logo
EXCLUSIVE My father is a cannibal and ate my mother when I was nine - he pushed me to the brink of insanity and made me sell my soul to the devil… but I turned my life around and now I'm a mum myself

EXCLUSIVE My father is a cannibal and ate my mother when I was nine - he pushed me to the brink of insanity and made me sell my soul to the devil… but I turned my life around and now I'm a mum myself

Daily Mail​a day ago

Jamie-Lee Arrow was nine years old when she lost her identity and became 'the cannibal's daughter'.
Her father, Isakin Jonsson, murdered his girlfriend Helle Christensen - a mother of five who Jamie saw as a 'second mum'.
In what became known as one of Sweden 's most horrifying killings, Jonsson slit Ms Christensen's throat before decapitating her and eating part of her body.
The disturbed killer, now kown to the world as the 'Skara cannibal', was convicted of his girlfriend's murder in 2011 and remanded in a psychiatric unit.
But his detention did not prevent him from terrorising his daughter, who has described how Jonsson tried to drag her into his dark and twisted world throughout her childhood and teenage years.
'My dad definitely brainwashed me and has done since I was three years old,' Ms Arrow told MailOnline.
'He has always exposed me to the dark side, with the devil and demons and evil spirits, and that has always been a part of my reality - a part of my everyday life.
'He was preparing my brain for it for as long as I remember because he wanted me to be him. He always said that: "You are me, you are a better version of me".'
Jonsson groomed his daughter during phone calls and hospital visits, describing to her how he carried out the killing, gifting her macabre Voodoo dolls, and finally forcing her to 'sell her soul' to the devil.
This was the trigger that pushed her to the brink of insanity at just 18, Ms Arrow said, and she was only saved when her mother learned what her 'sick' father was putting her through.
Just a few years later, Ms Arrow has turned her life around - surviving her father's abuse, severe mental illness, PTSD and addiction.
The 23-year-old is now a mother herself and in a loving relationship - and has vowed, for the sake of her two young children, to never see her killer father again.
She bravely reunited with Jonsson in a recent Investigation Discovery documentary, having not seen him for four years.
Surprising him at the facility where he is under supervision, she described feeling as though the father she knew and loved as a child had finally returned.
'He started crying and hugged me and seemed happy to see me,' she said. 'I so wanted to believe that he had changed and that he had become the dad I always wanted and needed.'
But her hopes were soon dashed, and it became all too clear to Ms Arrow that her father was still the troubled man who had killed his girlfriend.
'He sent me a sick text message where he threatened me and my family if I ever reached out to him again,' she said.
'After I met him during the production, I made my mind up that he can never, ever in a million years be a part of my life again.
'So that's difficult - I finally got closure, but I'm also grieving a person who is still alive.
'He will always be in the back of my head, but I know that I will never see him again.
'Mostly for the sake of my kids, so they are never going to be exposed to that darkness.'
Describing why she wanted to share her story, she said in the documentary: 'I want people to understand the darkness I came from and that I actually managed to get myself out from under it.
'I still struggle with feeling like I am my own person and that my dad has got nothing to do with who I am.'
Ms Arrow's parents divorced when she was very young and she lived with her mum for most of her childhood.
Her dad went to prison the week after her birth for robbery, and while he was in and out of jail she had no contact with him at all until the age of three.
'I then started seeing my dad on a regular basis,' she said. 'My mum let me see him because she knew I wanted to, they had shared custody and she didn't know how bad it was at my dad's house.'
She would visit him at his rented home in Skara on the weekends, and soon started spending time with Ms Christensen as well, who her father began seeing when she was six.
'Both of them were in a really bad state mentally, they met at a psychiatric institution, so she was herself not very well mentally,' Jamie explained.
'They were not good for each other, it was a very toxic relationship.
'They were fighting all the time, the fights were really bad. It would go from we were laughing, having the best time, and then in one second it could switch.
'They would both turn into monsters and did not care about me.'
She said the couple constantly provoked each other, and that her dad would often respond to Ms Christensen's taunting by saying he would kill her.
'She would not care, she would keep going. I would scream "Stop! Don't say that! He's going to kill you!" but she wouldn't listen to me.
'That was going on from the start, from when they met. I was certain that one day he would just pull out a knife and kill her in front of me.'
'The feeling they gave me every time they were fighting was that he was going to kill either her or me. I was always fearing for my life or her life.'
Ms Arrow said she was often forced to hide when the couple were fighting, and that they used her as a 'tool' against each other in their rows.
The most violent argument she ever witnessed between the two came just days before her father killed Ms Christensen.
'The last time I saw Hele they had the worst fight ever.
'She had cooked me a meal, and the last thing that she said to me was: "Enjoy your food, because this is the last time I will ever cook for you - he's going to kill me."
'That was the last thing she said to me. I completely believed her, because I myself was frightened for my life.
'Because of their fight that day, I decided then that I never wanted to come back to his house.'
Thankfully, Ms Arrow did not return to her father's house again.
'I was supposed to be there the weekend that he killed her,' she revealed.
'My dad had said he could not have me that weekend and cancelled on the Thursday. He committed the murder on the Friday.'
On November 12, 2010, after going to the shops to buy alcohol, Jonsson jumped on Christensen as she lay reading in bed, pinned her down and slit her throat. She died instantly.
The depraved killer then decapitated her corpse and cut off flesh from her arm, which he took to the kitchen, fried and ate.
After the savage murder, Jonsson called the police and confessed, saying he had 'no idea' what he had done but had 'woken up'.
Ms Arrow, who was staying with her grandmother at the time, was taken to see her mum Janette.
'Helle is dead,' Janette told her nine-year-old daughter as she tried to hold back tears.
'I immediately asked: "Was it dad?" and she said yes and started crying even more,' Ms Arrow said.
'I was devastated, panicking and screaming. It felt like something broke inside of me.
'The next day I woke up and felt nothing. That went on for years after that, I became a very cold person, all of my personality just vanished.
'I wasn't Jamie anymore, I was just this daughter of a famous murderer and cannibal.'
While her mum tried to protect her from the outside world during her childhood and didn't tell her the full extent of her father's crimes, Ms Arrow gradually learned the truth of what Jonsson had done to her stepmum.
'For some time I didn't go to school. My mum tried not to expose me to the news, she didn't want me to find out exactly what happened, because I only knew my dad had killed his girlfriend, I didn't know that he was a cannibal too.
'But everyone at school knew, everyone in my neighbourhood knew, everyone was looking at me with different eyes, it felt like I was robbed of my identity.
'I remember the first time I accidentally saw him on the cover of a newspaper, I saw the word cannibal. I didn't know what that meant.
'A few years passed and then I actually googled the word and I found out what it was - but I went into denial because it was just so gross, I didn't want it to be true.'
Ms Arrow maintained regular contact with her dad during those years, calling and visiting him more than her family realised.
Her trauma meant she struggled with severe mental health and addiction problems as a teenager, making her even more vulnerable to her dad's manipulation.
'He turned me against everyone around me, against my mum, my friends, my family, he made himself the centre of my world. He was my everything at that time.
'He made me believe that he was the only one that truly loved me and truly cared about me - that it was me and him against the world.
'Me and my dad didn't talk about it, but then when I was 17 he brought up the murder.
'He walked me through the murder, describing exactly how he went through with it.
'That was the first time it just became so real to me, that he had done that. The first time that I accepted it as the truth, that he had done such a horrible thing.'
Despite the horrific nature of what she had learned, Ms Arrow said she was 'brainwashed' and continued seeing her dad.
'It got to a point, when I was 18, where I was so trapped in that darkness that I felt like I was going insane. I hated everything about life. I just didn't want to live in that dark world that he had created for me.
'So I went to my dad and said: "Dad, I'm one second away from killing myself. What am I supposed to do?" And his solution for that was to sell my soul to the devil.
'That was like this big turning point for me, because when we had gone through with the ritual and everything it was like there was no turning back.
'I felt I couldn't die because then I would go to hell, and I couldn't live because my soul was sold to the devil. I felt stuck and I panicked.
'That night at home I felt like I was going to lose it. I screamed to my mother to come to me because I wanted to say some last words to her before I went insane.
'It was my mum who rescued me. I realised that it was my dad who had made me feel like that.
'I just remember my mum holding me and saying, "Jamie, why haven't you said anything? I didn't know he was this sick. You are light and love, Jamie. You are nothing like him!"
'She was my saviour. I am so grateful that I had my mum that night. I don't know what I would have done without her.'
It was the wake-up call she needed, and from that point Ms Arrow has bravely worked to break the cycle of generational trauma - something she believes she has finally achieved.
'It has been quite a journey. The heeling process actually began when I fell pregnant.
'I had promised myself that if I ever become a mum, I will be the best mum in the world, and I will never, ever let my children experience what I have experienced in my life.'
She immediately stopped drinking and smoking and threw herself into a healthy lifestyle for her unborn child.
'I gave myself nine months to become the best version of me and I succeeded in doing that, though I still struggle some days.'
'I could never have done any of this without my kids,' she said.
'You know how they say there's light at the end of the tunnel - I feel like I am now living in that light.'
Ms Arrow is now telling her story in the hope of helping others to 'find light over darkness'.
She is planning to leave Sweden for Portugal with her partner and children this year, where she dreams of building a community for people 'in a similar situation to me'.
'People who might be struggling with addiction, depression, who might have had difficult childhoods - those are the people I am trying to help to heel,' she said.
While initially worried about sharing details of her uniquely harrowing experiences on social media, Ms Arrow now says she has no regrets and has been overwhelmed by the response.
'It's been amazing, I did not know how the world would react to my story, but I have been met with so much love and understanding,' she said.
'People are writing to me every minute, I'm just being overflown with love.
'They are confirming that I am inspiring them and spreading hope, and that is exactly what my purpose is now.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?
What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

What is the role of an expert witness and how are they used in English courts?

Senior politicians, lawyers and doctors have warned that a lack of regulation over the use of expert witnesses in English courts could be leading to miscarriages of justice. But what is an expert witness and who gets to be one? An expert witness is someone who has specialised knowledge in a particular field, and appears in court to provide an objective and impartial opinion to help those involved in a case, such as a judge or jury, understand a particular issue. Expert witnesses can be useful to magistrates and juries in helping them to determine the issues in a criminal case, including whether a defendant is guilty or innocent. They are used in many aspects of civil law, and different experts have been used to provide evidence on everything from medical issues and forensics to construction and engineering. A solicitor or legal team will choose an expert with the necessary qualifications and experience in their relevant field, and it is ultimately up to a court to decide whether they can appear as a witness. However, there is no regulatory body that governs expert witnesses, and there are concerns that someone who wants to appear as a witness can 'self-appoint' and declare themselves to be an expert in a particular area. Sometimes solicitors will contact someone directly who they believe may have expertise in a particular area. There are also listing sites where experts can register and these private companies will connect lawyers to people in various fields, including forensics and medical specialists. Some agencies offer 'urgent quotes within the hour'. Rates can vary hugely, with fees varying between the type of expert and the type of case. Some will be paid less than £100 an hour in legal aid cases, but fees for others will be much more. In criminal prosecutions, the crown must provide defence teams with access to all material that is capable of undermining the prosecution case, including expert opinions. However, there is no requirement on the defence to do the same. In civil litigation, there is also a legal obligation for parties to share any relevant documents or other information that could support or undermine their case.

Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts
Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Politicians, lawyers and doctors express concern over use of expert witnesses in English courts

A lack of regulation over the use of expert witnesses in English courts could be leading to miscarriages of justice, senior politicians, lawyers and doctors have said. The former attorney general Dominic Grieve and the former justice secretary Jack Straw were among those to tell the Guardian that criminal and civil trials were sometimes hanging on evidence by self-appointed 'experts' who could lack relevant knowledge. Grieve warned that although experts were supposed to be independent, they often came across as being 'hired guns'. 'Expert evidence is clearly critical, legitimate and in some cases can be absolute clinchers,' he said. But when dealing with issues 'at the limits of human scientific knowledge and understanding', expert witnesses could make people feel comfortable about making decisions when 'quite frankly, the evidence isn't there', he said. Concerns over the use of expert witnesses have been raised in relation to the case of Lucy Letby, the neonatal nurse convicted of murdering seven babies. Lawyers appealing against her conviction argue that the expert evidence presented at her trial was flawed. Expert witnesses were also criticised during the Post Office scandal, where subpostmasters were convicted of stealing based on evidence from IT experts that has been subject to criticism. Expert witnesses are used in both criminal and civil courts to give information and opinion on matters relevant to the case that would be considered outside the knowledge of a judge or jury. They are supposed to give an objective and unbiased opinion, according to guidelines from the Crown Prosecution Service, and can be instructed by the prosecution and the defence. But there are no formal controls on who can describe themself as an expert or training required to ensure they understand legal procedure. Jack Straw, a former justice secretary, said there was a 'nagging worry' that expert witnesses were not being properly regulated. He said courts often encourage both sides to agree on using one expert witness, to save on time and costs, but 'in my view this emphasises even more the need for there to be better regulation of expert witnesses' to ensure reliability. Nazir Afzal, a former chief crown prosecutor for north-west England, said there are 'a number of issues' with the system. He said it would generally be up to a judge to decide whether somebody has the relevant expertise, which becomes more complicated if the area of expertise is related to 'lived experience' rather than science. With international experts, he said, it may also be difficult for a court to verify their qualifications. He also said there were issues with 'expert shopping', where lawyers will consult different experts until they find one who will say what they need them to. The law firm Bond Solon offers expert witnesses training, and also runs an annual survey that looks at improving standards of expert evidence. More than a third of experts who responded to the 2024 survey said they had experienced 'hired gun' experts in their field in the past year, referring to people who provide 'evidence to substantiate the opinion preferred by the instructing party'. One in four also said they had been pressured by solicitors to produce biased opinions. Simon Berney-Edwards, the chief executive of the Expert Witness Institute, a not-for-profit membership body for expert witnesses which provides training, vetting and a directory, said there 'is no bar set' to ensure people not only have the correct qualifications, but that they understand legal procedure. 'There is no thing that says [expert witnesses] have to be registered with their professional body, or with any regulatory body. The onus on vetting the quality of their expert remains very much with the legal team,' he said. 'Many people will say that they're doing expert witness work but haven't had one bit of training. Where you've got people that don't understand what they're doing, that's where you get the problems, the possible miscarriages of justice.' Expert witnesses are paid for their time, and although in criminal cases – particularly those funded via legal aid – it is not always very lucrative, people can make large sums in civil and medico-legal work. Prof Sir Norman Williams, a former president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, carried out a government commissioned review into gross negligence manslaughter prosecutions against medical professionals in 2018 that found widespread concern about expert witnesses. The review found issues with 'the quality and consistency of opinion provided by healthcare professionals acting as expert witnesses' that may not be uncovered until trial or appeal, and made recommendations for more training. 'Ideally one would like to see a system that was better regulated, but I can't see that happening easily,' Williams said. 'You have to be somewhat concerned that problems [highlighted in the review] can recur, because some cases are very complex, they're difficult for juries to appreciate. If all the factors aren't taken into consideration, there could be miscarriages of justice.' Jonathan Lord, an NHS consultant gynaecologist and co-chair of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists abortion taskforce, said there is concern among medics about some witness evidence that has come before the courts. 'They are hired by one side, not the court, and many have substantial earnings from this work, so conflicts of interest that would not be acceptable in other professional spheres are embedded into the system,' he said. 'While they are supposed to be neutral, given the large payments involved and the need to be called and engaged again in the future, it's hard to be reassured that bias doesn't creep in.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store