logo
89 seconds to midnight: Understanding the threats nuclear weapons pose

89 seconds to midnight: Understanding the threats nuclear weapons pose

IOL News23-06-2025
Nuclear weapons explained: History, power, nations involved, and war risk.
Image: Pixabay
It is 89 seconds to midnight. This is according to the Doomsday Clock, a symbolic clock maintained by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
The clock represents how close humanity is to global catastrophe, 'midnight' symbolises apocalypse, usually nuclear war, climate disaster, or other existential threats.
With the US getting involved by bombing Iran, alarms are going off over the possibility of a larger conflict with nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons remain the most destructive armaments ever created, capable of annihilating cities in seconds and threatening the survival of humanity.
Developed in the 20th century, their design, spread, and potential for use continue to dominate global security discussions.
How a nuclear bomb works
A nuclear bomb releases massive energy through either nuclear fission or a combination of fission and nuclear fusion. In fission bombs, heavy atoms such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239 are split into smaller atoms, releasing energy and neutrons that trigger a chain reaction. In thermonuclear or hydrogen bombs, fusion reactions, where light atoms such as hydrogen isotopes combine produce far greater explosive power.
These reactions release energy in the form of intense heat, shockwaves, radiation, and electromagnetic pulses.
The result is catastrophic: a single nuclear bomb can flatten a city, incinerate thousands instantly, and leave long-term radiation effects.
Who created the first nuclear weapon?
The first nuclear bomb was developed during the Second World War under the Manhattan Project, a top-secret programme led by the United States with support from the United Kingdom and Canada.
The scientific team was headed by physicist Julius Robert Oppenheimer, and the first successful test, codenamed Trinity, occurred on July 16, 1945, in New Mexico.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Countries with nuclear weapons
As of 2025, nine countries officially possess nuclear weapons:
Russia - approximately 5,889 warheads (the front part of a bomb or missile that contains explosives).
US - around 5,244 warheads
China - 500 warheads
France - around 290 warheads
The United Kingdom - an estimated 225 warheads; all deployed on submarines.
Pakistan - around 170 warheads
India - 170 warheads
Israel is widely believed to possess around 90 nuclear weapons, although it has never officially confirmed this, maintaining a policy of ambiguity.
North Korea is estimated to have produced between 40 and 50 warheads and continues to conduct missile tests and develop its programme in defiance of international sanctions.
Power and impact
The explosive power of nuclear bombs is measured in kilotons or megatons of TNT. For comparison:
The bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had a yield of about 15 kilotons.
Modern thermonuclear weapons can exceed 1,000 kilotons (1 megaton), making them dozens to hundreds of times more powerful.
The human, environmental, and geopolitical impacts of even a single modern nuclear detonation are almost incalculable.
Use of nuclear weapons in war:
Nuclear weapons have only been used twice in conflict, both by the US against Japan in August 1945. On August 6, a uranium bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, killing approximately 140,000 people by the end of the year.
Three days later, on August 9, a plutonium bomb devastated Nagasaki, resulting in around 70,000 additional deaths. Many victims died from burns, radiation sickness, and injuries, while survivors have lived with long-term health consequences and trauma.
Probability of nuclear war
The risk of nuclear war remains low but not negligible. Tensions between nuclear-armed states such as those involving Russia and NATO, China and the US, or India and Pakistan pose serious concerns.
Accidental launches, miscalculations, or the breakdown of communication systems could spark unintended escalation.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists currently places the Doomsday Clock the closest it has ever been to 'midnight'. This symbolic measure reflects the heightened risk of nuclear conflict, especially amid rising geopolitical instability, modernisation of arsenals, and arms control breakdowns.
IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets
Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

(Bloomberg) — Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden wrote a letter to Cantor Fitzgerald LP Chairman Brandon Lutnick raising questions about possible conflicts of interest and insider trading in bets the firm reportedly made on the legality of Trump administration tariffs. Lutnick is the son of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key figure in the Trump administration's tariff policies. The letter, dated Wednesday, was released by the senators on Thursday morning. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The firm's alleged bets on the legality of the tariffs were reported by Wired in July. 'What is being reported about our business is absolutely false. Cantor is not in the business of positioning any risk, taking views or facilitating business in litigation claims involving the legality of US tariffs,' Cantor Fitzgerald spokesperson Erica Chase said in a statement. —With assistance from Todd Gillespie. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Appeals court agrees NFL can be put on trial over claims Black coaches face discrimination.
Appeals court agrees NFL can be put on trial over claims Black coaches face discrimination.

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Appeals court agrees NFL can be put on trial over claims Black coaches face discrimination.

NEW YORK (AP) — The NFL can be put on trial over civil claims that Brian Flores and other Black coaches face discrimination, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, finding insurmountable flaws with a league arbitration process that would permit Commissioner Roger Goodell to serve as arbitrator. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld Judge Valerie Caproni's ruling that Flores can proceed with claims against the league and three teams: the Denver Broncos, the New York Giants and the Houston Texans. In a written decision, the appeals court said the NFL arbitration rules violate the Federal Arbitration Act to explain why Flores and other coaches should be permitted to take their claims to trial rather than be forced into arbitration. The 2nd Circuit said the NFL constitution's arbitration provision 'contractually provides for no independent arbitral forum, no bilateral dispute resolution, and no procedure.' 'Instead, it offends basic presumptions of our arbitration jurisprudence' by forcing claims to be decided by the NFL's 'principal executive officer,' the appeals court said. Messages for comment were sent to lawyers for the league and coaches who sued. In February 2022, Flores sued the league and several teams, saying the league was 'rife with racism,' particularly in its hiring and promotion of Black coaches. Other coaches later joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs. After filing his lawsuit, Flores said he believed he was risking the coaching career he loves by suing the NFL, but he said it was worth it for generations to come if he could succeed in challenging systemic racism in the league. Flores is currently the defense coordinator for the Minnesota Vikings. Caproni said in a March 2023 decision that descriptions by the coaches of their experiences of racial discrimination in a league with a 'long history of systematic discrimination toward Black players, coaches, and managers — are incredibly troubling.' 'Although the clear majority of professional football players are Black, only a tiny percentage of coaches are Black,' she said.

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows
Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows

Subjects, schools and gender – what the latest A-level data shows Business studies and physics are booming, while entries for French and German have sunk to a record low, this year's A-level results show. There is also evidence that the gap in performance between private and state schools is narrowing, but there remains a sharp gender imbalance among key subjects. Here the PA news agency takes a look at some of the long-term trends in the latest exam data. – Most popular subjects: What's up and what's down? While there was no change this year in the top choices for A-levels, with maths, psychology, biology and chemistry once again occupying the first four spots, there were big changes further down the chart. Business studies appears in the top five for the first time, up from sixth place in 2024. The subject has gained steadily in popularity in recent years, rising from 13th in the rankings in 2015 to 10th in 2020, eighth in 2022, then climbing one place in each successive year. Last year's fifth most popular subject, history, has dropped to seventh place, while physics has leaped from ninth to sixth. It is the first time since at least 2000 – the earliest available archive data – that no arts or humanities subjects have appeared in the top five. As in previous years, the top subject choices vary by gender. For boys, the most popular A-levels this year were maths, physics, economics, chemistry and business studies; for girls, it was psychology, biology, maths, chemistry and sociology. – French resumes its decline The number of French A-level entries has resumed its long-term decline, more than reversing last year's unexpected rise and suggesting the long-term future of the subject is grim. There were 6,858 entries in 2025, down from 7,544 in 2024 and the lowest figure since current data began. Entries have fallen 34% in the past 10 years and 53% in the last two decades. German has also resumed its descent after a small increase in 2024, with just 2,224 entries this year, down year on year from 2,431 and another new low. Entries for German have dropped 45% in the past decade and 62% since 2005. The one piece of positive news for the 'big three' foreign languages is a slight rise in entries for Spanish, with 8,325 in 2025, up from 8,238 in 2024, though below the recent peak of 9,139 in 2021. Among the smaller modern languages, the most popular were Chinese (1,624 entries, down from 1,643 in 2024) and Russian (1,118, up from 1,044). – State v private gap narrows The gap between the proportion of A-level entries at private schools receiving top grades and those at state schools has narrowed slightly. Some 48.5% of entries at independent schools – including city training colleges – were awarded A or A* this year, compared with 25.4% of entries at state-funded schools – a gap of 23.1 percentage points. This is down from 23.9 points last year, when the figures were 48.6% for independent schools and 24.7% for state schools. But it is larger than in the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when the gap stood at 21.3 points (43.9% for independent schools, 22.6% for state schools). During the pandemic the gap widened considerably, peaking at 30.0 points in 2021. – Gender imbalance persists Computing recorded the biggest gender imbalance towards males for the sixth year in a row, with boys making up 81% of entries and girls 19% – a slight narrowing on last year, when the figures were 83% and 17%. Physics (76% boys, 24% girls), accounting (73% and 27%) and further maths (also 73% and 27%) were the other subjects skewed most heavily towards males. The biggest imbalance towards females was in the subject of health and social care, as has been the case each year since 2021. In the double award for this subject, girls made up 96% of entries and boys just 4%, while in the single award the figures were 89% and 11%. Performing/expressive arts (92% girls, 8% boys) and English literature (80% girls, 20% boys) were other subjects with predominantly female entries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store