Border agency clears employee after Indian media reports link him with terrorism
While Sundeep "Sunny" Singh Sidhu has been reinstated in his post with the CBSA, his lawyers say the government of Canada should have defended him more vigorously from a foreign government accused of mounting a hostile disinformation campaign in this country.
Sidhu has worked for the CBSA for two decades. He told CBC News he does not wear a turban, is not particularly religious and has no connections to Sikh separatist politics.
Nevertheless, last month Sidhu found his name and image plastered across multiple Indian news outlets citing Indian government sources. The Hindustan Times, which supports the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, described Sidhu as "a member of the banned International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF), accused of promoting terrorist activities in Punjab."
The paper also claimed that Sidhu "allegedly had ties with Pakistan-based Khalistan terrorist Lakhbir Singh Rode and other [Pakistani intelligence] operatives, reportedly playing a role in the 2020 assassination of Balwinder Singh Sandhu."
Many of the Indian media reports cite the country's National Investigation Agency as the source for their allegations against Sidhu.
"It's almost laughable," said Sidhu. "It's like the alphabet soup of criminal organizations. I have zero links to any of these organizations. I've never supported these organizations. I don't know any members in these organizations."
On October 1, 2023, a co-worker told Sidhu that he had been named in a YouTube video posted by a former Indian army major named Gaurav Arya.
Arya is a pro-Modi influencer who appears to be close to India's intelligence community.
WATCH: Arrests made after violent clashes outside Hindu temple, Sikh gurdwara
Arrests follow violent clashes outside Hindu temple, Sikh gurdwara
8 days ago
Duration 2:03
In a video purporting to list India's enemies and fugitives living abroad, Arya identified Sidhu as a wanted terrorist involved in Sikh separatist militancy and shared his home address. The video remained on YouTube for several months but has since been removed.
"I reported these allegations to my employer," Sidhu told CBC News.
CBSA reassigned Sidhu away from his frontline job and launched an investigation. He said the agency brought in the Canadian Security Intelligence Agency to conduct two days of polygraph tests.
"I have been through a year-long investigation where they've talked to my family, they've talked to my coworkers, they've gone through my financial statements, they've gone through my bank statements, my telephone records," Sidhu said.
'Go and kill him'
Last month, almost a year after that initial video, Sidhu became the focus of news stories in Indian newspapers and television. He was the target of an avalanche of threats on social media.
One posting on X showed a satellite photo of a neighborhood with Sidhu's home address marked on it and the caption, "Go and kill him."
Sidhu had every reason to take the threats seriously. The claims being made against him online were similar to claims Indian government officials had made about the late Hardeep Singh Nijjar before his killing.
Nijjar, a Sikh-Canadian activist, was brazenly shot dead outside a Sikh temple in Surrey, B.C. on June 18, 2023. More than a year ago, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly accused the Modi government of involvement in Nijjar's death.
Last month, the head of the RCMP publicly accused agents of the Indian government of playing a role in "widespread violence" in Canada, including homicides.
An Indian man living in Winnipeg, Sukhdool Singh, was named in one of Arya's videos and then shot dead the following day. Arya subsequently posted on X about the death.
Arya continues to take a strong interest in Canadian affairs. His videos harshly criticize Trudeau and promote Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre as a superior leader who can restore relations with India.
'An orchestrated campaign'
Sidhu said he had no idea who Arya was before he saw the video.
Sidhu said he was born and raised in Prince Rupert, B.C., hasn't been to India since a wedding in 2018 and knows nothing about the 2020 murder to which Indian media reports have linked him.
Sidhu's lawyer Jeffrey Kroeker, of Massey LLP in Toronto, said his client has been checked out thoroughly by his employer.
"They've spoken to his colleagues, his family, gone through his records, tracked his travel, his banking, polygraph-tested him," he said.
"What we would like everyone to know is that there is an orchestrated campaign by a foreign entity that has nefarious purposes. They've accused him of something that is just patently not true."
Last month, CBSA told its employees it had found nothing to back up the claims and reinstated Sidhu.
"The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) has no evidence to support the allegations made in the articles against our employee Mr. Sidhu," CBSA spokesperson Luke Reimer told CBC News.
'False allegations' spread through internal mail
"The government needs to respond to allegations and they need to take these things seriously," said Kroeker. "But ... when the allegations are totally baseless and pulled out of thin air, there needs to be a full-throated response to clear the person and make sure that their reputation is upheld."
When asked whether the government has taken those steps, Kroeker replied, "They have a lot more work to do."
Sidhu's lawyers say one of the frustrating aspects of CBSA's investigation is that the agency's media monitoring service automatically picked up news stories from Indian media labelling Sidhu a terrorist, and shared them with his colleagues in automated emails.
"False allegations were further amplified within the department," said Kroeker.
India criticizes Canada for linking minister Amit Shah to plots targeting Sikhs
10 days ago
Duration 2:15
Reimer told CBC News that "daily media coverage summaries prepared for the CBSA are based on pre-determined keywords."
"Dissemination of these summaries and unedited articles, regardless of tone or accuracy, does not imply endorsement of the content of these articles," he added.
Kroeker said he believes the allegations against his client fit into an Indian government narrative that presents Canada as a safe haven for extremists, and the Trudeau government as complicit.
In the wake of the recent expulsions of Indian diplomats, the Modi government and pro-Modi Indian media have doubled down on portraying Canada as a lawless land where Khalistani terrorism and Punjabi gangsterism enjoy free rein.
'Canary in the coal mine'
India's Times Now television news reported last month that "it is of course no secret that under the unpopular and embattled Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Canada has become a safe haven."
"Not only are the Khalistanis given a free run and platform, they're also employed by the Canadian government! Can you believe that? Not only are they being shielded, dreaded terrorists are being employed by the Canadian government!"
Kroeker said Sidhu is "the canary in the coal mine" for a new kind of foreign interference that "is pervasive and is getting worse."
"And now what's going to start happening more and more is that governments around the world will try to undermine the credibility of loyal civil servants," he said.
Kroeker said Canada needs to be quicker to defend its public servants from such attacks. Sidhu said he has no doubt that he was targeted because of his job.
"If I was Sunny the blueberry farmer, we wouldn't be sitting here," he said.
Sidhu said his family faced considerable hardship as a result of Arya's allegations, and received no protection despite credible threats.
Although he's now been cleared by CBSA, he said he believes he's still in danger.
"I sometimes go to my car and I turn it on and I'm like, 'Oh my God,' fingers crossed," he said.
Sidhu said he's been told not to pick up his daughter at school for safety reasons.
"I've had to relocate my family to different houses," he said, adding the ordeal has cost him tens of thousands of dollars.
"I'm a proud public servant. I love going to work every day. It's a huge part of my identity. I've been doing it for 20 years.
"I want to continue protecting our country. What I want from my country is to protect me at this point."
Dick Fadden, former director of CSIS, told CBC News that any agency involved in national security would have to investigate any serious allegation against an employee coming from a foreign government.
"I think in this case they were not only entitled, they were duty bound to have an administrative inquiry," he said.
"It's not so much the what, it's the how. You have to make a judgment in every case. How serious is it? How much detail are you going to seek? Are you going to put the person on administrative leave or not?"
Fadden said India has a long history of making allegations without providing evidence.
"As a matter of principle, he's a Crown servant. He is being subjected to all of this because he's a Crown servant, largely, I think," he said. "So there is a duty of care and concern.
"And I can't see any reasons why, with the vast resources of the Government of Canada, they couldn't have put him in a better position than he appears to have been in."
Fadden, the first director of CSIS to go public about foreign interference in Canadian politics, told CBC News that "the scope of activities that we would put under foreign interference continues to broaden" and could include false allegations intended to sow suspicion and discord.
"And if it is discovered that this is the case, I think the Government of Canada has an active obligation to protect its employees, much like somebody in the private sector would," he said.
Hashtags
- Politics#Indian,Sikh,YouTube,Hindu,Canadian,Pakistan-based,Khalistan,Pakistani,pro-Modi,Sidhu,Arya,Sundeep"Sunny"SinghSidhu,NarendraModi,LakhbirSinghRode,BalwinderSinghSandhu,GauravArya,CBSA,CBCNews,CanadaBorderServicesAgency,TheHindustanTimes,InternationalSikhYouthFederation,ISYF,NationalInvestigationAgency,CanadianSecurityIntelligenceAgency
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation from the rampart of the 17th century Mughal-era Red Fort monument during the country's Independence Day celebrations in New Delhi, India, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Manish Swarup) MS flag wire: true flag sponsored: false article_type: : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false :
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks
NEW DELHI (AP) — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan that India will punish its neighbor if there are future attacks on India as he marked 78 years of independence from British colonial rule. Modi's remarks Friday come three months after nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan engaged in four days of intense fighting, their worst clash in decades. Modi addressed the country from New Delhi's 17th-century, Mughal-era Red Fort, saying India has established a 'new normal' that does not differentiate between 'terrorists' and those who support terrorism. He said he would not tolerate what he called Islamabad's 'nuclear blackmail.' 'India has decided that it will not tolerate nuclear threats. For a long time, nuclear blackmail had been going on but this blackmail will not be tolerated now,' Modi said. Pakistan previously has rejected India's statements about nuclear blackmail as provocative and inflammatory. India celebrates its Independence Day one day after Pakistan. The two states came into existence as a result of the bloody partition of British India in 1947. The process sparked some of the worst communal violence the world has seen and left hundreds of thousands dead. It triggered one of the largest human migrations in history and some 12 million people fled their homes. India and Pakistan exchanged tit-for-tat military strikes in May that brought them to the brink of a war. The fighting between the two countries was sparked by an April massacre by gunmen in Indian-controlled Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists. India blamed the attack on Pakistan-backed militants. Islamabad denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Days after the massacre, India launched strikes on Pakistan and said it had hit nine 'terrorist infrastructure' sites. 'Terror infrastructure was turned to rubble,' Modi said in his speech Friday. Pakistan responded by sending waves of drones into India, as well as missile and artillery bombardments. Dozens of people were killed on both sides until a ceasefire was reached May 10 after U.S. mediation. Pakistan immediately claimed it shot down six Indian aircraft during the clashes, including a French-made Rafale fighter. India acknowledged some losses but did not provide details. Last week, India's air force chief said India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during clashes in the first such public claim by India. Pakistan rejected it, saying both sides should open their aircraft inventories to independent verification. During his Friday speech, Modi also hinted India would continue its unilateral suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. The treaty, which India suspended after the April massacre, allows sharing of the Indus River that runs about 2,897 kilometers (1,800 miles) through South Asia and is a lifeline for both countries. 'Rivers from India were irrigating the lands of enemies while my country's farmers and land faced a deficiency of water,' Modi said. 'India has now decided that blood and water will not flow together.' Pakistan has said any effort by India to stop or divert the water from flowing into Pakistan would be considered an 'act of war.' Modi did not directly mention U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on India in his Independence Day speech but said he would not compromise on the agriculture sector, one of the main sticking points in trade negotiations with the U.S. Earlier this month, Trump imposed a 25% penalty on India in addition to 25% tariffs for buying oil and weapons from Russia. India has resisted U.S. pressure to open its markets to some farm products as Modi's government is unwilling to risk angering farmers, who are a powerful voting bloc. 'India will not compromise on interest of farmers,' Modi said.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Afghanistan is starting its fifth year of Taliban rule. Here are 5 things to know
The Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 2021 for the second time. Since then, the former insurgents have consolidated their grip on power, excluded women and girls from public life, stamped out internal dissent and external challengers, and gained debut recognition as the country's official government from Russia, a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council. The Taliban govern through decrees, but Afghans have aspirations and needs that cannot be fulfilled through edicts and ideology. Climate change, an increasing population, and severe cuts to foreign aid will test the Taliban's ability to lead and not just rule. Here are five things to know about the Taliban as they start their fifth year in power: The supreme leader has cemented his legacy Kandahar-based Hibatullah Akhundzada has led the Taliban from insurgency to authority since his appointment in 2016. But transition and status are peripheral to what he has wanted for the past 20 years: establishing an Islamic system. Central to this vision was his ratification last year of the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Law, which codifies many aspects of Afghan life, including who people can befriend. In June, Akhundzada said the Taliban had fought and sacrificed themselves for the implementation of Islamic law. It was obligatory to follow the leadership's commands and directives, he added, and everyone was required to act within the bounds of this obedience. His supporters emphasize his superior religious authority to issue decrees. The higher education minister went one step further in April, equating criticism of Akhundzada with blasphemy and saying obedience to him was a divine order. 'He (the leader) decides what moves and what doesn't move, what happens and what doesn't,' said Ibraheem Bahiss, a senior analyst with Crisis Group's Asia program. The Taliban's internal differences are buried deep There were pockets within the Taliban that initially advocated lifting bans on women and girls, or at least modifying them, to allow greater global and financial engagement. Akhundzada and his circle withstood such pressure, however, and the Taliban government has emerged from its isolation to develop diplomatic ties and raise several billion dollars every year in tax revenues to keep the lights on. Power brokers, like Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani, have been weakened. Since November, Akhundzada has had direct control over Afghanistan's weapons and military equipment, sidelining the Interior Ministry and the Defense Ministry, which is run by Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob, whose father founded the Taliban. Haqqani, whose uncle was killed in a high-profile suicide attack last December, used to take swipes at the leadership. Not anymore. Haqqani, who heads a powerful network of his own, cannot start a fight with the Kandahar faction and win. Political deputy Sher Abbas Stanikzai rebuked Akhundzada in January, stating the education bans had no basis in Islamic law, or Sharia. He left Afghanistan shortly afterwards and remains outside the country. He denies reports that he fled or faced arrest had he stayed. Akhundzada has put Islamic law at the heart of his leadership, while also putting his leadership at the heart of its implementation. 'He's made himself indispensable, and the entire movement is beholden to him,' Bahiss said. There's no sign of change for Afghan women and girls Russia's recognition of the Taliban sends a 'deeply troubling' message, said Zahra Nader, the editor-in-chief of the Afghan women-led newsroom Zan Times. 'It tells the Taliban they can continue to suppress women's rights and commit systematic human rights violations without facing consequences. They are being rewarded for it. This move is a slap in the face to Afghan women.' There is opposition to the Taliban's policies, but people are fearful because no powerful alternative exists, she said. The Taliban 'took the country by force and maintained control' through violence. Women took to Afghanistan's streets in protest after the takeover, but these were met with retaliation. 'The absence of visible protest should not be mistaken for acceptance,' said Nader. 'It reflects the extreme risks people face for dissent. The resistance is still there, quiet, private, and simmering, but public expression has been crushed through fear and force.' The Taliban insist that women's rights are protected. Nader says that, although there is 'little faith' that the country's rulers will change their policies, women are preparing themselves 'emotionally and intellectually' for a future beyond the Taliban. 'That hope, that this brutality will not last forever, is what keeps many of them going. These women do not believe the regime will change its stance on women's rights.' Regional ties are transactional It's not trust or shared values that define the Taliban's relationships. Afghanistan borders six countries, many of which are trade partners and also balk at being lectured by the West on rights and freedoms. Landlocked Afghanistan is sandwiched between the Middle East, Central Asia, and South Asia, making it strategically located for energy-rich and energy-hungry nations. The Taliban's bilateral relations proceed on common ground: borders, water, transit, and security. Anti-migrant rhetoric, especially in Europe, could increase diplomatic engagement as political parties in the West seek to placate their supporters. The UK-based International Institute for Strategic Studies said the Taliban's broader diplomatic interactions were eroding the 'non-recognition' approach of the West and ushering in 'creeping normalization.' The Taliban feel comfortable in the region and have found an acceptable way of operating, while the region has adjusted to their presence. 'What we've seen in the last four years is not real pressure (on the Taliban), but rather normalization and appeasement,' Nader said. 'For those of us watching from inside and outside Afghanistan, this is not just political, it's personal. It's painful. It confirms our fear that the suffering of Afghan women is being sidelined in favor of political interests.' The real test for the Taliban is yet to come Until April, the U.S. was the largest donor to Afghanistan, where more than half of the population relies on aid to survive. But it terminated this emergency assistance due to concerns that the Taliban were benefiting from such aid. Thousands of Afghans, including women, will lose their jobs as nongovernmental organizations and agencies scale back their work or shut down. The loss of jobs, contracts, and the shrinking humanitarian footprint also equate to a loss in revenue for the Taliban. One U.N. agency said there were 'reputational and staff security risks' where humanitarian agencies were forced to suspend operations due to reduced funding, causing grievances among communities, or after partners couldn't pay suppliers or complete contracts. Aid officials warn that frustration and an increase in tensions will trigger spontaneous violence as people compete for resources and services. The cuts coincide with the mass expulsions of Afghans from neighboring countries, swelling the population and the ranks of the unemployed while also halting the flow of inward remittances. The World Health Organization estimates the population will increase by 85% to 76.88 million by 2050. Afghanistan needs to give people food, shelter, and economic opportunities. Thomas Ruttig, from the Afghanistan Analysts Network, recalled meeting a leading Taliban figure in a 'completely rundown' office during the late 1990s. The Taliban fighter told him they could live under those circumstances, but foreigners couldn't. 'What they also say is that Afghans can live under those circumstances, which, to an extent, is true,' said Ruttig. 'They were forced to live under those circumstances and have learned how to cope.' Now their means of coping — houses, land, and some savings — are gone. The Taliban took it for granted that they won the war with the help of Allah and the population, he explained. He added that, although the Taliban were a reflection of Afghans' ambitions, they needed to open up and listen to people's concerns. 'But they know the more they open up, the more they are questioned, and their rule might be undermined.' The Taliban needed to think about whether they wanted to govern the country simply to rule it, said Ruttig. 'Or do we want to rule this country to make Afghanistan a better place to live? That's probably the big question in front of them.'
