Trump sues to oust US public broadcasting board members
In a complaint filed in federal court in Washington, the US Justice Department said Trump lawfully fired the three board members - Laura Ross, Diane Kaplan and Tom Rothman — and requested a court order ousting them.
The lawsuit is the latest twist in a larger fight between the CPB, which spends more than $US500 million annually on organisations like the Public Broadcasting Service and National Public Radio, and the Trump administration.
The White House and many Republicans have argued that the government should not provide funding to support programming that they consider too liberal.
The CPB did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment from the organisation and from the board members.
Created by the US Congress in 1967, the CPB provides financial support for PBS, NPR, and more than 1500 locally managed public radio and TV stations.
A Trump executive order from May aimed to slash public subsidies to PBS and NPR, which have called the move blatantly unlawful.
The CPB's directors are nominated by the US president and confirmed by the Senate for six-year terms. The five current members of the board were all nominated by former president Joe Biden.
White House Deputy Director of Presidential Personnel Trent Morse sent emails to Rothman, Ross, and Kaplan in April saying they had been terminated from their posts.
The CPB responded by filing its own lawsuit, saying that "because the president has no authority over the CPB, he has no authority to terminate its board members as he has purported to do here."
US District Judge Randolph Moss, who is hearing that case, ruled last month that the three board members can keep their seats, even as he denied the CPB an injunction blocking Trump from removing them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump says he wants Musk to 'thrive' as Epstein scrutiny continues
US President Donald Trump says he does not want to destroy Elon Musk's businesses and has expressed hopes that they "thrive" alongside the US economy. Mr Trump made the comments on his Truth Social platform on Thursday morning local time, over a month after the pair had a public falling out which eventually led the world's richest man to found an alternative political party. "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!," Mr Trump said. "I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE." The US president and the tech billionaire had been close allies before and for the months after Mr Trump began his second term. But relations between the two soured after Mr Musk criticised the president's "big beautiful bill" legislation for adding trillions to US government's debt and undermining his so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Mr Trump has maintained the space and automotive billionaire was unhappy because the bill would remove incentives for consumers to buy electric vehicles, such as those made by Tesla. A week after the spat in June, Reuters reported the White House had directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts to ready possible retaliation against the Mr Musk and his companies. Mr Trump also publicly pondered whether to deport Mr Musk, who is a naturalised US citizen. On Wednesday, the tech billionaire also warned investors that US government cuts to electric vehicle makers could lead to a "rough few quarters" for Tesla. Before the relationship soured, Mr Musk had spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to help Mr Trump win November's presidential election and led the Department of Government Efficiency's chaotic effort to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce. Mr Trump's new-found warmth for Mr Musk comes as he faces considerable and sustained pressure from some of his own supporters over his handling of the Epstein case. During their public spat, Mr Musk posted and then deleted that Mr Trump's name was mentioned in files related to Jeffrey Epstein. On Thursday local time, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche was scheduled to meet Ghislane Maxwell, who was convicted of trafficking minors on behalf of the deceased paedophile and financier. Multiple US media outlets reported Mr Blanche as expected to interview Maxwell at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida. Maxwell, the daughter of the late British press baron Robert Maxwell, is the only former Epstein associate who was convicted in connection with his activities, which right-wing conspiracy theorists allege included trafficking young models for VIPs. Reuters/AFP
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Risk of higher US tariffs looms despite beef deal
Australia's move to lift restrictions on US beef is unlikely to shift the dial on tariff negotiations, as the nation's products face the possibility of even steeper duties. The Albanese government will allow access to US beef that has been raised in Canada or Mexico but processed in America, following a safety review. Australia is subject to a baseline 10 per cent tariff applied by the Trump administration and has been keeping an eye on the trade negotiations of other countries. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said Donald Trump's flagged higher tariffs might include the nation's exports. "The risk for Australia is that we may be lucky to hang on to 10 per cent, which could actually turn out to be higher," he told AAP. "This (beef decision) might help us hang on to 10 per cent or avoid a worse outcome, but I don't think there's any guarantees of that." American beef was banned from Australia almost two decades ago following an outbreak of mad cow disease. Mr Trump has pressured the government to ease restrictions as Labor argues for an exemption from the tariffs as part of the US president's deepening trade war. Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said while biosecurity investigations can take a while to finalise, it was a "sensible outcome". "The challenge here is it doesn't look like we're putting together a package deal," he said. "It'd be better if there was a package approach to this if we're seeking to gather an overall trade outcome with the US." Australian Farm Institute executive director Katie McRobert said the cattle industry has been "extremely nervous" about biosecurity traceability from different parts of the north and South America regions. "We wouldn't expect a significant impact on Australian producers from the potential to import American beef ... because we already produce far more beef in Australia than we can possibly eat," she said. Trade Minister Don Farrell said he didn't have any meetings scheduled with American counterparts after last meeting US trade representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of an OECD ministerial meeting in Paris in June. Senator Farrell said Mr Greer didn't raise beef concerns at that meeting. "We believe that America should lift those tariffs on Australia, there's no justification whatsoever for the United States to apply tariffs to Australia," he told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. "We have a free trade agreement, that agreement makes it very clear that it's a tariff free arrangement." Senator Farrell also denied the move was to create a bargaining chip. The Philippines and Japan recently struck agreements with the US to lower their tariff rates, but both are still above the 10 per cent baseline.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Risk of higher US tariffs looms despite beef deal
Australia's move to lift restrictions on US beef is unlikely to shift the dial on tariff negotiations, as the nation's products face the possibility of even steeper duties. The Albanese government will allow access to US beef that has been raised in Canada or Mexico but processed in America, following a safety review. Australia is subject to a baseline 10 per cent tariff applied by the Trump administration and has been keeping an eye on the trade negotiations of other countries. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver said Donald Trump's flagged higher tariffs might include the nation's exports. "The risk for Australia is that we may be lucky to hang on to 10 per cent, which could actually turn out to be higher," he told AAP. "This (beef decision) might help us hang on to 10 per cent or avoid a worse outcome, but I don't think there's any guarantees of that." American beef was banned from Australia almost two decades ago following an outbreak of mad cow disease. Mr Trump has pressured the government to ease restrictions as Labor argues for an exemption from the tariffs as part of the US president's deepening trade war. Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said while biosecurity investigations can take a while to finalise, it was a "sensible outcome". "The challenge here is it doesn't look like we're putting together a package deal," he said. "It'd be better if there was a package approach to this if we're seeking to gather an overall trade outcome with the US." Australian Farm Institute executive director Katie McRobert said the cattle industry has been "extremely nervous" about biosecurity traceability from different parts of the north and South America regions. "We wouldn't expect a significant impact on Australian producers from the potential to import American beef ... because we already produce far more beef in Australia than we can possibly eat," she said. Trade Minister Don Farrell said he didn't have any meetings scheduled with American counterparts after last meeting US trade representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of an OECD ministerial meeting in Paris in June. Senator Farrell said Mr Greer didn't raise beef concerns at that meeting. "We believe that America should lift those tariffs on Australia, there's no justification whatsoever for the United States to apply tariffs to Australia," he told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. "We have a free trade agreement, that agreement makes it very clear that it's a tariff free arrangement." Senator Farrell also denied the move was to create a bargaining chip. The Philippines and Japan recently struck agreements with the US to lower their tariff rates, but both are still above the 10 per cent baseline.
