logo
Plans for primary-care hub on site of Baggot Street hospital on hold amid residents' fears it may include methadone clinic

Plans for primary-care hub on site of Baggot Street hospital on hold amid residents' fears it may include methadone clinic

Several appeals have been lodged with An Bord Pleanála against the recent decision of Dublin City Council to grant planning permission for a proposed new medical centre to be located at the rear of the main hospital building on Baggot Street Upper.
The HSE is hoping to develop the new primary-care centre, including a pharmacy, in vacant buildings that form part of the former Baggot Street Hospital site at the junction of Haddington Road and Eastmoreland Lane.
The red-brick building, known formally as the Royal City of Dublin Hospital, has been closed as a hospital since 1987.
The new facility, to be known as The Haddington Road Primary-Care Centre, will incorporate an existing three-storey Victorian building and a newly constructed building up to six storeys in height.
However, the HSE has separately appealed against a condition imposed by Dublin City Council as part of the grant of planning permission to omit one floor of the proposed development because of the local authority's serious concerns about the height of the structure.
The HSE claims the requirement to omit one of the six storeys would have minimal impact on the overshadowing of neighbouring properties but would make the development of the primary-care centre 'unfeasible'.
The council's ruling is also being appealed against by several local residents and business owners, including the Pembroke Road Association.
Although the residents' group recognised the need for a new primary-care centre in the area, it criticised its proposed height, which it said would be 'disruptive' and 'entirely excessive'.
Together with other individual appellants, the Pembroke Road Association also expressed concern that a methadone clinic is being considered as part of the new facility.
The group claims the layout of the proposed centre with an entirely separate pharmacy 'would indicate a methadone dispensing service'.
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Dublin City Council said any issue of the medical centre being used for dispensing methadone was under the remit of the HSE's operational governance and healthcare regulations rather than planning control.
Planning files submitted by the HSE make no reference to any type of drug-treatment clinic being proposed.
The HSE said it had identified a need to provide a new primary-care centre in a modern purpose-built building to serve the healthcare needs of the local community in the Baggot Street and Sandymount areas.
The new facility will provide a range of services including public-health nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, social work, speech and language therapy and dietetics, as well as a pharmacy.
Separately, council planners expressed concern about the lack of any future plans for development of the former hospital building, which it described as 'a sensitive protected structure' and asked the HSE to re-examine its potential reuse.
However, the HSE said a report into the potential use of the building for use for healthcare purposes, which was carried out in October 2022, had concluded that it would 'present a number of serious challenges in terms of structure, fire safety, access, services, conservation, cost and time'.
The HSE claimed the proposed development would not involve any works that would affect the special character of the protected structure or result in the removal of significant original fabric or features of interest.
The HSE's chief executive, Bernard Gloster, informed the Department of Health last year that the former hospital is surplus to its needs as it is no longer deemed suitable for delivering public healthcare services.
Last month, the HSE indicated the building is to be sold on the open market as no state agency wanted to use the premises. whose condition has deteriorated over the years.
However, the HSE said the absence of a confirmed use for the buildings should not hinder the development of the proposed primary-care centre.
Council planners said a masterplan for the entire site would have been better 'in terms of a meaningfully developed site rather than the current proposal'.
'The redevelopment of part of this site without consideration of this structure is worrying and is not considered planning best practice,' they added.
The council said it has included 'robust conditions' to the grant of planning permission as the response of the HSE to a wide range of concerns raised over the plans was 'disappointing'.
'Minimal alterations were made which did not address these concerns,' it observed.
The council acknowledged that they might affect the functionality of the new facility but said it had to ensure the amenity of adjoining structures and the future development potential of adjoining sites was protected.
It also expressed disappointment with the delay by the HSE in disposing of the main hospital as it had a detrimental impact on the fabric of the building that was being protected.
A ruling by An Bord Pleanála on the various appeals is due by early October.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From 20 cigarettes a day for 55 years to finally quitting: ‘I took it up, thinking I was the big man'
From 20 cigarettes a day for 55 years to finally quitting: ‘I took it up, thinking I was the big man'

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

From 20 cigarettes a day for 55 years to finally quitting: ‘I took it up, thinking I was the big man'

For 55 years, Mick Staunton smoked more than 20 cigarettes a day. His wife, Olivia, wasn't far behind him, having taken up smoking 46 years ago and smoking at least 10 a day ever since. However, proving that you are never too old to quit, the Roscommon couple have finally ditched the habit and are feeling much healthier as a result. 'I took it up, like every young fella, thinking I was the big man,' said the 74-year-old. 'Olivia (71) was similar, and with the two of us smoking, it became harder and harder to quit, even though we tried a few times.' The retired garda says that he and his wife, who used to work in the Civil Service, attempted to stop smoking on numerous occasions throughout their lives, but knew they needed support to stop for good. READ MORE 'Whenever I tried, I would only last a few months before going back on them [cigarettes] and Olivia was the same,' said the father of five. 'We tried to go cold turkey and were using sweets and chewing gum whenever we wanted a cigarette, but they were a poor substitute. So last year we contacted the [ HSE ] QUIT team and the support we got was the biggest thing to help us through.' More than 17 per cent of the Irish population are smokers, with 14 per cent smoking daily, and 4 per cent occasionally. With 20 per cent of the 25- to 34-year-old age bracket smoking, this demographic has the highest number of smokers. However, these figures have declined since the first Healthy Ireland Survey in 2015, when the figure was 32 per cent. This decrease could be down to more available supports, as, according to the HSE, smokers are four times more likely to quit successfully if they use a combination of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the form of sprays, mists, lozenges and patches, along with support from a 'stop smoking adviser'. Smoking is a leading cause of preventable death and significantly impacts physical and mental health, so giving up can lead to improved health, reduced disease risk, and better overall wellbeing, including increased life expectancy and reduced stress. 'Smoking is dangerous, and the odds facing people who smoke are stark - 1 in 2 will die of a smoking-related disease; on average, people who smoke will die 10 years earlier and are at increased risk of cancer, heart attack, stroke, lung disease and many other debilitating diseases,' said Dr Paul Kavanagh, HSE public health consultant and clinical adviser to the Tobacco Free Ireland Programme. [ Smoking ban has important lessons for Ireland's approach to climate issues Opens in new window ] However, Dr Kavanagh says it's not all bad news, as these odds can be changed when people stop smoking. 'We see changes in physiological measures like heart rate, blood pressure and exhaled carbon monoxide within days; breathing and exercise tolerance will improve within weeks; and over the coming months and years, the risk of smoking-related disease reduces dramatically.' Mick Staunton with his wife Olivia in their garden in Castlerea. Photograph: Arthur Ellis According to the HSE, other health benefits include increased life expectancy as smoking takes an average of 10 to 15 years off a person's life, reduced risk of life-threatening diseases, improved respiratory function, circulation and oxygen levels, and better skin, teeth and hair. Quitting smoking also helps with improved mood and reduces feelings of stress, anxiety and depression. Giving up also helps to improve fertility, reduces risk of pregnancy complications, offers protection for loved ones from second-hand smoke and creates financial savings as it can 'free up a significant amount of money'. Research from Healthy Ireland Statistics shows that 17 per cent of the population smokes cigarettes, while another 8 per cent uses e-cigarettes, either daily or occasionally. These figures have not changed since 2023, and Martina Blake, national lead for the HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, says NRTs can help more people to quit. 'These licensed medicines safely give you just enough nicotine to relieve cravings and withdrawal symptoms, while reducing your dependence on nicotine gradually,' she said. 'They help you to cope with cravings and withdrawal symptoms, but do not contain the poisonous and cancer-causing chemicals in tobacco smoke, such as tar and carbon monoxide.' [ Quitting smoking isn't easy, but these tricks could help Opens in new window ] Men remain more likely to smoke than women (20 per cent of men smoke as opposed to 15 per cent of women), and Mick Staunton says it's never too late to think about giving up. 'We both wish we did it years ago, as we're flying it now.'

Employee suspensions lasting more than a decade ‘extraordinarily rare', say lawyers
Employee suspensions lasting more than a decade ‘extraordinarily rare', say lawyers

Irish Times

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Employee suspensions lasting more than a decade ‘extraordinarily rare', say lawyers

The paid suspension of an employee lasting more than a decade is 'extraordinarily rare' but can indicate the seriousness of alleged wrongdoing, according to people working in employment law. The Irish Times reported on Monday that two Health Service Executive employees have been suspended with pay or have been on administrative leave for 11 years. Generally, in employment, suspensions are a precautionary measure during a workplace investigation into alleged misconduct. They can last for months if not years in some rare circumstances. However, one breaching two years is considered unusual, so how could a suspension last 11 years? Although employers are now encouraged to avoid suspensions where possible due to the potential reputational damage suffered by the off-work employee, they are sometimes necessary, particularly where safety concerns are at play, according to Alan Eustace, an assistant professor of private law at Trinity College Dublin. READ MORE Allegations at the more serious end of the scale may require a 'more robust procedure' that can result in lengthy suspensions, he said. Dr Eustace, who has a particular interest in employment law, said suspensions of employees subject to allegations of misconduct can often be necessary if their presence is deemed to be 'potentially dangerous'. 'In general, it's quite rare to find people on very lengthy suspensions, unless there's been an extremely serious allegation made against them, and the investigation into that case is extremely complicated,' he said. While all employees have a right to fair procedure, through thorough and fair investigations of alleged misconduct, this procedure can be made more complex in the public sector where collective agreements can see procedures vary between roles. [ Two HSE staff suspended with pay or on administrative leave for 11 years Opens in new window ] On the other hand, employees can take legal action to halt investigations. If the employer in question is found to be proceeding incorrectly or unfairly, they can be ordered to restart the investigation. Sick leave, potentially due to stress as a result of the investigation, can also result in the process being paused entirely until they are well enough to engage again, he said. While suspending an employee can be costly, it can end up 'cheaper than sacking them unfairly and being sued for that later on', Dr Eustace said. Due to its potential reputational damage to the employee in question, suspension, even with pay, has become 'much harder to do', according to Anne O'Connell, principal of employment law firm AOC Solicitors. Historically, there was little preventing employers from suspending employees during investigations in the past, once the employee was paid. However, in the last decade or so, more stringent steps have been required to do so. A botched or rushed investigation could result in costly legal proceedings down the line, she said, and an investigation must run its course before any disciplinary action, including dismissal. 'You can't just fire somebody before a full investigation is complete, they have a right to fair procedures,' she said, stressing that the outcome of investigations may not warrant dismissal and any allegations could be deemed unfounded. Unforeseen events, such as relevant court proceedings, can delay investigations, she said. Regardless, '11 years is very rare – extraordinarily rare', she said.

ieExplains: What is the new covid variant and is it in Ireland?
ieExplains: What is the new covid variant and is it in Ireland?

Irish Examiner

time15 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

ieExplains: What is the new covid variant and is it in Ireland?

Is there a new strain of covid? Yes. It is called NB.1.8.1, and is a sub-variant of the Omicron variant. Omicron was the dominant strain in Ireland at the end of 2021 and 2022. The new strain was first detected in January 2025. What is the new strain? In May, the World Health Organization (WHO) designated the NB.1.8.1 strain of covid as a 'variant under monitoring", and the public health risk posed by it is "evaluated as low at the global level". It said: "Currently, approved covid vaccines are expected to remain effective to this variant against symptomatic and severe disease. "Despite a concurrent increase in cases and hospitalisations in some countries where NB.1.8.1 is widespread, current data does not indicate that this variant leads to more severe illness than other variants in circulation." The new strain comprised of 13.6% of all cases in the week ending May 18. While the percentage remains low, this is an increase from 0.7% in the week ending April 20. Have there been any cases in Ireland yet? Yes. As of June 9, there are 19 cases linked to this variant of the virus detected in Ireland. The first case was detected here on April 16. In the five-week period from April 20 to May 24, the new strain accounted for 13.6% of all sequenced cases — compared to 4.3% in the previous five weeks. Those figures are based on GISAid sequence data. GISAid is a global science initiative that monitors and provides access to data on influenza viruses. In response to a query from the Irish Examiner, the HSE said that based on WHO data and on the mutation profile, there is no evidence of increased severity or impact on vaccine effectiveness against severe disease. The HSE added that since the end of March 2025, levels of covid have shown a slow but steady increase. However, "levels of hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and deaths remain low". Is it the only covid variant? No. There are still multiple covid variants. In a statement last week, the WHO said that the variants "continue to evolve". They said: "Between January and May 2025, there were shifts in global SARS-CoV-2 variant dynamics. At the beginning of the year, the most prevalent variant tracked by WHO at the global level was XEC, followed by KP.3.1.1. "In February, circulation of XEC began to decline while that of LP.8.1 increased, with the latter becoming the most detected variant in mid-March. Since mid-April, the circulation of LP.8.1 has been slightly declining as NB.1.8.1 is increasingly being detected." At the moment, six variants are being tracked. What are the symptoms of the new covid variant? Common symptoms align with typical Omicron subvariants from the height of the pandemic in 2021. They include fatigue, fever, muscle aches, and a sore throat. Writing in The Conversation, Australian virologist Lara Herrero said: "The evidence so far suggests NB.1.8.1 may spread more easily and may partially sidestep immunity from prior infections or vaccination. These factors could explain its rise in sequencing data. "But importantly, the WHO has not yet observed any evidence it causes more severe disease compared to other variants." The WHO does note that the global public health risk associated with covid remains high. There has been evidence of "decreasing impact on human health" throughout 2023 and 2024. The HSE has said that anyone with covid symptoms, even mild ones, should stay at home until 48 hours after their symptoms are mostly or fully gone. People should also avoid contact with other people, especially people at higher risk of severe covid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store