Venezuelan Disney workers put on leave from jobs after losing protective status
The move was made to make sure that the employees were not in violation of the law, Disney said in a statement on Friday.
The 45 workers across the company who were put on leave will continue to get benefits.
'We are committed to protecting the health, safety, and wellbeing of all our employees who may be navigating changing immigration policies and how they could impact them or their families,' the statement said.
About two-thirds of the workers were in union jobs.
The union contract for Walt Disney World service workers in Florida allows them to be reinstated without loss of seniority or benefits once they provide proper work authorisation within a year of losing their jobs, said Julee Jerkovich, secretary-treasurer of the United Food And Commercial Workers International Union's Local 1625.
'It's very distressing,' Ms Jerkovich said. 'Disney is being made to be the bad guy, but they didn't have any choice.'
Disney would have been criticised if the workers were not put on leave, and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents made raids at Disney World, she said.
The Supreme Court's order on Monday put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that kept in place Temporary Protected Status for the Venezuelans that would have otherwise expired last month.
The justices provided no rationale, which is common in emergency appeals.
The order potentially exposes as many as 350,000 Venezuelans to deportation. The status allows people already in the United States to live and work legally because their native countries are deemed unsafe for return due to natural disaster or civil strife.
The case was the latest in a string of emergency appeals President Donald Trump's administration has made to the Supreme Court, many of them related to immigration and involving Venezuela.
Earlier this month, the government asked the court to allow it to end humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, setting them up for potential deportation as well.
'These workers — our colleagues, friends, and neighbours — have contributed immensely to the success of the Walt Disney Company and to the vibrant culture of central Florida,' a coalition of unions at Disney World said in a statement.
'No worker should have to live in fear of losing everything after building a life here.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Public's confidence in Police Scotland could be damaged by gender ruling inaction
Public confidence in policing is under threat because of a lack of progress on implementing the Supreme Court 's transgender ruling, it was claimed yesterday. Katharina Kasper, a member of the board of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), questioned whether there was a 'policy vacuum' over whether rapists can self-identify as women. In a bombshell judgment in April, the Supreme Court stated the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Top brass had promised a full report on updates to their guidance but yesterday presented an 'interim' report on progress - which Ms Kasper said was 'disappointing'. Last night Scottish Tory equalities spokesman Tess White said: 'Even SPA board members are rightly raising concerns about Police Scotland dragging its feet on the Supreme Court ruling. 'This should not be up for debate and the public will understandably be asking why the force is still not complying with its legal obligations. 'SNP ministers must issue an urgent directive to all public bodies, including Police Scotland, to follow the law immediately so that the public retain confidence in their decision-making.' At a virtual meeting of the SPA's policing performance committee, Ms Kasper challenged Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs and Assistant Chief Constable Catriona Paton about trans issues. Ms Kasper voiced a 'degree of frustration', adding: 'I am concerned about public confidence in Police Scotland because this process has been taking so long, and about the impact on officers and staff.' She said Police Scotland's policy on recording gender remained unclear despite the Supreme Court ruling which should have cleared up any confusion. In March, police chiefs asked an equalities watchdog – the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) - for advice about whether they should allow rapists to self-identify as women, and provide single-sex changing rooms for staff. Last year Chief Constable Jo Farrell said the public and MSPs should be 'assured' that a man who commits rape or serious sexual assault will always be recorded as male. In March, the Mail revealed that this stance, which campaigners said was a major policy U-turn, was not communicated to officers, sparking claims that police may have misled parliament. Responding to Ms Kasper, Ms Paton said 'policing is not immune to the complexity of this issue', adding that she 'acknowledged [Ms Kasper's] frustration', while Mr Speirs said she 'understood' her concerns. It came after Ms White raised a formal complaint with Police Scotland about a 'shocking' internal document which compared gender-critical campaigners to Nazis. She was prompted to act after the Mail revealed the paper said 'gender binary' - the belief there are two genders - was a 'key feature' of Hitler's ideology.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Argentina's top court upholds guilty verdict against Kirchner that bans her from office
BUENOS AIRES, June 10 (Reuters) - Argentina's Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a guilty verdict that sentenced powerful two-term former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner to six years in prison for defrauding the state and banned her from public office. Kirchner, 72, a polarizing figure and leftist who served as president from 2007 to 2015, was convicted by a trial court in 2022 for a fraud scheme that steered public road work projects in the Patagonia to a close ally while she was president. Kirchner, Argentina's most starry politician in recent decades who has rockstar status among her supporters, has denied wrongdoing and claims she is a victim of political persecution. The Supreme Court's three judges left in effect an appellate court decision that had previously upheld the guilty verdict. A lower court will decide whether to grant Kirchner house arrest due to her age. The verdict is a blow for Kirchner, the Peronist's political grandee, though could galvanize the fragmented opposition movement ahead of midterm elections later this year where it will look to challenge libertarian President Javier Milei. Kirchner had announced this month plans to run in legislative elections scheduled for September.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Bolsonaro appears before Brazil's Supreme Court over alleged coup plan
Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro denied participation in an alleged plot to remain in power and overturn the 2022 election result as he gave evidence on Tuesday for the first time before the Supreme Court over the charges. Bolsonaro and seven close allies were being questioned by a panel of top judges as part of a trial over allegations they devised a multistep scheme to keep Bolsonaro in office despite his defeat to current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Advertisement 'There was never any talk of a coup. A coup is an abominable thing … Brazil couldn't go through an experience like that. And there was never even the possibility of a coup in my government,' Bolsonaro said. The defendants are standing trial on five counts: attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organisation, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, aggravated damage and deterioration of listed heritage. Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes hears evidence from Brazil's former president Jair Bolsaro (Eraldo Peres/AP) A coup conviction carries a sentence of up to 12 years. When combined with the other charges, the accused could be sentenced to decades behind bars. The far-right politician entered the witness box just after 2.30pm local time. When asked by Justice Alexandre de Moraes at the beginning of questioning whether the accusation was true, Bolsonaro said no. Advertisement 'The accusation does not hold, Your Excellency,' Bolsonaro said. The former president has repeatedly denied the allegations and said he is the target of political persecution. The eight defendants are accused of making up the plan's core group. Justices are also questioning Bolsonaro's former running mate and defence minister Walter Braga Netto, former ministers Anderson Torres and Augusto Heleno and ex aide-de-camp Mauro Cid, among others. Judges will hear from 26 other defendants at a later date. The court has already heard from dozens of witnesses in hearings that began in mid-May. Cid, who has signed a plea bargain with the federal police, told the court on Monday that Bolsonaro read and edited a document that aimed at cancelling the election result. Advertisement Cid also said that Bolsonaro refused to interfere regarding camps by supporters that were set up in front of army facilities calling for a military intervention after the then-president lost the election. Many of those followers were later part of the January 8 2023 riot, when the Supreme Court, Congress and presidential palace in Brasilia, the capital, were ransacked. Police say their uprising — which came after Lula was sworn in — was an attempt to force military intervention and oust the new president. Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet alleges the riot was one part of a sprawling, antidemocratic scheme to overturn the election result. Part of that plot allegedly included a plan to kill Lula and Justice Alexandre de Moraes. The plan did not go ahead at the last minute because the accused failed to get the army's commander on board, according to Mr Gonet. Advertisement Bolsonaro, a former military officer who was known to express nostalgia for the country's past dictatorship, openly defied Brazil's judicial system during his 2019-2022 term in office. He has already been banned by Brazil's top electoral court from running in elections until 2030 over abuse of power while in office and casting unfounded doubts on the country's electronic voting system. Thiago Bottino, a law professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, a think tank and university, called the trial historic. 'It's the first time we see people accused of an attempted coup are being subjected to a criminal trial, with the guarantees of due criminal process – being able to defend themselves but answering for these accusations,' he said. Advertisement
