faster results, the machines, I mean, they say we're going to have the results in two weeks with paper ballots. You have the results that night. Most people almost have, but most people in many countries use paper ballots. It's the most secure form." A little fact-checking is in order. As Axios points out, many countries around the world have some form of mail-in voting. And millions of Americans who live overseas, such as military families, are eligible for mailing in their ballots. Trump actually doesn't have the power to do this. While he says the states are an "agent" of the feds, the Constitution says the mechanics of holding elections "shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof." But Congress can change those requirements. Could the president get this through the narrow majorities in both chambers? "It's a fraud," Trump said, adding: "It's time that the Republicans get tough and stop it because the Democrats want it, it's the only way they can get elected." Trump even invoked Jimmy Carter. In 2004, a commission set up by the former president and ex-Reagan aide James Baker III concluded that "absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud." In 2020, Trump went all-out in favor of mail-in ballots, arguing that they would help Republicans. Of course, he may just have been trying to make the best of the tools already in place. No party believes in unilateral disarmament. But his enthusiasm for mail-in ballots in that election stands in stark contrast to his current stance that they are corrupt and should be banned. Trump wound up telling Brian Glenn, who is dating Marjorie Taylor Greene, "I'm glad you asked that question." The president doesn't let himself be tied down by the rules of consistency that most conventional politicians have to obey. Until last Friday, he was insisting on a cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine as a precondition for any peace agreement. After the Alaska summit, he dropped the cease-fire idea that Zelensky had been demanding, given that his country is being bombarded every day, with significant civilian casualties, and adopted the Putin stance of allowing the war to continue to further freeze his military gains in the crucial Donbas region. But that flexibility – what critics call flip-flopping – has put the president in the position where he has a shot at hammering out a peace agreement, though major obstacles remain. So I expect we'll hear a lot more about how mail-in ballots are horrible and evil in the coming months, though whether he can get his Hill allies to go along is very much an open question.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Southern African leaders meet in Madagascar to chart path for self-reliance
Southern African leaders are meeting in Madagascar to decide how to make the region more self-reliant and less vulnerable to global economic shocks after years of instability and falling foreign aid. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) summit gets underway in Antananarivo on Sunday, with Madagascar taking the bloc's rotating presidency for the first time. Leaders from 16 countries will set the course for the region's future, discussing how to boost trade from within and cut dependence on outside partners. The theme this year is clear: remove barriers, move goods faster and keep more value at home. Opening the SADC Council of Ministers on Tuesday, executive secretary Elias Magosi said the region is being squeezed by higher customs tariffs, shrinking aid and political unrest abroad. 'It is becoming increasingly evident that we are more likely to succeed when we depend more on our own resources than on external support over which we have absolutely no control,' he said. 'To achieve this, we must strengthen intra-regional trade, remove trade barriers and invest in essential infrastructure.' Southern African bloc decides to end military mission in DRC Building up manufacturing SADC wants manufacturing to make up 30 percent of its GDP by 2030, nearly triple today's 11 percent. The aim is to build an economy that can keep going when the global market stumbles. Madagascar's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Rafaravavitafika Rasata – who chairs the Council of Ministers – said all member states need to be part of the plan. 'By combining the maritime, economic, environmental and cultural potential of the islands with the resources and agricultural and industrial power of the continental member states, we can build the autonomous and competitive SADC we want,' she said. Southern African forces set to deploy in eastern DRC to quell M23 rebel militia Political tensions The summit comes at a time of political strain in Madagascar. Former presidents Marc Ravalomanana and Hery Rajaonarimampianina have criticised holding the event in Antananarivo. In a joint statement, they accused President Andry Rajoelina's government of presiding over a worsening political and economic climate. They cited alleged restrictions on peaceful protests, what they called the 'llack of real independence' of the electoral commission, and a situation in which 80 percent of the population live below the poverty line. They warned that pressing ahead without tackling these issues 'would undermine the credibility of the SADC'. Rajoelina rejected their accusations, saying his predecessors were trying to discourage SADC leaders from attending. He called the summit an historic opportunity for both Madagascar and the region as the island takes the bloc's leadership for the first time.
