High Court blocks residents' bid to challenge use of hotel for housing asylum seekers
Kinvara residents Ruth Sexton, Mary Boyce, Chris Hartnett Dalton and Paul Collins had asked the court for permission to challenge the decision from March to place up to 98 people in the village's Merriman Hotel, which is home at present to about 50 Ukrainians.
The Merriman Hotel has accommodated international protection applicants since 2019, but, the residents said, the Government's decision in March constituted a fresh designation of the building as international protection accommodation.
In designating a place as an accommodation centre, the Minister for Integration was obliged to consider the public interest under a statutory instrument provided for in the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018.
READ MORE
The residents said the Minister breached this obligation in his alleged designation of the building in March.
In a ruling, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said the decision was not a fresh designation of the premises, so the statutory instrument did not apply. The hotel was clearly designated in 2019 when international protection applicants were first accommodated there, she said.
The judge said she was not satisfied the residents had presented arguable grounds on which their case would succeed.
She said the Minister was not legally obliged to consult residents or prepare an assessment of how his decision might affect local businesses, the availability of a local venue for family events or the availability of social services where a premises has already been designated as international protection accommodation.
Ms Justice Bolger said the Government's decision was mainly grounded on the State's obligation to provide accommodation to those seeking asylum.
'The [residents] accept that the State has a legal obligation to provide accommodation for applicants for international protection, but seem to ask the court to prioritise their personal interest in having a hotel in their locality to accommodate tourists and provide a local venue for their family events over the State's attempt to comply with those national, European and international obligations,' she said.
Ms Sexton, of Sexton's Bar, Main Street; Ms Boyce, of Cathercon; Mr Hartnett Dalton, of Northampton; and Mr Collins, of Crushoa, all Kinvara, had sought to bring proceedings against the Minister for Integration and the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
39 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
X wants to appeal High Court dismissal of case challenging Online Safety Code, court told
Elon Musk's X wants to appeal a High Court ruling dismissing its action against Ireland's broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, over its online safety code. X International Unlimited Company, which operates X, formerly known as Twitter, had alleged that the media regulator engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content. Coimisiún na Meán's online safety code, which was adopted last October and came into effect earlier this month, sets out legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms. It is aimed at protecting the public, and especially children, from harmful online content. The social media giant had sought a High Court order compelling the commission to quash its decision to adopt certain sections of the code. It also sought the court to overturn the commission's decision to apply the code to its platform. In a judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley this week refused reliefs sought by X. The judge dismissed several arguments made by the platform in the proceedings, including that the code was out of step with European legislation. At the High Court on Thursday, senior counsel Declan McGrath, for X and appearing with barrister Emma Synnott, said he was instructed to seek permission to appeal the court's judgment. In some High Court cases permission must be granted by the court to appeal a judgment. Noting the judge's provisional view that the costs of the High Court action be awarded to the commission, Mr McGrath said he would not be making any submissions on the matter. Mr Justice Bradley set a date in October for the hearing of X's application for permission to appeal.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Powerscourt Distillery up for sale and what the Online Safety Code means for you
Receivers appointed to the Powerscourt Distillery in Enniskerry, Co Wicklow have put the business and its assets up for sale . Hugh Dooley reports on the latest development in the saga. Donald Trump is not a fan of diversity, equity and inclusion. That much is clear, but his rules to remove what the American right calls 'bias' in artificial intelligence (AI) models threatens to set back US ambitions in the space for the long term. In his column, Emmet Ryan explains why. Why would the tobacco industry lobby for tighter controls on what is arguably its most important product now? Cantillon explores the issue, along with the fallout from Amazon pulling a project from Ireland over electricity supply and where Datalex leaving the Irish stock market leaves the Dublin bourse. The new Online Safety Code has arrived , but what exactly does it involve? Ciara O'Brien outlines what it aims to do, and how it could impact you. READ MORE A €100 million plan to redevelop St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre in Dublin has been turned down by An Coimisiún Pleanála. As Gordon Deegan reports, the refusal overturns a grant of permission owners DTDL Ltd secured from Dublin City Council in December 2023. John FitzGerald on the 'poor show' of a trade deal struck between the EU and the US Listen | 23:32 This week host Ciarán Hancock is joined in studio by economist and Irish Times contributor John FitzGerald. He gives his reaction to the EU-US trade deal that will see a 15% tariff rate on European imports going into the US, a deal that he feels the EU had agreed to with 'two hands tied behind its back' on account of its continued reliance on the US when it comes to the war in ahead of Budget 2026 John outlines the need for the Government to stop pumping money into a booming economy and focus on making space for much-needed infrastructure. He feels we are inflating the economy when we should be cutting expenditure or raising taxes, neither of which would be politically by John Casey with JJ Vernon on sound. Cardboard box-maker Smurfit Westrock still expects to post full-year earnings growth of as much as 11 per cent to $5.2 billion (€4.5 billion), as it continues to turn around its North American operations even as tariffs weigh on consumer demand box sales. Dublin-based media firm NewsWhip is to be bought by a US firm in a deal worth as much as $65 million. Ian Curran has the story. The recent slump in official figures for the number of people visiting Ireland moderated sharply last month, according to Central Statistics Office data published on Wednesday. Some 654,500 foreign residents visited Ireland in June. That represented a year-on-year drop of 2 per cent, compared with drops of 10 per cent in May; 4 per cent in April; 15 per cent in March; and 30 per cent in February. Colin Gleeson reports. Datalex, the retail software provider for airlines, said on Wednesday that it plans to delist from the Irish stock market after 25 years and raise €6 million of needed funds by way of debt, following a sustained period of stock price malaise. Joe has the details. Joe also reports on Hostelworld, which said its net bookings and revenues have picked up during the summer months after a slow start to the year. Dublin Airport has applied for permission to add new boarding gates to ease overcrowding in a busy section of the gateway. State owned airport operator DAA said on Wednesday that it was seeking permission from local planning authority Fingal County Council to extend its pier one west building, part of the airport's terminal one facilities. Barry O'Halloran reports. Irish food ingredients giant Kerry saw revenue increase by 1.3 per cent to €3.5 billion in the first half of 2025 despite what it described as a 'soft' demand environment linked to macroeconomic uncertainty. Eoin BUrke-Kennedy reports. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Irish regulators take aim at Big Tech, but how will the online safety code be implemented?
No more self-regulation for the tech sector. That was the message that was sent to Big Tech by the introduction of the online safety code . The new rules are part of a raft of new legal restrictions and responsibilities placed on technology companies to ensure that harmful content is not easily available online. The code is designed to make online services safer not just for children, but for everyone, tackling everything from illegal content to dangerous challenges – anything that can be deemed harmful to children and the wider population. It also requires platforms to put in place appropriate forms of age verification, to protect children, and implement parental controls to help parents limit time spent online and the type of content children can see. And they must have clear reporting systems for content that violates the rules, and take action on those reports. But who decides what is harmful? Who does the act actually apply to? And what are the penalties for breaching the code? READ MORE The code, which specifically focuses on video sharing platforms, has been several years in the making. It was enabled by several pieces of legislation – the Online Safety and Media Regulation Act 2022, which was signed into law by President Michael D Higgins in December 2022, the EU Digital Services Act and the EU Terrorist Content Online Regulation. Work began in earnest with the establishment of Coimisiún na Meán (CnM) in March 2023 and the appointment of Ireland's first online safety commissioner, Niamh Hodnett. [ What are the new online safety regulations that Big Tech is unhappy about – and will they work? Opens in new window ] CnM put out a call for submissions on the proposed code, and developed a draft code that it put out for public consultation, receiving around 1,400 responses that helped shape the new rules. Based on that, it revised the draft code, coming up with a legally binding set of rules that regulate content on the platforms designated as video sharing platforms. It was formally adopted in October 2024 . What does the code cover? The code focuses on harmful and illegal content on video-sharing platforms in a number of forms, from the video content created by users to commercial video material that is available on these platforms. It is not just the video itself, but also the captions that accompany it, and comments associated with it. Who is covered by the legislation? If your platform is about sharing videos and you are European headquartered in Ireland, then the code applies to your service. Coimisiún na Meán has designated 10 platforms that are covered – for now – including the obvious ones: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube and LinkedIn. Udemy, Pinterest, Tumblr and Reddit were also on the list published by the commission in December 2023. Not everyone has taken the news well, with both Tumblr and Reddit taking cases to the High Court to argue that they should not be designated as video-sharing platforms. Those cases were dismissed in June last year . What does the code mean for these online services? Aside from ensuring that certain content is not uploaded to the site, video-sharing platforms are required to put in robust age verification systems to ensure that younger users are not gaining access to harmful content. The code also compels them to have parental controls available, allowing parents to not only limit the time spent online and the type of content users can access, but also who can see their content online. There must also be a transparent and easy-to-follow reporting system for content that does breach the rules. [ Online safety commissioner 'deeply concerned' at rise of AI-generated child sex-abuse images Opens in new window ] The more general rules were implemented in October, but the commission gave platforms a grace period – nine months – to allow the video-sharing platforms to make any changes needed to systems and other preparations that were needed to comply with the age verification and content rules in Part B of the code. That gave platforms 'more than enough time' in the eyes of some child-safety campaigners to develop robust age verification systems, stringent content controls to prevent exposure of children to harmful material, and easy-to-use reporting systems. Platforms serving up such content can't rely on simply asking users how old they are, and trusting they will tell the truth. Although the code doesn't say exactly how companies must verify ages, Hodnett has made clear that 'robust, privacy-respecting' verification measures are needed. What is considered harmful content? There is a wide definition of harmful in the code, from the obvious candidates – adult content such as pornography and violence – that must be restricted to prevent younger users from easily stumbling across it. Cyberbullying, self-harm and suicide, content that promotes or glorifies eating disorders, and incitement to hatred and violence is also covered. Even dangerous challenges that go viral on social media can be defined as harmful to younger users, and therefore subject to the code. Failure to meet these new obligations will mean fines of up to €20 million, or 10 per cent of the platform's annual turnover – whichever is greater. What about its critics? X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, has taken a court case challenging the rules. The platform claims Coimisiún na Meán engaged in 'regulatory overreach' in its approach to restrictions on certain video content, saying the code contradicts Irish legal requirements for protecting and balancing fundamental rights, particularly freedom of expression. That case is currently working its way through the courts. The code has been widely welcomed elsewhere but there have been a few concerns raised. Privacy campaigners, for example, have expressed concerns about storing the data required for age verification. Some campaigners, meanwhile, don't think the new code goes far enough. Child online safety charity CyberSafeKids, for example, welcomed the code as a 'step in the right direction', describing it as 'a milestone' that shifts legal responsibility on to tech companies to protect children online. 'This shift finally places a clear obligation on platforms to face the reality that underage users are accessing harmful content daily on their platforms, and to implement effective safeguards,' Cybersafe Kids said. However, it noted that the code only applied to the 10 platforms identified by CnM, excluding other widely used social media platforms, such as Snapchat, and gaming platforms popular with children, such as Roblox. 'This leaves significant gaps in the protection of children who are encountering similarly harmful content in gaming environments, highlighting the urgent need for broader regulatory coverage to ensure online safety for children across all digital environments,' the charity said. CyberSafeKids has also raised concerns that the code was vague in parts, without clear time frames for handling harmful content and complaints. [ Keeping children safe online is not child's play Opens in new window ] Another issue was the decision to remove measures dealing with 'recommender' algorithms – software that promotes and highlights content, pushing it to users – from the code. That algorithm can often be the source of the harmful content that the code is trying to protect users from. When the draft code was published, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties said it was 'dismayed' by the decision to remove measures to address toxic algorithms from the final code. ICCL senior fellow Dr Johnny Ryan described it as 'a dangerous U-turn'. How will it be enforced? Coimisiún na Meán will monitor the platforms to ensure the rules are being applied, particularly around mechanisms to report illegal or infringing content. However, members of the public can make complaints to the commission, although they should complain to the platform first. Campaigners have called on the commission to review the code's efficacy within 12 to 24 months, and if it is failing to protect children, to implement stiffer penalties. 'Ultimately, we need a long-term strategy that ensures we are preparing and equipping children and young people for safe and enriching online experiences, and that adequate and robust legislation and resources are in place to effectively achieve this,' CyberSafeKids says.
