180 Years of Standing Up for Science
Of course, SETI is still searching, and my name is on this page, not among the world's great scientists. But I could not be more thrilled and honored to introduce myself as Scientific American 's new editor in chief.
I was lucky to grow up in a time when science was celebrated and great communicators told American children that science was not only a worthy career but also exciting and cool. I could turn the television to PBS and watch Carl Sagan in Cosmos or Alan Alda in Scientific American Frontiers; flip it to the news, and I'd see space shuttle liftoffs, high-temperature superconductors and the launch of the Human Genome Project.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Unfortunately, the world of today is increasingly hostile to science. Our leaders deny the existence of human-driven climate change and vilify vaccines that have saved hundreds of millions of lives. Schools lack funding for STEM courses, and budgets are slashed at leading research institutions such as the NIH, NASA and NOAA. Earlier this year I spoke to a top-of-the-class postdoc who'd given up on the idea of securing a position at their U.S. alma mater and instead was weighing offers to relocate to Europe or China.
That makes Scientific American more important than ever. In our very first issue, dated August 28, 1845, editor Rufus Porter offered the publication as an advocate of science and industry and promised it would 'instruct while it diverts or amuses.' My goal as editor in chief is to uphold those values, to stand up for science, to promote its application in industry, and to help educate and inspire new generations of young scientists. I hope to ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery and that it supports working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
Given this context, I'm particularly excited that my first issue as editor in chief marks the 180th anniversary of Scientific American. Our celebration begins with an outstanding collection of stories about times when science itself has made 180-degree turns, including by abandoning ideas such as that light is a wave traveling through 'aether,' that nerves don't regenerate, and that the expansion of the universe is slowing. The anniversary party continues online, so don't forget to check out our website at sciam.com over the course of the coming months, too.
In our cover story, journalist Maryn McKenna looks at the perplexing world of peanut allergies. Food reactions are probably as old as time, and researchers now estimate that they affect one out of 10 Americans overall and two kids in every classroom. But peanut allergies didn't become widespread until the 1990s. Thankfully, remarkable new treatments might free millions of people from the deadly threat of anaphylaxis or even end food sensitivities once and for all. It's an extraordinary example of the way that science can make the world a better place. And that's the perfect way to kick off our next 180 years.
I'm glad that I have this soapbox to stand on at a time when our nation hungers for meaningful discovery and the scientific community needs everyone's support. I hope you'll stand with me. Scientific American helped shape the way I look at the world. It has always educated and delighted me, and I suspect it's done the same for you, too. I'm looking forward to exploring the future together.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Astronomers Say They've Finally Solved the 'Little Red Dots' Mystery
When the James Webb Space Telescope first came online in 2022, it immediately spotted something astronomers had never seen before: "little red dots" peppering the ancient expanse of deep space, originating from around when the universe was just one billion years old. Ever since, we've struggled to explain what these faint signals could be. The prevailing theory is that they're some kind of extremely compact galaxy. But at only two percent of the diameter of the Milky Way, the distribution of stars would have to be impossibly dense, perhaps more so than our current laws of physics allow. They're also too faint to be produced by a quasar, a type of supermassive black hole that is actively devouring matter, which it causes to heat up and glow. Moreover, the black holes would be "overmassive" for such a small galaxy, scientists argue. Now, famed Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb (or infamous, depending on how you view his speculative theories regarding aliens) and his colleague Fabio Pacucci believe they have an answer. In a new study published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, the pair reinforce the idea that the family of red oddities are, in fact, galaxies — but are unusually tiny because they haven't started spinning up to speed yet. It's a hypothesis rooted in one of the leading theories for galaxy formation, which holds that these structures form in "halos" of dark matter, the invisible substance thought to account for 85 percent of all mass in the cosmos. While we can't see or interact with dark matter, it does exert a significant gravitational influence, which explains how the largest structures in the cosmos came together and took shape. In the study, the astronomers propose that the diminutive galaxies formed in halos that just so happened to be among the slowest spinning in the cosmos, with 99 percent of halos spinning faster. The idea, in principle, is simple. If you held out a piece of rope in one hand and started spinning in place, the rope would stretch out and reach farther. But if you slowed down, the rope would slump to the ground. This hypothesis would explain why we're only seeing the dots at such a nascent period of the universe. Over time, the halos would inevitably speed up, and their constituent galaxies would expand. "Dark matter halos are characterized by a rotational velocity: some of them spin very slowly, and others spin more rapidly," Loeb said in a statement about the work. "We showed that if you assume the little red dots are typically in the first percentile of the spin distribution of dark matter halos, then you explain all their observational properties." It's a compelling theory — but it's not the only game in town. Recently, two teams of astronomers found clues that what we're witnessing may actually be an entirely new class of cosmic object: "black hole stars." Their work suggests the glowing dots are an active supermassive black hole surrounded by a vast and thick shell of gas. The intense radiation of the black hole heats up the shell, which absorbs most of the emissions, dimming the light to an outside observer. In many ways, it resembles a star blown up to epic proportions — except, instead of nuclear fusion powering the center, there's a voracious black hole churning through matter. Loeb and Pacucci's theory doesn't address whether these slow-spinning galaxies have a black hole at their center, but suggests that they could form one. "Low-spin halos tend to concentrate mass in the center, which makes it easier for a black hole to accrete matter or for stars to form rapidly," Pacucci said in the statement. The luminous red dots, he added, "might help us understand how the first black holes formed and co-evolved with galaxies in the early universe." More on space: Astronomers in Awe of Terrifying "Eye of Sauron" That's Pointed Straight at Earth
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump eyes Intel stake
Lutnick indicated the money for the stake would come from previously allocated Biden-era funding. Media reports have suggested the government is considering a 10 percent stake using CHIPS and Science Act grants. 'The president figures out that we should get, America should get the benefit of the bargain,' he told CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is, why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?' he continued. 'What is in it for the American taxpayer? And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity state for our money.' 'So we'll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration,' Lutnick added. 'We'll get equity in return for it, get a good return for the American taxpayer instead of just giving grants away.' The Commerce secretary's comments come just less than two weeks after President Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign. The president accused Tan of being 'highly conflicted' following Sen. Tom Cotton's (R-Ark.) letter to the company, voicing concerns about the CEO's investments in Chinese companies and his previous role at Cadence Design Systems. The software firm recently pleaded guilty to violating export controls by selling chip design technology to a Chinese military university during Tan's tenure. However, Trump changed his tone after meeting with Tan last week, and reports began emerging that the administration was considering taking a stake in the company. 'The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week.'
Scientific American
8 hours ago
- Scientific American
Spellements: Tuesday, August 19, 2025
How to Play Click the timer at the top of the game page to pause and see a clue to the science-related word in this puzzle! The objective of the game is to find words that can be made with the given letters such that all the words include the letter in the center. You can enter letters by clicking on them or typing them in. Press Enter to submit a word. Letters can be used multiple times in a single word, and words must contain three letters or more for this size layout. Select the Play Together icon in the navigation bar to invite a friend to work together on this puzzle. Pangrams, words which incorporate all the letters available, appear in bold and receive bonus points. One such word is always drawn from a recent Scientific American article—look out for a popup when you find it! You can view hints for words in the puzzle by hitting the life preserver icon in the game display. The dictionary we use for this game misses a lot of science words, such as apatite and coati. Let us know at games@ any extra science terms you found, along with your name and place of residence,
