WWDC: Apple faces AI, regulatory challenges as it woos software developers
CUPERTINO, California, June 9 (Reuters) - Apple is facing an unprecedented set of technical and regulatory challenges as some of its key executives are set to take the stage on Monday at the company's annual software developer conference.
On the technical side, many of the long-awaited artificial-intelligence features Apple promised at the same conference a year ago have been delayed until next year, even as its rivals such as Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google and Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab woo developers with a bevvy of new AI features. Those unfulfilled promises included key improvements to Siri, its digital assistant.
On the regulatory front, courts in the U.S. and Europe are poised to pull down the lucrative walls around Apple's App Store as even some of the company's former supporters question whether its fees are justified.
Those challenges are coming to a head at the same time U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened 25% tariffs on Apple's best-selling iPhone. Apple's shares are down more than 40% since the start of the year, a sharper decline than Google and also lagging the AI-driven gains in Microsoft shares.
Apple has launched some of the AI features it promised last year, including a set of writing tools and image-generation tools, but it still relies on partners such as ChatGPT creator OpenAI for some of those capabilities. Bloomberg has reported that Apple may open up in-house AI models to developers this year.
But analysts do not believe Apple yet has what technologists call a "multi-modal" model - that is, one capable of understanding imagery, audio and language at the same time - that could power a pair of smart glasses, a category that has become a runaway hit for Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab. Google said last month it would jump back in to this category, with partners.
Such glasses, which are far lighter and cheaper than Apple's Vision Pro headset, could become useful because they would understand what the user is looking at and could help answer questions about it.
While Apple has focused on its $3,500 Vision Pro headset, Google and Meta have seized on the smart glasses as a cheaper way to deploy their AI software prowess against Apple in its stronghold of hardware. Meta Ray-Bans all sell for less than $400.
Analysts say Apple needs to answer that challenge but that it is not likely to do so this week.
"I'm not trying to replace my phone - this is a complementary thing that gives me more world context, because it's got a camera and it sees what I see, and I can talk to it in natural language," said Ben Bajarin, CEO of technology consultancy Creative Strategies. "Apple is not positioned to do that."
To be sure, Apple's rivals are not decisively ahead in smart glasses. Anshel Sag, principal analyst with Moor Insights & Strategy, said Meta's Ray-Bans still lack some features and Google has not yet landed its "Gemini" model in a mass-market pair of glasses yet.
"Meta has the undisputed lead, but Google is catching up fast and probably has the best-suited AI for the job," Sag said. "Vision Pro is great, but it's a showroom product that developers can use."
But Bob O'Donnell, CEO of TECHnalysis Research, said it remains far from clear that smart glasses will gain wide acceptance. O'Donnell also said it is not certain that Apple is at any particular disadvantage if it partners with a company such as Google, OpenAI or even a smaller firm like Perplexity for core AI technology.
So far, O'Donnell said, there is not yet strong evidence that consumers are basing major hardware-purchasing decisions on AI features.
"There's an argument to be made that it's OK that (Apple) is behind because, except for the bleeding edge, most people don't care," O'Donnell said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
NCAA's Baker: Will Congress back $2.8B settlement with antitrust protection?
Now that the NCAA has taken care of its business, its president wants Congress to deliver. NCAA President Charlie Baker, like his predecessor a proponent of federal legislation to lock in some of the seismic changes hitting college sports, told The Associated Press on Tuesday that draft legislation circulating in Washington is what the association has been asking for. Now, it's simply a matter of passing it. ' One of the messages we got from them was, 'Clean up your own house first, and then come talk to us,'' said Baker, a former Massachusetts governor whose political acumen was a key selling point when he was selected for the NCAA job in 2023. The NCAA delivered, Baker said, with new rules that guarantee better post-graduate health care and scholarship protections for athletes, and then with the crown jewel of reforms — the $2.8 billion lawsuit settlement that a federal judge approved last week. The most fundamental change from the settlement is that schools can now directly pay players through revenue-sharing. For that to work, though, Baker and the NCAA have been lobbying for a limited form of antitrust protection that would prevent, for instance, lawsuits challenging the spending cap prescribed by the settlement, which will be $20.5 million in the first year. The Washington Post reported that draft legislation would include room for that sort of protection. Baker suggested that antitrust exemption might also include a carve-out for eligibility rules, which is not part of the settlement but that has landed the NCAA in court as a defendant in various lawsuits challenging a long-held rule that athletes have five years to complete four seasons of eligibility. 'The consequences of this for the next generation of young people, if you play this thing out, are enormous,' Baker said. 'You're moving away from an academic calendar to sort of no calendar for college sports, and that is hugely problematic.' Baker said the other top two priorities for the legislation are: —A preemption of state laws that set different rules for paying players, which amounts to 'competitive advantage stuff" for state legislatures seeking to give their public universities a recruiting edge. 'That's not just an issue for the NCAA on a level-playing-field basis, it's an issue for the conferences,' Baker said. Greg Sankey, the commissioner of the Southeastern Conference, agrees with that, recently saying that it was not good to have a league spanning 12 states operating under 12 different laws guiding player payments and other elements of college sports. —A ban on college athletes being deemed employees. Recently, Tennessee athletic director Danny White suggested collective bargaining for players was 'the only solution.' Whether that would lead to a direct employment model is difficult to know, but Baker said he's not the only one against it. 'This is something every student leadership group I've ever talked to has pretty strong feelings about," he said. 'They want to be students who play sports, they don't want to be employees because a lot of them worry about what the consequences for their time as students will be if they're obliged to be employees first.' ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: and
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Microsoft pulls major tech conference from dystopian Democrat city over rampant crime and drug-addled homeless
Seattle's reputation as a center for global innovation is in tatters as the Democrat-run city's rampant crime and drug-addled homeless problem has driven a major tech conference out of the Pacific North West for first time in almost a decade. Microsoft will relocate its flagship Build conference from 2026 following mounting concerns over dystopian scenes of open-air drug markets and violence, which have dramatically changed the character of Seattle since the company's first conference in the city in 2017. The decision, confirmed in a statement from the company, follows mounting concerns over public safety, visible drug use, and deteriorating conditions in the city's downtown. This year's event also faced disruptions when pro-Hamas protesters vandalized the convention center and attempted to enter the venue. An internal email from Visit Seattle, the city's tourism agency, said that both Microsoft leadership and event attendees had expressed alarm about the downtown area surrounding the Hyatt Regency and the Arch Building on 8th Street - key locations for the annual developer conference. 'The customers cited the general uncleanliness of the street scene, visibility of individuals engaging in drug use, and unhoused individuals, including the recurring tent in the Arch Tunnel,' the email, obtained by journalist Jonathan Choe, stated. Despite efforts to keep the conference in the city by Visit Seattle and local authorities - including the Seattle Police Department, the Downtown Seattle Association, and the city's Care Team - Microsoft's concerns ultimately proved decisive. 'Unfortunately for Build, it was a contributing factor to their final decision to move out of Seattle,' the agency wrote. The loss of Build represents a significant hit to Seattle's convention and tourism economy, which has long relied on major tech events to draw visitors and business. Protesters remove a man because he was bothering other protesters at the self-proclaimed Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) during a protest against racial inequality and call for defunding of Seattle police on in June 2020 Seattle restaurateur David Meinert also confirmed the news in a Facebook post, citing feedback from attendees about the open-air drug use, the large number of tents lining the streets, and the aggressive homeless population. 'Mayor Bruce Harrell's downtown activation plan is not having the success he claims,' Meinert wrote. 'I can tell you firsthand how poorly the massive spending on different city agencies is going, due to the inability for them to communicate and work together. It's 100% about lack of leadership.' Microsoft acknowledged the change in a formal statement: 'Our plans for Build 2026 have changed, but our vision to empower builders and developers at a major event next year remains the same. We thank the city and the community for their support over the years.' Build has been held in Seattle since 2017, drawing thousands of developers and tech leaders from around the world. Its departure underscores growing unease among corporate leaders about the state of downtown Seattle. The Build conference typically attracts thousands of developers from around the world. Seattle restaurateur David Meinert also confirmed the news in a Facebook post, citing feedback from attendees about the open-air drug use, the large number of tents lining the streets, and the aggressive homeless population Acknowledging the impact of the decision, Visit Seattle described Microsoft's departure as a 'huge loss for the city.' This development follows a pattern of businesses leaving downtown Seattle. Starbucks has closed several stores, with former CEO Howard Schultz attributing the closures to public safety issues and what he termed failed leadership. 'At the local state and federal level, these governments... and leaders, mayors and governors, and city councils have advocated their responsibility in fighting crime & addressing mental illness,' Schultz stated. Other major retailers, including Target, Nike, and Hard Rock Cafe, have also closed their downtown locations. Amazon Go has similarly shut down its stores in the area, citing underperformance. The situation has drawn comparisons to San Francisco, another city that has faced challenges with crime, homelessness, and business retention. In May, Seattle was the site of violent clashes between Christian activists and counter-protesters. The Seattle Police Department (SPD) reported 23 arrests at a 'Mayday USA' rally. 'Police working to keep two different groups apart, witnessed multiple people inside one group throw items at the opposing group,' SPD said. 'Officers immediately moved to arrest the people responsible... resulting in even more arrests.' Public safety in Seattle has been a contentious issue for several years. In 2020, then-Police Chief Carmen Best expressed a desire for officers to return to the East Precinct, which had been abandoned during protests that led to the creation of the 'Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone' (CHAZ). Her stance contrasted with that of then-Mayor Jenny Durkan, who favored a more hands-off approach. When asked how long she anticipated the protest zone would last, Durkan told CNN, 'I don't know. We could have a summer of love.' The 'autonomous zone' was established after clashes between police and protesters following the death of George Floyd, during which law enforcement used crowd control measures such as stun grenades and tear gas. While some reports described lawlessness in the CHAZ, authorities at the time also noted a 'block party atmosphere.' Protesters stated their intention to occupy the area until their demands, including police funding cuts, were met.
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Netflix defies Trump's movie tariffs with $1 billion investment: 'Nothing short of extraordinary'
Netflix is making a huge international investment, despite President Donald Trump's wishes. The streaming giant's CEO, Ted Sarandos, announced a $1.14 billion investment to help produce a pipeline of new shows in Spain. He made the declaration during a press conference in Tres Cantos, Spain, on Tuesday. Sarandos said the money will flow into the region between 2025 and 2028. It comes after the President said in May that he would slap a 100 percent tariff on any movie produced outside of the US. Netflix first started making content in Spain in 2015, producing well-watched shows like Money Heist. The major film and TV producer has continued to build production capacity, including a 10 soundstage studio complex in Madrid. 'Alongside your rich cultural heritage, vibrant entertainment industry and brilliant creative talent, Spain is also a great place to do business,' Sarandos said to an audience of journalists, movie producers, and local politicians. 'The last 10 years have been nothing short of extraordinary.' Trump's tariff announcement earlier this year has confused film production leaders, and offered little detail about how the levy would work in practice. 'Other countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States,' the President claimed on his Truth Social platform. 'Hollywood and many other areas within the USA are being devastated.' Like the sweeping tariffs placed on other industries — like 50 percent steel and aluminum levies or 25 percent automotive import fees — President Trump believes that the higher taxes will motivate increased investment in US production. Netflix's stock tumbled the day after the social media post. But it's impossible to know the knock-on impacts if Trump's policy was implemented. The White House hasn't revealed how it plans on assessing the value of international films before the tariff is applied. 'Although no final decisions on foreign film tariffs have been made, the Administration is exploring all options to deliver on President Trump's directive to safeguard our country's national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again,' White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said. In 2024, film industry experts reported a schedule of 5,048 total film and TV shoot days in Hollywood. That is good for a 36.4 percent drop from the five-year average. Other US production hubs, like Atlanta and Austin, have seen slower growth. President Trump recently threatened studios producing content outside the US with a 100 percent tariff - but his social media post didn't detail how the administration would administer the tax Netflix has fought back against regulators in other countries, including France, as it tries to expand into new markets Analysts worry that Trump's potential policy could make streamers slow down the number of shows they could produce. 'There's also a risk of retaliatory tariffs against American content overseas,' Barton Crockett, an analyst with Rosenblatt Securities, told Reuters. 'Raising the cost to produce movies could lead studios to make less content.' Hollywood production companies had already been in the crosshairs of back-and-forth tariff threats in the US trade war with China. Beijing is restricting the number of movies produced in Hollywood that can play in China, a move that can destroy the bottom line for multiple major US producers. Netflix's investment in Spain also comes as the company wrangles with regulators in other countries. In April, the company published an open letter asking French authorities to change their media chronology rules. Right now, the company must wait 15 months between releasing films in theatres and launching them on their platform. Netflix wants the country to trim down the timeline.
