Top DOJ official to meet with Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday
The meeting comes after the Department of Justice said earlier this week it had reached out to Epstein's former associate, with Blanche saying in a statement on Tuesday that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.'
It comes as many of Trump's supporters have demanded the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker alongside growing concerns for transparency among Republicans on Capitol Hill.
The House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the DOJ for files related to Epstein in a surprise move amounting to a show of defiance by some House Republicans against Speaker Mike Johnson.
Johnson has attempted to tamp down on efforts to push the release of the so-called Epstein files and shut the door on the possibility of a House vote on releasing information on Epstein before the August recess.
The subpoena calls for the Epstein files in the Justice Department's possession to be provided to Congress, but for the names of the victims to be redacted. It also calls for communications between former Biden officials and the Justice Department related to the Epstein matter, in addition to depositions among some major figures, including Bill and Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey.
Last week, the Justice Department asked a federal judge to make public years-old grand jury testimony against Epstein, though a Florida federal judge on Wednesday declined to release additional grand jury documents from the criminal investigation into Epstein.
Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has continued to appeal her conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Saudi Arabia Is Making a Power Play Against Hamas in Gaza
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Saudi Arabia aims to reassert its regional influence by pressing Hamas and Israel to resolve their ongoing war in the Gaza Strip. The campaign comes as U.S.-backed ceasefire talks continue to fail, prompting Riyadh to help rally Western nations toward a new wave of international recognition for Hamas' rival government, the Palestinian National Authority (PA, or PNA), and underlined by the kingdom's decision to sign a statement backed by fellow Arab powers and European nations calling for Hamas' disarmament. These parallel developments have the potential to mark a turning point for Saudi Arabia's role in the conflict. "Saudi Arabia is now in the driver's seat," Nawaf Obaid, a former special adviser to two Saudi ambassadors and consultant to the Saudi Royal Court, told Newsweek. He argued that "the real challenge lies" today in how Saudi Arabia, "by far the most influential Arab country, both in terms of regional leverage and global diplomacy," would be able to press forward in its bid to gain concessions from both Hamas and Israel, while elevating the West Bank-based PA to a position in which it would be able to preside over a unified Palestinian state. "The central question that's been lingering for a while now is Saudi Arabia's role—not just in the Middle East, but far beyond it," Obaid, now a senior research fellow at King's College London, said. "Its importance continues to grow, and it's increasingly clear that if a Palestinian state ever emerges, it will be because of Saudi Arabia. "That is the key formula that many still haven't fully grasped," he added. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman listens as U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured) speaks during the Gulf Cooperation Council Summit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 14. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman listens as U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured) speaks during the Gulf Cooperation Council Summit in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on May 14. Alex Brandon/AP The Balance of Pressure Saudi Arabia's relationship with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was forged early on in the history of the kingdom. Saudi Arabia, which was proclaimed by founder King Ibn Saud in 1932, was among the Arab nations to reject the United Nations' Israeli-Palestinian partition plan in 1947 and send troops to battle the newly declared Israel the following year. While Saudi Arabia's military role would remain limited in the following decades, the ruling House of Saud remained a major player in Arab views toward the conflict, having cultivated a unique level of regional influence, boosted by its custodianship of the Islam's two holiest sites of Mecca and Medina. Today, this position is further compounded by Riyadh's rapid economic growth and leading roles in regional blocs such as the Arab League, the Gulf Cooperation Council and Organization of Islamic Cooperation. In addition to building upon its long-standing relationship with the United States, Saudi Arabia has also invested in growing ties with China and Russia at a time when Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was pursuing historic transformations at home. Yet the region's dynamics have also shifted substantially since the last Arab-Israeli war that rocked the region more than half a century ago. The war in Gaza, likely deadlier than all previous Arab-Israeli conflicts combined, has pitted Israel against Hamas and a coalition of non-state actors backed by Iran. While Hamas' Muslim Brotherhood-inspired brand of militant Islamist ideology is widely rejected among the leaders of Arab states, regional governments have chosen their messaging carefully throughout the conflict. The last Arab peace plan, spearheaded by Egypt, did not once mention Hamas by name when it was first drafted in March. The call for Hamas to abandon its weapons during the French and Saudi-led conference in New York last week constituted a departure from this approach. Behind the scenes, Obaid argued that Saudi Arabia has begun to turn up the pressure against Hamas, whose military position has degraded significantly since the start of the war, though it continues to mount deadly attacks against Israeli forces. "On the Hamas front, Saudi Arabia exerts influence indirectly, particularly through Egypt and Qatar," Obaid said. "And the Qataris, frankly, are feeling the pressure. Their close association with Hamas is now a liability, and it's in their own interest to facilitate Hamas's agreement to the Saudi-led plan." Qatar, which hosts Hamas' main political office abroad, was notably among the Arab nations to call for the group's disarmament for the first time last week. Obaid said it was his understanding that "some key figures within Hamas have already agreed to the Saudi request," yet "the remaining question is not if, but when the rest will follow—and how the transfer of power to the Palestinian Authority and its security forces will be managed." "For that to happen," he added, "there must be a permanent ceasefire, and that's the biggest hurdle." And while U.S. and Israeli officials accuse Hamas of standing in the way of an end to the war, Obaid argued that "Israel remains the core obstacle—not merely as a state actor, but because of the political fate of one man," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu has vowed to continue all of the remaining hostages held by Hamas were released, the group was defeated and Gaza could no longer pose a threat to Israel. He has expressed opposition to allowing the PA to take control of Gaza and has preferred President Donald Trump's earlier plan to resettle Palestinians away from the territory, or, according to recent reports, have Israel reassume direct occupation of Gaza, as it did from 1967 to 2005. Such statements appear to have further galvanized Saudi Arabia's effort to enhance its position on the conflict. Eyad Alrefai, an instructor at King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia, argued that "Saudi Arabia's efforts to pressure Israel regarding its actions, particularly in Gaza, are part of a broader goal to achieve a more balanced and equitable approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." This includes acknowledging that Hamas' rule over Gaza, which the group seized from the PA amid post-election clashes in 2007, and the lingering disunity has only brought setbacks to the Palestinian statehood cause. "The Kingdom recognizes that for any meaningful progress to materialize, it is crucial to address the internal divisions among Palestinians," Alrefai told Newsweek. "The governance of Gaza by Hamas has often been marked by conflict, political infighting, and a lack of a cohesive and strategic approach in negotiations with Israel." "This fragmentation complicates the prospects for peace and undermines the credibility of Palestinian leadership in the eyes of the international community," Alrefai said. Hamas fighters stand in formation ahead of a ceremony to hand over Israeli hostages to the Red Cross in Nuseirat, Gaza Strip, on February 22. Hamas fighters stand in formation ahead of a ceremony to hand over Israeli hostages to the Red Cross in Nuseirat, Gaza Strip, on February 22. Abdel Kareem Hana/AP A 'Multifaceted Strategy' Thus far, Hamas has publicly pushed back at the Arab demand for disarmament, particularly after media outlets cited President Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East and lead Israel-Hamas negotiator, Steve Witkoff, as saying the group had agreed to such terms. "We reaffirm that the resistance and its arms represent a national and legal right as long as the occupation remains in place—a right recognized by international charters and conventions," Hamas said in a statement issued Saturday. "We will never relinquish this right until all our national rights are restored, foremost among them the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital," the group added. Yet Alrefai pointed out that Riyadh's "pragmatic strategy" in "setting clear terms for Hamas" could prove pivotal in shifting the dynamics of the conflict, especially in a way that paved the path for an empowered PA. "By advocating for the cessation of Hamas's rule in Gaza and facilitating a transfer of power to the Palestinian National Authority, Saudi Arabia seeks to promote a unified Palestinian leadership," Alrefai said. "This unification is essential, as it could result in a more credible negotiating partner for both Israel and the international community." "A consolidated Palestinian front would likely be viewed as more legitimate and effective," he added, "opening the door for greater international support for peace initiatives." Alrefai pointed out that Saudi Arabia had "has several strategic tools at its disposal to pressure Hamas into compliance with a peace agreement that facilitates the transfer of power in Gaza to the Palestinian National Authority." "These include leveraging diplomatic influence within the Arab League and among Muslim nations to politically isolate Hamas, providing economic incentives such as financial support to the PNA contingent on Hamas relinquishing control, and mediating reconciliation initiatives to foster dialogue between Hamas and the PNA that lead to power sharing or a full transfer of power," Alrefai said. "Additionally," he added, "mobilizing public opinion across the Arab world can increase pressure on Hamas to comply with expectations for a unified Palestinian leadership, while offering security assistance to the PNA can enhance its governance capabilities, serving as a deterrent against Hamas's continued rule." At the same time, Saudi Arabia could also "pressure Israel," he argued, by utilizing "the prospect of normalizing relations, working with global powers to advocate for a unified stance that calls for an end to the occupation and supports Palestinian statehood." Reports indicate that Saudi Arabia and Israel had discussed normalization under the auspices of the U.S. in the lead-up to Hamas' October 2023 surprise attack that sparked the ongoing war in Gaza. The kingdom has maintained, however, that such a move could only be taken in the event of a framework that would pave the way for Palestinian statehood, now the crux of Saudi Arabia's diplomatic push in Gaza. This "multifaceted strategy," as Alrefai described it, "involves diplomatic, economic, and security measures aimed at unifying Palestinian leadership while leveraging its influence to encourage Israel's compliance with a peace agreement." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to the audience at a conference in Jerusalem on July 27. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to the audience at a conference in Jerusalem on July 27. Ohad Zwigenberg/AP 'Not a Magic Wand' Given its long-standing relationship with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Saudi Arabia is no stranger to peace initiatives. As far back as 1981, then-Crown Prince and future King Fahd proposed an eight-point plan that called for an Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied after the 1967 Six-Day War—including Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem—as well as the Palestinian right to return and the establishment of a Palestinian state. A second Saudi-led proposal was launched in 2002, the "Arab Peace Initiative," which was built upon the 1981 framework, this time offering Arab-Israeli normalization in exchange for Israeli withdrawals and Palestinian statehood. The 2002 plan, though opposed by Israel and sidestepped by the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco through their establishment of diplomatic ties with Israel via the Abraham Accords, continues to serve broadly as the basis for the Arab League's position. Saudi Arabia has also previously weighed in on the rift between Hamas and the PA's leading Fatah faction, overseeing the 2007 Mecca Agreement that sought to establish an ultimately unrealized Palestinian unity government. "Collectively, these efforts represent a continuous narrative of Saudi initiatives designed to lay a political and security foundation upon which a viable Palestinian state can be established," Hesham Alghannam, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's Middle East Center and director general of Naïf Arab University for Security Sciences' Strategic Studies and National Security Programs, told Newsweek. Now, Alghannam argued, the recent "New York Declaration" represents a new chapter in Saudi Arabia's historic engagement on the issue, through its "calling for an immediate cessation of the Gaza war, affirming that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the future Palestinian state, and demanding its unification with the West Bank under the principle of 'one state, one weapon,' achieved through disarming Hamas and transferring all weaponry to the Palestinian Authority's security forces." He warned, however, that such a declaration, as with past initiatives, was "not a magic wand." It would require not only Israeli buy-in, he said, but also the kind of international guarantees that eluded the 1990s Oslo peace accords, which established the PA but were followed by renewed violence rather than the era of peace that was promised. As such, Alghannam explained that the new initiative "advocates for a comprehensive package of international guarantees linking the disarmament of factions to tangible steps: halting settlements, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Palestinian cities and territories, establishing a multinational peacekeeping force to manage the security vacuum in Gaza, and a reconstruction aid package conditioned upon sustained calm." "Without these safeguards," he said, "the principle of 'one weapon' risks becoming 'no weapon' in the face of annexation bulldozers." Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas listens to Russian President Vladimir Putin (not pictured) during their talks in the Grand Palace at the Kremlin in Moscow on May 10. Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas listens to Russian President Vladimir Putin (not pictured) during their talks in the Grand Palace at the Kremlin in Moscow on May 10. Sergei Bobylev/RIA Novosti/AP Opening the Door Even with support from Saudi Arabia and other nations, the PA finds itself in a fraught position as the war in Gaza approaches the two-year mark on October 7. At 89 years old, PA President Mahmoud Abbas is as old as Saudi King Salman, yet the Palestinian leader lacks a clear successor. The Palestinian leader's two-decade rule has been increasingly subject to claims of corruption, calls for new elections and challenges from both Israel and Hamas. On one side, Israeli officials also accuse the PA of tolerating militant groups and Netanyahu himself has objected to the replacement of Hamas with a "Fatah-stan." On the other, supporters of the more popular Hamas and other armed factions accuse Abbas' administration of too closely cooperating with Israel and have undermined his government through independent activity. Such unrest, coupled with growing Israeli military and settler activity, has turned the West Bank into a war zone on the sidelines of the war in Gaza, further eroding the PA's position and throwing into question the very viability of Palestinian statehood. The hope, according to Alrefai, would be that Saudi intervention could serve as a much-needed boost to the PA's fragile position. "As the PNA garners increased international recognition, Saudi Arabia's endorsement of it over Hamas will serve to enhance the PNA's legitimacy," Alrefai said. "This elevation in status could translate into increased international aid and support for Palestinian state-building efforts, which are vital for the long-term viability and sustainability of a Palestinian state." But there are "significant challenges" involved with such an endeavor, Alrefai said, not least of which include the fact that "Hamas commands substantial support in Gaza, and any attempt to curtail its influence could provoke backlash and lead to further conflict." "The deep-rooted historical grievances and the intricate dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict imply that any transition must be managed with great care to avoid exacerbating existing tensions," he said. Meanwhile, Alghannam said "several critical aspects remain overlooked" as the debate plays out over how Saudi Arabia could play a substantial role on this front. "Reforming the Palestinian Authority—including elections, transparency, and modernization of security forces—is imperative to ensure that disarmament does not translate into unilateral dismantlement of national legitimacy," Alghannam said. "Transitional justice regarding crimes committed in Gaza and the West Bank is essential to prevent cycles of violence." "Economic recovery is even more urgent than constitutional arrangements," he added, "a collapsed economy will create a vacuum quickly filled by more extremist factions." Perhaps even more difficult to approach will be what Alghannam calls "the refugee issue—right of return or compensation," which he said "must be addressed from the outset rather than postponed to 'final status' negotiations, or the agreement risks being suspended in legal and moral limbo." So, while he felt that "the two-state solution remains the most persuasive framework," he argued at the same that "its success hinges on three indivisible components: an Israeli willingness to transcend settlement ideology, international guarantees that are implemented rather than merely promised, and unified Palestinian performance capable of consolidating arms under law instead of shattering it at the first test." "Saudi Arabia has once again opened the door," Alghannam said. "It is now incumbent upon the international community to demonstrate it has learned from Oslo's failure, ensuring this time the clauses are not written with the same ink used to sketch expansionist plans onto maps of the West Bank."
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Why China is Becoming Donald Trump's Biggest U-Turn
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When President Donald Trump launched the trade war with China in his first term, he did so amid a growing consensus in Washington that Beijing posed a long-term challenge to U.S. security, political and economic interests globally. Now, China watchers on both sides of the aisle are concerned at signs that Trump is pivoting away from years of efforts to compete with America's top geopolitical rival, which is likely to seize the moment and solidify its foothold in strategic industries that Trump wants to win back. The White House did not immediately comment when reached after hours. Setting Expectations While Democrats have criticized Trump's yearslong economic war with Beijing and his government's perceived lack of coordination with key allies, they were largely supportive of a tougher approach to China, citing accusations such as unfair trade practices, currency manipulation and unequal access to the Chinese market. The shift in Trump's first presidency had such far-reaching effects on Sino-American sentiment in both capitals that former President Joe Biden found the chill of the new Cold War hard to reverse. Biden not only extended, but later expanded Trump-era tariffs and further tightened controls on U.S. tech exports over fears they were accelerating China's military modernization. Trump campaigned on a promise to be even tougher. Matthew Pottinger, his deputy national security adviser from 2019-2021, predicted Trump would "pick up the baton and run with it" in pursuing Section 301 investigations into Chinese trade practices considered harmful to international and U.S. economic interests. In April, when the White House launched sweeping tariffs against friend and foe alike to bring Beijing to the negotiating table for a new trade deal, it appeared to signal the start of a new phase of the tech war, designed not only to address the trade deficit and revive U.S. manufacturing, but to ensure America stayed one step ahead of China in technological and military supremacy in an increasingly unstable world. The Biggest U-Turn of Donald Trump's Presidency The Biggest U-Turn of Donald Trump's Presidency Newsweek Illustration/Canva/Getty Reaction and Compromise The reaction from President Xi Jinping's China was swift and targeted. It played the tit-for-tat tariff game for a while but reached quickly for the nuclear option of cutting American firms out of its rare earths supply chain, weaponizing its dominance in the same way the U.S. had sought to curb Chinese access to advanced computer chips. Observers of the ongoing trade talks have sensed a shift in tone and approach, marked by a number of notable concessions in July—both symbolic and substantive—that they argued were overly conciliatory toward Beijing for the sake of securing an agreement. At the top of the list are emerging technologies and the Trump administration's decision to permit the export of U.S. tech—specifically Nvidia's H20 artificial intelligence chip—to China, following an intense lobbying campaign by company CEO Jensen Huang, who had argued that further curbs would only accelerate Chinese domestic breakthroughs in the race to dominate the global AI market. The decision has alarmed some of Trump's current and former allies in the GOP. "The H20 is a potent accelerator of China's frontier AI capabilities, not an outdated AI chip," said a July 28 letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, signed by Pottinger and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, among others. Last week, it emerged that Trump had broken precedent by refusing a request by Taiwan President Lai Ching-te to transit the United States as part of his wider visit to Taipei's remaining allies in Latin American—a diplomatic coup for China, which claims Taiwan as its own. In this file photo taken on June 28, 2019, China's President Xi Jinping, right, shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka. In this file photo taken on June 28, 2019, China's President Xi Jinping, right, shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who signed the letter, told Newsweek: "Several factors are contributing to the shifting climate on China policy. The Trump administration wants to open up China's market for American businesses, which is elevating the cooperative agenda for the moment." "The [Chinese Communist Party's] willingness to leverage U.S. dependency on critical minerals is also curtailing the willingness of some officials to anger Beijing," he said. Sobolik said: "Jensen Huang is putting Nvidia's profit margin ahead of U.S. national security. It's the job of leaders in Washington to put national security ahead of one company's economic interests. Selling advanced AI chips to China does the opposite: it equips China's military with powerful tools to target Americans. We need to win the AI race, not unilaterally surrender to the Chinese Communist Party." China's embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to a request for comment after hours. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said last week that Beijing was opposed to "politicizing, instrumentalizing and weaponizing tech and trade issues and malicious attempts to blockade and keep down China" The Debate If Trump stays the course, it would be among the biggest pivots in what was to be a generational U.S.-China rivalry. But not all are convinced Trump is showing his true hand. George Magnus, an associate at the University of Oxford China Center, told Newsweek that Trump wants to demonstrate to the world that only he can strike trade deals with Beijing while his predecessor could not. "I don't think Trump and the administration are necessarily not thinking about China as a strategic adversary, but I think he wants to boast 'a win' in his first year in office and show to the world that America and China can do business together regardless," Magnus said. "We should also remember the U.S. has an America First investment policy memo which is unashamedly anti-China, and it's not unlikely that the U.S. will withdraw [most favored nation] status from Chinese goods. So there is a lot of nuance and ambiguity in Trump's poses and postures, all of which can be real," he said.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Rising Defense Partner Reacts After Trump Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. India has hit back at the United States in defense of its oil purchases from Russia after President Donald Trump issued a new threat of tariffs tied to the trade. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside of office hours. Why It Matters The increasing friction between India and the United States is in part an indication of the failure to reach a trade deal between the Trump administration and the world's most populous country and fastest growing top economy. Increasingly friendly U.S. relations with Indian rival Pakistan have been another irritant in the relationship. But it also highlights a souring in a relationship that is key for global security, with India seen as a potential bulwark against China for the United States while pursuing a foreign policy that had traditionally been strongly independent. What To Know Trump issued a new threat of tariffs on India on Monday, linking it to India's purchases of Russian oil. It came at a time when Trump was seeking to increase pressure on Russia over its war in Ukraine, which has only increased in intensity despite the president's pledge to end it as soon as he took office. The Indian national flag waves on National Flag Day, July 22, 2025, in front of the Tripura State Museum, Ujjayanta Palace, in Agartala. The Indian national flag waves on National Flag Day, July 22, 2025, in front of the Tripura State Museum, Ujjayanta Palace, in Agartala. Photo by ABHISEK SAHA/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images India's External Affairs Ministry said in a statement that its purchases of oil from Russia were a necessity compelled by the state of the global market. It challenged criticism over the oil deals from both the United States and European Union. "It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion," the statement from the ministry spokesperson said. "Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals." Ukraine Invasion New Delhi said Washington had encouraged it to buy Russian oil after the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 to stabilize the global energy market. It also said the EU's trade with Russia had been significantly bigger than India's. Russia has continued to make billions from energy exports despite Western sanctions to try to apply pressure over the Ukraine war. "Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment," it said. "The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." In the absence of a trade deal with the United States, India has meanwhile been pursuing other agreements and strengthening its ties with China. What People Are Saying U.S. President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!! President DJT" India's Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson: "India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion." What Happens Next India is unlikely to be swayed by U.S. pressure and in the absence of a trade deal is likely to continue to take an independent line. The worsening of the relationship between the United States and India could be to the benefit of U.S. rivals Russia and China as they also seek to cement India in their camp.
