Colombias Petro rejects Perus claim to Amazon River island
The South American nations have feuded for decades over the delineation of their border in the Amazon River, where the shifting course complicates demarcation.
Santa Rosa Island lies in the tri-border area between Brazil, Colombia and Peru.
Peru insists it owns the area, calling it an extension of Chineria Island, formed when water levels in the Amazon dropped.
In July, Peru formally created the district of Santa Rosa and sent officials to the area.
But Colombia disputes the claim, with the government branding Peru's presence on the island "irregular occupation," and calling for a binational commission to settle the matter.
"Colombia does not recognize Peru's sovereignty over the so-called Santa Rosa Island and does not recognize the de facto authorities imposed in the area," President Gustavo Petro said Thursday in a speech in the Amazonian city of Leticia, near the disputed island.
Earlier in the week, on social media, he accused Peru of "appropriating" land that belongs to Colombia.
Peru's Prime Minister Eduardo Arana responded from Santa Rosa, where he traveled on Thursday.
"We categorically reject these remarks that deny Peruvian sovereignty," Arana told reporters.
Lima's foreign minister Elmer Schialer said Petro "has no legal, historical or geographical reason (to make those remarks)."
"Santa Rosa Island is not a new islet. It has been part of Peruvian territory, recognized for more than a century," he told the Canal N television channel.
Under a 1922 treaty, the border is set at the deepest point of the river.
But the water flow has plunged alongside an extreme South American drought in recent years, raising concerns in Colombia about access to the world's biggest river by volume.
Lima maintains that Santa Rosa's roughly 3,000 inhabitants have always been Peruvian, a claim Walter Rubio, a 43-year-old fisherman and island resident, was mostly inclined to agree with.
"We practice Peruvian patriotism," he told AFP. "But we want to seek solidarity among the three borders."
The issue is set to be discussed at a bilateral technical meeting on border issues in mid-September, advanced from an initial date in October.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Humari khopdi sanak gayi toh…': Mithun Chakraborty's 'tsunami' warning to Bilawal Bhutto's war threat to India
Actor-turned-Bharatiya Janata Party leader Mithun Chakraborty on Tuesday slammed former Pakistan foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari's fresh warning to India over changes to the Indus Waters Treaty. Former Pakistan foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and actor-BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty. (AFP/PTI) Speaking to reporters in Kolkata, Mithun Chakraborty said, 'Agar aisi baatein karte rahenge aur humari khopdi sanak gayi toh phir ek ke baad ek BrahMos chalega (If such statements continue and we lose our patience, then BrahMos missiles will be launched one after another).' In a remark laced with sarcasm, the BJP leader further said, 'We have also thought of building a dam where 140 crore people will pee. After that, we will open the dam, and a tsunami will occur. I have nothing against the people of Pakistan. I have said all of this for him (Bilawal Bhutto).' His comments came a day after Bilawal Bhutto's warning, delivered at an event organised by the Culture Department of the Sindh government, framed the diversion of the Indus River as an attack on Pakistan's 'history, culture, and civilisation', particularly Sindh. He alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's water project on the Indus amounted to a direct threat to Pakistan's water security, and linked the move to what he claimed was India's defeat in a military clash in May. This was not the first time Bilawal has issued such warnings. In June, he told Pakistan's Parliament that the country would 'go to war' if denied its share of Indus waters. India suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty in April, days after the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. Union home minister Amit Shah has said the accord will never be restored. Earlier, Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir issued a fresh nuclear threat to India, warning that Islamabad could use its atomic arsenal in case of an existential crisis and would destroy Indian infrastructure if New Delhi diverted water flows to Pakistan. The ministry of external affairs, responding to Asim Munir's remarks, said the fresh nuclear threat reinforced doubts about the safety and credibility of Pakistan's nuclear command and control, adding that India 'will not give in to any nuclear blackmail' and will continue to safeguard its national security.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
After 125% tariffs, tit-for-tat moves: Why Trump announced 90-day pause on China duties
In a policy shift, US President Donald Trump on Monday announced a postponement of the planned hike in tariffs on Chinese goods, just hours before the trade truce between Washington and Beijing was set to end. Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Kremlin in Moscow on May 8, 2025 and US President Donald Trump at US Steel - Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, May 30, 2025. (AFP) The White House's halt on steeper tariffs will be in place until November 10. "I have just signed an Executive Order that will extend the Tariff Suspension on China for another 90 days," Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Earlier this year, Washington and Beijing imposed increasingly steep tariffs on each other's goods, pushing them to crippling triple-digit rates and disrupting trade. However, in May, both sides agreed to scale them back temporarily. So, why did Donald Trump change his mind? In the executive order posted Monday to its website, the White House reiterated its position that there are 'large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits' and they 'constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.' The order acknowledged Washington's ongoing discussions with Beijing "to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship" and noted that China has continued to 'take significant steps toward remedying' the US complaints, news agency AFP reported. Here's the timeline on the development of US-China trade war this year: January 21: A day after taking office, Donald Trump threatened 10% penalty on Chinese imports, citing fentanyl flowing from China. February 1: Trump imposed 0% on goods from China along with 25% on Mexico and Canada, demanding they curb the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the US. February 4: In a tit-for-tat move, China responded with a wide range of measures targeting US businesses, including Google, farm equipment makers and the owner of fashion brand Calvin Klein. Beijing also slapped levies of 15% on imports of US coal and LNG and 10% for crude oil and some autos, beginning February 10. It also restricted exports of five metals used in defence, clean energy and other industries. March 3: The US doubled fentanyl-related tariffs on all Chinese imports, increasing levies to 20%, effective March 4. March 4: China hit back with 10-15% retaliatory levies on US agriculture exports, affecting about $21 billion in US exports. Beijing also imposed export and investment curbs on 25 US firms, on grounds of national security and banned imports of genetic sequencers from US medical equipment maker Illumina. April 2: Trump escalated global trade friction with sweeping "liberation day" tariffs, announcing a baseline 10% across all imports and significantly higher duties on some countries. Trump levies 34% on all Chinese goods, took effect on April 9. The Trump administration also decided to end duty-free access for low-value shipments from China and Hong Kong, known as "de minimis" exemptions, from May 2. April 4: China announced retaliatory tariffs of 34% on all US imports from April 10 and export curbs on some rare earths. It imposed restrictions on about 30 US organisations, mostly in defence-related industries. Beijing also suspended sorghum, poultry and bone meal shipments from some US firms. April 8: The US raised tariff on all Chinese imports to 84% from 34%. April 9: China raised its levies on US imports to 84% too, and added 12 US companies to a control list that prohibits exports of dual-use items and another six to its "unreliable entities" list, which allows Beijing to take punitive actions against foreign entities. The US further hiked tariffs on Chinese imports to 125% from 84%. China later on the day issued risk warnings to its citizens against travelling to the US. April 10: China announced it would immediately restrict imports of Hollywood films. April 11: China also raised levies on imports of US goods to 125%, dismissing the Trump tariff strategy as 'a joke' and indicated it will ignore any further US 'numbers game with tariffs'. May 10-12: Beijing and Washington held high-stakes trade talks over the weekend in Geneva. Both sides released a joint statement agreeing to a 90-day pause on their steep tariffs. The temporary truce meant US tariffs on China would fall to 30% from 145%, while China tariffs on the US drop to 10% from 125%. China also committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2. May 28-29: The US said will start "aggressively" revoking visas of Chinese students. It also ordered a broad swathe of companies to stop shipping goods covering semiconductors, design software and aviation equipment to China. June 5: Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump held an hour-long phone call. June 9-10: The US and China held a new round of trade talks in London and reach a framework agreement. July 6: Trump threatened an additional 10% tariff on countries he said were aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of BRICS, which includes China. July 28-29: The US and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce after two days of talks in Stockholm. Both sides described the talks as constructive, but no major breakthroughs were announced. August 8: The US started issuing licenses to Nvidia to export its H20 chips to China. August 11: The US and China extended their tariff truce for another 90 days. (With inputs from agencies)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
After Asim Munir's nuclear rhetoric, Bilawal Bhutto's war threat to India over Indus Waters Treaty
A day after Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir's fresh nuclear threat against India, former Pakistan foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has issued another round of war threats against India on Monday, if New Delhi proceeds with changes to the Indus Waters Treaty. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former foreign minister of Pakistan and current head of the Pakistan People's Party, speaks during an interview with AFP at the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, DC. (AFP) Speaking at an event organised by the Culture Department of the Government of Sindh, Bilawal Bhutto claimed the diversion of the Indus River's water away from Pakistan is as an attack on the history, culture, and civilisation of the country - particularly Sindh. India put in abeyance the 1960 agreement soon after the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack that killed 26 people. Union home minister Amit Shah had earlier announced that India would never restore the historic accord. 'If Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announces an attack on Indus, he attacks our history, our culture and our civilisation,' Bilawal was quoted as saying by The Express Tribune. Bilawal alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement of a water project on the Indus amounted to a warning that Pakistan's water supply could be curtailed. He claimed that during his overseas visits, he had raised the issue to highlight what he called India's aggressive water policy. According to him, this 'water aggression' was a response to India's setback in a military clash earlier this year in May. He added that the people of Sindh have always stepped forward to defend the Indus whenever they felt it was under threat. 'The people of Pakistan have the strength to confront Modi in the event of war,' Bilawal said, warning India that another war might result in Pakistan reclaiming all six of its rivers. The former Pakistani foreign minister's threat comes after Field Marshal Munir reportedly said that Pakistan could use its nuclear weapons to take down India and "half the world" in case his country faced an existential threat in a future war with India. In an address to Pakistani diaspora in Florida's Tampa, the Pakistani Army chief also warned that Islamabad would destroy Indian infrastructure if they hit water flow to Pakistan. "We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we will take half the world down with us," media reports quoted him as saying. "We will wait for India to build a dam, and when they do so, we will destroy it," he added. Munir is currently on a visit to the US, his second in two months. Hitting back, the ministry of external affairs said on Monday that Munir's fresh nuclear threat against India reinforced the well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in that country, where the military is "hand-in-glove" with terrorist groups and New Delhi will not give in to any nuclear blackmail. Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's 'stock-in-trade', the MEA said, adding that India will continue to take all steps necessary to safeguard its national security. In an apparent message to the US, the ministry said it is also regrettable that these remarks were made from the soil of a 'friendly third country'. Bilawal Bhutto's earlier threat In June, Bilawal said his country would go to war if India denies Islamabad its fair share of water under the Indus Waters Treaty. Bilawal's comments came two days after Pakistan's foreign ministry criticised Shah's 'brazen disregard' for international agreements. Bilawal, in a speech in parliament, rejected the Indian decision to suspend the agreement and threatened to get Pakistan's share of water.
