logo
Greggs makes major change amid shoplifting rise

Greggs makes major change amid shoplifting rise

Wales Online20-05-2025

Greggs makes major change amid shoplifting rise
The customer experience is about to become a lot less independent
The beloved franchise is trying to clamp down on shoplifters
(Image: GETTY )
Greggs customers might notice a major change that feels like their favourite products are disappearing. However, they can rest assured their sandwiches, drinks and other snacks are still there, just more hidden away.
The bakery chain is trying to curtail the rise in shoplifting. The staggering increase in thievery has seen many high street stores and supermarkets clamping down on security or even changing their checkout procedures.

Greggs will be removing their self-serve fridges and placing these products, like sandwiches and drinks, behind the counter with the rest of their baked goods.

This new policy will mean customers now have to get the help of a shop assistant to hand over their items instead of being able to quickly grab it themselves.
Customers that are used to popping in and quickly grabbing their items will now have to wait in line first. The new measures will be trialled out at only five stores that have been particularly exposed to anti-social behaviour.
This will include those in Whitechapel, Peckham and Ilford. The BBC reported it's not expected for these measures to be rolled into all 2,600 Greggs bakeries across the UK.
Article continues below
But it could make an appearance in other sites facing high levels of theft. A Greggs spokesperson told the Independent: 'This is one of a number of initiatives we are trialling across a handful of shops which are exposed to higher levels of anti-social behaviour.
'Customers can expect to see our full range of great value and tasty Greggs favourites available from behind the counter. The safety of our colleagues and customers remains our number one priority.'
The Office for National Statistics noted that in 2024, shoplifting offences rose by 20%. This marks 516,971 instances of shoplifting reported to the police.

However, the number of thefts retailers recorded last year were far higher, hitting more than 20 million according to the British Retail Consortium. Some have reported being targeted by organised gangs.
These shoplifters work in teams, communicating through Bluetooth headsets to trigger alarms and create distractions. Thus allowing their fellow shoplifters to escape.
Shoplifting incidents have been steadily rising since a sharp spike appeared during the pandemic. This was attributed to the higher cost of living that started to skyrocket at the time.
Article continues below
But it's not the same shoplifters that are being caught nowadays. John Nussbaum, director of service for retail at Kingdom Security, explained that a worrying number of thieves are now over the state pension age.
He explained: 'For us over the last 12 months, we've got this different level of crime now. We're now experiencing something different - pensioners, people who don't normally shoplift.'
It's become a crime of necessity as the security expert noted: 'We've seen a massive increase in pensioners shoplifting, putting a jar of coffee in their bag and one in the trolley, that sort of thing. We've had instances of mothers caught shoplifting when they're with their kids."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year

Powys County Times

time4 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year

The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'

Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year

The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'

Garth Crooks gets driving ban: BBC football pundit blames hidden speed camera as he is ordered off the roads for six months for breaking 20mph limit
Garth Crooks gets driving ban: BBC football pundit blames hidden speed camera as he is ordered off the roads for six months for breaking 20mph limit

Daily Mail​

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Garth Crooks gets driving ban: BBC football pundit blames hidden speed camera as he is ordered off the roads for six months for breaking 20mph limit

Former footballer turned BBC pundit Garth Crooks has been hit with a six-month driving ban after being caught speeding again. The former Tottenham Hotspur striker, 67, complained the speed camera that caught him was deliberately hidden but the magistrates disqualified him anyway. Stoke-on-Trent-born Crooks, who started his career with his home town club, went onto also play for Manchester United, WBA and Charlton Athletic before embarking on a media career with the BBC. He pleaded guilty to driving his silver 1.4 litre Mercedes A Class diesel hatchback in excess of 20mph along Camden Road, at the junction of Hillmarton Road, Holloway on January 3. Crooks, who lives in a £2m detached five-bedroom house in Kingston Hill, Kingston-upon-Thames, represented himself during the short hearing. Lavender Hill Magistrates' Court heard the camera captured three separate images of Crooks' vehicle travelling at 24mph. However, he asked the court for a 'little latitude' as he claimed the speed camera was behind 'two strategically positioned poles'. He already had nine penalty points on his licence for two speeding offences and for failing to comply with a traffic signal. Yesterday's three points triggered the automatic six-month ban for reaching twelve penalty points. Crooks - who was awarded the OBE in 1999 - told the court he was now 'retired' and in receipt of a £118,000 a year pension. Showing magistrates photographs of the camera that caught him Crooks said: 'I have come here today to admit my guilt of driving at twenty-four miles per hour in a twenty mile an hour zone. 'I ask for a little latitude. The speed camera was behind two poles, obliterating my sight lines. 'Had it not been for two strategically positioned poles I would have seen the camera and mediated my speed. 'I ask the court to look at the pictures of the proximity of the posts.' Bench Chairman D Simms told Crooks: 'We have observed the photographs and how the camera is situated, but the speed limit does apply to that road at all times. 'It is not a case that you should modify your speed by seeing the camera. You were speeding and that's why you are in court today.' Crooks, who won the FA Cup with Spurs in 1981 and 1982, along with the UEFA Cup in 1984 was fined £666, with £110 costs and ordered to pay a £266 victim surcharge. 'It is the lowest level of seriousness for this offence,' added Mr Simms. 'However, you have nine points on your record and this makes twelve points so you are disqualified from driving for six months for a totting offence. 'The offence of driving while disqualified is taken very seriously and could attract a custodial sentence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store