logo
The popular snack that can increase risk of type 2 diabetes

The popular snack that can increase risk of type 2 diabetes

Independent5 hours ago
Eating just three portions of French fries a week could significantly increase an individual's risk of developing type 2 diabetes, a new study suggests.
In contrast, those who consume similar amounts of boiled, baked, or mashed potatoes do not face an elevated risk, researchers found.
An international team, including an expert from the University of Cambridge, investigated the potential links between potato consumption and type 2 diabetes.
Academics analysed health data from more than 205,000 US health workers, with repeated surveys about their diets tracking their well-being over nearly four decades.
During this extensive follow-up period, some 22,000 cases of type 2 diabetes were documented.
Overall the research team found that consumption of baked, boiled or mashed potatoes were not linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D).
But people who had a higher consumption of French fries – at least three weekly servings – had a 20 per cent increased risk.
And those who eat fries five times a week appeared to have a 27 per cent increased risk.
'The risks associated with potato intake varied by cooking method,' the authors wrote in The BMJ.
'The association between higher potato intake and increased T2D risk is primarily driven by intake of French fries.
'Higher intake of French fries, but not combined baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes, was associated with a higher risk of T2D.'
The research team also found that replacing three servings of potatoes each week with whole grains was found to lower the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent.
'Replacing any form of potatoes, particularly French fries, with whole grains is estimated to lower the risk of T2D, reinforcing the importance of promoting whole grains as an essential part of a healthy diet,' they wrote.
But replacing potatoes with white rice was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, they found.
The research team also performed a review of all of the other studies on the topic which had similar findings.
In a linked editorial, also published in The BMJ, experts from the US and Denmark wrote: 'This finding also corresponds to the observed associations between high intake of ultra-processed foods and high risk of type 2 diabetes – French fries are often ultra-processed, whereas baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes are often minimally processed.'
They added: 'With their relatively low environmental impact and their health impact, potatoes can be part of a healthy and sustainable diet, though whole grains should remain a priority.'
Commenting on the study, Dr Faye Riley, research communications lead at Diabetes UK, said: 'This research shows that the link between potatoes and type 2 diabetes isn't as clear-cut as it might seem.
'Type 2 diabetes is a complex condition, with many factors influencing its development, including genetics, age and ethnicity.
'Diet is just one part of the picture, but this study suggests that how food is prepared can make a difference and reinforces the advice to prioritise whole grains and cut back on fried or heavily processed foods as a way to support a balanced diet and reduce your risk.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors
UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors

Nearly one in five doctors is considering quitting in the UK, new figures show, while one in eight is thinking about leaving the country to work abroad. The General Medical Council (GMC), which commissioned the research, is warning that plans to cut hospital waiting lists will be at risk unless more is done to retain them. By July 2029, the prime minister has said 92% of patients needing routine hospital treatment like hip and knee replacements will be seen within 18 weeks. "[Poor staff retention] could threaten government ambitions to reduce waiting times and deliver better care to patients," warned the authors of the GMC's latest report. The main reason doctors gave for considering moving abroad was they are "treated better" in other countries, while the second most common reason was better pay. Some 43% said they had researched career opportunities in other countries, while 15% reported taking "hard steps" towards moving abroad, like applying for roles or contacting recruiters. "Like any profession, doctors who are disillusioned with their careers will start looking elsewhere," said Charlie Massey, chief executive of the GMC. "Doctors need to be satisfied, supported, and see a hopeful future for themselves, or we may risk losing their talent and expertise altogether." 3:13 The report - which comes after a recent five-day walkout by resident doctors - is based on the responses of 4,697 doctors around the UK and also explores how they feel about career progression. One in three said they are unable to progress their education, training and careers in the way they want. Those who didn't feel like their careers were progressing were at higher risk of burnout and were less satisfied with their work. The GMC blamed workloads, competition for jobs, and lack of senior support for development for adversely impacting the career progression of UK doctors. 2:51 'Legitimate complaints' The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledged doctors had suffered "more than a decade of neglect". "Doctors have legitimate complaints about their conditions, including issues with training bottlenecks and career progression," said a spokesperson. "We want to work with them to address these and improve their working lives, which includes our plans set out in the 10 Year Health Plan to prioritise UK graduates and increase speciality training posts. "This government is committed to improving career opportunities and working conditions, bringing in ways to recognise and reward talent - as well as freeing up clinicians' time by cutting red tape."

The NHS must accept the reality of sex
The NHS must accept the reality of sex

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

The NHS must accept the reality of sex

The Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of sex in the Equality Act ought to have been the final word in a particularly ugly chapter of public discourse. Four months on from that landmark verdict, however, not enough has changed for the women who have suffered most from the capture of the public sector by gender extremism. It is time for ministers, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), to lay down the law that too many public bodies are still ignoring. Just look to Fife, whose NHS trust is still spending exorbitant sums of public money fighting an employment tribunal against a nurse, Sandie Peggie, who refused to share a female changing room with a transgender doctor. Ms Peggie, a working-class woman whose NHS career was curtailed after 30 years for standing up for the existence of biological sex, has been dragged through the mud for daring to object to a male-bodied colleague watching her deal with a menstrual flood. It was always absurd and offensive that Ms Peggie should be disciplined for expecting single-sex changing facilities. Now the law has been clarified, there should be no reason for the NHS to persist in wasting public money on tribunals brought by working women subjected to similar indignities. In Darlington, a group of nurses who similarly objected to a transgender colleague changing in their single-sex space will fight a full tribunal from October; others, including Jennifer Melle, who was racially abused by a trans-identifying male paedophile she called 'mister', have been suspended. • Trans doctor Beth Upton lamented lack of guidelines on changing rooms Enough is enough. The public sector in general and the health service in particular cannot be allowed to treat the law as optional. It is time for ministers to assert their authority. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has been admirably assertive in his dealings with the trans lobby in banning the prescription of puberty blockers to children. Now he must show the same initiative in forcing hospitals, NHS leaders and the NHS Confederation to abide by their legal obligations to female staff and patients. Mr Streeting must also ensure that the Scottish government duly falls into line. It now falls to the EHRC to state those obligations beyond reasonable doubt. The watchdog has dragged its feet on providing new guidance to ministers. It need not be difficult. The EHRC should state that trans women must not be allowed in single-sex spaces. And when it comes to women's sport, the guidance must be clear that transgender competitors cannot take part. The Supreme Court ruling has finally settled the question of what defines sex; the EHRC must now ensure it is understood and delivered across all parts of society, with statutory underpinning. • Janice Turner: Class snobbery is at heart of NHS gender war Once that guidance is submitted to ministers, it must be implemented without delay. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary and equalities minister, showed admirable courage in overruling wrong-headed Labour MPs to appoint Mary-Ann Stephenson as the next chairwoman of the commission — someone who has three decades of experience in human rights law and will lead in the vein of Baroness Falkner of Margravine. The rest of her cabinet colleagues must back Dr Stephenson too. The era in which careers could be destroyed, reputations traduced and taxpayers' money wasted denying objective reality on sex and gender should have ended with the Supreme Court ruling. It is long past time for ministers to impose their authority in the name of sanity.

Depression, suicides, overdoses: broad impacts of US wildfires revealed in study
Depression, suicides, overdoses: broad impacts of US wildfires revealed in study

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Depression, suicides, overdoses: broad impacts of US wildfires revealed in study

New research looking at the aftermath of some of the deadliest wildfires to have struck the US in recent years has shed light on the devastating effects the disasters have on human health, with impacts that extend far beyond the official death toll and injury counts. Three studies published this week examine the long-term fallout from the Maui and Los Angeles wildfires, including depression, suicide and overdose deaths, lung damage, and deaths caused by healthcare disruptions. The August 2023 Hawaii blazes killed more than 100 people, in what was the deadliest US wildfire in more than a century, and destroyed the town of Lahaina. The fires that tore through the LA communities of Altadena and the Pacific Palisades earlier this year killed 31 people and destroyed more than 18,000 structures. Some of the new research found that the Maui fire left one in five people with lung damage, and as many as half with symptoms of depression. That study, co-led by Ruben Juarez of the University of Hawaii, looked at more than 1,100 adults six to 14 months after the Maui fire. It found lower lung function in people in areas close to the fire compared with those in lower-exposure areas, with about 22% experiencing below-normal lung function. Additionally, about 40% of people reported their health had declined since the fires, according to the study, and close to half mentioned increased fatigue and weakness, eye irritation and lung-related symptoms. 'It's a stark reminder that wildfires can leave an invisible but lasting scar on respiratory health, long after the flames are gone,' Juarez told the Associated Press in an email. During the month of the fire, 13 suicides were reported in the area, nearly double the normal suicide and overdose death rates, another study found. The study of the Los Angeles fires, led by researchers in Finland, concluded that in addition to at least 30 deaths attributed to the fire, more than 400 deaths between January and February could be blamed on the event because of interruptions in healthcare and other factors. Dr Jonathan Patz, a University of Wisconsin environmental public health researcher who was not involved with the research, said the studies add 'a really important piece to the understanding of the true health risks from these extreme climatic events'. As the climate crisis fuels worsening disasters across the US, from flooding to deadly wildfires, scientists are trying to gain a better understanding of the impacts of extreme weather events. Research into the effects of wildfire smoke has surged in recent years as massive blazes have caused orange skies and unhealthy air for millions of people from the west coast to New York. A 2021 study found that breathing wildfire smoke during pregnancy raises the risk of premature birth. Research published earlier this year found the climate crisis contributed to about 15,000 deaths from exposure to small particulate matter from wildfires and cost about $160bn between 2006 and 2020. Another study, published in 2024, determined that wildfire smoke prematurely killed more than 50,000 people in California over a decade. Kristie Ebi of the University of Washington noted that there is a growing understanding that wildfire smoke can be more toxic than standard air pollution. 'It's not just leaves and branches and trees' that are burned, she said. 'It's buildings. It's gasoline stations. It's old houses that have asbestos in them. It's automobiles. There are lots of components of wildfire smoke.' She said the study of the Maui fire suggests 'this toxicity is affecting people's long-term lung function', but noted more research is needed to look at cause and effect. Meanwhile, the research calculating rates of suicide and overdose deaths in Maui and Hawaii's four other counties found a 97% increase in both on Maui during the month of the wildfires. The total number of suicide and overdose deaths was 13 that month, most of them suicides. That's a significant increase, Ebi said. They also found a 46% increase in such deaths in all five counties, which may have been influenced by displaced Maui residents migrating to other islands, the authors said. But rates fell in the following months. In addition to the studies published this week, a new report from the University of Hawaiʻi Economic Research Organization (UHERO), which is based on nearly a year of data from surveys of 950 people, documented the challenges that persist for those affected by the Maui fire. Two years later, some have found permanent housing and greater economic stability, but many people are still displaced and have faced long-term income loss and high rent burdens. While permanent housing is increasing, poverty rates in the region have almost doubled as full-time employment has not yet fully returned to pre-fire levels and nearly 60% of households report lower income. 'Our findings show two realities unfolding side by side,' said Daniela Bond-Smith, a UHERO research economist. 'Some households are finding new footing – moving into stable housing, returning to work and regaining stability. But others are still living with deep uncertainty, especially those with limited support and population groups who had already been marginalized prior to the fires.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store