DC Council votes on changes to Initiative 82
The council vote took time, as members were embroiled in other debates.
They eventually decided to essentially water down the current version of the legislation, slowing down and capping the increase to tipped workers' wages.
What we know
Mayor Bowser proposed repealing Initiative 82 this spring.
Supporters of I-82 say any changes would go against the wishes of voters–the measure raised the base wage for tipped workers to $17.95 an hour and restaurants were meant to be responsible for making sure workers earned the new minimum wage if their tips didn't get them there.
But the head restaurant association told FOX 5 say the law has confused customers with unclear service, I-82 is causing businesses to close.
Local perspective
"In the District, we're the highest in the country, I would add. So we're asking council to take a look at Initiative 82 and come up with a measure that works for restaurants and workers alike," said Shawn Townsend, President and CEO of the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington.
"We talk to lots of tipped workers and they say their take-home pay is higher and they are making more money as a result of having a higher base wage," said Elizabeth Falcon with D.C. Jobs With Justice.
Two weeks ago, Council Chair Phil Mendelson thought he had a compromise proposal which would have scaled back I-82 but not get rid of it all together.
But in a surprise move the council voted 7-5 to reject that proposal.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Immigrants seeking green cards may be placed in removal proceedings, USCIS says
Immigrants seeking green cards through marriage could be vulnerable to deportation, according to a new Trump administration policy. Federal immigration authorities may begin removal proceedings for immigrants who lack legal status and apply to become residents through a spouse, according to new guidance issued by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on Monday. The policy, which went into effect immediately, also applies to immigrants who seek lawful permanent residency through other family members. Immigrants and the spouse or family who sponsor them 'should be aware that a family-based petition accords no immigration status nor does it bar removal,' the USCIS' policy manual said. USCIS said in a statement to NBC News that the change applies both to pending requests and those filed on or after Aug. 1. The policy broadly targets a major pathway for some immigrants seeking green cards, immigration policy and legal experts told NBC News. 'This is one of the most important avenues that people have to adjust to lawful permanent status in the United States,' Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, said. The new policy is very broad and seems to empower USCIS to begin removal proceedings for a green-card applicant 'at any point in the process,' she said, adding that wait times for a green card can vary greatly depending on multiple factors, including where the application was filed and the type of familial relationship the immigrant has in its application. Nearly 520,000 I-130 petitions, the first step in the process to obtain the U.S. residency through spouse or family, were filed by family members on behalf of immigrants in the first six months of 2025, according to an NBC News analysis of USCIS data. As of June, there were more than 2.4 million pending I-130 petitions, according to USCIS data. Of those, more than 1.9 million have been pending for more than six months, also per USCIS data. It is not clear how many of those seeking green cards include immigrants who lack lawful status or lost their status during the process. Mukherjee said that previously 'no one expected to be put into immigration court' during this process, unless there was a serious issue like violating criminal law, adding that the change could 'instill fear in immigrant families, even those who are doing everything right.' USCIS said in its statement that the new policy 'is dedicated to ensuring integrity in the U.S. immigration system through enhanced screening and vetting to deter, detect, and disrupt immigration fraud and threats to our national security and public safety.' The agency said in its statement that the policy manual updates 'increased benefit integrity and introduced screening and vetting opportunities by providing direction on adjudication and decision issues, including when USCIS requires an in-person interview.' 'Fraudulent, frivolous, or otherwise non-meritorious family-based immigrant visa petitions erode confidence in family-based pathways to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and undermine the immigration system in the United States. USCIS must ensure that qualifying marriages and family relationships are genuine, verifiable, and compliant with all applicable laws,' the agency said in an alert announcing the new policy and guidance on Monday. Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute, said the policy change was in line with the administration's mass deportation agenda. 'We're seeing the Trump administration send a message in every way that it can to unauthorized immigrants that they should consider giving up their lives in the U.S. and returning to their home countries,' she said. The policy will not only affect immigrants who entered the country illegally and are now seeking green-card status as a means to remain, she said. In addition, people whose legal visas expire while they wait for a decision on green cards, Dreamers and hundreds of thousands of immigrants whose legal status is in jeopardy after the Trump administration moved to cancel temporary legal pathways under the Biden administration could also be affected. 'There are a lot of people who are losing status, and this is taking away one of the avenues that they might have had to be able to stay in the U.S.,' Gelatt said. Mukherjee said that, while it remains to be seen how aggressively the Trump administration will use this policy, if it were to be applied aggressively it will be 'a sea change in immigration enforcement and it will dissuade people who should be eligible to adjust to lawful permanent status from doing so.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
San Diego artist turns curbs into stunning street art masterpieces
(FOX 5/KUSI) — 'When most people think about curb painting, they just think of simple numbers,' said Antonio Lopez, 'We want to take it to a different level.' A concrete canvas for the San Diego Curb Doctor. 'My inspiration is typically seeing the Sports teams,' continued Lopez. 'I want to be known as a quality curb painter.' Starting in February 2024, Antonio Lopez began by creating stencils and posting them to social media. Now with more than 5,000 followers, the 27-year-old says business is booming. 'Each category of art is different,' he said. 'We really wanted to focus on something that isn't too saturated yet. Curbs are a big thing; you can always add different kinds of logos, different colors. That's where I take inspiration from.' With prices ranging from $125 to $175, each curb has its own unique design. 'It's different compared to traditional painting on canvas,' continued Lopez. 'I feel like it's not really seen in San Diego yet. You don't see too many curb painters putting out the quality I do.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
November recall election set for Poway councilmember Tony Blain
POWAY (FOX 5/KUSI) — The city if Poway is proceeding with a recall election against embattled District 2 Councilmember Tony Blain. During Tuesday night's meeting, Blain abstained while the rest of council voted to adopt a resolution to accept the 'certification of the San Diego County Registrar of Voters as to the sufficiency of signatures on the recall petition.' On Nov.4, District 2 voters will decide whether Blain should continue serving. 'This is democracy in its rawest form — 2,500 plus people from District 2 order us to have an election and we're going to have an election,' said District 1 Councilmember Christopher Pikus. Former Poway Councilmember John Mullin is at the forefront of the recall push launched in late March and pointed to Blain's actions. San Diego artist turns curbs into stunning street art masterpieces 'It's kind of a laundry list and it goes on and on. He still continues to violate the Brown Act and continues to email the council as a whole,' said Mullin, who is also co-chair of the Committee to Recall Tony Blain. In July, Blain was censured a second time for allegedly bullying and harassing the city manager and city attorney, claims that were verified by an independent investigator. Blain declined an interview with FOX 5/KUSI Tuesday and continued to refute the claims against him. 'This recall is not about wrongdoing. Instead, this recall is about disagreements, about willingness to challenge decisions, to speak up, when I believe something doesn't serve the public and to take a different approach than some have grown used to. That's not misconduct. That's democracy,' said Blain, who represents District 2. Blain was first censured in February after he was accused of attempted vote trading and bribery, threatening recalls against his colleagues, and attempting to use law enforcement to silence critics. 'I hold no personal anger toward my colleagues or political opponents. We simply see things differently,' said Blain. The city is willing to spend up to $305,000 for the special election and directing the San Diego County Registrar of Voters to oversee it. The Poway city attorney said even if Blain resigns, elections code requires the city to hold a special election. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
