
The Observer view on SUVs: they are too dangerous and too big, their drivers should be made to pay
The consequences of this uncontrolled vehicular expansion have become profound. Potholes are being created in greater numbers as our roads are pounded by heavier vehicles; multiple parking spaces are being taken over by single, giant cars; and road accidents are now producing more severe injuries to drivers and passengers of other vehicles. This last issue is of particular concern.
A study by the European Transport Safety Council found that in a collision between a modest-size SUV (sports utility vehicle) weighing 1,600kg and a lighter car weighing 1,300kg, the risk of fatal injury decreases by 50% for the occupants of the heavier car but increases by almost 80% for the occupants of the lighter car. Similarly, pedestrians and cyclists are more likely to be killed if the car that strikes them has a bonnet that is higher off the road than average, a typical feature of an SUV.
The trouble is that sales of these vehicles are booming. In 2024, they accounted for 33% of all registrations, compared with a figure of only 12% a decade earlier. This dramatic change in the use of our roads has led organisations such as the campaign group Clean Cities to call for strict measures to be imposed on car owners. Their argument is straightforward. If a car generates more potholes in our roads, takes up more parking space and poses more danger to pedestrians, cyclists and other car occupants compared with smaller vehicles, then it is only fair that its owner pays more for driving that vehicle.
Paris has already introduced specific parking charges for SUVs. Drivers of these vehicles now have to pay triple the amount of those who drive regular cars. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has indicated that he would support such a scheme for the capital and should be encouraged to pursue the idea with rigour. However, attempts to tackle the problem should not be confined merely to parking. At present, the owners of polluting vehicles have to pay more road tax, based on the carbon dioxide they emit, and drivers of more expensive cars, including electric ones, are also hit with an extra tax.
It may be that these measures will have to be expanded in future, with similar levies being imposed on the owners of SUVs and other vehicles whose sizes exceed specific dimensions.
Sign up to Observed
Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers
after newsletter promotion
Avoiding such measures could allow a transport problem that has already reached significant levels to become a major crisis. It is an issue that now needs to be considered as a matter of urgency.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
3 days ago
- Times
Sadiq Khan breaks manifesto pledge as Met cuts police counters
Sir Sadiq Khan's manifesto commitment last year couldn't have been clearer: 'I'll continue to ensure the Met is able to effectively respond to the public, including maintaining a 24-hour police front office counter in every borough.' A year later, the mayor of London's commitment is set to be broken, and in dramatic fashion. This week the Metropolitan Police announced 18 counter closures that will leave a dozen of the capital's 32 boroughs without a place to report a crime in person. Among those to be shuttered will be counters in Tower Hamlets, Kensington and Chelsea, and Richmond, as well as Camden — despite that borough having the second highest crime rate in the capital. Khan is London's police and crime commissioner and retains overall responsibility for the policing of the capital's streets, and it has been reported he was aware of the Met's decision to shut the counters. The Met has said that even the busiest counter in the capital, in Charing Cross, averaged fewer than one reported crime an hour and that the move would save the financially stretched force £7 million a year and 3,752 hours of police time. The Met's budget for this year requires about £260 million of savings. Sir Mark Rowley, the Met commissioner, said that the cuts would force it to 'pick and choose' which crimes they would investigate. Both Rowley and Khan have criticised what they see as underfunding of the Met by central government, and the mayor has directly criticised the money allocated to the force in this summer's spending review. Kaya Comer-Schwartz, Khan's deputy mayor for policing and crime, said on Thursday: 'Nothing is more important to the mayor and I than keeping Londoners safe and we are determined to continue doing all we can to support Sir Mark Rowley deliver a new Met for London, putting neighbourhood policing at the heart of communities.' 'The proposed changes to police counters are an operational decision for the Met — based on resources, funding and public demand for services.' She added: 'After over a decade of cuts worth over a billion under the previous government, the Met is facing an extremely difficult financial situation. The mayor and I are working closely with the Met to boost visible neighbourhood policing in our communities and are having ongoing discussions with ministers and the commissioner about the funding the Met needs to ensure we can continue building a safer London for everyone.' Already only one in 20 muggings in London were solved last year, according to a recent report from the think tank Policy Exchange. The Times reported at the start of this year that violent robberies and knifepoint thefts of smartphones have risen by nearly 50 per cent since the pandemic. In 2012 about 12 per cent of crime was reported into station offices, though that has fallen to 5 per cent last year. A Labour source said there was a lot of anger in party circles 'at the way the Met has mishandled' the announcement of station closures. 'There should have been proper consultation and liaison with local communities,' they added. The Met's announcement said that the closures, which are badged as 'high-level proposals' will be formalised after 'detailed design work and engagement'. Those picked for closure have been chosen on the basis of front counter demand, accessibility and geographic spread, as well as 'operational alignment to custody suites and investigative teams'.


ITV News
6 days ago
- ITV News
London police station front counters at risk of closure as part of cost-cutting
Londoners will have access to 18 fewer police stations under radical closure plans revealed today. The move by the Metropolitan Police breaks a pledge made by Mayor Sadiq Khan to have one accessible 24 hours a day in each of the capital's 32 boroughs. The Metropolitan Police published a proposal overnight to cut the number of front counters from 37 to 20 as part of cost-cutting reorganisation. Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said the Met faced a "£260m black hole" in its budget but conceded the closures would save just £7m. Speaking in front of London Assembly members at an extraordinary additional meeting to urgently discuss the proposals, he said: "This essentially comes down to us having to choose between keeping officers on London streets where they can respond to the public and local communities, or, in the case that we are discussing today, retaining the current position on all front counters. "They may be a symbolic point of access but are largely under utilised, especially overnight. "Front counter usage has been in steady decline since 2012, when 12% of all of our reported crime came in via station offices. "Since then, crime reporting across front counters has reduced to 5% as people have shifted to use of phones and online means. " Mr Twist said London's quietest police station, Wimbledon, saw an average of just 2.5 crimes a day reported to staff at the front counter. London's busiest police station, Charing Cross, in the West End - sees 15 crimes a day reported. The Met said just 5 per cent of crimes were reported using front counters last year. The police counters to close are: Kentish Town in Camden, Tottenham in Haringey, Edmonton in Enfield, Harrow, Bethnal Green in Tower Hamlets, Dagenham, Chingford in Waltham Forest, Kensington, Hammersmith, Twickenham in Richmond, Lavender Hill in Wandswort h, Wimbledon in Merton, Hayes in Hillingdon, and Plumstead in Greenwich. A further four to close which are currently reduced front counters are Barking Learning Centre, Church Street in Westminster, Royalty Studios in Kensington and Chelsea and Mitcham in Merton. Shadow justice secretary Chris Philp posted on X, formerly Twitter: 'The police will now be less accessible and Londoners even less safe.' Speaking at the meeting, the deputy Mayor of Police and Crime, Kaya Comer-Schwartz said: "Nothing is more important to me and the Mayor than keeping Londoners safe." "Despite the Mayor pulling every lever at his disposal to support the Met, it's also true that after a decade of underfunding, the Met is facing an extremely difficult financial headwind. "Delivering a balanced budget has therefore meant some difficult decisions which the Commissioner has been very clear about. One of these tough choices the Commissioner has been looking at is the Met's front counters. "Throughout conversations with the Met, the Mayor has been clear on the importance of neighbourhood policing, response, public protection and agreed with the Commissioner that these must be protected." Deputy leader for the City Hall Conservatives, Emma Best, said front counters provide a space for people to go to for updates on missing people, lost and found, mental health concerns, or complaints. Ms Best, who's a leader of Waltham Forest Conservatives, said the Met are now asking elderly people in her area to travel over an hour to get to the next nearest station, and haven't considered those you do use front counters.


BBC News
6 days ago
- BBC News
Closing Metropolitan Police counters is 'difficult' choice
Almost half of police station front counters across London will be closed in a bid to save money, the Metropolitan Police Service has force plans to reduce the number of front counters where the public can speak to officers from 38 to 20, and cut the number of them open 24 hours a day from 32 to Police Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist told the London Assembly on Wednesday that the closures would save £7m a year but were "difficult choices".The proposals, which could begin by the end of the year, form part of the force's plan to make £260m worth of savings by reducing services and about 1,700 officer and staff roles. The plan would break a pledge from both the mayor and The Met to have a counter staffed 24/7 in each of the capital's 32 boroughs. The Met first began closing its front counters in 2013 - when London had nearly 140 of them. Then mayor Boris Johnson closed 65 of them - and in 2017 current mayor Sir Sadiq Khan closed a further 38. These closures left nearly all boroughs with only one counter open 24 hours a home secretary Chris Philp said Londoners would be less safe as a result of the changes. Mr Twist told the London Assembly that the force only realised how bad its finances were late last year."With a £260m black hole in our budget, it's inevitable that some of the choices we're having to make will change the way we police London and will be unpopular with some people," he said."We need to make difficult choices and prioritise," he said."This essentially comes down to us having to choose between keeping officers on London's streets, where they can respond to the public, or retaining the current position on all front counters, which may be a symbolic point of access but are largely underutilised, especially overnight." 'In decline' Mr Twist said front counter usage had been in decline since 2012, when 12% of all reported crime came in via station approximately 5% of crime is reporting on front counters, he said that while the Metropolitan Police force was reducing in size, it was being re-shaped to place more policing presence on London's streets. "These decisions are about making The Met more accessible and visible in neighbourhoods when the organisation is shrinking," he said. The Met said that under its current the proposal, the counters that would close were:Barking Learning Centre, Barking and DagenhamBethnal Green, Tower HamletsChingford, Waltham ForestChurch Street, WestminsterDagenham, Barking and DagenhamEdmonton, EnfieldHammersmith, Hammersmith and FulhamHarrowHayes, HillingdonKentish Town, CamdenKensington, Kensington and ChelseaLavender Hill, WandsworthMitcham, MertonPlumstead, GreenwichRoyalty Studios, Kensington and ChelseaTottenham, HaringeyTwickenham, RichmondWimbledon, MertonIt also proposed to re-open the front counter in Wood Green, Haringey, to replace the Edmonton closure.