FIA suspends steward for Canadian Grand Prix over Verstappen penalty comments
Formula 1's governing body has suspended a driver steward for this weekend's Canadian Grand Prix over comments he made regarding a penalty Max Verstappen received two weeks ago.
The FIA said Friday that Derek Warwick's comments were not authorized and he will be replaced by Enrique Bernoldi, who will officiate from the Remote Operations Centre in Geneva for the remainder of the weekend.
'After discussion, Derek acknowledges that his comments were ill-advised in his role as an FIA steward and has apologized,' the FIA said in a statement. 'Derek will resume his duties as a steward in the forthcoming Austrian Grand Prix.'
Verstappen received a three-point penalty for running George Russell off track at the Spanish Grand Prix. The penalty put the four-time reigning F1 champion just one point away from an automatic one-race suspension.
Warwick did an interview with a gambling publication in which he defended the penalty levied to Verstappen as the 'perfect' punishment because the Dutchman was "absolutely wrong' in the contact with Russell.
It is the second time this year the FIA has penalized a race steward.
Johnny Herbert was let go in January as a steward because the FIA said his 'duties as an FIA steward and that of a media pundit were incompatible.' The FIA said the decision was made 'with regret.'
Herbert at the end of the 2024 season gave several interviews to gambling sites, some related to high-profile decisions he was involved with in his role as a steward. He even had a public argument with Jos Verstappen, father of the four-time champion, after Verstappen was penalized in Mexico City for an incident with Lando Norris.
Jos Verstappen alleged Herbert was biased and said 'the FIA should take a good look at the staffing of the stewards, who they put there and whether there is no appearance of a conflict of interest."
Herbert in turn criticized Verstappen's driving and called it 'over the top.' He also said Verstappen had developed 'a horrible mindset of trying to gain an advantage by taking a fellow driver off the race track.'
The FIA determined Herbert had displayed impartiality and could no longer be a steward.
Warwick, meanwhile, has apologized and the FIA has indicated his punishment is only for this weekend.
___
AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Manchester United boss Erik ten Hag set to seal first transfer after new job
Erik ten Hag is expected to complete his first piece of transfer business since his appointment at Bayer Leverkusen. The former Manchester United head coach was confirmed as Xabi Alonso's replacement over the weekend. Advertisement Ten Hag had been out of work following his exit from United last October, but he has now returned to management after a seven-month exile. The Dutchman has signed a two-year contract at the BayArena. Speaking after his appointment was confirmed, Ten Hag, who will officially start his role on July 1, said: "I've come to Leverkusen to continue with the ambition shown in recent years. READ MORE: 'Young and exciting' - Bruno Fernandes gives verdict on Manchester United academy players READ MORE: Kobbie Mainoo transfer stance explained amid fresh Manchester United uncertainty "It's an attractive challenge to set up something together in this period of change and develop an ambitious team." Advertisement Leverkusen sporting director Simon Rolfes added: "With Erik ten Hag, we have brought in an experienced coach with impressive success on the pitch. "With three league titles and two domestic cup wins, he and Ajax dominated Dutch football from 2018 to 2022. "And Erik demonstrated his quality as a coach with the ensuing success at Manchester United under difficult circumstances at times." Now, just a matter of days since Ten Hag was unveiled as the new Leverkusen head coach, it has been reported that the German club are 'advancing to the final stages' of a deal for Brentford's Mark Flekken. Leverkusen are keen to strengthen their goalkeeping department and have set their sights on signing the Netherlands international, according to Fabrizio Romano. The 31-year-old is valued at around £8.4million and personal terms are not anticipated to be an issue, as club to club talks are underway. Advertisement Flekken has been one of Brentford's standout performers this season, having made the most saves out of any 'keeper in the Premier League (152). Despite this, he has kept just seven clean sheets in 30 matches. Ten Hag wanted Flekken at United before his £11m move to Brentford in May 2023. He has since made 70 appearances for Thomas Frank's side but is now closing in on a move to Leverkusen, with Liverpool shot-stopper Caoimhin Kelleher identified as a potential £20m replacement. Here at The Manchester Evening News, we are dedicated to bringing you the best Manchester United coverage and analysis. Make sure you don't miss out on the latest United news by joining our free WhatsApp group. You can get all the breaking news and best analysis sent straight to your phone by clicking here to subscribe. Advertisement You can also subscribe to our free newsletter service. Click here to be sent all the day's biggest stories. And, finally, if you would rather listen to our expert analysis then make sure to check out our Manchester is Red podcast, featuring The Samuel Luckhurst Show and The Midweek Debate. Our shows are available on all podcast platforms, including Spotify and Apple Podcasts, and you can also watch along on YouTube.
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Justin Herbert says he's moved on from poor playoff performance. But is it fueling him?
Justin Herbert says he's moved on from poor playoff performance. But is it fueling him? Show Caption Hide Caption Greg Olsen talks Tight End University and what he's excited for in the 2025 NFL season Greg Olsen stops by to talk about another year of Tight End University and who he's excited to watch as the NFL season inches closer. Sports Seriously Editor's note: This story is a part of a series by USA TODAY Sports called Project: June. We will publish at least one NFL-themed story every day throughout the month because fans know the league truly never sleeps. One thing about OTAs and minicamps is that they always feature a heavy dose of optimism. Players are rejuvenated and have closed the chapter from the previous season. One of the biggest beneficiaries of the upcoming year is Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert. Herbert owns NFL records for completions (1,945) and passing yards (21,093) for a player in their first five seasons. But he's 0-2 in his postseason career. The last time Herbert played in a game, he threw a career-high four interceptions and had career-worst 43.8 completion percentage in the Chargers' 32-12 playoff loss to the Houston Texans. Statistically, it was the worst performance of Herbert's career. His all-time low 40.9 passer rating in the playoff contest validates it. 'I think just like every other loss, you take a look at what you did wrong, what you did right and you try to improve. If I spend any more time worrying or focusing on a loss like that, I think I'm doing a disservice to my teammates,' Herbert said to reporters this week. 'Obviously, it didn't go the way we wanted to, like I said at the end of the year. You got to move on. You got to take a look at what you did wrong. Be honest with yourself, be critical, but you can't let it take up too much of your time.' Chargers head coach Jim Harbaugh went as far as to say the team did Herbert a disservice in 2024. So, a new season is just what the doctor ordered for the quarterback. The Chargers made a concerted effort to add more playmakers on offense this offseason. They drafted running back Omarion Hampton and wide receiver Tre Harris in the first-two rounds. And acquired running back Najee Harris, tight end Tyler Conklin and reunited with wide receiver Mike Williams (who played with the Chargers from 2017-23) in free agency. The Cincinnati Bengals have another disgruntled player. It's a Bengals tradition. 'It's always great to have playmakers like that. Guys that are able to stretch the field,' Herbert said. 'To have guys like that, it definitely opens up our offense.' More playmakers should aid a Chargers offense that ranked 20th in the NFL last season. But Herbert's familiarity with Harbaugh and offensive coordinator Greg Roman's scheme could have just as much of an influence. This year is set to be only the second time in Herbert's career he's had the same offensive coordinator for consecutive seasons. 'He can go out and run the practice. He knows this offense inside and out now. Last year this time, it was third system in three years so that was a challenge I guess you would call it, which he conquered. This year with him and some of the guys we're able to kind of progress things,' Roman said. 'We understand who we are now way differently than we did last year. What we do will be a little different, how we do it and how we practice it.' Harbaugh, who's always been staunch supporter of Herbert, called the quarterback one of the Chargers nine players who trained at an elite level this during minicamp. 'He's in a great place,' Harbaugh said. Harbaugh named Herbert, Derwin James, Khalil Mack, Daiyan Henley, Zion Johnson, Ladd McConkey, Tuli Tuipulotu, Rashawn Slater and Joe Alt as the nine elite workout warriors. He later added Josh Harris to the group. For Herbert, it could be a subtle sign that he's motivated -- especially after the way he ended the previous season. Follow USA TODAY Sports' Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Every incident: How Max Verstappen ended up on the brink of an F1 race ban
In 11 months, reigning Formula One world champion Max Verstappen accrued as many penalty points across six different infringements. Some of the incidents from last season weren't egregious per se, such as driving unnecessarily slowly in qualifying, while others were a direct result of battling with another driver, including several incidents with Lando Norris. Verstappen's most recent altercation with a rival, though, carried the most penalty points and played out during the recent 2025 Spanish Grand Prix. Advertisement The stewards found Verstappen at fault for causing a collision with George Russell — which Russell at the time said 'felt deliberate' — and handed him a 10-second time penalty and three penalty points to take Verstappen to the perilous point on 11. But questions were raised by many commentators and fans about whether Verstappen had intentionally crashed into the Mercedes driver and if he should therefore have been disqualified (and here's more on why he wasn't). Verstappen admitted a day later in a social media post that the move 'was not right and shouldn't have happened.' Penalty points last for 12 months in F1, and so Verstappen's slate won't start clearing until June 30, the day after the Austrian Grand Prix. And even that is just two points falling off, if he navigates clean weekends in Canada and Austria in the coming weeks. Here's how the Red Bull driver ended up on the brink of a Formula One race ban — and what the stewards had to say about each infringement. Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 2 This was the first race weekend Norris and Verstappen truly raced for real — and hard — in F1. Norris made multiple attempts to pass Verstappen for the lead of the Austrian GP but couldn't stick the overtake. Heading into Turn 3 at the Red Bull Ring late on, Norris was on the left of Verstappen, and the Dutchman drifted towards the McLaren, leading to the two colliding. Both suffered damage and headed to the pits, but only Verstappen continued racing, finishing fifth while Norris retired. The stewards determined that the Red Bull driver was at fault and said the penalty (a 10-second time penalty and two penalty points) was ' in line with precedents.' The incident raised the question of whether such hard racing was over the limit or within accepted bounds, a topic that continued to surface throughout different parts of the 2024 season. Advertisement 'It was such a silly little touch that had great consequences for both of us, and a bit more for Lando with how (his) puncture then evolved,' Verstappen later said, a few days removed from the incident. The two had cleared the air by this point. Infringement: Forcing another driver off track Penalty points: 2 Norris and Verstappen went head-to-head again in Mexico, a week after their battle in Austin had controversially ended with Norris being penalized. Again, the McLaren driver made a move on Verstappen's outside – first at Turn 4. According to the evidence reviewed by the stewards, the papaya car was ahead of the Red Bull 'at the entry, apex and towards the exit of the turn when he started being forced off the track.' The two drivers did not have any contact, but Norris had to cut the corner, gaining an advantage as he emerged briefly ahead of eventual race winner Carlos Sainz of Ferrari. 'The Stewards believe that the maneuver was done in a safe and controlled manner and that Norris would have been able to make the maneuver on the track had he not been forced off the track by Verstappen.' Verstappen received a 10-second penalty for this infringement, along with two penalty points. But a few corners later, he tried to retaliate against Norris, going up the inside of the McLaren at Turn 8 and forcing them both off the track. Had he completed the maneuver on the track, he 'would have been entitled to racing room.' However, the Dutchman 'left the track and kept the lasting advantage,' resulting in another 10-second penalty (but no penalty points for the second move). Infringement: Going too fast under the Virtual Safety Car Penalty points: 1 Late in the São Paulo Grand Prix's sprint race, a virtual safety car period unfolded after Nico Hülkenberg's car stopped off track. In these periods, Article 56.5 of F1's sporting regulations state, in part, 'All cars must also be above this minimum time when the FIA light panels change to green' as racing resumes. Verstappen, though, tried to challenge Oscar Piastri for second place and was below the minimum time, by 0.63 seconds, 'at VSC End when the FIA light panels changed to green.' Advertisement 'This indicates a sporting advantage gained under VSC,' the stewards said in their decision. 'The driver explained that as he was awaiting VSC to end, he got the notification that he was below the minimum time, he attempted to correct the error but failed to do so by the point that the panels turned green.' Verstappen was dealt a five-second time penalty and one penalty point as a result — something the stewards called the standard 'for the advantage gained at that time'. Infringement: Driving unnecessarily slow on a cool-down lap Penalty points: 1 This was one of the rare penalties for Verstappen that came during qualifying, and it was a case that the stewards described as 'complicated.' This was because he 'did not comply with the Race Director's Event Notes and clearly was driving, in our determination, unnecessarily slowly considering the circumstances' late in the main race qualifying in Qatar. Verstappen was nursing his tires — but remained on the racing line — as Russell was approaching fast behind. But that neither driver was on a push lap impacted the type of penalty Verstappen received. Rather than the standard three-place grid drop, the stewards levied just a one-place grid drop and one penalty point for Verstappen. While it seemed like a minor incident, this penalty sparked a spat between Russell and Verstappen that stretched into the Abu Dhabi GP weekend and has simmered even since. Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 2 Verstappen tangled with the McLaren driver this time. He made an aggressive move down the inside of Piastri at Turn 1 on Lap 1 of 2024's dead rubber season finale, and they collided before spinning. Ultimately, the stewards found Verstappen at fault, resulting in a 10-second time penalty and two penalty points – to make it eight points in just over five months. 'I tried to grab the inside and I quickly realized once I committed to it that the gap was closing and I wanted to try to get out of it because I didn't want to actually crash with Oscar, but unfortunately we still clipped each other,' Verstappen said after the race. 'I already apologized to Oscar. It's not what you want to happen and especially not with him. He's a great guy. Advertisement Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 3 The big question that came from the 2025 Spanish Grand Prix incident is whether Verstappen intentionally collided with Russell. It all began shortly after the late safety car period was ending, as Ferrari's Charles Leclerc first overtook Verstappen at the start. They banged wheels and Verstappen was then under attack from Russell, who was on fresher soft tires while the Red Bull driver was fitted with slower hards. They clashed at Turn 1, with Verstappen going wide but staying ahead. Red Bull told Verstappen to give the position back, in an effort to avoid a potential penalty — one that the stewards later determined 'we would take no further action in relation to that incident.' Verstappen didn't hide how he felt about the team's request, and approaching Turn 5 on a subsequent lap, he slowed down and appeared to be letting Russell by. The Mercedes driver got ahead and was braking at the entry of Turn 5 when Verstappen accelerated before the two collided at the apex. Found at fault, Verstappen received a 10-second time penalty and three penalty points, making it 11 in 12 months. The thing about F1 penalties is that precedents are set and held over the years. The regulations provide a guideline to help the stewards – appointed to be independent by the FIA – determine how to judge an incident and what penalties are available. But it's up to their discretion on exactly what to choose, which is where precedent comes into play. 'When I saw it, it was like, 'Yeah, 10 seconds it's all right because it wasn't right but it wasn't too bad,'' former Haas team boss turned F1 TV pundit Guenther Steiner recently told The Athletic. Steiner has plenty of experience with drivers under his watch in F1 getting involved in controversial incidents. Advertisement 'But then afterwards I thought about it, 'What have we done? We have set a precedent.' And that is my comment now. Would it not have been better to disqualify him so it doesn't happen again? In the end, Max would not have lost a lot more, one point, exactly. If you get disqualified, you wouldn't get the three penalty points. He got his penalty not for being disqualified. And in the future now, basically it is all right to do what he did.' There are also questions of whether the stewards are punishing the consequences of incidents, which will vary depending on the scenario, and if they are taking mitigating factors into consideration. Sometimes the penalties don't match, and it's not clear why to fans. During the 2025 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, both Verstappen and Liam Lawson left the track and gained an advantage at different points of the race. But Verstappen did so on lap one and received only a five-second penalty, while Lawson was hit with a 10-second penalty when he committed the offense later in the race. The standard penalty for that type of infringement is a 10-second penalty, but the mitigating factor for Verstappen was that it was a Lap 1, Turn 1 offense, which the stewards acknowledged in their decision documents provided a mitigating factor in this instance. 'I think a penalty needs to be black or white. Not like, 'Oh, we know because it was,'' Steiner said. 'Either it is or it isn't. And if you're not sure that it is, it's zero, it's nothing. That's my opinion about it because you cannot start to say, 'I'm not really sure.' If you're not sure, don't give any penalty.' In Verstappen's Jeddah incident – where again he was racing Piastri – the Red Bull driver did not have any penalty points added to his super license. This could be worth remembering if Verstappen gets involved in any contentious moves without contact at the upcoming races in Canada and Austria. He won't automatically be banned if he does. (Top image: Jure Makovec / AFP / Getty Images)
