logo
NGT seeks reply from state over ‘illegal' jetty in Chilika

NGT seeks reply from state over ‘illegal' jetty in Chilika

CUTTACK: The East Zone Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in Kolkata has issued notices to multiple authorities in Odisha over alleged illegal construction of a concrete jetty in the ecologically-sensitive Chilika lake by a private company.
The bench comprising Justice B Amit Sthalekar (Judicial Member) and Dr Arun Kumar Verma (Expert Member), heard the petition filed by Maa Kalijaee Motor Boat Workers Union, represented by advocates Sankar Prasad Pani and Ashutosh Padhy.
The petitioner society, a collective of traditional boat workers and fishermen, alleged that their community has been seeking construction of a government-sanctioned jetty to support tourism and fishing livelihoods. However, their demands were ignored while a private company began unauthorised construction of a concrete jetty on the banks of the lake at Garadwar in Khurda district .
The bench observed that the matter warrants serious consideration and issued notices to the member secretaries of Odisha State Pollution Control Board, SCZMA, State Wetland Authority, chief executive of Chilika Development Authority, and the private company involved. All respondents have been directed to file counter-affidavits within four weeks. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on September 15.
According to the petition, the construction violates provisions of the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2019, as the site falls under CRZ-III A and CRZ-IV B categories, both highly regulated zones with specific restrictions. The CRZ-III A refers to densely populated rural areas where no development is permitted within 50 mtr of the high tide Line. The CRZ-IV B includes tidal water bodies and associated areas extending to the low tide line on opposite banks.
The petition has also sought demolition of the illegal jetty and restoration of the site, along with exemplary cost imposition on the private company for environmental violations, including discharge of untreated sewage into Chilika lake. They alleged that no clearance has been issued for the Garadwar site by the State Coastal Zone Management Authority (SCZMA). The only CRZ clearance granted to the private company was for a floating jetty in Satapada in Puri district on the opposite side of the lake.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder
HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder

Hindustan Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder

Kolkata, The Calcutta High Court on Thursday did not pass any interim order in a petition against a proposed protest rally near the West Bengal state secretariat 'Nabanna' on August 9. HC refuses to pass order on rally near state secretariat on first anniversary of RG Kar rape-murder On this day last year, the body of an on-duty doctor was found raped and murdered inside the state-run R G Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, sparking outrage nationwide. The court observed that the persons participating in the rally should protest peacefully as law-abiding citizens and not cause any harm to the police or government authorities, buildings and public properties. While not granting any interim relief as prayed for against the rally, a division bench presided by Justice Sujoy Paul said it will be open for the West Bengal government to implement a prohibitory order imposed in the area near Nabanna and inform the organisers about adequate alternative places for protest. The Kolkata Police arrested one person, and the CBI, which took over the investigation on a Calcutta High Court order, also made him the sole accused in the RG Kat rape-murder case. The trial court on January 20 sentenced the accused Sanjay Roy to life imprisonment till death. The central agency is continuing its investigation into the alleged conspiracy angle of the case. The court on Thursday noted that Article 51A of the Constitution contemplates that it is the duty of every citizen to "Safeguard public property and to abjure violence. The bench, also comprising Justice Smita Das De, directed that the state file a report, if any, in four weeks and the reply affidavit by the petitioner in 15 days therefrom. The court directed that the matter will come up for hearing again thereafter. The petitioner, a resident of Howrah city, sought issuance of an order prohibiting the state from allowing any rally or demonstration in the surrounding areas of the state secretariat. He also prayed that a direction be issued to the government for framing proper guidelines for ensuring public peace, safety and convenience during any such protest. The petitioner's lawyer submitted that following the gruesome crime at R G Kar hospital, a rally took place last year near Nabanna which created chaos and untoward incidents had taken place. Claiming that the protest is being projected on social media in the name of "Parents of RG Kar Student victim", the petitioner prayed that such a protest be prohibited by issuing an interim order. Appearing for the state, Advocate General Kishore Dutta argued that last year's protest march over the issue took an ugly shape and about 47 police personnel were injured. The AG also stated that government properties were destroyed and in this backdrop, it is better if the protest takes place in an alternative place in Howrah city and suggested three other locations - Mandirtala bus station, Howrah Maidan and under Bankim Setu flyover. During the course of hearing, both the petitioner and the state submitted that although the right to protest is a fundamental right under the Constitution, there must be some balancing of fundamental rights. The court noted that the Howrah police commissioner has invoked prohibitory orders under section 163 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita . "In our opinion, the government is best suited to take care of law and order situation," the bench observed. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Madras High Court directs TN govt to provide protection for Vijay Devarakonda's 'Kingdom' amid protests
Madras High Court directs TN govt to provide protection for Vijay Devarakonda's 'Kingdom' amid protests

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Madras High Court directs TN govt to provide protection for Vijay Devarakonda's 'Kingdom' amid protests

CHENNAI: Madras High Court on Thursday directed the state government to provide security for theatres screening Vijay Devarakonda movie 'Kingdom'. This move comes after the Telugu movie faced protests from faced protests in Madurai and Trichy from Naam Thamizhar Katchi (NTK) cadres for its alleged portrayal of Sri Lankan Tamils in a poor light. Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy issued the directive stating that the movie makers have the right to express their views and none can disrupt screening of a movie, which is duly certified by the Censor Board, nor threaten the theatre owners against screening. The court further added that those who have different views can express them through protests but should obtain permission from the Police and hold the stir only at the designated venues. It would be open for them to protest and propagate their own view against the movie's content. 'That liberty is always available to express any contrary view in a democracy, and therefore, the right of the respondent is not curtailed.' 'In a democracy, the creators of a movie have every right to express their views and in this case, it is a fiction, therefore, anything expressed in any movie may be abhorrent and unpalatable to a particular section of the society. Even then, when the censor board cleared the movie for being exhibited in theatre, no third party can prevent its exhibition or threaten the theatre owners,' said Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy on Thursday while disposing of a petition filed by SSI Productions, the producers of 'Kingdom', seeking protection to the theatres. The judge recollected the orders passed by a division bench of Madras High Court in the Perumal Murugan case stating it is better to put the book down or refrain from watching the movie. Justice Chakravarthy recorded the undertaking given by the government advocate on behalf of the police that they will give due protection to the theatres. He further stated the Police can take appropriate action, if the screening of the movie is disrupted or any theatre owners are threatened against exhibiting the movie by any person.

Can't allow mobocracy': Kerala HC orders police protection for Kizhakkambalam panchayat project site
Can't allow mobocracy': Kerala HC orders police protection for Kizhakkambalam panchayat project site

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Can't allow mobocracy': Kerala HC orders police protection for Kizhakkambalam panchayat project site

Kochi: High court has stated that horrendous acts of mobocracy cannot be allowed to become the new norm and must be curbed with an iron hand, warning that if such acts are permitted, they would mark the beginning of the end of the democratic system and rule of law. Justice N Nagaresh made the remarks while granting police protection to the Kizhakkambalam grama panchayat, its officials, elected representatives, contractors, workers and suppliers to ensure the unhindered completion of the ongoing bus stand modernisation project at Kizhakkambalam junction. The court was considering a petition filed by the panchayat president seeking protection. The petitioner alleged that the project is facing obstruction from certain political parties and their affiliates. The project involves a bus waiting area, toilets and a cafeteria on the ground floor; a restaurant on the first floor; and a women's sales centre, e-facilitation centre and a 'She Gym' on the second floor. It was alleged that the former panchayat president, along with a political party leader, unlawfully entered the project site, dismantled barricades, and forcibly allowed buses to operate from the unfinished bus stand. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest Undo They also erected a temporary waiting shed without any authority or approval. Taking note, HC stated that when a duly elected panchayat committee takes steps to discharge its statutory functions and public duties, such actions cannot be thwarted by physical force or unlawful interference. It warned that forces attempting to seize control of a panchayat today may, if unchecked, seek to challenge state or Union administrations tomorrow, posing a grave threat to the democratic polity. It further emphasised that police authorities cannot remain mute spectators in the face of such lawlessness and must act decisively to uphold the rule of law. Accordingly, the bench directed the Ernakulam rural SP and Kunnathunad police station house officer to provide effective police protection to the panchayat and other stakeholders to ensure completion of the project. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store