Unfinished deepsea observatory spots highest-energy neutrino ever
A neutrino with 30 times more energy than any previously seen on Earth was detected by an unfinished observatory at the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea after travelling from beyond this galaxy, scientists said Wednesday.
Neutrinos are the second most abundant particle in the universe. Known as ghost particles, they have no electric charge, almost no mass and effortlessly pass through most matter -- such as our world or bodies -- without anyone noticing.
The most violently explosive events in the universe -- such as a star going supernova, two neutron stars smashing into each other or the almighty suck of supermassive black holes -- create what is called ultra-high-energy neutrinos.
Because these particles interact so little with matter, they glide easily away from the violence that created them, travelling in a straight line across the universe.
When they finally arrive at Earth, neutrinos serve as "special cosmic messengers" offering a glimpse into the far reaches of the cosmos that is otherwise hidden from our view, Italian researcher Rosa Coniglione said in a statement.
However, these ghost particles are extremely difficult to detect. One way is by using water.
When light passes through water, it slows down. This sometimes allows quick-moving particles to overtake light -- while still not going faster than the speed of light.
When this happens, it creates a bluish glow called "Cherenkov light" that can be detected by extraordinarily sensitive sensors.
But to observe this light requires a huge amount of water -- at least one cubic kilometre, the equivalent of 400,000 Olympic swimming pools.
That is why the Cubic Kilometre Neutrino Telescope, or KM3NeT, lies at the bottom of the Mediterranean.
- Think of a ping pong ball -
The European-led facility is still under construction, and spread over two sites. Its ARCA detector, which is interested in astronomy, is nearly 3,500 metres (2.2 miles) underwater off the coast of Sicily.
The neutrino-hunting ORCA detector is in the depths near the French city of Toulon.
Cables hundreds of metres long equipped with photomultipliers -- which amplify miniscule amounts of light -- have been anchored to the seabed nearby. Eventually 200,000 photomultipliers will be arrayed in the abyss.
But the ARCA detector was operating at just a tenth of what will be its eventual power when it spotted something strange on February 13, 2023, according to new research published in the journal Nature.
A muon, which is a heavy electron produced by a neutrino, "crossed the entire detector, inducing signals in more than one-third of the active sensors," according to a statement from KM3NeT, which brings together 350 scientists from institutions in 21 countries.
The neutrino had an estimated energy of 220 petaelectronvolts -- or 220 million billion electron volts.
A neutrino with such a massive amount of energy had never before been observed on Earth.
"It is roughly the energy of a ping pong ball falling from one metre height," Dutch physicist and KM3NeT researcher Aart Heijboer told a press conference.
"But the amazing thing is that all this energy is contained in one single elementary" particle, he added.
For humans to create such a particle would require building the equivalent of a Large Hadron Collider "all around the Earth at the distance of the geostationary satellites", said French physicist Paschal Coyle.
- Blazars as source? -
With this kind of energy, the event that created this neutrino must have been beyond Milky Way.
The exact distance remains unknown, "but what we are quite sure is that it's not coming from our galaxy", said French physicist Damien Dornic.
The astrophysicists have some theories about what could have caused such a neutrino. Among the suspects are 12 blazars -- the incredibly bright cores of galaxies with supermassive black holes.
But more research is needed.
"At the time this event happened, our neutrino alert system was still in development," Heijboer emphasised.
If another neutrino is detected near the end of this year, an alert will be sent in seconds to "all the telescopes around the world so that they can point in that direction" to try to spot the source, he said.
ber-dl/js
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The science behind the smell of rain
You know the smell. It's there every time the first fat raindrops hit the ground—a distinctive, earthy scent that suffuses the air, an aroma that speaks of the changing seasons and promises relief from stifling summer heat. There's a name for the smell of rain, too: 'petrichor,' a poetic portmanteau of the Greek words 'petros' (stone) and 'ichor' (the blood of the gods in Greek mythology). Petrichor: the smell of rain. But what causes it? The name 'petrichor' was coined by Australian scientists Isabel Bear and Dick Thomas in 1964, in a paper that constituted perhaps the first serious scientific attempt to explain the phenomenon. The duo used the word to refer to an oil that they distilled from samples of soil and vegetation that were left for up to a year exposed to air and daylight but shielded from rain. They found that the oil contained a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds. One question left unanswered by Bear and Thomas was the origin of these compounds, and subsequent research has focused on one particular compound, a volatile bicyclic alcohol called geosmin. The compound was isolated a year after Bear and Thomas's paper, and its name literally means 'earth smell.' Along with another volatile organic compound called 2-methylisoborneol or 2-MIB, geosmin is primarily responsible for the characteristic smell of earth—and both contribute greatly to the smell of rain. Ryan Busby, an ecologist at the US Army's Corps of Engineers, tells Popular Science that these compounds exist in soil the world over, and that they're spritzed into the air whenever soil is disturbed. '[The compounds] accumulate in the pore spaces in the soil,' Busby explains. 'There might be some binding to soil particles. [And] research has shown that that impact with the soil surface causes the volatiles to be released into the atmosphere.' So where do geosmin and 2-MIB come from? Busby says that while the source of both compounds remains the subject of plenty of active research, the current scientific consensus is that they are released by soil-dwelling bacteria. Differing ratios of the two compounds may explain why the smell differs subtly from place to place. 'Geosmin is pretty consistent across the environment, while 2-MIB is more variable. [Where 2-MIB is present], it is released in much higher concentrations, so you get areas where there's huge concentrations, and then areas where there's none,' Busby says. The other components that make up petrichor—a myriad less powerful plant-related volatiles, and also perhaps the distinctive acrid smell of ozone that accompanies lightning—vary from location to location. Humans are remarkably sensitive to the smell of geosmin, in particular. In water, it can be detected at concentrations as low as 4 ng/L, which equates to about one teaspoon in 200 Olympic swimming pools. Busby says there are several theories for why this might be. 'One [theory] is finding water sources,' he explains. 'Geosmin seems to be more prevalent in moist, fertile soils.' The presence of moist soil means the presence of water, and it's easy to see how being able to catch a whiff of geosmin on the wind and follow it to a source of water would provide a valuable evolutionary advantage. It's not just humans who appear to be able to rely on the scent of these volatile compounds to find water, Busby says. 'Camels can detect geosmin and find oases in the desert from 50 miles away. Mosquitoes use it to find stagnant ponds for laying eggs, and raccoons use it to find turtle nests and buried eggs.' But while the smell of geosmin and 2-MIB are appealing to us, their taste is the complete opposite. 'It's kind of funny,' muses Busby. 'We love the smell, but we hate the taste.' In water, these compounds are responsible for the musty, moldy taste that indicates that water isn't safe to drink. Busby says, 'Any time you drink water and you think, 'Oh, this, this tastes like lake water,' it's because those compounds are dissolved in what you're drinking.' Again, there's most likely an evolutionary reason for this: it's one thing for the soil around a water source to smell of bacteria, but if the water itself carries the distinctive musty odor of geosmin and 2-MIB, it also most likely carries the potential for gastrointestinal unpleasantness. Busby says that this explains why geosmin and 2-MIB are 'the primary odor contaminants of drinking water globally.' There's one unanswered question here, though: why are geosmin and 2-MIB there in the first place? As Busby points out, while it's clear that 'there are a number of uses for geosmin for us, we're not sure exactly why [bacteria] produce it in such quantities. It's a [large] energy cost to produce a chemical like that.' So why do soil-borne bacteria pump out geosmin and 2-MIB? What's in it for them? A paper published in Nature Microbiology in 2020 suggested a possible answer. The study examined interactions between Streptomyces—one variety of geosmin- and 2-MIB-producing bacteria—and small creatures called springtails. (Springtails are one of three varieties of six-legged arthropods that are not considered insects, and they have a taste for bacteria.) Crucially, the researchers found that in the bacteria studied, geosmin and 2-MIB were produced only by colonies that were also producing reproductive spores. In fact, they can only be produced by those specific colonies: 'The genes for geosmin and 2-MIB synthases are under the direct control of sporulation-specific transcription factors, constraining emission of the odorants to sporulating colonies,' the paper explains. Springtails are attracted by geosmin and 2-MIB, so unsurprisingly, upon arrival at the odor-emitting colonies, they helped themselves happily to a tasty microbial snack. In doing so, they also consumed the bacterial spores. The spores were then able to pass through the springtail's digestive tracts and emerge ready for action from the other end. Busby says this might also explain why the smell of rain is strongest when it comes from rain hitting dry soil. 'As soil dries out, the bacteria are going to go dormant, and there seems to be a flush of release [at that point]. So from that respect, [the compounds] are a way to attract something that maybe will carry [the bacteria] to a more conducive environment for growth.' It might feel like the poetic appeal of petrichor is diminished somewhat by discovering that the oh-so-evocative smell of rain most likely exists to encourage a bunch of tiny arthropods to poop out bacterial spores. But ultimately, it's another example of nature finding a way—a co-evolutionary relationship that recalls bees and pollen, and one that extends its benefits to the rest of us. So the next time the rain hits dry soil, think about the tiny bacteria that both lead us to water and stop us drinking from sources that might harm us. This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
Scientific American
4 hours ago
- Scientific American
Brain Implant Lets Man with ALS Speak and Sing with His ‘Real Voice'
A man with a severe speech disability is able to speak expressively and sing using a brain implant that translates his neural activity into words almost instantly. The device conveys changes of tone when he asks questions, emphasizes the words of his choice and allows him to hum a string of notes in three pitches. The system — known as a brain–computer interface (BCI) — used artificial intelligence (AI) to decode the participant's electrical brain activity as he attempted to speak. The device is the first to reproduce not only a person's intended words but also features of natural speech such as tone, pitch and emphasis, which help to express meaning and emotion. In a study, a synthetic voice that mimicked the participant's own spoke his words within 10 milliseconds of the neural activity that signalled his intention to speak. The system, described today in Nature, marks a significant improvement over earlier BCI models, which streamed speech within three seconds or produced it only after users finished miming an entire sentence. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. 'This is the holy grail in speech BCIs,' says Christian Herff, a computational neuroscientist at Maastricht University, the Netherlands, who was not involved in the study. 'This is now real, spontaneous, continuous speech.' Real-time decoder The study participant, a 45-year-old man, lost his ability to speak clearly after developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a form of motor neuron disease, which damages the nerves that control muscle movements, including those needed for speech. Although he could still make sounds and mouth words, his speech was slow and unclear. Five years after his symptoms began, the participant underwent surgery to insert 256 silicon electrodes, each 1.5-mm long, in a brain region that controls movement. Study co-author Maitreyee Wairagkar, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Davis, and her colleagues trained deep-learning algorithms to capture the signals in his brain every 10 milliseconds. Their system decodes, in real time, the sounds the man attempts to produce rather than his intended words or the constituent phonemes — the subunits of speech that form spoken words. 'We don't always use words to communicate what we want. We have interjections. We have other expressive vocalizations that are not in the vocabulary,' explains Wairagkar. 'In order to do that, we have adopted this approach, which is completely unrestricted.' The team also personalized the synthetic voice to sound like the man's own, by training AI algorithms on recordings of interviews he had done before the onset of his disease. The team asked the participant to attempt to make interjections such as 'aah', 'ooh' and 'hmm' and say made-up words. The BCI successfully produced these sounds, showing that it could generate speech without needing a fixed vocabulary. Freedom of speech Using the device, the participant spelt out words, responded to open-ended questions and said whatever he wanted, using some words that were not part of the decoder's training data. He told the researchers that listening to the synthetic voice produce his speech made him 'feel happy' and that it felt like his 'real voice'. In other experiments, the BCI identified whether the participant was attempting to say a sentence as a question or as a statement. The system could also determine when he stressed different words in the same sentence and adjust the tone of his synthetic voice accordingly. 'We are bringing in all these different elements of human speech which are really important,' says Wairagkar. Previous BCIs could produce only flat, monotone speech. 'This is a bit of a paradigm shift in the sense that it can really lead to a real-life tool,' says Silvia Marchesotti, a neuroengineer at the University of Geneva in Switzerland. The system's features 'would be crucial for adoption for daily use for the patients in the future.'
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Tyrannosaur species reshapes T. rex family tree
A newly identified dinosaur species from Mongolia is rewriting the history of the T. rex family tree. Dubbed the 'Dragon Prince' (scientifically named Khankhuuluu mongoliensis), this prehistoric predator lived about 86 million years ago and is believed to be a key ancestor of the famous Tyrannosaurus rex. For decades, fossils of this dinosaur sat largely overlooked in museum collections, misidentified as a known species called Alectrosaurus. But recent re-examination by researchers revealed that the fossils represent a completely new species — one that provides a vital missing link between smaller early tyrannosaurs and the massive apex predators that later dominated Earth. At about 13 feet long and weighing about 1,650 pounds, the Dragon Prince was much smaller than later tyrannosaurs like T. rex, which could grow up to 41 feet long and weigh more than 23,000 pounds. It had a smaller head and longer arms compared to its gigantic descendants, meaning it may have occupied an in-between evolutionary phase. Scientists say the discovery fills a crucial gap in understanding how tyrannosaurs evolved from modest-sized hunters to colossal rulers of their ecosystems. Paleontologists believe the Dragon Prince primarily hunted prey smaller than itself, unlike later giants that tackled enormous herbivores. Beyond its size and anatomy, experts say the find offers fresh insights into tyrannosaur migration patterns. Research shows that around 85 million years ago, a species closely related to K. mongoliensis migrated from Asia to North America across a land bridge near today's Bering Strait. This migration likely gave rise to the first true tyrannosaurs in North America, which went on to become dominant predators of the Late Cretaceous period. Later migrations back and forth between Asia and North America helped shape tyrannosaur diversity, producing both massive species like Tarbosaurus bataar and smaller, slimmer ones like Qianzhousaurus sinensis, nicknamed 'Pinocchio rex.' About 68 million years ago, one giant tyrannosaur species likely migrated back to North America and evolved into T. rex. This discovery, published in Nature, highlights how migration events fueled tyrannosaur evolution and offers a fascinating glimpse into the complex family tree of these iconic dinosaurs — the princes before they became kings. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
