
USC Explores Electric Fields Approach to Attack Deadliest Form of Brain Cancer
The study finds that using Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields), which delivers targeted waves of electric fields directly into tumors to stop their growth and signal the body's immune system to attack cancerous tumor cells, may extend survival among patients with glioblastoma when combined with immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) and chemotherapy (temozolomide).
TTFields disrupt tumor growth using low-intensity, alternating electric fields that push and pull key structures inside tumor cells in continually shifting directions, making it difficult for the cells to multiply. Preventing tumor growth gives patients a better chance of successfully fighting the cancer. When used to treat glioblastoma, TTFields are delivered through a set of mesh electrodes that are strategically positioned on the scalp, generating fields at a precise frequency and intensity focused on the tumor. Patients wear the electrodes for approximately 18 hours a day.
Researchers observed that TTFields attract more tumor-fighting T cells, which are white blood cells that identify and attack cancer cells, into and around the glioblastoma. When followed by immunotherapy, these T cells stay active longer and are replaced by even stronger, more effective tumor-fighting T cells.
'By using TTFields with immunotherapy, we prime the body to mount an attack on the cancer, which enables the immunotherapy to have a meaningful effect in ways that it could not before,' said David Tran, MD, PhD, chief of neuro-oncology with Keck Medicine, co-director of the USC Brain Tumor Center and corresponding author of the study. 'Our findings suggest that TTFields may be the key to unlocking the value of immunotherapy in treating glioblastoma.'
TTFields are often combined with chemotherapy in cancer treatment. However, even with aggressive treatment, the prognosis for glioblastoma remains poor. Immunotherapy, while successful in many other cancer types, has also not proved effective for glioblastoma when used on its own.
However, in this study, adding immunotherapy to TTFields and chemotherapy was associated with a 70% increase in overall survival. Notably, patients with larger, unresected (not surgically removed) tumors showed an even stronger immune response to TTFields and lived even longer. This suggests that when it comes to kick-starting the body's immune response against the cancer, having a larger tumor may provide more targets for the therapy to work against.
This study demonstrates that combining TTFields with immunotherapy triggers a potent immune response within the tumor – one that ICIs can then amplify to bolster the body's own defense against cancer.
'Think of it like a team sport – immunotherapy sends players in to attack the tumor (the offense), while TTFields weaken the tumor's ability to fight back (the defense). And just like in team sports, the best defense is a good offense,' said Tran, who is also a member of the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Keck Medicine is participating in the multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial to validate the efficacy of TTFields with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Tran, who has been researching TTFields for more than a decade, serves as the chair of the steering committee for this trial. Frances Chow, MD, neuro-oncologist with USC Norris, is the principal investigator of the Keck Medicine study site.
This Phase 3 trial, currently open at 28 sites across the United States, Europe and Israel, aims to enroll over 740 patients through April 2029, including those with gross total resection, partial resection or biopsy-only tumors to assess the extent of how surgically removing tumors influences immune response.
Information was sourced from Keck Medicine. To learn more, contact gabriella.robison@med.usc.edu.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Wearable Sensor Will Improve Bipolar Disorder Treatment
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A wearable sensor could make tracking medication levels much easier for people living with bipolar disorder, eliminating the need for blood draws and lab analyses. The first-of-its-kind device could vastly improve treatment, convenience and drug safety for millions of patients who take lithium—a type of mood stabilizer—for bipolar disorder. While lithium is highly effective, it must be administered precisely and needs regular monitoring. Too low a dose, and the treatment doesn't work—but too high a dose can be toxic to patients, with the potential to cause kidney and thyroid damage, or even death. In addition, the correct dose of lithium depends on the individual. In their study, the researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) argue that sweat is an easier alternative to blood for lithium tracking because it can both be collected noninvasively and reflect lithium concentrations in real time. Printed and flexible wearable sensor for lithium monitoring in sweat being stuck to skin. Printed and flexible wearable sensor for lithium monitoring in sweat being stuck to skin. Mohammad Shafiqul Islam, Khan Lab, USC Viterbi School of Engineering Bipolar disorder affects around 5.7 million adult Americans, or about 2.6 percent of the U.S. population aged 18 and older each year, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. The current method of laboratory-based blood draws for tracking can be time-consuming, inconvenient and painful. "While past approaches required collecting body fluids for lab testing or using multiple devices—such as stimulating sweat, applying a color-changing lithium sensor, and then photographing it to estimate levels—our wearable simplifies everything," USC electrical and computer engineer professor Yasser Khan told Newsweek. "It collects sweat and measures lithium levels in one fully integrated, non-invasive device." The newly designed wearable includes a skin-safe, electrical current-based system to induce sweat without requiring physical exertion. In just minutes, the device can collect the data and transmit it directly to a smartphone app, allowing people to track their lithium levels from home (or wherever they might be). This reduces the need for more invasive tracking, similarly to a glucose monitor reducing the need for people with diabetes to check their blood glucose levels with a finger prick test, though they work slightly differently. "Unlike continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) that rely on a needle under the skin, our wearable is sweat-based and sticks on the skin like a simple bandage. While CGMs don't require a sample collection step, our device needs to first stimulate sweat before measuring lithium levels, adding one step, but avoiding needles entirely," Khan explained. The wearable sensor to track lithium has been made possible by the innovative use of something called 'organic electrochemical transistors' (OECTs) specifically designed for lithium detection, according to the researchers. OECTs are electronic devices that respond to ionic signals in liquid, converting them into readable electronic data. Unlike conventional OECTs, the sensor developed at USC features a fully printed OECT using a new material formulation tailored to detect lithium ions specifically. "We developed the entire lithium monitoring system—from the OECT-based sensor patch and on-demand sweat induction to the readout electronics and smartphone app—using a simple, scalable and cost-effective fabrication process," said study author and doctoral student Mohammad Shafiqul Islam in a statement. "Our goal was to make lithium tracking as easy and comfortable for patients as checking a daily fitness tracker." This makes it the first OECT-based lithium sensor to be entirely printed, which is hoped to pave the way for affordable and scalable production. In partnership with psychiatrist Adam Frank at Keck School of Medicine, the device has already been tested by those of his patients taking lithium—gaining positive feedback. Sweat samples were collected using the wearable device and lithium measurements were successfully matched against values derived from bulky commercial sensors. "We conducted a pilot study with three patients, focusing primarily on showcasing the wearable's development. All participants appreciated the convenience of using a simple at-home device compared to frequent lab visits for blood draws," Khan told Newsweek. "The wearable measures lithium levels and displays the concentration on a smartphone, making it accessible to both patients and physicians. Over time, patients can better understand what works for them—for example, one participant noted that a concentration around 0.4 mM was effective. This kind of personalized insight is one of the key benefits of wearable technologies." The new device is hoped to improve safety by allowing for medication dose adjustments that avoid side effects and potential medication toxicity. Keen to keep the momentum going for those living with bipolar disorder, Khan said: "This is a market-ready technology that now needs to be translated from the lab into a consumer device. To reach widespread adoption, a larger clinical study involving hundreds of patients will be essential." The team plans to develop more advanced wearable systems powered by AI to automatically adjust lithium dosage and achieve optimal therapeutic benefits without causing lithium toxicity. Do you have a health story to share with Newsweek? Do you have a question about bipolar disorder? Let us know via health@ Reference Islam, M. S., Kunnel, B. P., Ferdoushi, M., Hassan, M. F., Cha, S., Cai, W., Frank, A., & Khan, Y. (2025). Wearable organic-electrochemical-transistor-based lithium sensor for precision mental health. Device.


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Alcohol-Related Liver Disease Increases Sharply
Significant liver fibrosis associated with heavy alcohol use rose more than twofold over roughly the past two decades in the US despite alcohol use rates holding steady, which might be explained by risk factors for alcohol-related liver injury in the population, researchers said. Those most likely to be heavy drinkers are women, adults aged 45 years or older, those living in poverty, and those with metabolic syndrome, the data showed. 'Alcohol-related liver disease is the main cause of liver-related death, and these results are a major wake-up call to the dangers of drinking,' lead investigator Brian Lee, MD, MAS, hepatologist and liver transplant specialist with Keck Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, said in a statement. The study was published online on July 23 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . Call for Increased Awareness To gauge trends in advanced alcohol-related liver disease among heavy drinkers, Lee and colleagues mined data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 1999-2020. The primary outcome was a high Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score (FIB-4 > 2.67 for those aged 65 years or younger and > 3.25 for those older than 65 years), which has previously been linked to a 25-fold higher risk for liver-related death. People with hepatitis B or C were excluded. Among 44,628 adults, 2474 were heavy drinkers — defined as at least 20 g/d for women and 30 g/d for men in the prior year. Among heavy drinkers, the prevalence of high FIB-4 — a marker of advanced liver scarring — increased more than twofold over time, from 1.8% in 1999-2004 to 4.3% in 2013-2020, vs an increase of 0.8%-1.4% among non-heavy drinkers. Notably, average alcohol intake stayed the same during the study period, the researchers said. Among heavy drinkers, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome rose from 26.4% in 1999-2004 to 37.6% in 2013-2020, the mean age increased, and a greater proportion was women or living in poverty — factors that can amplify susceptibility to alcohol's liver effects. Supplementary analyses restricting the cohort to adults aged 35-65 years or to pre-pandemic years (1999-2018) confirmed the same upward trends, with significant liver scarring tripling over 20 years. Limitations cited by the authors include the cross-sectional design of NHANES and reliance on self-reported alcohol intake, which can't capture fluctuations over time, and the use of FIB-4 as a surrogate for liver disease. Collectively, the data suggest that increasing morbidity and mortality due to alcohol-related liver disease 'may be related to a population more sensitized to the alcohol-related effects in the liver due to increased baseline risk factors,' the researchers wrote. The findings provide impetus for 'urgent awareness' of the contemporaneous risk for alcohol-related liver disease with heavy drinking and interventions to screen and treat risk factors, they added.


USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
People living with Alzheimer's ‒ and their caregivers ‒ need more than hope
I hope my film sparks a conversation not just about the search for a cure but also about the necessity to care ‒ honoring the people we love and the caregivers who ease their journeys. In June 2021, I was sitting in a small outside café in Stowe, Vermont. My husband and I were chatting with a lovely elderly Peruvian man sitting nearby. His name was Pedro. He had a character-rich face, a warm smile and a mischievous twinkle in his eye. I'm a casting director in Los Angeles, perpetually on the lookout for interesting faces, and my husband and I love meeting people and striking up conversations with strangers. Just as I was about to quiz Pedro more on his life, I got a phone call from a recruiter at the University of Southern California's Keck medical center about a new drug trial for Alzheimer's disease. My husband, Charlie Hess, was living with early onset Alzheimer's, and though you might not notice right away, the challenges were real. Living with Alzheimer's doesn't need to be a story of pure tragedy. It's a terrible disease ‒ a disease that should be much further along in developing treatments ‒ but because Alzheimer's is more invisible than, say, a person battling cancer, the disease has largely been ignored. This accelerated trial for the drug known as donanemab held the promise of slowing the progression of Alzheimer's by clearing the amyloid plaque that many view as a key driver of the disease. It's a more complex trajectory ‒ Alzheimer's is a multifactorial disease ‒ but clearing amyloid might be akin to prescribing statins for people with high cholesterol to help keep their arteries from clogging and causing a heart attack. The USC recruiter insisted this medication donanemab was much better than Aduhelm, a drug I was well aware of that got provisional accelerated approval later that summer in 2021 but was mired in controversies from the get-go. The Food and Drug Administration's expert outside advisers voted not to approve it for many reasons, and Aduhelm finally was removed from the market by Biogen in 2024, as the manufacturer turned its focus toward another Alzheimer's medication that showed more promise. But the jury is still out whether these drugs, which cost up to $32,000 a year, and lengthy infusion therapy will be the answer. There are significant risks for Alzheimer's patients, and issues of cost and access to consider. I was at a loss that June day four years ago. The infusion, given once every six weeks, might slow progression. And I thought, while Charlie was still talking to Pedro, that in a year Charlie might lose conversations like this. The recruiter pressed me: Charlie was on their short list, and if we didn't decide in 24 hours, it would be gone. My stomach tightened. My mind kept thinking, 'If not now, when?' Families living with Alzheimer's are at a tipping point We said goodbye to Pedro. I looked Charlie in the eye and told him we had gotten a 'golden ticket' ‒ a spot in a trial for a new drug ‒ and we had to decide immediately. My husband was clear in his thinking and calm in his delivery. 'Why would we rush back to LA for a drug that is only a pile of promises?' Charlie said. 'I feel way better here in nature, slowing down. We have great doctors. If this drug proves to be the one, I'm sure you'll find a way to get me back in. The only thing I know is that nobody knows what to do with this, and we just have to keep living.' Opinion: Is it Alzheimer's or am I just getting old? Here's how to find an answer. Charlie sometimes struggles for words, but then suddenly finds clarity and speaks directly. That June in 2021, he did just that, and I think he was right. In February 2025, in a New York Times opinion column, journalist Charles Piller raised alarm about fraud and controversy in Alzheimer's research. His book, "Doctored: Fraud, Arrogance, and Tragedy in the Quest to Cure Alzheimer's," sent shock waves across the Alzheimer's community. It's a messy story, and I do not think all researchers are cooking their studies. Even so, drug companies certainly have a huge financial incentive, and we ‒ caregivers and people living with Alzheimer's ‒ are at a tipping point. What Alzheimer's looks like from the inside There may be more drugs approved in the future that are worth pursuing for some, but the risks are high, the costs are staggering, and the resources we put toward selling hope could undermine health care for everyone. Hope itself is perhaps the most powerful drug of all, but it won't cure Alzheimer's. We need a cure, but we also need to rethink the narrative. It's time we fund caregiver supports, and find a way to help people live with dignity and compassion alongside their disease. It's time we recognized that Alzheimer's doesn't just affect a person ‒ it profoundly impacts the whole family. Opinion: Dementia care for families has an unexpected ally ‒ you My own experience with Alzheimer's and this ongoing journey alongside Charlie profoundly influenced me to make "Walk With Me," a documentary that traces our life together and the quiet, intimate struggles of caregiving. The film is a deeply personal view into what Alzheimer's looks like from the inside ‒ not just for the person living with it, but also for the family that bears it alongside them. "Walk With Me" will be screening on Tuesday, July 29, in Toronto, Canada, in the same week that more than 10,000 people will be gathered there at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference to discuss new research, care options and more. I will be at the Toronto conference with my hopes up. But what I fear most is that what the drug companies will be selling is not a cure yet but rather another hope. While hope is a powerful drug, we are due for a reality check. We need to learn to live better by strengthening caregiver supports ‒ this vast, unpaid workforce that underpins much of health care today. My hope is that my film sparks a conversation not just about the search for a cure but also about the necessity to care ‒ honoring the people we love and the caregivers who make their journeys more human and compassionate. According to Statistics Canada, 4 in 10 Canadians ages 15 or older provide unpaid care, amounting to more than $97 billion in annual economic value. In the United States, 1 in 5 Americans provide unpaid care, valued at over $470 billion a year. Let's stop selling hope and start funding better care for all. Heidi Levitt is a casting director in Los Angeles. Her documentary "Walk With Me" will be screening on July 29 at the TIFF Lightbox theater in Toronto, Canada. It is playing film festivals all over the United States and internationally with the goal to find distribution to play the film widely theatrically and online. Please check the website for updates.