Conservative Karol Nawrocki wins Poland's presidential election
Mr Nawrocki won 50.89% of the votes in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received 49.11%.
The close race had the country on edge since a first-round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union.
An early exit poll released on Sunday evening suggested Mr Trzaskowski was headed to victory before updated polling began to reverse the picture hours later.
The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new leader, who was backed by US President Donald Trump.
Most day-to-day power in the Polish political system rests with a prime minister chosen by the parliament.
However, the president's role is not merely ceremonial. The office holds the power to influence foreign policy and to veto legislation.
Nawrocki will succeed Andrzej Duda, a conservative whose second and final term ends on August 6.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk came to power in late 2023 at the end of a coalition government that spans a broad ideological divide — so broad that it hasn't been able to fulfil certain of Mr Tusk's electoral promises, such as loosening the restrictive abortion law.
But Mr Duda's veto power has been another obstacle.
It has prevented Mr Tusk from fulfilling promises to reverse laws that politicised the court system in a way that the European Union declared to be undemocratic.
Now it appears Mr Tusk will have no way to fulfil those promises, which he had made both to voters and to the EU.
Mr Nawrocki, a 42-year-old historian, was tapped by the Law and Justice party as part of its push for a fresh start.
The party governed Poland from 2015 to 2023, when it lost power to a centrist coalition led by Mr Tusk.
Some political observers predicted the party would never make a comeback, and Mr Nawrocki was chosen as a new face who would not be burned by the scandals of the party's eight years of rule.
Mr Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values.
Those who oppose secular trends, including LGBTQ+ visibility, have embraced him, viewing him as a reflection of the traditional values they grew up with.
Mr Trump made it clear he wanted Mr Nawrocki as Poland's president.
The conservative group Conservative Political Action Conference (Cpac) held its first meeting in Poland last week to give Mr Nawrocki a boost.
Kristi Noem, the US Homeland Security secretary and a prominent ally of Mr Trump, strongly praised Mr Nawrocki and urged Poles to vote for him.
The US has about 10,000 troops stationed in Poland and Ms Noem suggested that military ties could deepen with Mr Nawrocki as president.
A common refrain from Mr Nawrocki's supporters is that he will restore 'normality,' as they believe Mr Trump has done.
US flags often appeared at Mr Nawrocki's rallies, and his supporters believed that he offered a better chance for good ties with the Trump administration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Britain bled for America after 9/11 - but Trump still calls us NATO freeloaders
Once again, NATO's warning sirens are blaring but this time they're being sounded not just by a hawkish US defence secretary, but by Donald Trump's hand-picked megaphone. Pete Hegseth, a Fox News fixture turned Pentagon mouthpiece, has marched into Brussels and told Europe to get its act together. His demand? NATO allies must ramp up defence spending to five per cent of GDP or risk losing American support. It's a steep ask, but let's be honest: this isn't coming from Hegseth alone. He's simply parroting the orders of his puppetmaster back in Washington. Trump has spent years bellyaching that Europe doesn't pull its weight, pushing the fiction that the United States carries the whole NATO alliance like a single parent doing all the chores. Hegseth is now trying to turn that narrative into policy. Never mind that the only time NATO's mutual defence clause, Article 5, has ever been invoked was to defend the United States. After the horrors of 9/11, it was Britain, France, Canada and others who answered the call and bled alongside American forces in Afghanistan. We didn't hesitate. We didn't quibble. We showed up. But Trump? He recently claimed he doesn't believe NATO allies would come to America's defence if the roles were reversed. It wasn't just insulting, it was revisionist nonsense. Trump has never let the facts get in the way of a good rant. And now, with his second term, he's dusted off the old playbook: threatened the allies, demanded more cash, and wrapped it all in a red-white-and-blue flag of grievance. Hegseth, speaking ahead of a NATO defence ministers meeting, didn't bother with diplomacy. 'The commitment is there. Five per cent on defence spending,' he said. 'We don't need more flags. We need more fighting formations… hard power.' In other words, stop talking and start paying up or else. NATO's new Secretary-General, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, echoed the urgency. He made it plain: sticking to the current two per cent spending target won't cut it anymore. 'Forget it,' he said bluntly. In the face of Russia's aggression, he added, Europe must 'equalise' with the US. And what of Britain? We're currently hovering at just over two per cent - enough to technically meet the old NATO target, but nowhere near the five per cent being floated now. Downing Street is under pressure to lift that figure to 3.5 per cent to avoid falling out with the Trump White House. Sir Keir Starmer has promised to raise defence spending to three per cent when economic conditions allow, which, for those in the States, has been taken as political code for 'don't hold your breath.' Meanwhile, NATO wants to have 300,000 troops ready to deploy to the eastern flank within 30 days. Experts say we're nowhere close. Russia isn't waiting around, and if we don't catch up, we'll be caught out. Let's not kid ourselves. These new capability targets aren't just about tanks and missiles, they're about logistics, transport, refuelling, and the infrastructure needed to move large armies quickly. All of it costs serious money. The uncomfortable truth is this: for too long, Britain and Europe have been skating by on goodwill, political promises, and Washington's indulgence. That indulgence may soon run dry, and we'll only have ourselves to blame. It's time to stop playing catch-up, stop relying on American muscle, and start taking responsibility for our own defence. If we want to remain a serious player on the world stage, we need to start acting like one before Trump throws his NATO dummy out of the pram once and for all.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Is the end of the dreaded airport queue in sight? Not quite
Last week, British passengers arriving at Tenerife South Airport reported 'inhumane' conditions after queueing for more than two hours without access to water or loos. 'We couldn't move our arms, we could barely breathe, and people were sweating. Some parents lifted their children onto their shoulders to stop them from suffocating,' one passenger told local media. It's a frightening image, and one that has become more common at European airports since British air passengers became 'third-country nationals' after Brexit. This effectively gives us the same rights as arrivals from, say, Venezuela, banishing us to the often snail-paced 'All Passports' queue to get a stamp on arrival. When flying home we must also pass through border control to get a second exit stamp before proceeding to the gate. This can lead to scenarios where passengers are kettled at the gates with no access to refreshments if a flight is delayed, and no way to go back to the main terminal area. A new deal Change, it seems, is on the horizon. The Labour party has struck a deal with the EU to allow British passport holders to pass through e-gates, and the introduction of the Entry/Exit System (EES) in October will automate identity checks and remove the need for manual passport stamps. So will these images of British passengers snaking out of arrival halls at European airports soon be a thing of the past? Yes, but it may take a while. When it first rolls out, EES will require British (and all non-EU) travellers to provide fingerprints and facial images when entering or exiting the Schengen Area. This process has been much-delayed, not least because implementing it requires a continent-wide tech overhaul. And as we all know, airport IT systems, often operated by third-party firms and alongside multiple other systems, have a tendency to buckle at inopportune moments. If the new tech doesn't create hold-ups, the data capture process could. Pressing thumbs on sensors and having a photograph taken may sound like a simple process, but how many times have you seen somebody push their passport into the e-gate sensor the wrong way up? Such are the fears of hold-ups that airports are planning 'safety valve' procedures, where the requirement to capture everyone's data will be temporarily waived if a checkpoint gets too busy. On e-gates, I have found this new Labour/EU e-gates 'agreement' to be somewhat smoke and mirrors. The wording in the relevant document says that 'British passengers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe'. But this does not necessarily mean we will be able to use fast-track EU e-gates. Instead, it might be that we remain in the naughty ('All Passports') queue that happens to have an e-gate at the end of it. This will ultimately be up for individual countries and airports to decide. Additional hurdles Perhaps I'm being overly negative. Let's say that the EES roll-out isn't as clunky as feared, and that through some miracle the majority of European airports do kindly allow Britons to use their fast-track e-gates. Surely the airport queues will have simmered down by next summer? Maybe. But we will still face the additional border check when flying home, albeit with biometrics rather than a passport stamp. Even if e-gates are rolled out to British arrivals (as Faro Airport announced this week), we will still need to go to another booth afterwards to get our passports stamped by a human. And hold-ups like those seen in Tenerife are as much to do with poor scheduling as anything else. I checked the arrivals board on Tuesday June 2, and at 10.40am there were scheduled flights from Manchester (Jet2), Liverpool (Jet2), East Midlands (Tui) and Bournemouth (Ryanair). Ten minutes later, flights from Birmingham and Leeds (both Jet2) were scheduled to land, plus another from Paris. That's seven 180-or-so capacity flights touching onto tarmac, one after the other, in the space of ten minutes, at a single-runway, single-terminal airport. Even the sleekest, AI-powered biometric arrivals system would struggle to process all those passengers without the formation of a queue. There are some changes to the airport process that we can feel optimistic about. Soon, we'll be able to take greater quantities of liquids through security at all UK airports. A shake-up of UK flight paths promises to reduce air traffic delays before the end of the decade. And yes, all this new tech will eventually reduce friction at borders. But when you are stuck in a packed arrivals hall with a child on your shoulders and no access to water, you will be praying for progress now – not at some ambiguous point in the future.
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Aide to EU chief joins tariff negotiation team to spur US talks, sources say
BRUSSELS, June 5 (Reuters) - The European Union has changed its team locked in trade talks with the Trump administration, bringing in a close aide to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to deal more swiftly with political questions arising from the technical negotiations, three sources familiar with the talks said. The move follows frequent outbursts of frustration by U.S. President Donald Trump at what the White House perceives as slow progress in talks with the EU. Late in May he recommended a 50% tariff on most European goods from June, before backtracking. The move to bring more political decision-making to the EU team reflects challenges confronting the bloc as it negotiates a trading relationship with a U.S. president who has said repeatedly the EU was established to screw the United States. It also reflects the difficulties negotiating trade terms in isolation when Trump has sought to fold non-tariff barriers such as digital services taxes and food standards into the talks. "If you are a trade negotiator you need to be sure you have full political backing, so if the top level is there you feel stronger," one of the sources said. The expanded team, which apart from the von der Leyen aide now also includes a cabinet member of Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, was dispatched to Washington this week after a call between Trump and von der Leyen in which they agreed to fast-track negotiations. Following that call Trump agreed to allow more time for talks between Washington and the 27-nation bloc to produce a deal by July 9. "It was a merger of Commission layers to reinforce and act fast," a second of the sources said of the team's expansion, adding the team's shape could change again as talks continue. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said a meeting with Sefcovic in Paris on Wednesday had been constructive and that he was pleased negotiations were advancing quickly. He noted "a willingness by the EU to work with us to find a concrete way forward to achieve reciprocal trade". Sefcovic told reporters that both sides had concluded talks were "advancing in the right direction, at pace," and that high-level contacts would follow shortly. He and Greer had agreed how to "restructure" the focus of negotiations with the United States, he added. Washington was focused on four areas in its negotiations with other countries: tariffs, non-tariff barriers, purchases and economic security, one of the sources said. Trump has already hit Europe with a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium as well as a heightened levy on car imports. The EU is racing to secure a deal before July 9 when "reciprocal" tariffs on most other goods could surge from 10% to as high as 50%. Unlike Britain, the first major economy to reach a narrow trade agreement with the Trump administration, the EU is pushing for a comprehensive deal, with a baseline tariff rate below the 10% now in force. Two of the three sources said additional technical expertise had also been added to the negotiating team, but there had been no changes to the team's leadership. "I think it suits everyone to have the political cover," the first source said.
