logo
Andrew Norfolk, tenacious reporter who broke the story of the grooming gangs scandal

Andrew Norfolk, tenacious reporter who broke the story of the grooming gangs scandal

Yahoo25-05-2025
Andrew Norfolk, who has died aged 60, was the dogged investigative journalist who braved accusations of racism and the hostility of officialdom to uncover the widespread existence of Asian grooming gangs in the north of England.
The first intimation of one of the most dismaying British public scandals of the century so far was a report by Norfolk that appeared on the front page of The Times on January 5 2011, under the headline: 'Revealed: conspiracy of silence on UK sex gangs.'
He disclosed that for more than a decade child protection experts had been cataloguing repeated instances of groups of men, mostly of Pakistani origin, befriending and grooming vulnerable under-age girls, usually white, whom they met in the street.
'No research has been carried out into why such a high proportion of the offenders belong to one minority ethnicity,' Norfolk wrote, 'and with the exception of one town there is scant evidence of work being undertaken in British Pakistani communities to confront the problem.'
He quoted the view of DCI Alan Edwards of West Mercia Police that a 'damaging taboo' was preventing police forces, local authorities and charities from acknowledging the scale of the problem. As Edwards put it: 'To stop this type of crime you need to start talking about it, but everyone's been too scared to address the ethnicity factor. No one wants to stand up and say that Pakistani guys in some parts of the country are recruiting young white girls and passing them around their relatives for sex.'
The report provoked a national outcry and the rapid announcement by the Coalition government of an inquiry. It was one of the great scoops of the decade. And yet, for many years beforehand Norfolk had talked himself out of pursuing the story.
Shortly after being appointed North-East correspondent of The Times in 2003, he had reported on the concerns raised by Ann Cryer, the Labour MP for Keighley in West Yorkshire, about groups of Pakistani men hanging around outside schools and targeting teenage girls for sex. Although the parents of several girls complained that the police and social services were ignoring pleas to take action, Norfolk decided not to investigate in depth.
'Liberal angst kicked instinctively into top gear,' he recalled. 'If I'm honest, I didn't want the story to be true because it made me deeply uncomfortable… [It] was always going to be the far Right's fantasy story come true.'
Over the next half a dozen years, however, 'regular prodding of my conscience' came from reading frequent reports of gangs of men preying on girls aged between 11 and 15, using the same modus operandi and 'inevitably [with] Muslim names'.
He decided to investigate but received no co-operation from the police, or from the larger children's charities such as Barnardo's. Eventually two small organisations that worked with children put him in touch with people whose daughters had been groomed and forced to have sex with several older men.
His stories caused a sensation, and in 2012 he was promoted to chief investigative reporter. He continued to delve into the grooming scandal, focusing on Rotherham, where he found that one girl living in a children's home had been taken to Greater Manchester and raped by 50 men in one night, while a 13-year-old girl found naked in a flat with seven men had been arrested for being drunk and disorderly with no action taken against the men.
Norfolk had to hold his nerve when one trial collapsed and colleagues at The Times began to question the wisdom of pursuing the story. But in 2012 he produced evidence culled from confidential documents 'that laid bare a decade in which senior council officials and police officers knew exactly what was happening to hundreds of girls in the town, and often the names of the men committing the offences, yet invariably chose to look the other way'.
In 2014 he was happy to observe that there had been 'a steady transformation, for the better, in the stance adopted towards child sexual exploitation by police forces, local authorities, the Crown Prosecution Service and the judiciary'. The inquiry report published that year by Prof Alexis Jay, which identified more than 1,400 young victims in Rotherham, led to several police misconduct investigations and the resignation of the chief executive of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.
Norfolk always took care to point out that most grooming of young girls in Britain was carried out online by white men, but nevertheless endured a torrent of accusations of racism for focusing on Asian perpetrators. He regretted that, inevitably, aspects of his reports fuelled racist rhetoric from the far Right.
'There have been many days,' Norfolk once admitted, 'when I secretly longed for it all to come to an end. It was just too bleak, the details of the crimes too grotesque, too calculated to make one utterly despair of human nature.' He was reluctant to accept praise for his dedication. 'It was always the girls and their families who kept me going… They are the closest this tale will ever come to having heroes or heroines.'
Andrew Mark Norfolk was born in Canterbury on January 8 1965, the son of David Norfolk, a teacher and Methodist lay preacher, and his wife Olive, née Bellerby. The family later moved to Harrogate when David Norfolk was appointed headmaster of the Methodist school Ashfield College, where Andrew excelled academically and as a sportsman. He read English at Durham University and became a trainee at the Scarborough Evening News before joining the Yorkshire Post in 1995.
The most modest and mild-mannered of journalists, Norfolk only secured a job at The Times after his brother applied on his behalf, attaching copies of his outstanding reports into corruption at Doncaster Council. Norfolk loathed living in London, however, and after two years insisted on being transferred to Leeds in 2002.
Among other stories he investigated at The Times were allegations of abuse at more than 100 boarding schools, corruption at the trade union Unite and links between British banks and Islamist extremists. In 2014 he received the Orwell Prize and was named Journalist of the Year at the British Journalism Awards. Latterly rheumatoid arthritis obliged him to walk with a stick, and he retired in 2024.
Earlier this year Norfolk criticised Elon Musk for claiming that the mainstream media had been silent on the grooming gang scandal: 'It just seems that Elon Musk, whose relationship with the truth seems so loose… clicks his fingers, shoots his mouth off and the whole British establishment responds. I find it surprising that man wields that much power.'
When Musk accused Sir Keir Starmer of complicity in a cover-up, Norfolk reiterated that it was Starmer, as Director of Public Prosecutions, who had 'changed the rules to make more prosecutions possible. That happened and there was a huge increase in convictions.'
He also rejected recent calls for another inquiry into the scandal: 'These girls… are being exploited all over again. Now for politicians to jump on the bandwagon again when they've been silent for so many years just strikes me as a bit shameful.'
Andrew Norfolk was a dedicated smoker and lifelong Tottenham Hotspur fan with a tattoo of the club crest on his ankle. He is survived by his sister and two brothers.
Andrew Norfolk, born January 8 1965, died May 8 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vladimir Putin now has little choice but to agree to talks
Vladimir Putin now has little choice but to agree to talks

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vladimir Putin now has little choice but to agree to talks

Given Vladimir Putin's track record, it is still difficult to be optimistic about the Ukraine peace process, much as anyone with a grain of humanity would wish to be. After the recent dazzling flurry of diplomatic activity, the initiative has returned to Moscow. Putin has the future of this process in his hands but seems to be in no hurry to take it forward. More worryingly, he has hardly changed his demands in many months, and he has form, which is not encouraging. During his time running the Russian Federation in various capacities, he has flagrantly broken every previous guarantee of Ukrainian sovereignty including the Budapest Memorandum (1994), the Treaty of Friendship (1997), and a 2003 border treaty. For a decade after that, Putin gradually escalated secessionist activity in the eastern Donbas and Crimea, before annexing them. Even days before the February 2022 invasion, he was denying any such intention. Since then, Putin has taken every opportunity to declaim that Ukraine isn't a real country and merely a province of Russia, which is at least his honest view. It is also one that he will not abandon simply because he has signed some piece of paper. Putin's word counts for nothing, a fact that Donald Trump seems unable to accept. Mr Trump deals in personalities but against Putin it is, as we've seen, an unequal match. Still, there are at least some hopeful signs that have emerged from the summits in Alaska and in Washington. The most significant is the suggestion, albeit tentative and seemingly limited, that the United States would be prepared to offer Ukraine some form of 'security guarantee' for its future borders. Mr Trump seems strangely susceptible to persuasion, particularly when it is slathered in flattery, and his more isolationist colleagues in the administration would seem to have made him temper his willingness to commit US forces to the region. There will be no US forces on the ground, says President Trump, which doesn't come as much of a surprise, and the most that might be expected from Washington seems to be 'air cover', which is more than has ever been offered before. Mr Trump ruled out Nato forces, but volunteered that he'd be prepared to support the British, French and, most sensitively for historical reasons, German troops. The vague promise of a Nato Article 5-style guarantee remains, with no form of words, and not necessarily as comprehensive as the Atlantic alliance's 'all for one and one for all'. But, again, it is a shift from the doctrine of pure isolationism adumbrated in the US president's inauguration address last January. Nato membership for Ukraine is ruled out, but Volodymyr Zelensky gave that ambition up some time ago. Diplomatically, Mr Zelensky is also shrewd to accept the offer of bilateral talks with Putin, or trilateral talks involving Mr Trump, or both options. The Ukrainian leader has repaired his relations with Mr Trump, and assembled an impressive posse of European leaders to advise and to back him. The 'coalition of the willing', led jointly by Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, is a potentially powerful force with which Ukraine can build an even more formidable military capability. So we know where the Ukrainian president stands – a respectful interlocutor to Mr Trump and a willing negotiator, albeit reserving his position on territorial adjustments. With some skill, he has managed to land Putin with the task of taking up the offer of talks and negotiations. The Kremlin has long been reluctant to grant Mr Zelensky his proper status and claims that he is illegitimate because there have been no fresh presidential elections, something rendered impossible by Russian occupation and bombardment. But, if Putin wants to keep Mr Trump on side, or string him along some more, he must agree to the talks – and quickly. That leaves the most difficult issue of all for both sides – territory. Mr Zelensky and his brave nation should feel proud that the total subjugation of their country has been avoided, and seems out of the question in the short to medium term. The 2022 'special military operation', complete with a tank column heading down the road to Kyiv, was designed quickly to absorb Ukraine, and send Mr Zelensky into exile. At worst, Ukraine will have to give up some land, and, tragically, millions of its citizens, that it has little chance of regaining – or at least not until the Russian economy and its war machine collapse. But it should not have to cede any more than that – and certainly not without some meaty security guarantees, tantamount to those that would flow from Nato membership. This is the trap Mr Zelensky and his allies have set for the Kremlin – for Putin cannot accept external troops and security guarantees that would make some subsequent attack impossible. If they deter Russia, they are unacceptable to Russia, and Putin would have to reject the offer of the whole of Donbas and Crimea. Mr Trump has already accepted that possibility. That would displease the Americans and encourage them and the coalition of the willing to back Ukraine until such time that the Russian economy finally breaks. That, however, is quite an optimistic scenario.

UK free speech crackdown sees up to 30 people a day arrested for petty offences such as retweets and cartoons
UK free speech crackdown sees up to 30 people a day arrested for petty offences such as retweets and cartoons

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

UK free speech crackdown sees up to 30 people a day arrested for petty offences such as retweets and cartoons

Bernadette Spofforth lay in jail on a blue gym mattress in a daze, finding it difficult to move, even breathe. 'I just closed down. But the other half of my brain went into Jack Reacher mode,' she said, referring to the fictional action hero. 'Every single detail was in this very vivid, bright, sharp focus.' She remembers noticing that you can't drown yourself in the toilet, because there's no standing water in it and the flush button is too far to reach if your head were in the bowl. 14 Chester businesswoman Bernadette Spofforth says 'I don't think I'll ever recover' after she spent 36 hours in a British jail over a social media post that contained a mild inaccuracy, a post she had deleted within hours. Bernie Spofforth/ X 14 Spofforth was inspired to keep speaking out, and even started a podcast, after being arrested for asking 'If this is true' of another user's content on X. Bernie Spofforth/ YouTube She'd end up being detained for 36 hours in July 2024. Three girls had just been murdered in Southport, England, at a Taylor Swift-themed dance party. But Spofforth was not under suspicion for the crime. Instead, horrified, and in the fog of a developing tragedy, she'd reposted on X another user's content blaming newly arrived migrants for the ghastly crime — clarifying in her retweet, 'If this is true.' Hours later she realized she may have received bad information and deleted the post — but it had already been seen thousands of times. The murders resulted in widespread civil unrest in the UK, where mass migration is a central issue for citizens. Four police vehicles arrived at her home days later. Spofforth, 56, a successful businesswoman from Chester, was placed under arrest. 'We're a year on now and I can honestly tell you that I don't think I will ever recover,' she told The Post. 'I don't mean that as a victim. Those poor children were victims. But I will never trust anything the authorities say to me ever again.' Her story is one repeated almost hourly in the UK, where data suggests over 30 people a day are arrested for speech crimes, about 12,000 a year, under laws written well before the age of social media that make crimes of sending 'grossly offensive' messages or sharing content of an 'indecent, obscene or menacing character.' Social media continues to be flooded with videos of British cops banging on doors in the middle of the night and hauling parents off to jail—all over mean Facebook posts and agitated words on X. 14 A man in the UK receives a police advisory notice in August 2025 after authorities learn the man is planning to attend a protest. @TwinsArch/ X 14 Users have flooded social media with videos of UK police barging into their homes in the middle of the night to arrest them over 'offensive' online posts. @EYakoby/ X Maxie Allen, a radio producer in Hertfordshire, was on a Zoom call at home when he saw police standing over his shoulder from the camera view on his screen. Six officers came knocking — his partner Rosalind Levine, who answered the door, thought their disabled daughter had died — to haul the couple off over comments they posted in a private WhatsApp group for parents are their children's school. In the chat, the couple had been repeatedly critical of the public school's slow pace to bring on a new governor. 'It's shaken the faith of the country I thought I lived in. I never imagined that just by airing your views about how an organization was run, trying to hold people to account in public office, that you get arrested for that,' Allen, 50, told the Post. 'If you have a vague law and then it's enforced to an officious and stupid degree, then it's always going to end in tears.' 14 Six police officers turned up at Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine's house in January to arrest the couple over messages they posted in a private WhatsApp group for parents at the local school. 14 Allen and Levine's story has shocked the nation yet the UK government has doubled down on arresting citizens for angry or critical speech, with Starmer's government announcing it's building an elite squad of speech police. Good Morning Brtiain Similar stories abound. In 2018 a man identifying himself as 'Adam' phoned into the British talk radio station LBC to describe his encounter with police earlier that year. 'I'm Asian myself and I did this drawing of a mate of mine, who's also Asian, and I said, 'you look like a terrorist.' And he took it really well. He thought it was funny,' he told the host. But someone else saw the humorous doodle, took issue, and called police. Months later, Adam and his friend were interviewed by authorities — the friend told cops he laughed at the drawing and wasn't offended — but police still made an official report for a 'non-crime hate incident' and forced Adam to write a letter of apology to his friend, which he had to email to him. Last year, 21-year-old student Jamila Abdi of East London, who is black, was charged under the Communications Act of 2003 for 'indecent or grossly offensive [speech] for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety' after she used a version of the n-word in post on X out of frustration while watching a soccer match. 'I'm so p—-d off let me get my hands on that f—–g n—a,' she wrote about black footballer Alexander Isak. 14 Britons are increasing fed up with mass migration, taking to the streets to protest at their own peril as the government monitors speech activity online and in the streets of the UK. Getty Images 14 Data shows that actual criminals rarely face charges in the UK's biggest cities, while the nation arrests 12,000 people a year for mean words and sharing 'misinformation.' Getty Images Meanwhile in Derby, a 35-year-old man named Dimitrie Stoica was arrested for 'sending a false communication with intent to cause harm' after he posted a video on TikTok to his 700 followers, which he called a spoof, where he pretended he was being chased by right-wing rioters. Despite police admitting the video caused no problems, Stoica was jailed for three months and forced to pay a $200 fine. Last October, Adam Smith-Connor, a 51-year-old Army veteran, was convicted and forced to pay a $12,000 fine for silently praying outside an abortion clinic in Dorset. In April, anti-mass migration French philosopher Renaud Camus was banned from the UK, where he was set to give a speech. And on, and on. The face of Old Blighty's free speech struggle has become 42-year-old Lucy Connolly, currently sitting in prison on a 31-month sentence for 'publishing written material with the intent to stir up racial hatred,' an offense under a law from 1986. Following the slaughter in Southport, Connolly posted on X her support for mass deportations. Authorities say she 'falsely claimed' the Al Qaeda-supporting killer was a migrant. (When, in fact, it was his parents who were migrants, from Rwanda). Connolly, like Spofforth, realized her mistake and deleted the tweet three hours after posting but police still showed up a week later to arrest her. 14 Lucy Connolly was arrested in her pink hoodie for posting 'misinformation' online and is currently serving a 31-month prison sentence, where she's become the face of the free speech struggle in the UK. Northamptonshire Police 14 Activists called it a 'two-tier' justice system when Labor councillor Ricky Jones was found not guilty after calling for the murder of anti-migration protestors, telling a crowd 'we need to cut all their throats.' The stories are so shocking, it's caught the attention of the White House, which is taking an increasingly aggressive stance against censorship in the Eurozone. In a fiery address to the Munich Security Conference in February, Vice President JD Vance blasted 'a crisis of censorship' in Britain. On Tuesday, the US State Department's annual Human Rights Report slammed British authorities' 'serious restrictions on freedom of expression,' writing that the 'human rights situation worsened' in Britian over the last year, and criticized laws like 2023's Online Safety Act. 'We consider freedom of expression to be a foundational component of a functioning democracy,' State Department press secretary Tammy Bruce told reporters, calling Britain's chilling government actions 'intolerable in a free society.' 14 President Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer met in Scotland weeks before the US decried increasing human rights violations in the UK and called the assault on speech 'intolerable in a free society.' POOL/AFP via Getty Images 14 At the Munich Security Conference in February 2025, Vice President J.D. Vance put Europe and Britain on notice, slamming a 'crisis of censorship' in the region. Getty Images But Britain's Labor government has brushed off America's criticisms and doubled down on its nebulous and Kafkaesque speech codes. In the ashes of riots that erupted after the Southport murders, Starmer bragged that over 400 people had been arrested and jailed, 'some for online activity.' This July, the Home Office announced it was assembling an elite force of special agents drawn from across the country to monitor speech on social media. Also this summer, the UK government updated its definition of terrorist ideologies to include 'cultural nationalism,' singling out Westerners who express concern over mass migration. Then last Thursday a court acquitted Labor councillor Ricky Jones after he was caught on video calling for the murder of anti-mass migration protestors, telling a crowd: 'We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Speech advocates immediately decried a 'two-tier' justice system, comparing Jones' case to Connolly's. 14 Anti-mass migration protests turned fiery in Sunderland, England in August 2024 following the murder of three British girls by an Al Qaeda-supporting terrorist who was the child of migrants. Drik/Getty Images 14 UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer bragged that the protests had resulted in a dragnet of arrests for 'online activity.' Drik/Getty Images All this police action devoted to mean words is occurring while actual criminals roam the streets of British cities. Of the 33,000 car thefts recorded in London alone last year, only 300 arrests were made; while just five percent of the over 40,000 shoplifting incidents reported in London in 2023 led to charges. 'In Britain there is increasingly a sense that whatever your problem is, someone else can sort it out for you,' Maxie Allen told the Post. 'It's like Amazon, you click a button, you get a product. And I think people are saying, right, I don't like the situation, I'll call the police, they can shut these people up.' As the boot of the government, or the soft tyranny of busybodies, continues to stomp on the throats of everyday Brits, many aren't backing down. When Bernadette Spofforth got home from jail, she was forbidden under her bail conditions from engaging on social media, not that she wanted to at the time. 'I guess [my arrest] took the attention off the real reasons for the riots and it gave them a scalp because in the UK what's happening, particularly with the silencing of speech, is that if the government can shut people up, they don't have to deal with the underlying issue,' she told the Post. She's since picked herself up and launched a podcast, hoping to give voice to others. 'My husband said to me, if you live the next 40 years in silence on our farm, when you die the news on Google will be no different than it is today. So, the only thing you can do is to speak out again.'

Hollyoaks star calls on late mother's friends not to attend stepfather's funeral
Hollyoaks star calls on late mother's friends not to attend stepfather's funeral

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hollyoaks star calls on late mother's friends not to attend stepfather's funeral

Hollyoaks star Callum Kerr has called on friends of his late mother not to attend his stepfather's funeral, after the couple were found dead in what is being treated as a murder-suicide. Andrew Searle and Dawn Kerr, who were both aged in their 60s, were found dead in their home in the south of France in the early afternoon of February 6. Mrs Kerr was found lying dead in front of her house partly undressed and with a significant head injury while Mr Searle was found hanged inside the property, which is in the hamlet of Les Pesquies in Villefranche-de-Rouergue, Aveyron. Police launched an investigation to establish whether the couple died as a result of a murder-suicide, or if a third party was involved. Prosecutor Fabrice Belargent previously said that 'the analysis carried out does not so far show any evidence that a third party was involved'. In a statement posted on social media on Tuesday Mr Kerr said it would be 'inappropriate' for his mother's memory to be 'associated with a service honouring the man who, based on all available evidence, may have been responsible for her death'. He called on the funeral arrangements for the pair to be kept separate and for photographs showing the couple together not to be shared. The full statement, which is signed by Kerr and his sister Amanda Kerr, reads: 'In the absence of any evidence suggesting third-party involvement in the tragic death of our mother, Dawn Kerr, the prevailing hypothesis remains that of a murder-suicide. 'Our mother was killed by multiple blows to the head, and Andrew was found deceased by hanging. 'His injuries are consistent with self-hanging, and no defensive wounds were found on his body. 'There is also no evidence of any third-party's involvement at this stage. 'While the official investigation is still ongoing, we cannot ignore the circumstances as they stand. 'For this reason, we must respectfully but firmly request that our mother not be included in any way in the funeral arrangements being made for Andrew. 'Please do not share photographs of them together. 'Please do not attend Andrew's service if you were a friend of our mother. 'It would be inappropriate for her memory to be associated with a service honouring the man who, based on all available evidence, may have been responsible for her death. 'We ask for understanding, privacy and respect as we continue to grieve and seek justice for our mum.' Callum Kerr played Pc George Kiss in the popular Channel 4 soap opera, and appeared in Netflix's Virgin River. According to his LinkedIn page, Mr Searle was a retired fraud investigator specialising in financial crime prevention who worked at companies including Standard Life and Barclays. A statement issued by French prosecutors in February said: 'The two deceased persons, a man and a woman, were the owners of the house in which their bodies were discovered. 'They were British expatriates, retired, and had been living in Aveyron for five years. 'The first victim, Ms Kerr, has a significant head injury. 'A box containing jewellery was found near to her, but no item or weapon which could have caused the injuries were located. 'Mr Searle, who was found hanged… did not show any visible defensive injuries.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store