In A World Of AI, A Great Domain Means You're Building For Real
Right now, it feels like there's a new product launch every hour.
You can't blame people. The tools are all there. With AI, you can spin up a landing page, write copy, generate a logo, create a promo video, even build a semi-working MVP. You can go from idea to something that looks like a real business in a weekend. That used to take months.
But the strange part is, the more polished things look, the less believable they feel. That's the downside of speed and scale. When anyone can create anything, trust becomes the scarce resource.
A name might seem like a small detail. A domain might feel like a technicality. But when people are deciding what feels real, what's worth their time, their trust, or their money, your name is often the first and strongest signal they get.
We've seen this again and again. And we've felt it ourselves.
Logos can be templated. Copy can be AI-generated. Testimonials can be written by ChatGPT. Even team pages can be faked with stock images and made-up bios. But your domain? That's real.
You don't accidentally own a strong domain. You don't fake your way into a name like Drift, Loop, Slack or even Atom, which we chose when we rebranded.
Great names feel clean and timeless. They carry weight. They tell people: we're serious. We're staying.
We rebranded from Squadhelp to Atom.com not long ago. Squadhelp had served us well. We built a strong business under that name. But over time, we outgrew it.
We weren't just helping people come up with names anymore. We were evolving into a full brand platform, with our own marketplace, AI tools, and other building blocks for startups. We needed a name that matched that shift. Something broad, modern, and foundational.
When Atom.com became a possibility, we knew it would be a big investment. But we didn't hesitate. Almost immediately after the switch, we saw the difference.
Organic traffic went up. CPCs dropped. And across the board, we saw more trust — from customers, partners, even cold leads. People stayed longer. They took us more seriously. The shift in perception was real. And when perception changes, outcomes follow.
A good name reduces friction. You don't have to explain where the hyphen goes. You don't have to clarify the spelling. You don't have to keep reminding people what your company does. The name does some of the work for you.
It gets you attention. It earns a second look. And over time, it builds brand memory. The kind that compounds.
I've never met a founder who bought a great name early and regretted it. But I've met plenty who waited too long, lost the name they wanted, and now spend every day working around it.
At Atom, we're seeing more demand for one-word domains that feel human. Not robotic. Just clean, intuitive words that sound like something people already trust.
Names like Nugget.com, Rush.ai, Lapel.com, Wand.com, Ace.ai - all of which recently sold on atom.com.
AI can generate endless combinations. But human language feels rare now, and that rarity makes it valuable. Founders aren't just buying names. They're buying identity. Something to build on, something that lasts.
Right now, AI is making it easier than ever to build. But that also means more of the same. The same naming patterns, the same page structures, the same GPT-written headlines.
Most startups feel like variations of each other. That's why the ones with strong identity, real voice, real positioning, and real presence stand out even more.
A great domain name won't make your company. But it will make people pause. It gives you a shot at being remembered, and that shot is getting harder to come by.
AI is going to keep changing how we build. That's not a bad thing. But as creation becomes cheaper and faster, the things that can't be copied — trust, clarity, conviction — become more valuable.
Your name sits at the center of all of that.
It's not just what people type in their browser. It's what they feel when they hear about you for the first time. It's how they remember you later. It's what gets passed along in conversations you're not in.
And in this moment, with more noise and speed than ever, a great name might be the most human thing you have.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As federal funding cuts hit Harvard, a private investment firm and other donors step up
At a time when Harvard University is experiencing deep cuts to its federal funding and looking for alternative avenues for money, Turkish investment firm, İş Private Equity, committed $39 million over 10 years to support a Harvard faculty member's lab, according to the university. The investment, through the private equity firm's biotech startup, is aimed at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health faculty member Gökhan Hotamışlıgil's work, aiming to create potential therapies for obesity and other metabolic diseases. Read more: Federal judge delays decision over Trump admin barring Harvard foreign students The privately sourced funding could be a highly pursued avenue for the institution, as the federal government strips nearly $3 billion of its federal dollars and additional contracts in the name of addressing antisemitism. 'Harvard Chan School has long welcomed industry collaborations and research sponsorship, with strong guardrails to prevent conflicts of interest,' Andrea Baccarelli, Dean of the Faculty at Harvard Chan School, wrote in a letter to the community last week. Initial funding of Hotamışlıgil's more than 20 years of work came from the National Institutes of Health. It helped uncover new insights about the metabolic system and identified a protein that plays a critical role in obesity and age-related disorders, according to the university. The lab didn't have any current federal grants canceled at the time of the investment firm's announcement, a university spokesperson said. Harvard has also been dealing with a wave of federal research grant terminations and was barred from acquiring new federal grants. While a federal judge on Monday ordered that the Trump administration restore 367 National Institutes of Health grants, it doesn't apply to a broad swath of grants, including the large numbers at Harvard. The Harvard Chan School announced in April that it was facing a 'significant budget crisis' resulting in layoffs and the non-renewal of two building leases. Since then, every one of the school's direct federal grants have been terminated and the school has even taken to social media to ask for donations. Federal funding makes up 46% of Harvard Chan School's budget. At the same time as the investment firm is putting money into Harvard, others have been pitching in as well. Donors have contributed more than $3.5 million in recent weeks and alumni and members of the public have raised $350,000 for Harvard Chan School, according to a letter from Dean Baccarelli. 'Each contribution is a vote of confidence in our mission, our people and our future,' she said. The school also created a new Dean's Leadership Fund for existing donors to support. 'Harvard Chan School will emerge from this crisis a focused, resilient and unambiguously world-class school of public health, dedicated to excellence and impact and strengthened by surprising, solutions-focused partnerships," she wrote. 20 NIH grants restored to UMass system after judge rules against Trump admin Trump admin asks court to rule against Harvard without a trial Federal judge orders Trump admin to reinstate hundreds of NIH grants Federal judge delays decision over Trump admin barring Harvard foreign students Harvard's Monday court date will be important for international students. Here's why Read the original article on MassLive. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Credit scores will drop for more student loan borrowers, data shows
Imagine your credit score suddenly dropping by 63 points. For more than four million federal student loan borrowers, that's no nightmare. It's a wake-up call. In fact, a 63-point drop was just the average. Many of these borrowers experiencing a serious delinquency — at least 90 days late on a payment — in early 2025 saw their credit score drop by 42 to 175 points, according to a May analysis by the credit bureau TransUnion. And no one is immune. Borrowers with strong credit histories and cleaner credit reports saw their scores drop the most, by up to three figures. Even scarier? These borrowers could soon have more company. Some of the nearly eight million enrolled in the decaying SAVE Plan may soon face delinquency. So too could borrowers who have been struggling to enroll in income-driven repayment (IDR) plans. 'We're just waiting for them to be reported — we're calling those the shadow delinquencies,' says Michele Raneri, TransUnion vice president of financial services research and consulting. Yes, more than one in every five federal student loan borrowers in active repayment — 20.5 percent of about 19.6 million individuals — are three months or more late on their monthly dues. That's an all-time high, according to TransUnion, in part because Raneri says her team filtered out millions of federal loan borrowers who don't have an active payment due date. According to the Department of Education's own figures, that means more than five million borrowers are in default (270 or more days tardy), and as many as 10 million could be this summer. Being in default hits your credit, but it can also mean wage garnishment and forfeiture of federal tax refunds and Social Security benefits, among other consequences. 'So everything indicates that [this] is just the first group' to be reported, Raneri says. Related: We're facing a student loan default crisis. This academic research might help As mentioned, 20.5 percent of borrowers are 90 or more days delinquent (as of February 2025), but that figure pales in comparison to the 11.5 percent who were similarly tardy five years ago. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon places the blame squarely on colleges and universities, but the COVID-19 pandemic-inspired repayment pause and the last half-decade's fallout undoubtedly play a role, student loan payments are paused, borrowers saw their credit scores increase by an average of 74 points, thanks to the pause, according to the New York Federal Education Department announces 'Fresh Start,' removing the default status on credit reports for about 7.5 million defaulted Education Department calls for the resumption of monthly loan servicers begin reporting 90-days-or-more delinquencies to the credit Education Department resumes debt collection for federal loan defaults. In case you'd like a refresher, payment history is the single biggest determinant of your credit score. For FICO scores, for instance, whether you're on time or tardy with debt payments accounts for 35 percent of your score composition. That explains why borrowers have seen their scores fall so precipitously. Credit score before defaulting Average credit score drop after default (pts) 300 to 600 42 601-660 64 661-720 99 721-780 121 781 plus 175 Though borrowers with super-prime credit are the least vulnerable cohort, their path back to excellent credit won't be easy, Raneri says. 'They probably didn't have a 90-day-past-due on any [account] in the last seven years,' she says. 'And so it's difficult to come out and still become a super-prime again… And it'll take a couple of years probably for that to be in the rearview mirror, for it to fade away enough for it to bring the[ir score] back up.' Unsurprisingly, the lower your credit score, the more likely you have fallen behind in repayment. However, over the past half-decade, higher-credit borrowers have seen the biggest jump into delinquency. Percent of borrowers who are at least three months past due on a federal loan February 2020 February 2025 Percent change 300 to 600 38.8% 50.8% 31% 601 to 660 9.1% 23.3% 156% 661 to 720 1.3% 7.5% 477% 721-780 0.1% 2.1% 2,000% 781-plus 0.1% 0.9% 800% Spoiler alert: What's good for your student loan repayment is mutually beneficial for your credit report and score. Rehabilitate a defaulted loan, and your credit will thank you. Make a series of on-time payments toward your outstanding balance, and your score should increase over time. Of course, it's all easier said than done. And it can be overwhelming when you're wondering where to start. She continues, 'And so, if you have a fear of your credit, then you need to buckle down and just do it because it's not going to just go away. And I feel like there [are] people who with these student loans are kind of gambling with their credit score, thinking that maybe some [relief] is going to come through and it's not going to affect them. And by the time that you see it, it's probably too late. And then you have to start repairing it.' Take it from a certified student loan counselor: The important thing is to get moving. Here are some initial steps to take if your repayment has gone awry or requires a reset: Create or update your budget. It's the best way to understand your cash-flow, minimize unnecessary experience and set priorities, whether for your student loan or other debt payments. Reacquaint yourself with your education debt. You might log into your account (or your private lender's portal) to check your outstanding balances, interest rates and repayment status. Ask for help. While it's critical to be your own expert on your student loan accounts, it's always wise to request assistance. If you're disappointed in your federal loan servicer or private lender, talk to a certified counselor, student debt lawyer or organizations that offer student loan help. Settle on a strategy. Once you know where you stand and are aware of your education debt payoff options, picking a lane will ensure you keep moving toward the finish line. With that said, changes to your cash-flow could necessitate switching tactics down the road. Start or resume monitoring your credit. As you're getting more confident about handling your outstanding loans, track the improvement of your credit score. That can be gratifying and motivate you to stay on track to the bitter end. How to find help The National Foundation for Credit Counseling or your state's student loan ombudsperson are potential starting points. You're also welcome to email the writer at apentis@ Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MIT joins group of universities suing the DOD over funding cuts
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has joined a lawsuit against the Department of Defense (DOD) over funding cuts related to indirect costs for military-based research. The institution joins a group of 11 other universities, including Brown University in Rhode Island, and three higher education organizations that filed the complaint against the DOD on Monday. Boston University supported the lawsuit as a member of the Association of American Universities. As of Tuesday, a federal judge had approved a temporary restraining order to halt the implementation of the cuts. 'We underscore that MIT drives US national security through its cutting-edge research, defense innovation and substantial contributions to military leadership,' said Kimberly Allen, a spokesperson for MIT, in an email. DOD declined to comment because it is ongoing litigation. Boston University didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday. 'DOD's latest action would have an immediate and dire effect on our national security by disrupting research designed to help our military,' the group of those suing said in a statement released Monday. Read more: MIT sues federal science agency over cuts to 'crucial research' The lawsuit comes in response to the DOD's announcement that it would limit facilities and administrative reimbursements to a 15% cap for all DOD research grants. Facilities and administrative costs include maintenance and administrative staff, research facilities and safety expenses, among others, which the group cites as being essential costs in maintaining the country's status as a leader in military technology research. Initially proposed by U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in a memo sent on May 14, the cuts are set to save the DOD $900 million per year, according to Hegseth. According to court filings, MIT received $107 million in funding from the DOD in the 2024 fiscal year. They estimate that a 15% cap on Facilities and administrative expenses by the DOD would result in an estimated loss of $21 million annually. MIT has expressed it intends to apply for new funding awards from the DOD in addition to pending funding proposals. MIT is also involved in lawsuits against other federal organizations over cuts to indirect costs in other departments, namely the National Institute of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Science Foundation. 'Far reaching consequences' — UMass Amherst sounds the alarm amid federal uncertainty As federal funding cuts hit Harvard, a private investment firm and other donors step up 20 NIH grants restored to UMass system after judge rules against Trump admin Trump admin asks court to rule against Harvard without a trial Federal judge orders Trump admin to reinstate hundreds of NIH grants Read the original article on MassLive.
