GE2025: SDP's Paul Tambyah calls on Chan Chun Sing to reassure voters they can vote ‘without fear of retribution'
'I would call on Mr Chan Chun Sing… to make a strong statement reassuring Singaporeans they can vote freely without fear of retribution, no matter whether they work in the civil service, the military, the police or any other government organisation,' said Dr Tambyah at an election rally.
In addition to his education portfolio, Chan also serves as Minister-in-charge of the Public Service.
Dr Tambyah cited a Straits Times article published on Monday, in which a 21-year-old law student – who attended an SDP rally the day before – declined to reveal her name after her father, an employee at a government-linked corporation, advised against it.
Such fears could be 'generational', Dr Tambyah said in his 12-minute address, noting that the student's father 'may have grown up in the era of Operation Coldstore or Operation Spectrum, when the 3 am knock on the door was a reality for critics of the PAP'.
'It is disturbing that today, many young people still share the same fear,' he added.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Dr Tambyah was speaking at a lunchtime rally at UOB Plaza's promenade, an event traditionally known as the Fullerton rally. He was the seventh of eight SDP speakers, with party chief Chee Soon Juan delivering the final speech.
In his 23-minute speech, Dr Chee criticised several incidents that occurred under the government's watch.
Said Dr Chee: 'I'm going to list out a list of PAP scandals and screw-ups only because our PAP ministers keep running the propaganda that they are exceptional, and that they don't need an opposition to hold them accountable.'
He cited Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong's handling of former Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin affairs; the use of TraceTogether data for police investigations; the Ridout Road controversy; and the six-day MRT breakdown on the East West Line, as some examples.
'My message is not that the PAP (or) this government is 100 per cent bad or that it's 100 per cent good,' Dr Chee said.
'What I want to get across to you, is that the PAP is most certainly not the exceptional party that it says that it is. And if you're not exceptional, then be humble.'
Tuesday's event was the second lunchtime rally of this year's General Election (GE), following the People's Action Party's (PAP) rally at the same venue on Monday.
The SDP is the only opposition party to have held a lunchtime rally since 1997, when the Workers' Party last did so; the last time the SDP held such a rally in the Central Business District was during GE2015.
Dr Tambyah is contesting Bukit Panjang SMC, where he faces a rematch against the PAP's Liang Eng Hwa, who narrowly defeated him five years ago with 53.73 per cent of the vote – the closest margin among all the single-ward contests that year.
Fear tactics
At the rally, other SDP candidates spoke about the ruling party's 'fear tactics', urging voters not to let 'fear guide (their) decisions'.
'As we turn into the final days of the campaign, you will hear the PAP turn up the fear rhetoric,' said James Gomez, a candidate for Sembawang GRC.
'When you vote for a stronger opposition, you are not hurting Singapore – you are only threatening the PAP's desire for total control,' he added.
First-time candidate Ariffin Sha, standing in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC, also urged voters to reject what he described as the 'policy of fear'.
'Do not let the PAP's fear tactics sway you in any way,' he said. 'You are not shortchanging yourself by voting for an SDP MP in Parliament – the government's programmes will still go on your estate.'
Other speakers at Tuesday's lunchtime rally included Jufri Salim, contesting Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC, as well as Alfred Tan, Damanhuri Abas, and Bryan Lim, who are all part of the Sembawang GRC slate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- Straits Times
How Europe learned to speak so Trump would listen
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump's persistent effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. BERLIN – By mid-day Aug 15 in Europe, a question was bouncing among the government offices and vacation villas of the continent's most influential leaders. The Ukrainian president was headed to the White House for a crucial meeting with President Donald Trump. Mr Trump was allowing him to bring backup. But who should go? It was the sort of dilemma that once might have erupted into public disputes among Germany, France and Britain, the continent's largest powers. This time, it didn't. The leaders of those countries decided they would all accompany Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, to Washington, for a summit with Mr Trump about peace talks with Russia. So would the leaders of Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato. They flew in on separate planes. But with Mr Trump, they spoke in one voice. 'We were well prepared and well coordinated,' Mr Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, told reporters after he and his counterparts met Mr Trump at the White House. 'We also represented the same viewpoints. I think that really pleased the American president.' Mr Trump's persistent and sometimes volatile effort to bring a diplomatic end to the war between Ukraine and Russia has forged stronger bonds among European leaders. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 World Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out sending US troops Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Opinion The era of job dating? It's all about matching employers and talent Opinion Singapore's next phase of growth requires a refreshed blueprint Business SGX wants to woo private companies to list in Singapore, says its head of research It has strengthened the unity that emerged earlier this year amid Mr Trump's tariff threats and his wavering on what have been decades-long security guarantees that America has provided to Europe. Since Mr Trump's election, European leaders have raced to shore up their own defenses, wary of losing American support. Nato members, led by Germany, have pledged to increase their military spending significantly, to meet a target set by Mr Trump. Mr Merz, President Emmanuel Macron of France and Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain have signed new friendship treaties with one another and begun to build a set of shadow diplomatic institutions, including one for Ukraine, that advance European interests but do not include the United States. The last two weeks have forced them to coordinate even more closely, on the fly. After Mr Trump made the shock announcement that he would meet President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Alaska, Mr Merz quickly pulled together European allies for a video call with Mr Trump. The Europeans presented Mr Trump with a five-point strategy for him to take into the Alaska meeting – including the insistence that only Ukraine could negotiate any land swaps with Russia and that for serious peace talks to begin Russia must first agree to a ceasefire. Mr Trump signed on to it. But at the summit, he abandoned it – agreeing with Mr Putin's long-standing push to negotiate a peace deal while fighting continues, a position that advantages Russia, which is making gains on the battlefield. That reversal alarmed the European officials, even as they publicly stressed a few areas in which Mr Trump had seemingly won concessions, like the need for a robust multinational security guarantee for post-war Ukraine. After Mr Trump called to brief Mr Zelensky and then the European leaders on his way back from Alaska early on Aug 15, they scrambled again. They agreed on the large group to accompany Mr Zelensky, which was formalised by a White House invitation on the night of Aug 16, and hammered out a strategy for the meeting. Early on Aug 18, they huddled at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington. Their script leaned heavily on flattery for Trump, which is by now standard practice among visiting dignitaries, and on declarations of unity with each other and with Mr Trump. 'Everybody around this table is in favor of peace,' Mr Macron said, as television cameras rolled, near the start of a large group meeting with the president. The Europeans avoided big disagreements with Mr Trump; the closest anyone came to a diplomatic row was when Mr Merz, on camera, repeated his belief that talks between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin could only happen if a ceasefire was in place. Privately, Mr Merz pressed Mr Trump on at least forcing a ceasefire for the duration of any actual meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. They also tugged on Mr Trump's heartstrings. Mr Zelensky presented a letter from his wife to Mrs Melania Trump, the first lady, echoing her public concerns over the fate of Ukrainian children abducted by Russian troops. Mr Zelensky and Dr Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Union, raised the topic again shortly before their meeting ended and Mr Trump left to call Mr Putin. European leaders expressed confidence that the approach had helped to break whatever spell Mr Putin appeared to have cast over Mr Trump in Alaska, and that Mr Trump had ended the day back in agreement with them over most points about the peace process. Mr Trump, in an interview with Fox News on Aug 19, sounded pleased with the Europeans who had visited him. 'They want to get back to leading their countries,' he said. 'They're consumed with this far more than we are.' He also took credit, in a way, for their united front. 'A year ago, they wouldn't have come,' he said. 'They wouldn't have even thought about it.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US hikes steel, aluminium tariffs on imported appliances, railcars, EV parts
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The US Commerce department said 407 product categories are being added to the list of 'derivative' steel and aluminium products covered by sectoral tariffs. WASHINGTON - The US Commerce Department said on Aug 19 it is hiking steel and aluminium tariffs on more than 400 products including wind turbines, mobile cranes, appliances, bulldozers and other heavy equipment, along with railcars, motorcycles, marine engines, furniture and hundreds of other products. The department said 407 product categories are being added to the list of 'derivative' steel and aluminium products covered by sectoral tariffs, with a 50 per cent tariff on any steel and aluminium content of these products plus the country rate on the non-steel and non-aluminium content. Evercore ISI said in a research note the move covers more than 400 product codes representing over US$200 billion (S$256.96 billion) in imports in 2024 and estimates it will raise the overall effective tariff rate by around 1 percentage point. The department is also adding imported parts for automotive exhaust systems and electrical steel needed for electric vehicles to the new tariffs as well as components for buses, air conditioners as well as appliances including refrigerators, freezers and dryers. A group of foreign automakers had urged the department not to add the parts, saying the US does not have the domestic capacity to handle current demand. Tesla unsuccessfully asked Commerce to reject a request to add steel products used in electric vehicle motors and wind turbines, saying there was no available US capacity to produce steel for use in the drive unit of EVs. The new tariffs take effect immediately and also cover compressors and pumps and the metal in imported cosmetics and other personal care packaging like aerosol cans. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 World Trump rules out US troops but eyes air power in Ukraine deal Business SGX wants to woo private companies to list in Singapore, says its head of research Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Opinion The era of job dating? It's all about matching employers and talent Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza 'Today's action expands the reach of the steel and aluminium tariffs and shuts down avenues for circumvention – supporting the continued revitalisation of the American steel and aluminium industries,' said Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Jeffrey Kessler. Steelmakers including Cleveland Cliffs, Nucor and others had petitioned the administration to expand the tariffs to include additional steel and aluminium auto parts. REUTERS
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Accept diversity of perspectives to realise ‘we first' Singapore
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox In his National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong called on Singaporeans to build a 'we first' society, one where 'we' must precede 'me'. It is a vision worth embracing. At its heart, 'we first' recognises that government alone cannot create a caring society. Change spreads through countless small acts, through communities and institutions, and through people who look out for one another. Civil society groups are part of this ecosystem by providing help on the ground, gathering lived experiences, and shaping policies so they better reflect the realities of Singaporeans. We see every day how care and courage can transform lives: survivors of sexual violence who choose to make a police report, not only for themselves, but also so the next woman may be spared. We see it in volunteer helpliners who give their time to listen with patience and compassion, guiding callers through difficult options, and in advocates who push for reforms so that laws protect families from harm. These are the voices of 'we first' – people who know the well-being of others is their concern too. But solidarity requires more than neighbourly goodwill. It also needs systems that guard against inequality and abuse. Survivors of sexual violence need not only support services, but also police officers trained to respond sensitively, and laws that recognise emotional and physical abuse. These are not 'me' issues; they are 'we' issues because when women are safe, families and communities are stronger. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail At Aware, we try to make the 'we first' spirit practical. Through our bystander training, people learn how to step in safely when they witness harassment or abuse. When multiplied across society, such skills help create a culture where everyone knows they have a role in preventing harm. Crucially, 'we first' should never mean only one view. Respectful critique and alternative perspectives are part of caring for society. Different voices are not a threat; they are an expression of collective responsibility. If we engage in good faith and listen across divides, policies will be stronger and trust deeper. A 'we first' Singapore is an important aspiration. To realise it, we must embrace not only small acts of kindness, but also the diversity of perspectives that move us closer to justice. Corinna Lim Executive director Aware



