logo
Cabinet approves transport strategy wish list

Cabinet approves transport strategy wish list

PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL'S Cabinet has endorsed a Regional Transport Strategy that relies on Welsh Government funding of £125m over the next five years. However, the plan also relies on the Council spending other money allocated to it by the Welsh Government to pay for the delivery of Welsh Government as well as local priorities.
Based on comparisons between similar projects, the low end of the cost of delivering the Pembrokeshire-only projects will be at least £66m. That suggests that not only will all the projects not come to fruition in the plan period but also indicates that the Welsh Government funding allocation to them underestimates the cost of delivering the majority, if not all, of the projects.
If the strategy's budget is fantasy, the prospects of delivering all of it are even more fanciful. The projects in the strategy read like a Guardian reader's wishlist instead of something grounded in local needs.
ACTIVE TRAVEL SCHEMES DOMINATE
The thirty-plus projects located solely in Pembrokeshire include fifteen schemes solely dedicated to active travel or which incorporate active travel as part of them. In context, and based on the cost of delivering similar schemes, the low-end estimate for 'active travel' schemes alone is around £22m.
'Active Travel' under the Welsh Government's Active Travel Act refers to efforts to reduce the use of cars for everyday journeys, such as commuting and education. Active travel schemes create infrastructure which supports walking, cycling, and wheeling (e.g., wheelchairs, mobility scooters).
Those schemes work well in urban areas. However, in rural areas with dispersed working populations, such as Pembrokeshire, their impact is less beneficial. The now-former Welsh Government minister Lee Waters got an earful from Plaid Cymru and fringe environmental groups (mostly funded by the Welsh Government) when he dared say that cars would continue to be the primary mode of transportation in rural Wales. If an MS from Dolgellau can use an e-scooter to get the mile and a half from their taxpayer-funded flat in Cardiff to the Senedd, there's evidently no reason why commuters between Fishguard and Haverfordwest can't do the same.
The active travel schemes planned for Pembrokeshire include a Multi-User Route from Narberth to Haverfordwest, an active travel route from Pembroke Dock to Pennar, one from Pembroke to Angle, six schemes in and around Tenby, and an expansion of the County Council's e-bike scheme.
BIG TICKET SPENDING
The big spending item is the relocation of the A487 at Newgale. That project has been on the cards for fourteen years, if not longer. It forms part of the Welsh Government's regional transport strategy as a permanent solution to the challenge of coastal erosion and the increased risks of tidal and pluvial flooding, standing against less certain and temporary interventions to hold the existing line. As it is part of the Regional Strategy, it will be predominantly funded by the Welsh Government through project-specific grants, in the same way as the preliminary investigations and public engagement.
The plan will funnel transport funding towards supporting the Celtic Sea Freeport. Its backers hope the Freeport's economic impact will be positive and spread across the Freeport area. However, the existing transport infrastructure for it is a bad joke. Addressing its shortcomings is a major component of the Regional Transport Strategy.
Setting aside projects scheduled for Neath Port Talbot, millions of pounds are projected to be spent on hydrogen fuel infrastructure and green/blue energy grid improvements. However, one project guaranteed to cause controversy seeks to increase road capacity and flow through Pembroke to support increased traffic from the Celtic Freeport development in the Angle Peninsula. Bearing in mind obvious geographical and logistical constraints and its need to cross conservation areas and sensitive landscapes within the National Park, any road expansion (there's also an active travel route planned) will likely cause uproar and cost tens of millions to deliver. That is, however, a long-term project.
MORE TRANSPORT HUBS
In the medium term, the Regional Strategy looks at a multi-million-pound project to improve roads between Haverfordwest and Milford Haven. That scheme looks to address congestion between the county town and the centre of Freeport operations in Pembrokeshire. Again, geographical and logistical issues suggest that the project will find it difficult to do much more than put lipstick on a pig. If, however, the scheme manages to resolve the congestion hotspots at Cartlett, Salutation Square (subject to a separate congestion-easing plan), Freemen's Way, and Johnston as far as the Sunnycroft Roundabout, it will doubtless be welcomed by commuters.
And, if you thought one transport hub was a bad idea, there's more to come – from the Milford Haven transport interchange to one planned for Pembroke Dock, improved access to Fishguard's ferry port, and a host of other projects that will connect Pembrokeshire's public transport network, as the plan puts it poetically 'ensuring better multimodal connectivity'.
Given the almost certain budget problems which these projects will encounter and, therefore, cause the County Council when it comes to setting its budgets, ensuring Pembrokeshire gets what it needs to improve the local economy instead of what the Welsh Government thinks it ought to have will be a major source of tension and contention.
If half of the plan is delivered on time, on budget, and within the Welsh Government's funding envelope, its effects will be limited – as we will all have pigs to fly around on.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Southport victim Bebe King's family slam new plans to share suspects' ethnicity
Southport victim Bebe King's family slam new plans to share suspects' ethnicity

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Southport victim Bebe King's family slam new plans to share suspects' ethnicity

Bebe King's grandfather said the actions of the far-right and Nigel Farage's Reform UK party in bid to "make a political gain" had been "despicable" in the wake of the horrific tragedy Southport victim Bebe King's family have urged the government to shelve new police guidance encouraging forces to publish the ethnicity and immigration status of high-profile suspects. ‌ Little Bebe was the youngest of the three little girls killed in the horrific knife attack last year. The six-year-old was murdered alongside Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine. ‌ In the aftermath of the tragedy, Bebe's grandfather, Michael Weston King, said they had been failed by the "despicable" far-right who "tried to make a political gain" from their loss. Mr Weston King urged ministers to reconsider their support for the new official guidance, slamming it as "completely irrelevant" information about suspects. ‌ He also hit out at Nigel Farage's "despicable" Reform UK, whose party has been calling for the guidance to be an enforced policy. Mr Weston King told the Guardian: "This apparent kowtowing to the likes of Farage and Reform, who surely want such a policy in place, is extremely disappointing, though perhaps not surprising. 'I not only speak for myself but for all of the King family when I say that the ethnicity of any perpetrator, or indeed their immigration status, is completely irrelevant. Mental health issues, and the propensity to commit crime, happens in any ethnicity, nationality or race. 'The boy who took Bebe had been failed by various organisations, who were aware of his behaviour, and by the previous government's lack of investment in [the official anti-extremism strategy] Prevent . As a result, we were also failed by this.' He added that the family 'were failed further, by the likes of Reform and the right wing, as they tried to make political gain from our tragedy, only causing further misery to us and others, which was despicable'. ‌ Teen killer, Axel Rudakubana, was jailed for a minimum of a 52 years for his attack on the Taylor Swift themed dance class full of children in July last year. In the days that followed, fascist thugs used the tragedy to incite riots across the UK. They spread false information that Rudakubana, a black Brit born in Wales to a Christian family, was in fact a Muslim asylum seeker. The unrest saw scores of police officers injured, mosques and asylum hotels targeted and people of colour lynched indiscriminately in the streets. Home secretary, Yvette Cooper, welcomed new police guidelines released on Wednesday, despite criticism from anti-racism campaigners and women's groups. ‌ It follows claims of police 'cover up' that two men charged in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, were asylum seekers. The far-right then staged an anti-immigration protest, where some worw Nazi imagery on their clothes and told a crowd the 'far right must unite'. A judge defied court guidance to publicly name underage Rudakubana, who was 17 at the time of the attack, in a bid to stop the riots. But the violence only stopped once hundreds of thugs involved began receiving prison sentences. Mr Weston King said: 'Though we are not interested in retribution or revenge, we were glad to see that the rioters, along with those who spread lies and hatred online, received prison sentences. I very much hope that the mood and opinion of the nation is in keeping with ours, and that this plan does not go ahead.'

Major U-turn on council ‘fat tax' proposal after ‘20% levy' on 6ft-wide graves for bodies ‘too big to bury' sparks fury
Major U-turn on council ‘fat tax' proposal after ‘20% levy' on 6ft-wide graves for bodies ‘too big to bury' sparks fury

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Major U-turn on council ‘fat tax' proposal after ‘20% levy' on 6ft-wide graves for bodies ‘too big to bury' sparks fury

A COUNCIL has been forced into a U-turn after it tried to slap grieving families with a so-called 'fat tax' for bigger burial plots. Wolverhampton City Council has ditched plans to charge more for wider graves at Danescourt Cemetery in Tettenhall, following major backlash from funeral directors and charities. 3 3 3 Danescourt cemetery told families it would cost £2,700 if they need to buy a 6ft wide plot, which is 20 per cent more than a standard 5ft grave. The proposals were made in May after talks with local funeral parlours, but councillors were forced to back down on Thursday after the outcry. The council claimed the higher price tag was due to a rise in demand for larger graves. Statistics from 2021 revealed that a third of Wolverhampton's population was classed as obese, well above the national average of 25.9 per cent. But after public pressure, the council said it had 'decided not to proceed with the plans'. A City of Wolverhampton Council spokesperson told The Sun: 'No formal decision was ever taken on plans to charge more for larger burial plots. 'This is a common practice taken by councils around the country where higher charges cover the costs of providing a larger plot. 'However, while under consideration, we have decided not to proceed with the plans.' A source said: 'It looked heartless - grieving families don't need a bill like this on top of everything else.' The move to set aside a special section at Danescourt Cemetery for bigger coffins was given the green light by councillors back in May. Other councils, including Birmingham, Walsall and Coventry, have introduced higher fees for larger burial plots, and Wolverhampton said this was among the reasons behind their original proposal. Trolls say council houses can't look nice but my stunning hallway will prove them wrong Before signing it off, the council said it reached out to 25 local funeral directors for their views - but only 10 replied, and just one raised any objections. Funeral directors condemned the proposed plans before the council changed their mind. Ross Hickton, a fourth-generation funeral director who runs seven branches of his family firm, Hickton Family Funeral Directors, said: 'Essentially it's a fat tax. 'Families are already going through enough when they're bereaved. "People have paid into the system their whole lives and paid local council tax, and now they're being slapped with another tax at the point of death just due to their size.' Hickton acknowledged that space was limited but said the council had 'a duty of care to local residents to ensure burial space is provided' while catering to religions and cultures that practise burial. Wolverhampton resident Rosemarie McLaren told the BBC she felt the move was "discrimination, it's not acceptable". "Someone like me who's a bit bigger, is going to be charged [more] because I'm fat," she added. However, Matthew Crawley, chief executive at the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, said the charge seemed reasonable. "You have a finite amount of space to work with; therefore if you need to eat into a grave next door, say, then that needs to be accounted for," he said. "You also have to account for the idea that digging the grave itself will also need extra equipment to keep it safe." The National Association of Funeral Directors warned this year that the width of the average coffin had increased in the past decade from between 18 and 20 inches to between 20 and 24 inches.

Row over Burnley Council's waste transfer station plan
Row over Burnley Council's waste transfer station plan

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Row over Burnley Council's waste transfer station plan

A major row has broken out over Burnley Council's plans to build a new waste transfer station with the authority's leader branding his Labour group counterpart "petty and pathetic."Councillor Afrasiab Anwar made the accusation about opposition leader, Councillor Mark Townsend, as the authority approved the new development on the Heasandford Industrial Estate on Balderstone Labour group had distributed leaflets opposing the scheme on grounds of proximity to houses and the lack of a proper council said the new waste transfer station (WTS) - an industrial facility where waste is temporarily stored - would save money and residents "should not be concerned". Townsend told the meeting the leaflets had generated more than 500 letters of also claimed the development would cause "foul odours from rotting waste, increased presence of seagulls and rodents, and constant traffic from bin lorries throughout the day".The plan involves buying a site on Widow Hill Road, 400m (437 yards) from its current depot which houses its vehicle fleet for £361,000 and freeing up the existing depot site for the new WTS. 'Rats or seagulls' This would enable Burnley Council to get the development up and running by 1 April 2026 when Lancashire County Council's (LCC) contract with SUEZ to use the Whinney Hill landfill site council said the new WTS would avoid the estimated £1.6m a year cost of taking borough waste to Lancashire County Council's alternative recycling facility at Farrington near accused Townsend and the Labour group of "disinformation" in the leaflet and associated social media posts, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said: "This is just scaremongering for political advantage."Councillor Townsend and the Labour group are being petty and pathetic."We take tough decisions head on."Burnley Council's environment boss, Councillor Howard Baker, said: "This plan ensures Burnley meets new waste disposal rules while reducing as far as possible any extra burden on taxpayers."To be clear, these plans do not create a new landfill site in Burnley."He said it would be enclosed and emptied daily, with "filtered air extraction to prevent odours at a location 500 metres away from the nearest residential home"."Residents should not be concerned about noise, rats or seagulls," he the meeting, Townsend said: "It's not the first time when having no response to serious questions that Councillor Anwar has resorted to personal insults instead of addressing genuine resident concerns with his decisions."I can live with that. I'll support residents fighting for their community when he fails to."He said the accusation of misinformation was "desperate stuff" and he stood by what was in the leaflets."If it wasn't for Labour councillors seeking residents' views only a handful in Briercliffe would know anything about the new WTS," he added. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store