&w=3840&q=100)
UK adds India to 'deport now, appeal later' criminal list: What it means
The UK Home Office confirmed on Sunday that its 'Deport Now Appeal Later' scheme will grow from eight countries to 23. Under the policy, foreign nationals from these countries who have had their human rights claim refused will be sent home before their appeal is heard. They will be able to take part in hearings remotely via video link.
'For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end,' said Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. 'Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.'
The official press release does not specify which countries have been added to the list.
What is UK's 'Deport Now, Appeal Later' scheme?
The UK's 'Deport Now, Appeal Later' scheme is a Home Office policy that allows certain foreign nationals to be deported before their appeal against removal is heard, instead of remaining in the UK while the process is ongoing.
How it works
• Normally, a person who is refused leave to remain in the UK can stay in the country while appealing the decision.
• Under this scheme, eligible individuals are removed to their home country first, and then take part in their UK appeal hearing remotely — usually via video link.
• If the appeal succeeds, they can return to the UK.
Who it applies to
• Initially introduced in 2014 under the Immigration Act, it was aimed at foreign criminals given a prison sentence of at least 12 months.
• The policy has been revived and expanded — as of August 2025, the Home Office plans to almost triple the list of countries covered, from 8 to 23, including India.
• It applies where the Home Office believes removal before the appeal would not cause 'serious irreversible harm' or breach human rights obligations.
The Home Office says the measure prevents people from using the appeals process to delay deportation for months or years, and ensures quicker enforcement against those convicted of crimes.
List of countries in the scheme
The list originally covered Finland, Nigeria, Estonia, Albania, Belize, Mauritius, Tanzania and Kosovo when revived in 2023 by then Conservative home secretary Suella Braverman.
According to Financial Times, the expanded list will now include:
• India
• Angola
• Australia
• Botswana
• Brunei
• Bulgaria
• Canada
• Guyana
• Indonesia
• Kenya
• Latvia
• Lebanon
• Malaysia
• Uganda
• Zambia
The Home Office has not published the full list in its official press release but said discussions are ongoing with other countries about joining the scheme.
'We are leading diplomatic efforts to increase the number of countries where foreign criminals can be swiftly returned, and if they want to appeal, they can do so safely from their home country,' said Foreign Secretary David Lammy. 'Under this scheme, we're investing in international partnerships that uphold our security and make our streets safer.'
Earlier release from prison
The scheme comes alongside legislation passed in June, which from September will allow the government to deport prisoners after they have served 30 per cent of their sentence, instead of the current 50 per cent.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said the powers will apply to foreign national offenders already in custody and those newly sentenced. Discretion will be retained on a case-by-case basis.
'Deportations are up under this government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before,' said Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood. 'Our message is clear: if you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing.'
Offenders serving life sentences, including terrorists and murderers, will still have to complete their prison terms before deportation.
Impact and figures
• Around 5,200 foreign nationals have been deported since July 2024, a 14 per cent rise over the previous year.
• Foreign offenders make up about 12 per cent of the total prison population.
• The average annual cost of a prison place is £54,000.
The government has also committed £5 million to deploy specialist staff across nearly 80 prisons in England and Wales to speed up removals.
Other immigration measures
The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill will allow the removal of asylum seekers convicted of certain sex offences from refugee protection.
Plans in the Immigration White Paper published in May will also tighten how Article 8 of the Human Rights Act – the 'right to a family life' – can be used in deportation and asylum appeals.
Since July 2024, the Labour government says it has returned 35,000 people with no right to remain, increased illegal working raids and arrests by 50 per cent, and boosted asylum decision-making by more than 116 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Billionaire Uday Kotak calls for urgent support to help India withstand US tariff shock
Indian banking billionaire Uday Kotak has called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to provide stronger budgetary support to small and medium-sized enterprises, warning that the country faces a 'major shock' from US tariffs. Kotak, founder of Kotak Mahindra Bank, India's third-largest private lender, told the Financial Times that the tariffs introduced by US President Donald Trump had 'woken Indians up' to the vulnerabilities of the economy. 'We must think about this as an opportunity for us to get out of our cruise mindset and from a comfort mindset to 'we are at risk',' he recently imposed an additional 25 per cent levy on Indian imports, including discounted Russian oil, on top of existing 25 per cent 'reciprocal' tariffs. The US president has cited the oil imports as helping finance Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine. Also Read: Facing Trump tariffs, India's shrimp farmers consider switching to other businesses Kotak said the Indian government should offer 'direct fiscal support' to 'turbocharge' small businesses in manufacturing, research, and technology. 'Once you give that capital support, private equity, entrepreneurs' equity [and] risk capital will come additionally,' he told FT. Kotak is not alone in urging government intervention. Earlier this month, Anand Mahindra, chair of the Mahindra Group, called for more liquidity for SMEs, infrastructure investment, and incentives for manufacturers. Harsh Goenka, chairman of RPG Enterprises, has also suggested that New Delhi create a fund to help exporters find new markets and attract manufacturers relocating from Minister Modi has pledged a series of tax and regulatory reforms aimed at boosting business, including cuts to the goods and services tax and a reduction in bureaucratic red tape. The government frames these measures as part of its push for a 'self-reliant India.' Still, the steep US tariffs threaten Modi's goal of strengthening Indian manufacturing, which currently contributes around 14 per cent to GDP, well below the target of 25 per cent. Many economists say India needs to sustain GDP growth of roughly 8 per cent to meet Modi's long-term vision of developed economy status by 2047. The economy expanded 7.4 per cent in the first quarter year-on-year, but analysts warn that tariffs on exports to the US, India's largest trading partner, could reduce growth by almost 0.5 percentage a highly influential figure in Indian finance, highlighted both the risks and opportunities presented by the tariff regime. 'The uncertainty of Trump's tariff regime has created a sense of urgency for transforming India,' he said. 'It is a great opportunity to pivot.' Also Read: About $48 billion worth of goods to be impacted by US' 50% tariff: Govt He also emphasised that India's macroeconomic fundamentals are strong. 'India's macroeconomic situation is very comfortable. Our fiscal deficit is under control, our current account is under control, you've got macroeconomic stability.'Kotak called on policymakers and businesses to use the trade shock to enhance 'productivity, efficiency, excellence and building world-class brands.' He stressed the importance of manufacturing and warned against relying solely on India's domestic market to avoid India's per capita GDP at $2,700, far below China's $13,300 and the US's nearly $89,000, he argued the country cannot afford to remain in a comfort zone. 'At the current 'cruise' level, we'll keep on improving our position, but is it fast enough for us to get past the middle-income trap? I think there's a gap,' Kotak said.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Billionaire Uday Kotak calls for urgent support to help India withstand US tariff shock
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Indian banking billionaire Uday Kotak has called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government to provide stronger budgetary support to small and medium-sized enterprises, warning that the country faces a 'major shock' from US tariffs Kotak, founder of Kotak Mahindra Bank , India's third-largest private lender, told the Financial Times that the tariffs introduced by US President Donald Trump had 'woken Indians up' to the vulnerabilities of the economy.'We must think about this as an opportunity for us to get out of our cruise mindset and from a comfort mindset to 'we are at risk',' he recently imposed an additional 25 per cent levy on Indian imports, including discounted Russian oil, on top of existing 25 per cent 'reciprocal' tariffs. The US president has cited the oil imports as helping finance Vladimir Putin's war in said the Indian government should offer 'direct fiscal support' to 'turbocharge' small businesses in manufacturing, research, and technology. 'Once you give that capital support, private equity, entrepreneurs' equity [and] risk capital will come additionally,' he told is not alone in urging government intervention. Earlier this month, Anand Mahindra, chair of the Mahindra Group, called for more liquidity for SMEs, infrastructure investment, and incentives for Goenka, chairman of RPG Enterprises, has also suggested that New Delhi create a fund to help exporters find new markets and attract manufacturers relocating from Minister Modi has pledged a series of tax and regulatory reforms aimed at boosting business, including cuts to the goods and services tax and a reduction in bureaucratic red tape. The government frames these measures as part of its push for a 'self-reliant India.'Still, the steep US tariffs threaten Modi's goal of strengthening Indian manufacturing , which currently contributes around 14 per cent to GDP, well below the target of 25 per cent. Many economists say India needs to sustain GDP growth of roughly 8 per cent to meet Modi's long-term vision of developed economy status by economy expanded 7.4 per cent in the first quarter year-on-year, but analysts warn that tariffs on exports to the US, India's largest trading partner, could reduce growth by almost 0.5 percentage a highly influential figure in Indian finance, highlighted both the risks and opportunities presented by the tariff regime. 'The uncertainty of Trump's tariff regime has created a sense of urgency for transforming India,' he said. 'It is a great opportunity to pivot.'He also emphasised that India's macroeconomic fundamentals are strong. 'India's macroeconomic situation is very comfortable. Our fiscal deficit is under control, our current account is under control, you've got macroeconomic stability.'Kotak called on policymakers and businesses to use the trade shock to enhance 'productivity, efficiency, excellence and building world-class brands.' He stressed the importance of manufacturing and warned against relying solely on India's domestic market to avoid India's per capita GDP at $2,700, far below China's $13,300 and the US's nearly $89,000, he argued the country cannot afford to remain in a comfort zone. 'At the current 'cruise' level, we'll keep on improving our position, but is it fast enough for us to get past the middle-income trap? I think there's a gap,' Kotak said.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro reminds India of America's exorbitant privilege & diktats
Synopsis Peter Navarro's op-ed reveals the US expectation that India, to maintain its strategic partnership and trade benefits, must align its economic policies with Washington's interests. This includes purchasing American weapons without technology transfer demands and ceasing the use of dollar surpluses to buy Russian oil for re-export. Agencies Without saying anything really new, Peter Navarro has revealed something important. If India wants to keep earning dollars by selling goods and services to America, it has to recycle them as per Washington's diktats. The White House trade adviser's op-ed in the Financial Times is aimed at critics who have been shocked by the summary disdain with which President Donald Trump has alienated an ally that past administrations have spent a quarter-century cultivating. Navarro's main message: 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Also Read: Who is Trump's trade guru giving gyan to India? Basically, the White House expects the same level of loyalty as it got from the Germans in 1967. Back then, the Lyndon B. Johnson administration prevailed upon Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger to not exchange any of the Bundesbank's dollar holdings for gold, even though they were well within their rights to do so under the prevailing Bretton Woods arrangement. Bonn made a public pledge to not join the rebellious French who were beginning to question what Valery Giscard d'Estaing called America's exorbitant relations in the 1960s were rooted in the calculus of the Cold War. Historically, New Delhi and Washington have never been as close, yet the latter is going to decide how the most-populous nation will use its trade dollars. That means Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to buy American weapon systems without insisting on technology transfers or local production. The US has no desire to gift cutting-edge military capabilities to a country cozying up to both Russia and China, Navarro says. The second constraint is on how dollar incomes are not to be used. Recycling greenbacks from its $43 billion trade surplus with the US to buy crude oil from Russia — only to sell refined petroleum products to other countries in Asia, Europe and Africa to earn yet more dollars — was 'deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy,' Navarro says. It has to stop. The tone of the piece suggests that the Trump administration is making a calculated bet. However much Modi tries to flex his muscles against US hegemony, he really can't afford to put $87 billion in annual exports to America at risk of a prohibitive 50% tariff from Aug. 27. Without dollars from its single-largest export destination, how will India pay for the $109 billion it spends on everything from power equipment to kitchen appliances from China? Or buy more from it, as Beijing is bound to insist?One way to square the circle may be to give the Chinese equity stakes in local joint ventures, so that some of their $91 billion bilateral trade surplus comes back as investment. This may well happen. According to a Bloomberg News report this week, India's biggest tycoons — from Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani to JSW Group's Sajjan Jindal — have been pursuing under-the-radar deals with Chinese firms that have the most mature and cost-efficient technology in renewable sectors like electric vehicles and lithium-ion Washington sending a natural ally into the arms of its biggest rival? Not really. At best the fraught relationship between the two Asian giants will normalize. After their border clashes five years ago, New Delhi actively suppressed investment proposals from the bigger economy next door. The Modi government announced, with some pride, that between April 2020 and December 2021, China's share in total foreign direct investments into the country had fallen to only 0.43%. Although that would change now, there's little risk of India moving into China's strategic sphere, not after Beijing's liberal defense assistance to Islamabad in the recent India-Pakistan military conflict. Washington's orbit is hard to escape. To see why, it's illustrative to look back at the early days of the India-Russia oil trade after the start of the Ukraine war. Back then, there was a great deal of chest-thumping in New Delhi that Moscow will agree to sell crude for rupees. Russian importers would then pay rubles to buy tea and other stuff from India. The rupee-ruble transactions were supposed to be relayed over SPFS, the Russian alternative to the SWIFT messaging system, the 'financial data panopticon' through which Washington surveils global trade and I noted in April 2022, any such deal wasn't in India's long-term interest. Bypassing SWIFT would help Russia, whose banks faced Western sanctions. New Delhi had nothing to gain. Ultimately, the rupees-for-oil trade didn't even work out. The Russian exporters got tired of holding funds in a non-convertible currency in Indian bank accounts. So refiners went back to buying crude with dollars and dollar-linked UAE dirhams, placing India squarely in the grip of the mighty greenback even as discounted Urals crude came to account for more than a third of its imports, from barely 1% before the Ukraine war. Had the benefits of cheaper oil flowed to local motorists, the middle class would have been all for standing up to Trump. That isn't the case, and Modi has to appease voters now with a long-overdue cut in consumption Chinese have done the same Russian oil trade, and yet the US has singled out India for exemplary punishment. That isn't hard to explain. Not all sides of this relationship are equal. While advanced economies like the US 'are more exposed to China as a supplier, China is becoming less reliant on them as a market,' concludes a new study by Federal Reserve economist Florencia Airaudo, and her coauthors. Control over hard-to-replace inputs, such as rare earths, graphite, and battery materials gives Beijing leverage, they note. New Delhi has no such bargaining chips. The dollars India garners from exporting textiles, carpets, gems and jewelry, shrimp, and software code are its to spend, but not entirely freely. As Navarro reminded the critics of the sudden US-India estrangement, America's exorbitant privilege comes in many hues.
