
Why Donald Trump must let Jerome Powell do his job
'One of the dumbest, most destructive people in Government'
'Too Late' Jerome Powell is a Fool, who doesn't have a clue.'
'A golfer who can't putt.'
'Total and Complete Moron.'
'Real dummy… very dumb, hardheaded person.'
The Economy Speaks — But Are We Listening?
Live Events
ETMarkets.com
GDP projections have been cut from 2.1% in Dec 2024 to 1.4% in June 2025.
Core PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditure) Inflation is rising: 2.5% in Dec 2024 to 3.0% in June 2025.
Unemployment? It's inching up too: From 4.3% in Dec 2024 to 4.5% in June 2025.
Powell: The Only Adult in the Room
Trump's Interference: A Strategic Mistake?
Markets Can Ignore Reality — Powell Can't
Let's not repeat that mistake.
Final Word: Let the Man Do His Job
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
No, These aren't random insults from an angry investor on social media. These are actual words from the President of the United States 'Donald J. Trump' not aimed at a political rival, but at his own Federal Reserve Chairman, 'Jerome Powell'.Now imagine this: the most powerful economy in the world, hanging on a tightrope of inflation job losses , and slowing growth and its central banker being publicly undermined by the very person who nominated him. After decades in the market, I've learned one thing with certainty: nothing shakes investor confidence more than uncertainty at the top.While Powell is meticulously navigating an economy dangerously close to stagflation , Trump is busy firing verbal missiles that only escalates confusion. Powell's job is hard enough already. What he needs is support, not sabotage.The markets may be cheering, with the S&P 500 rallying after the Fed's latest decision to hold rates steady. But don't let the green screens fool you. the U.S. economy 's foundations are beginning to shake.These aren't just numbers, this is the classic recipe for stagflation, and we've seen it before. In the 1970s and early '80s, the Fed learned a hard truth: you don't fight inflation with politics or tweets — you fight it with policy and patience.Today, Powell is the one standing between global economy and another inflation spiral. The Fed Chair doesn't get to dance with sentiment or popularity polls. He deals in data — and data alone. Unlike markets, Powell cannot afford to celebrate illusions.Yet here we are: headlines promise rate cuts, politicians demand stimulus, and the public cheers short-term sugar highs. But Powell must look beyond applause. He must look at the map, not the mood.In a bid to regain political ground, Trump has renewed his campaign of Fed criticism. From threatening to replace Powell to promising deep tax cuts and trade tariffs — his actions are not only populist but a threat to economic stability.Let's connect the dots: tariffs lead to price hikes, Higher prices raise inflation, and Inflation forces rate hikes — creating a vicious cycle that no central bank wants to enter, especially not one already juggling slowing growth and rising joblessness.The stock market has a notorious history of celebrating bad news when it's wrapped in a pretty forecast. But central bankers can't afford to keep myopic vision. Powell is fighting to avoid a situation where political pressure forces him to cut rates too soon, only for inflation to spiral out of control again.Yes, retail investors want relief. Yes, Wall Street craves easy money. But at what cost?I've seen this play before. When inflation was called 'transitory' in 2021, we ended up with the highest price surge in four decades.America doesn't need another stage performer. It needs a steady hand, adjusting economic levers with precision, not populism. That man, whether popular or not is Jerome Powell.Mr. Trump, you've built towers. Now let Mr Powell install stability.The Fed Chair doesn't need jibes — he needs space. Because this isn't about applause. It's about accountability. It's not about dominance. It's about direction.Let Powell do his job — not because it's easy, but because it's essential. Not because it's popular, but because it's right. In a world roaring for attention, real leadership still whispers through results.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Satellite images show Iran expanding Fardo nuclear facility after US bombed the site last week
New satellite images showed Iranian construction crews and heavy machinery at the Fordo nuclear facility five days after the US carried out massive strikes at Tehran's three nuclear sites. According to a report by The New York Post, images captured by Maxar Technologies on Friday showed crews operated excavators, bulldozers, and other construction vehicles near the craters and punctures in the ground above the nuclear facility caused by the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs dropped by American B-2s last weekend. The report also said that some satellite images showed apparent construction crews building access roads to the facility and rebuilding the damaged dirt road that led to the bunker laboratory that was targeted by the US as part of Israel's conflict with Iran. Similar construction activity was seen on the surface of the Fardo nuclear site in images from before the US attack. 'Those vehicles appeared to be moving unidentified contents out of the facility to a location roughly half-a-mile away,' the report added. The United Nation's nuclear watchdog, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said that Fordo's centrifuges are currently 'no longer operational' and the facility has 'suffered enormous damage'. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said 'there is very, very, very considerable damage', the report added. The extent of the destruction — and the amount of time the Iranian regime's program has been set back — have yet to be officially determined. The Trump administration on Thursday insisted the operation had been a total success, berating journalists for having reported on an intelligence assessment that took a more conservative line. President Donald Trump "created the conditions to end the war, decimating – choose your word – obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities", Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told journalists at the Pentagon. Earlier this week however, US media reported on a leaked preliminary US intelligence assessment that said the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear programme by months – coverage sharply criticised by Hegseth and others. The Israeli military has said it had delivered a "significant hit" to Iran's nuclear programme. While it said its attacks had delayed the programme "by several years" it also said it was "still early to assess the results of the operation". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday hailed a "historic victory" in the 12-day conflict and vowed to thwart "any attempt" by Iran to rebuild its nuclear programme, according to an AFP report. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has hailed what he described as Iran's "victory" over Israel. "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways," Khamenei said, insisting the strikes had done "nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, the report added. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi however called the damage "serious" and said a detailed assessment was under way. Doubts remain about whether Iran quietly removed more than 400 kilogrammes (880 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60 per cent from its most sensitive sites before the strikes – to hide it elsewhere in the country. The stockpile could in theory produce more than nine atomic bombs – if the enrichment level were raised to 90 per cent. A Khamenei adviser, Ali Shamkhani, has said that the country still had its stockpile. "Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, game isn't over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, political will remain," he said in a post on X. (With inputs from agencies)


Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
‘These people are SICK': Donald Trump calls report of paying Iran $30 billion for nuclear agreement ‘fake news'
US President Donald Trump on Friday slammed a news report of America willing to pay Iran $30 billion to build non-military nuclear facilities. Calling the report 'fake news', he said that it was a 'ridiculous idea'. The report, published by CNN earlier this week, had said quoting four sources that Donald Trump has proposed to pay $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear programme. 'Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea. It's just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!,' he said in a post on Truth Social. Trump bashes news report Bashing CNN directly, Trump said that one of their reporters has 'no idea what she is talking about." 'Where does CNN get its 'talent?' Just watched someone named Abby Phillip lecture her audience on Tariffs and the economy (which is doing record business!). She has absolutely no idea what she is talking about, strictly 3rd rate. Fortunately, the audience has long ago left CNN, and it will only get WORSE. LOSERS ALL!!!,' he said. Trump's second post on the matter According to the report by CNN citing at least four sources, the Donald Trump administration discussed helping Iran get access to $30 billion to build the nuclear programme, ease sanctions and free up billions in restricted Iranian funds. The talks were reportedly held in a hush-hush manner as Iran and Israel continued to strike a flurry of drones and missiles at each other, CNN reported, quoting sources. The talks have continued even as the two countries agreed to a ceasefire. The Trump administration has floated several evolving proposals in return for one thing: zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently maintained it needs. This was done a day before America launched three strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. One Trump official told the outlet that the funding will not directly come from the US and its Arab partners may pay the bill. 'The US is willing to lead these talks' with Iran, the Trump administration official told CNN. 'And someone is going to need to pay for the nuclear program to be built, but we will not make that commitment.' Iran has repeatedly resisted the US's offers to strike a nuclear deal, insisting that nuclear enrichment is necessary for it.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump says Iran warned of missile strike at Al Udeid base: ‘They asked if 1 o'clock was OK — I said fine'
Donald Trump Says Iran Warned US Ahead of Missile Strike Discrepancy Emerges Between Donald Trump's Tone and Top Military Official Live Events Pentagon Praises Troops, Defends Trump and Pete Hegseth Donald Trump Suggests Base Was Evacuated Before Strike FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As US president Donald prepared to leave a NATO summit on Wednesday, he said something surprising and unexpected, that Iran had warned the United States in advance of a missile strike on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and that he personally told them to go ahead, as per a report. Iran's attack on a US military base was in retaliation for the United States' strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites amid the conflict between Israel and described Iranians as they "were very nice," and revealed that, "They gave us warning," as quoted in report. The US president said that Iranians asked Trump, "We're going to shoot 'em. Is one o'clock OK?," and Trump admitted that he replied, saying, "It's fine," as quoted in the READ: Who is Hariana Veras, the woman Trump flirted with? President says she is beautiful and wishes more were like her However, Trump's remark regarding Iran's strike on US forces at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, an attack that involved more than a dozen Iranian missiles, was in stark contrast to what Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine told reporters the next day, according to the said it was potentially the largest single use of the Patriot air defense system in US history, explaining that "there was a lot of metal flying around, and yet our U.S. air defenders had only seconds to make complex decisions with strategic impact," as quoted in the went on to praise the US military, as he said, "These awesome humans, along with their Qatari brothers and sisters in arms, stood between a salvo of Iranian missiles and the safety of Al Udeid," and he also called them the "unsung heroes of the 21st-century United States Army," as quoted in the READ: Could Disney stock surge? Analysts raise price targets after strong earnings While, Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson pointed out that, "The safety of our service members is of the utmost importance to Secretary Hegseth, and he couldn't be prouder of the troops who put their lives on the line every day to keep Americans safe," as quoted in the on, even chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said, 'Thanks to President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's leadership, our troops know that their commander-in-chief and secretary of defense have their back. Any insinuation to the contrary is absurd,' as quoted in the READ: Pornhub, XNXX in panic? US Supreme Court ruling lets states crack down on online adult content access However, there is speculation that Trump might have been aware of the danger that the Iranian attack posed because just after saying he gave Iran permission to strike, he also pointed out that "everyone was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt except for the gunners," quoted even Caine had revealed that only two Patriot surface-to-air missile batteries remained on base, leaving "roughly 44 American soldiers responsible for defending the entire base," which includes the forward headquarters for US Central Command, as reported by said, "The oldest soldier was a 28-year-old captain. The youngest was a 21-year-old private who'd been in the military for less than two years," as quoted in the according to his claims, Trump said Iran warned of the strike and asked if 1 o'clock was acceptable. He replied, 'It's fine.'It was in retaliation for US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites during tensions involving Iran and Israel, as per the report.